Eddy Martinez
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 24 | AA/ROK2 orgs | 179 | .217/.305/.325 | 4 | 2 | 32 | — | .178/.243/.264 |
| 2020 | 25 | INTLCaneros de lo… | 88 | .298/.314/.548 | 5 | 1 | 133 | — | |
| 2021 | 26 | INTLCaneros de lo… | 103 | .198/.317/.372 | 4 | 2 | 95 | — |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2016 | 21 | A | South Bend Cubs | — | 517 | 460 | 117 | 24 | 2 | 10 | 50 | 113 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 254 | 333 | 380 | 713 | 126 | 315 | 22 | 10 | 321 | 56 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 22 | A+ | Myrtle Beach Pelicans | — | 502 | 464 | 113 | 11 | 2 | 14 | 31 | 78 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 244 | 298 | 366 | 664 | 123 | 265 | 16 | 6 | 298 | 54 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | AA | Tennessee Smokies | — | 448 | 411 | 91 | 21 | 3 | 12 | 31 | 91 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 221 | 278 | 375 | 652 | 153 | 254 | 20 | 7 | 288 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | AA | Tennessee Smokies | — | 160 | 141 | 30 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 16 | 30 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 213 | 297 | 305 | 602 | 92 | 248 | 19 | 10 | 276 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | ROK | AZL Cubs 1 | — | 19 | 16 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 250 | 368 | 500 | 868 | 250 | 250 | 16 | 16 | 383 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 25 | INTL | Caneros de los Mochis | — | 88 | 84 | 25 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 298 | 314 | 548 | 862 | 250 | 303 | 17 | 2 | 365 | 133 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 26 | INTL | Caneros de los Mochis | — | 103 | 86 | 17 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 34 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 198 | 317 | 372 | 689 | 174 | 265 | 33 | 14 | 308 | 95 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2016 | 21 | A MLE | South Bend Cubs | — | 517 | 476 | 98 | 19 | 2 | 8 | 34 | 158 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 206 | 265 | 305 | 569 | 99 | 283 | 31 | 7 | 251 | 56 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 22 | A+ MLE | Myrtle Beach Pelicans | — | 502 | 474 | 100 | 9 | 2 | 13 | 21 | 114 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 211 | 252 | 321 | 573 | 110 | 247 | 23 | 4 | 248 | 54 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | AA MLE | Tennessee Smokies | — | 448 | 420 | 80 | 19 | 2 | 10 | 22 | 114 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 190 | 233 | 317 | 549 | 126 | 229 | 25 | 5 | 237 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | AA MLE | Tennessee Smokies | — | 160 | 146 | 25 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 38 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 171 | 234 | 240 | 474 | 68 | 209 | 24 | 7 | 211 | 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | ROK MLE | AZL Cubs 1 | — | 19 | 17 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 235 | 316 | 471 | 786 | 235 | 184 | 21 | 11 | 259 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 21 | A MLE | South Bend Cubs | — | 517 | 476 | 98 | 19 | 2 | 8 | 34 | 158 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 206 | 265 | 305 | 569 | 99 | 288 | 31 | 7 | 251 | 56 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 21 | A RAW | South Bend Cubs | — | 517 | 460 | 117 | 24 | 2 | 10 | 50 | 113 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 254 | 333 | 380 | 713 | 126 | 315 | 22 | 10 | 321 | 56 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 22 | A+ MLE | Myrtle Beach Pelicans | — | 502 | 474 | 100 | 9 | 2 | 13 | 21 | 114 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 211 | 252 | 321 | 573 | 110 | 249 | 23 | 4 | 248 | 54 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 22 | A+ RAW | Myrtle Beach Pelicans | — | 502 | 464 | 113 | 11 | 2 | 14 | 31 | 78 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 244 | 298 | 366 | 664 | 123 | 265 | 16 | 6 | 298 | 54 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | AA MLE | Tennessee Smokies | — | 448 | 420 | 80 | 19 | 2 | 10 | 22 | 114 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 190 | 233 | 317 | 549 | 126 | 234 | 25 | 5 | 237 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | AA RAW | Tennessee Smokies | — | 448 | 411 | 91 | 21 | 3 | 12 | 31 | 91 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 221 | 278 | 375 | 652 | 153 | 254 | 20 | 7 | 288 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | AA MLE | 2 teams | — | 179 | 164 | 28 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 42 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 171 | 232 | 250 | 482 | 79 | 208 | 23 | 7 | 216 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | AA RAW | 2 teams | — | 179 | 157 | 34 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 19 | 33 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 217 | 305 | 325 | 630 | 108 | 248 | 18 | 11 | 287 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 25 | INTL MLE | Caneros de los Mochis | — | 88 | 84 | 25 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 298 | 314 | 548 | 862 | 250 | 303 | 17 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 25 | INTL RAW | Caneros de los Mochis | — | 88 | 84 | 25 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 298 | 314 | 548 | 862 | 250 | 303 | 17 | 2 | 365 | 133 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 26 | INTL MLE | Caneros de los Mochis | — | 103 | 86 | 17 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 34 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 198 | 317 | 372 | 689 | 174 | 265 | 33 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 26 | INTL RAW | Caneros de los Mochis | — | 103 | 86 | 17 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 34 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 198 | 317 | 372 | 689 | 174 | 265 | 33 | 14 | 308 | 95 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 21 | A MLE | South Bend Cubs | — | 517 | 474 | 98 | 19 | 2 | 8 | 34 | 158 | 4 | 8 | 5 | 207 | 265 | 306 | 570 | 99 | 283 | 31 | 7 | 251 | 56 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 22 | A+ MLE | Myrtle Beach Pelicans | — | 502 | 471 | 100 | 9 | 2 | 