Ryan Gridley
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 23 | ABeloit Snappe… | 261 | .269/.359/.361 | 3 | 3 | 57 | — | .213/.286/.289 |
| 2019 | 24 | A+/A2 orgs | 474 | .268/.332/.383 | 6 | 10 | 51 | — | .213/.263/.293 |
| 2021 | 26 | A+OAK | 133 | .231/.323/.291 | 0 | 6 | 45 | — | .192/.271/.233 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2018 | 23 | A | Beloit Snappers | — | 261 | 227 | 61 | 10 | 1 | 3 | 28 | 46 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 269 | 359 | 361 | 720 | 93 | 324 | 18 | 11 | 328 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | A+ | Stockton Ports | — | 261 | 237 | 65 | 15 | 0 | 3 | 17 | 43 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 274 | 331 | 376 | 706 | 101 | 321 | 16 | 7 | 315 | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | A | Beloit Snappers | — | 213 | 189 | 49 | 14 | 1 | 3 | 16 | 32 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 259 | 333 | 392 | 725 | 132 | 297 | 15 | 8 | 323 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 26 | A+ | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 133 | 117 | 27 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 17 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 231 | 323 | 291 | 614 | 60 | 270 | 13 | 8 | 289 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2018 | 23 | A MLE | Beloit Snappers | — | 261 | 235 | 50 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 20 | 60 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 213 | 286 | 289 | 575 | 77 | 265 | 23 | 8 | 252 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | A+ MLE | Stockton Ports | — | 261 | 243 | 53 | 11 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 57 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 218 | 261 | 288 | 549 | 70 | 267 | 22 | 4 | 242 | 50 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | A MLE | Beloit Snappers | — | 213 | 194 | 40 | 10 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 43 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 206 | 267 | 299 | 566 | 93 | 243 | 20 | 5 | 246 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 26 | A+ MLE | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 133 | 120 | 23 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 23 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 192 | 271 | 233 | 504 | 42 | 242 | 17 | 6 | 235 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | A MLE | Beloit Snappers | — | 261 | 235 | 50 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 20 | 60 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 213 | 286 | 289 | 575 | 77 | 272 | 23 | 8 | 252 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | A RAW | Beloit Snappers | — | 261 | 227 | 61 | 10 | 1 | 3 | 28 | 46 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 269 | 359 | 361 | 720 | 93 | 324 | 18 | 11 | 328 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 474 | 437 | 93 | 21 | 1 | 5 | 22 | 100 | 8 | 10 | 4 | 213 | 263 | 300 | 563 | 87 | 263 | 21 | 5 | 244 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | A+ RAW | 2 teams | — | 474 | 426 | 114 | 29 | 1 | 6 | 33 | 75 | 8 | 10 | 4 | 268 | 332 | 383 | 715 | 115 | 310 | 16 | 7 | 318 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 26 | A+ MLE | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 133 | 120 | 23 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 23 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 192 | 271 | 233 | 504 | 42 | 237 | 17 | 6 | 235 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 26 | A+ RAW | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 133 | 117 | 27 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 17 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 231 | 323 | 291 | 614 | 60 | 270 | 13 | 8 | 289 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | A MLE | Beloit Snappers | — | 261 | 235 | 50 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 20 | 60 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 213 | 286 | 289 | 575 | 77 | 265 | 23 | 8 | 252 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 474 | 441 | 93 | 21 | 1 | 5 | 22 | 100 | 8 | 10 | 4 | 211 | 263 | 297 | 560 | 86 | 256 | 21 | 5 | 244 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 26 | A+ MLE | Lansing Lugnuts | — | 133 | 119 | 23 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 23 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 193 | 271 | 235 | 506 | 42 | 242 | 17 | 6 | 235 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 868 | 792 | 166 | 33 | 2 | 8 | 50 | 183 | 17 | 19 | 9 | 210 | 271 | 287 | 558 | 77 | 261 | 21 | 6 | 245 | 52 | -50 | +0 | +0 | +3 | +19 | -2.8 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 593 | 124 | 25 | 1 | 6 | 37 | 137 | 13 | 14 | 7 | 209 | 271 | 285 | 556 | 76 | 260 | 21 | 6 | 245 | 52 | -37 | +0 | +0 | +2 | +14 | -2.1 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2021 A+Lansing Lugnuts · 133 PAwOBA .282 → .235 (−47)K% 12.8% → 17.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 12.78% | ÷0.998 | ×1.350 | — | — | 17.29% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.27% | ÷0.938 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.968 | 6.06% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.76% | — | ×0.810 | — | ×0.968 | 2.95% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.00% | ÷0.961 | ×0.910 | ×1.026 | ×0.968 | 18.80% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.00% | ÷1.066 | ×0.830 | ×1.026 | ×0.968 | 5.41% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.820 | ×1.026 | ×0.968 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.959 | ×0.830 | — | ×0.968 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A+ factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 92, 1B 92, 2B 113, 3B 130, K 100, BB 88 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 22.8 → −3.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.026.
Result: wOBA .282 → .235; ISO .060 → .045; BABIP .270 → .242. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 A+Stockton Ports · 261 PAwOBA .309 → .242 (−67)K% 16.5% → 21.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 16.48% | ÷1.007 | ×1.340 | — | — | 21.92% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 6.51% | ÷1.075 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.988 | 4.25% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.15% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×0.988 | 0.90% |
| Singles /BIP | 24.23% | ÷0.992 | ×0.910 | ×0.950 | ×0.988 | 20.85% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.73% | ÷1.036 | ×0.820 | ×0.950 | ×0.988 | 5.74% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.958 | ×0.760 | ×0.950 | ×0.988 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.55% | ÷1.114 | ×0.920 | — | ×0.988 | 1.26% |
Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 123, 1B 98, 2B 107, 3B 92, K 101, BB 115 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .309 → .242; ISO .101 → .077; BABIP .321 → .267. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 ABeloit Snappers · 213 PAwOBA .316 → .246 (−70)K% 15.0% → 20.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 15.02% | ÷1.019 | ×1.360 | — | — | 20.06% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.51% | ÷0.978 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.980 | 5.19% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.35% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.980 | 1.79% |
| Singles /BIP | 19.75% | ÷0.992 | ×0.920 | ×0.950 | ×0.980 | 17.06% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.92% | ÷1.049 | ×0.830 | ×0.950 | ×0.980 | 6.57% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.64% | ÷1.150 | ×0.910 | ×0.950 | ×0.980 | 0.47% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.91% | ÷1.014 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.980 | 1.48% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 103, 1B 98, 2B 110, 3B 130, K 104, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.0 → −2.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .316 → .246; ISO .132 → .098; BABIP .297 → .243. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 ABeloit Snappers · 261 PAwOBA .322 → .252 (−70)K% 17.6% → 23.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 17.62% | ÷1.044 | ×1.360 | — | — | 22.95% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.73% | ÷0.969 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.990 | 7.56% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.53% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.990 | 1.18% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.97% | ÷1.068 | ×0.920 | ×0.989 | ×0.990 | 21.89% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.52% | ÷1.153 | ×0.830 | ×0.989 | ×0.990 | 3.89% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.55% | ÷0.994 | ×0.910 | ×0.989 | ×0.990 | 0.50% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.66% | ÷0.895 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.990 | 1.47% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 79, 1B 114, 2B 131, 3B 99, K 109, BB 94 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.989.
Result: wOBA .322 → .252; ISO .093 → .073; BABIP .324 → .265. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).