Eduardo Diaz

PosCF

B/TR/R

Born1997-07-19

Age (2027)30

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

INTLLAST SEASON 2023

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2021	24	AA/A+/INTL2 orgs	390	.265/.326/.513	21	13	71	—	.191/.240/.369
2022	25	AA/INTL2 orgs	547	.254/.313/.412	14	15	59	—	.211/.257/.333
2023	26	INTLCaribes de An…	34	.172/.273/.241	0	0	48	—

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2016	19	ROK	Missoula Osprey	—	260	221	66	8	2	3	29	44	5	23	8	299	392	394	786	95	356	17	11	352	69	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	20	ROK	Missoula Osprey	—	268	247	77	18	5	7	11	47	7	11	2	312	358	510	869	198	361	18	4	377	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	21	A	Kane County Cougars	—	128	120	27	5	2	2	3	40	3	3	0	225	262	350	612	125	321	31	2	269	13	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	22	A+	Visalia Rawhide	—	198	187	53	11	3	3	8	43	2	5	1	283	320	422	742	139	352	22	4	327	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	22	A	Kane County Cougars	—	324	286	81	15	3	7	26	57	8	13	4	283	359	430	789	147	327	18	8	350	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	24	AA	Amarillo Sod Poodles	—	111	98	31	6	2	7	7	27	5	2	1	316	391	633	1.024	316	369	24	6	437	104	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	24	A+	Hillsboro Hops	—	234	216	49	7	1	14	14	63	2	11	4	227	280	463	743	236	248	27	6	322	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	24	INTL	Caribes de Anzoategui	—	45	41	14	4	1	0	2	7	2	0	0	341	400	488	888	146	412	16	4	395	153	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	25	AA	Amarillo Sod Poodles	—	466	426	112	29	3	11	29	116	8	14	7	263	322	423	744	160	336	25	6	329	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	25	INTL	Caribes de Anzoategui	—	81	74	15	2	0	3	6	17	0	1	0	203	263	351	614	149	218	21	7	272	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	26	INTL	Caribes de Anzoategui	—	34	29	5	2	0	0	2	11	2	0	0	172	273	241	514	69	278	32	6	240	48	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2016	19	ROK MLE	Missoula Osprey	—	260	232	56	6	2	2	18	63	5	23	8	241	310	310	620	69	301	24	7	270	69	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	20	ROK MLE	Missoula Osprey	—	268	251	56	12	3	5	7	68	7	11	2	223	264	355	619	131	280	25	3	264	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	21	A MLE	Kane County Cougars	—	128	121	18	3	1	1	2	56	3	3	0	149	183	215	397	66	272	44	2	188	13	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	22	A+ MLE	Visalia Rawhide	—	198	189	41	7	2	2	6	59	2	5	1	217	249	307	556	90	297	30	3	243	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	22	A MLE	Kane County Cougars	—	324	295	67	13	2	6	17	78	8	13	4	227	287	346	633	119	276	24	5	275	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	24	AA MLE	Amarillo Sod Poodles	—	111	100	25	5	2	4	5	35	5	2	1	250	318	460	778	210	316	32	5	322	104	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	24	A+ MLE	Hillsboro Hops	—	234	221	36	4	1	10	9	88	2	11	4	163	203	326	528	163	197	38	4	226	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	25	AA MLE	Amarillo Sod Poodles	—	466	436	92	23	3	8	19	140	8	14	7	211	257	333	590	122	284	30	4	253	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	19	ROK MLE	Missoula Osprey	—	260	232	56	6	2	2	18	63	5	23	8	241	310	310	620	69	318	24	7	270	69	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	19	ROK RAW	Missoula Osprey	—	260	221	66	8	2	3	29	44	5	23	8	299	392	394	786	95	356	17	11	352	69	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	20	ROK MLE	Missoula Osprey	—	268	251	56	12	3	5	7	68	7	11	2	223	264	355	619	131	285	25	3	264	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	20	ROK RAW	Missoula Osprey	—	268	247	77	18	5	7	11	47	7	11	2	312	358	510	869	198	361	18	4	377	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	21	A MLE	Kane County Cougars	—	128	121	18	3	1	1	2	56	3	3	0	149	183	215	397	66	266	44	2	188	13	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	21	A RAW	Kane County Cougars	—	128	120	27	5	2	2	3	40	3	3	0	225	262	350	612	125	321	31	2	269	13	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	22	A MLE	2 teams	—	522	485	108	19	5	9	22	137	10	18	5	223	271	338	609	115	288	26	4	263	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	22	A RAW	2 teams	—	522	473	134	26	6	10	34	100	10	18	5	283	344	427	771	144	337	19	7	341	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	24	A+ MLE	3 teams	—	390	362	68	10	3	16	16	139	9	13	5	188	240	365	605	177	248	36	4	257	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	24	A+ RAW	3 teams	—	390	355	94	17	4	21	23	97	9	13	5	265	326	513	838	248	304	25	6	363	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	25	AA MLE	2 teams	—	547	513	107	27	3	9	22	165	8	15	7	209	252	326	578	117	287	30	4	253	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	25	AA RAW	2 teams	—	547	500	127	31	3	14	35	133	8	15	7	254	313	412	725	158	317	24	6	321	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	26	INTL MLE	Caribes de Anzoategui	—	34	29	5	2	0	0	2	11	2	0	0	172	273	241	514	69	278	32	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	26	INTL RAW	Caribes de Anzoategui	—	34	29	5	2	0	0	2	11	2	0	0	172	273	241	514	69	278	32	6	240	48	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	19	ROK MLE	Missoula Osprey	—	260	235	56	6	2	2	18	63	5	23	8	238	310	306	616	68	301	24	7	270	69	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	20	ROK MLE	Missoula Osprey	—	268	252	56	12	3	5	7	68	7	11	2	222	264	353	617	131	280	25	3	264	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	21	A MLE	Kane County Cougars	—	128	122	18	3	1	1	2	56	3	3	0	148	183	213	396	66	272	44	2	188	13	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	22	A MLE	2 teams	—	522	485	108	19	5	9	22	137	10	18	5	223	271	338	609	115	284	26	4	263	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	24	A+ MLE	3 teams	—	390	362	68	10	3	16	16	139	9	13	5	188	240	365	605	177	235	36	4	257	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	25	AA MLE	2 teams	—	547	512	107	27	3	9	22	165	8	15	7	209	252	326	578	117	284	30	4	253	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	2149	1993	418	79	17	42	89	639	44	83	27	210	259	330	589	120	283	30	4	252	56	-111	+6	+0	+8	+47	-5.2
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	603	127	24	5	13	27	193	13	25	8	211	260	332	591	121	284	30	4	252	56	-34	+2	+0	+2	+14	-1.6