13 | 21 | 114 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 212 | 252 | 323 | 575 | 110 | 247 | 23 | 4 | 248 | 54 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | AA MLE | Tennessee Smokies | — | 448 | 422 | 80 | 19 | 2 | 10 | 22 | 114 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 190 | 233 | 315 | 548 | 126 | 229 | 25 | 5 | 237 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | AA MLE | 2 teams | — | 179 | 164 | 28 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 12 | 42 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 171 | 232 | 250 | 482 | 79 | 206 | 23 | 7 | 216 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 1837 | 1704 | 348 | 58 | 7 | 43 | 105 | 477 | 12 | 24 | 17 | 204 | 255 | 322 | 578 | 118 | 255 | 26 | 6 | 217 | 33 | -146 | -2 | +0 | -20 | +40 | -13.1 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 603 | 123 | 21 | 2 | 15 | 37 | 169 | 4 | 8 | 6 | 204 | 254 | 320 | 574 | 116 | 255 | 26 | 6 | 217 | 33 | -52 | -1 | +0 | -7 | +14 | -4.6 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2019 AATennessee Smokies · 160 PAwOBA .270 → .211 (−59)K% 18.8% → 23.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 18.75% | ÷0.972 | ×1.220 | — | — | 23.53% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.00% | ÷1.047 | ×0.680 | — | ×1.012 | 6.57% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.62% | — | ×0.840 | — | ×1.012 | 0.53% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.72% | ÷1.051 | ×0.920 | ×0.950 | ×1.012 | 17.43% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.60% | ÷0.977 | ×0.910 | ×0.950 | ×1.012 | 3.23% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.957 | ×0.880 | ×0.950 | ×1.012 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.70% | ÷1.142 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.012 | 1.92% |
Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 128, 1B 110, 2B 95, 3B 91, K 94, BB 109 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .270 → .211; ISO .092 → .071; BABIP .248 → .209. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 ROKAZL Cubs 1 · 19 PAwOBA .373 → .259 (−113)K% 15.8% → 22.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 15.79% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 22.74% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 15.79% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.955 | 9.35% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.955 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 15.38% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.955 | 12.05% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.69% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.955 | 5.29% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.955 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 7.69% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.955 | 5.73% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 19.5 → −4.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (4.5 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .373 → .259; ISO .250 → .181; BABIP .250 → .184. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 AATennessee Smokies · 448 PAwOBA .282 → .237 (−44)K% 20.3% → 25.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 20.31% | ÷0.975 | ×1.220 | — | — | 25.43% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 6.92% | ÷0.982 | ×0.680 | — | ×1.027 | 4.92% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.22% | — | ×0.840 | — | ×1.027 | 0.19% |
| Singles /BIP | 17.19% | ÷0.990 | ×0.920 | ×0.950 | ×1.027 | 15.59% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.56% | ÷0.966 | ×0.910 | ×0.950 | ×1.027 | 6.03% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.94% | ÷1.128 | ×0.880 | ×0.950 | ×1.027 | 0.71% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.75% | ÷0.947 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.027 | 3.25% |
Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 89, 1B 98, 2B 93, 3B 126, K 95, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 24.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .282 → .237; ISO .153 → .130; BABIP .254 → .229. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2017 A+Myrtle Beach Pelicans · 502 PAwOBA .290 → .248 (−42)K% 15.5% → 22.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 15.54% | ÷0.969 | ×1.420 | — | — | 22.77% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.98% | ÷0.922 | ×0.630 | — | ×1.012 | 4.13% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.00% | — | ×0.860 | — | ×1.012 | 0.87% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.28% | ÷1.019 | ×0.940 | ×1.011 | ×1.012 | 21.03% |
| Doubles /BIP | 2.85% | ÷0.979 | ×0.830 | ×1.011 | ×1.012 | 2.47% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.52% | ÷0.986 | ×0.800 | ×1.011 | ×1.012 | 0.43% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.63% | ÷0.936 | ×0.900 | — | ×1.012 | 3.53% |
Factors used: league row CAR. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 87, 1B 104, 2B 96, 3B 97, K 94, BB 84 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.011.
Result: wOBA .290 → .248; ISO .123 → .109; BABIP .265 → .247. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2016 ASouth Bend Cubs · 517 PAwOBA .312 → .251 (−62)K% 21.9% → 30.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 21.86% | ÷0.973 | ×1.360 | — | — | 30.56% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.09% | ÷0.968 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.015 | 6.58% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.77% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.015 | 0.61% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.34% | ÷0.993 | ×0.920 | ×0.976 | ×1.015 | 21.44% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.92% | ÷0.963 | ×0.830 | ×0.976 | ×1.015 | 5.91% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.58% | ÷0.900 | ×0.910 | ×0.976 | ×1.015 | 0.58% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.88% | ÷0.997 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.015 | 2.35% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 99, 1B 99, 2B 93, 3B 80, K 95, BB 94 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.976.
Result: wOBA .312 → .251; ISO .126 → .099; BABIP .315 → .283. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .