Marlin Willis

P Northwest Arkansas Naturals
Age 29 LHP 6'4" / 190 lbs AA
Overview
AAPROSPECT
MLB%2%
YearAgeLvl / TeamGGSIPERAFIPK%BB%WARMLE rates
202224AKC270424.933.8130.6%18.9%—K 22.6% · BB 22.3% · FIP 4.93
202325A+KC290317.844.3329.6%27.7%—K 22.8% · BB 31.8% · FIP 5.21
202527MIX3 levels260384.933.3624.1%12.9%—K 15.4% · BB 16.1% · FIP 4.68
202628No MLB games played
2027PROJ29MLBKC——05.135.1319.3%13.4%—
2028PROJ31% MLB30MLBKC5055.165.2319.4%13.2%-0.0
Next 2 projected WAR -0.0Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.
Contract
No contract data on file.
CompsJuan Pablo Perez (age 28) · Stephen Randolph (age 29) · Keith Hessler (age 29)
2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection
showingPROJ
wRC+ AGAINSTvL 114122vR 131
ERA5.13
FIP5.13
K%19.3%
BB%13.4%
K-BB%6.0%
Proj IP19
Value2027 · WAR
Runs saved vs league avg · 19 IP
K: -0.4 runs (Runs saved by strikeouts vs lg-avg K%)-0KBB: -1.1 runs (Runs saved by walk suppression vs lg-avg BB%)-1BBCONTACT: -0.5 runs (Runs saved on contact quality (HR suppression) vs lg)-0CONTACTSTAM: +0.8 runs (Replacement credit for innings volume)+1STAMTotal WAR: -0.13 (19 IP)-0.1WAR
-0.10.02728
Grades · Contract
Scouting Grades
K†4545

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.

YearAge LvlTeam GGSIPBF KBBHR GS%IP/G K%BB%K-BB%HR% ERAFIP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
201719ROK MLEAZL Royals832192135038%2.79.6%6.8%2.8%0.0%3.803.15—
201719ROK RAWAZL Royals832192135038%2.714.1%5.4%8.7%0.0%3.802.58—
201820ROK MLEBurlington Royals113392043234527%3.510.7%20.8%-10.2%3.4%8.386.72—
201820ROK RAWBurlington Royals113392043234527%3.515.7%16.7%-1.0%2.5%8.385.76—
202123MIX MLE2 levels26041204623810%1.623.4%24.3%-0.8%0.6%6.154.51—
202123MIX RAW2 levels26041204623810%1.630.4%18.6%11.8%0.5%6.153.17—
202224A MLEColumbia Fireflies27042206633930%1.622.6%22.3%0.3%1.7%4.934.93—
202224A RAWColumbia Fireflies27042206633930%1.630.6%18.9%11.7%1.5%4.933.81—
202325A+ MLEQuad Cities River Bandits29031159474400%1.122.8%31.8%-9.1%0.0%7.845.21—
202325A+ RAWQuad Cities River Bandits29031159474400%1.129.6%27.7%1.9%0.0%7.844.33—
202527MIX MLE3 levels26038170412220%1.515.4%16.1%-0.6%1.5%4.934.68—
202527MIX MLE3 levels26038170412220%1.515.4%16.1%-0.6%1.5%4.934.68—
202527MIX RAW3 levels26038170412220%1.524.1%12.9%11.2%1.2%4.933.36—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
202729MLBKC——0——————19.3%13.4%6.0%2.9%5.135.13—
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
202830MLB MLEKC150166613920%1.019.4%13.2%6.2%3.1%5.165.23-0.1
202830MLB CTXKC505214310%1.019.4%13.2%6.2%3.1%5.165.23-0.0
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career— RAW505214310%1.019.4%13.2%6.2%3.1%5.164.85-0.0
/ 200 IP— RAW1900200844163122410%1.119.4%13.2%6.2%3.1%5.164.85-0.7
Career— MLE12762121035187222145%1.718.1%21.5%-3.4%1.4%6.105.04-0.1
/ 200 IP— MLE1206200975177209135%1.718.1%21.5%-3.4%1.4%6.105.04-1.6

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2025 AANorthwest Arkansas Naturals · 19 IPFIP 4.74 → 5.44 (+0.70)K% 21.1% → 17.1%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF21.05%—×0.81017.05%
BB% (unintentional) /BF17.89%—×1.10019.68%
HR / BF /BF2.11%÷1.077×1.2002.35%

Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 115).

Result: FIP 4.74 → 5.44, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2025 A+Quad Cities River Bandits · 13 IPFIP 2.76 → 3.22 (+0.46)K% 16.0% → 12.3%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF16.00%—×0.77012.32%
BB% (unintentional) /BF8.00%—×1.1509.20%
HR / BF /BF0.00%÷0.983×1.2500.00%

Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 97).

Result: FIP 2.76 → 3.22, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2025 ROKACL Royals · 6 IPFIP -0.78 → 0.75 (+1.53)K% 52.0% → 35.4%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF52.00%—×0.68035.36%
BB% (unintentional) /BF4.00%—×1.2505.00%
HR / BF /BF0.00%÷0.939×1.4000.00%

Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 88).

Result: FIP -0.78 → 0.75, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2023 A+Quad Cities River Bandits · 31 IPFIP 4.11 → 5.21 (+1.10)K% 29.6% → 22.8%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF29.56%—×0.77022.76%
BB% (unintentional) /BF27.67%—×1.15031.82%
HR / BF /BF0.00%÷1.033×1.2500.00%

Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 107).

Result: FIP 4.11 → 5.21, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2022 AColumbia Fireflies · 42 IPFIP 3.71 → 4.93 (+1.22)K% 30.6% → 22.6%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF30.58%—×0.74022.63%
BB% (unintentional) /BF18.93%—×1.18022.34%
HR / BF /BF1.46%÷1.140×1.3001.66%

Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 128).

Result: FIP 3.71 → 4.93, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2021 AColumbia Fireflies · 36 IPFIP 3.33 → 4.51 (+1.18)K% 31.7% → 23.4%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF31.67%—×0.74023.43%
BB% (unintentional) /BF20.56%—×1.18024.26%
HR / BF /BF0.56%÷1.237×1.3000.58%

Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 147).

Result: FIP 3.33 → 4.51, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2021 ROKACL Royals Blue · 5 IPFIP 1.87 → 2.56 (+0.69)K% 20.8% → 14.2%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF20.83%—×0.68014.17%
BB% (unintentional) /BF4.17%—×1.2505.21%
HR / BF /BF0.00%÷1.000×1.4000.00%

Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).

Result: FIP 1.87 → 2.56, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 ROKBurlington Royals · 39 IPFIP 5.23 → 6.72 (+1.49)K% 15.7% → 10.7%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×= MLE
K% /BF15.69%—×0.68010.67%
BB% (unintentional) /BF16.67%—×1.25020.83%
HR / BF /BF2.45%÷1.000×1.4003.43%

Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).

Result: FIP 5.23 → 6.72, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).