Andres Regnault

PosC
B/TR/R
Born1998-12-21
Age (2027)28
No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.
Overview
ROKLAST SEASON 2018
YearAgeLvl / TeamPAAVG/OBP/SLGHRSBwRC+WARMLE AVG/OBP/SLG
201617ROKDSL Mets 2126.132/.264/.16002-18—.081/.184/.099
201718ROKDSL Mets 2132.270/.359/.3833330—.160/.237/.202
201819ROKDSL Mets 1224.333/.423/.5739569—.210/.288/.335
Contract
No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve. Catcher framing: only 2027 Statcast framing is modeled (Baseball Savant server-caches the leaderboard to the current season); prior-year framing is unmodeled — projections for established framers may run 1-3 WAR low.

YearAge LvlTeam MLB% PAAB H2B3BHR BBSOHBP SBCS AVGOBPSLGOPS ISOBABIP K%BB% wOBAwRC+ BATRUNFLDPOSREP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
201617 ROKDSL Mets 2 — 126106 14300 17392 20 132264160424 28209 3113 215 -18 — — — — — —
201718 ROKDSL Mets 2 — 132115 31403 12284 32 270359383741 113333 219 336 30 — — — — — —
201819 ROKDSL Mets 1 — 224192 641719 22338 53 333423573996 240362 1510 433 69 — — — — — —
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
201617 ROK MLEDSL Mets 2 — 126111 9200 12482 20 8118499283 18137 3810 141 -18 — — — — — —
201718 ROK MLEDSL Mets 2 — 132119 19201 8344 32 160237202438 42221 266 213 30 — — — — — —
201819 ROK MLEDSL Mets 1 — 224200 421114 14408 53 210288335623 125230 186 270 69 — — — — — —
201617 ROK MLEDSL Mets 2 — 126111 9200 12482 20 8118499283 18143 3810 141 -18 — — — — — —
201617 ROK RAWDSL Mets 2 — 126106 14300 17392 20 132264160424 28209 3113 215 -18 — — — — — —
201718 ROK MLEDSL Mets 2 — 132119 19201 8344 32 160237202438 42214 266 213 30 — — — — — —
201718 ROK RAWDSL Mets 2 — 132115 31403 12284 32 270359383741 113333 219 336 30 — — — — — —
201819 ROK MLEDSL Mets 1 — 224200 421114 14408 53 210288335623 125241 186 270 69 — — — — — —
201819 ROK RAWDSL Mets 1 — 224192 641719 22338 53 333423573996 240362 1510 433 69 — — — — — —
201617 ROK MLEDSL Mets 2 — 126111 9200 12482 20 8118499283 18137 3810 141 -18 — — — — — —
201718 ROK MLEDSL Mets 2 — 132119 19201 8344 32 160237202438 42221 266 213 30 — — — — — —
201819 ROK MLEDSL Mets 1 — 224200 421114 14408 53 210288335623 125230 186 270 69 — — — — — —
▸ Career Totals
Career— MLE — 482430 701515 3412214 105 163247237484 74213 257 221 35 -37 +0 +0 +9 +10 -1.8
/ 162G— MLE — 650580 942017 4616519 137 162247236483 74212 257 221 35 -50 -0 +0 +12 +14 -2.5

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2018 DSLDSL Mets 1 · 224 PAwOBA .422 → .270 (−153)K% 14.7% → 18.0%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA14.73%÷1.000×1.220——17.97%
BB% (unintentional) /PA8.93%÷1.000×0.700—×0.9856.16%
HBP% /PA3.57%—×0.700—×0.9852.46%
Singles /BIP23.27%÷1.000×0.680×1.020×0.98515.90%
Doubles /BIP10.69%÷1.000×0.600×1.020×0.9856.44%
Triples /BIP0.63%÷1.000×0.600×1.020×0.9850.38%
Home runs /BIP5.66%÷1.000×0.470—×0.9852.62%

Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 18.5 → −1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.020.

Result: wOBA .422 → .270; ISO .240 → .129; BABIP .362 → .230. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 DSLDSL Mets 2 · 132 PAwOBA .328 → .213 (−115)K% 21.2% → 25.9%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA21.21%÷1.000×1.220——25.88%
BB% (unintentional) /PA9.09%÷1.000×0.700—×0.9956.33%
HBP% /PA3.03%—×0.700—×0.9952.11%
Singles /BIP27.59%÷1.000×0.680×1.017×0.99518.99%
Doubles /BIP4.60%÷1.000×0.600×1.017×0.9952.79%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷1.000×0.600×1.017×0.9950.00%
Home runs /BIP3.45%÷1.000×0.470—×0.9951.61%

Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 18.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.017.

Result: wOBA .328 → .213; ISO .113 → .058; BABIP .333 → .221. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 DSLDSL Mets 2 · 126 PAwOBA .211 → .141 (−70)K% 31.0% → 37.8%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA30.95%÷1.000×1.220——37.76%
BB% (unintentional) /PA13.49%÷1.000×0.700—×1.0089.52%
HBP% /PA1.59%—×0.700—×1.0081.12%
Singles /BIP16.42%÷1.000×0.680×0.982×1.00811.05%
Doubles /BIP4.48%÷1.000×0.600×0.982×1.0082.66%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷1.000×0.600×0.982×1.0080.00%
Home runs /BIP0.00%÷1.000×0.470—×1.0080.00%

Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 18.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.982.

Result: wOBA .211 → .141; ISO .028 → .016; BABIP .209 → .137. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).