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2022 AAAmarillo Sod Poodles · 466 PAwOBA .321 → .253 (−68)K% 24.9% → 30.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	24.89%	÷1.008	×1.220	—	—	30.14%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.01%	÷1.061	×0.700	—	×0.998	3.96%
HBP% /PA	1.72%	—	×0.870	—	×0.998	1.49%
Singles /BIP	22.26%	÷1.048	×0.920	×0.992	×0.998	19.33%
Doubles /BIP	9.35%	÷1.022	×0.840	×0.992	×0.998	7.61%
Triples /BIP	0.97%	÷0.938	×0.940	×0.992	×0.998	0.96%
Home runs /BIP	3.55%	÷1.094	×0.800	—	×0.998	2.59%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 119, 1B 110, 2B 104, 3B 88, K 102, BB 112 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.992.

Result: wOBA .321 → .253; ISO .160 → .122; BABIP .336 → .284. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2021 A+Hillsboro Hops · 234 PAwOBA .314 → .226 (−88)K% 26.9% → 37.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	26.92%	÷0.970	×1.350	—	—	37.49%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	5.56%	÷1.011	×0.710	—	×0.988	3.85%
HBP% /PA	0.85%	—	×0.810	—	×0.988	0.68%
Singles /BIP	17.65%	÷1.033	×0.910	×0.986	×0.988	15.15%
Doubles /BIP	4.58%	÷1.304	×0.830	×0.986	×0.988	2.84%
Triples /BIP	0.65%	÷1.108	×0.820	×0.986	×0.988	0.47%
Home runs /BIP	9.15%	÷0.972	×0.830	—	×0.988	7.72%

Factors used: level-wide A+ factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 94, 1B 107, 2B 161, 3B 122, K 94, BB 102 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.986.

Result: wOBA .314 → .226; ISO .236 → .169; BABIP .248 → .197. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2021 AAAmarillo Sod Poodles · 111 PAwOBA .429 → .322 (−107)K% 24.3% → 31.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	24.32%	÷0.946	×1.220	—	—	31.38%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.31%	÷0.992	×0.690	—	×1.012	4.44%
HBP% /PA	4.50%	—	×0.850	—	×1.012	3.87%
Singles /BIP	22.54%	÷1.025	×0.940	×0.975	×1.012	20.38%
Doubles /BIP	8.45%	÷1.034	×0.870	×0.975	×1.012	7.01%
Triples /BIP	2.82%	÷0.945	×0.920	×0.975	×1.012	2.71%
Home runs /BIP	9.86%	÷1.271	×0.780	—	×1.012	6.12%

Factors used: level-wide AA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 154, 1B 105, 2B 107, 3B 89, K 89, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.975.

Result: wOBA .429 → .322; ISO .316 → .210; BABIP .369 → .316. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2019 AKane County Cougars · 324 PAwOBA .345 → .275 (−70)K% 17.6% → 24.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	17.59%	÷0.990	×1.360	—	—	24.18%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.02%	÷1.083	×0.690	—	—	5.11%
HBP% /PA	2.47%	—	×0.780	—	—	1.93%
Singles /BIP	24.45%	÷1.038	×0.920	×0.950	—	20.59%
Doubles /BIP	6.55%	÷0.920	×0.830	×0.950	—	5.61%
Triples /BIP	1.31%	÷1.056	×0.910	×0.950	—	1.07%
Home runs /BIP	3.06%	÷0.875	×0.800	—	—	2.79%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 75, 1B 108, 2B 84, 3B 111, K 98, BB 117 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .345 → .275; ISO .147 → .126; BABIP .327 → .276. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2019 A+Visalia Rawhide · 198 PAwOBA .320 → .243 (−77)K% 21.7% → 29.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	21.72%	÷0.979	×1.340	—	—	29.74%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	4.04%	÷0.986	×0.710	—	×1.012	2.94%
HBP% /PA	1.01%	—	×0.790	—	×1.012	0.81%
Singles /BIP	25.00%	÷0.974	×0.910	×0.950	×1.012	22.45%
Doubles /BIP	7.64%	÷1.148	×0.820	×0.950	×1.012	5.25%
Triples /BIP	2.08%	÷0.909	×0.760	×0.950	×1.012	1.68%
Home runs /BIP	2.08%	÷1.095	×0.920	—	×1.012	1.77%

Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 119, 1B 95, 2B 130, 3B 82, K 96, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .320 → .243; ISO .139 → .098; BABIP .352 → .297. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 AKane County Cougars · 128 PAwOBA .261 → .188 (−73)K% 31.2% → 43.6%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	31.25%	÷0.975	×1.360	—	—	43.57%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	2.34%	÷0.974	×0.690	—	×1.015	1.69%
HBP% /PA	2.34%	—	×0.780	—	×1.015	1.86%
Singles /BIP	22.50%	÷1.014	×0.920	×0.957	×1.015	19.82%
Doubles /BIP	6.25%	÷1.039	×0.830	×0.957	×1.015	4.85%
Triples /BIP	2.50%	÷1.150	×0.910	×0.957	×1.015	1.92%
Home runs /BIP	2.50%	÷0.937	×0.800	—	×1.015	2.17%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 87, 1B 103, 2B 108, 3B 130, K 95, BB 95 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.957.

Result: wOBA .261 → .188; ISO .125 → .086; BABIP .321 → .272. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 ROKMissoula Osprey · 268 PAwOBA .368 → .264 (−104)K% 17.5% → 25.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	17.54%	÷1.000	×1.440	—	—	25.25%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	4.10%	÷1.000	×0.610	—	×0.995	2.49%
HBP% /PA	2.61%	—	×0.720	—	×0.995	1.87%
Singles /BIP	23.50%	÷1.000	×0.820	×1.001	×0.995	19.19%
Doubles /BIP	9.00%	÷1.000	×0.720	×1.001	×0.995	6.45%
Triples /BIP	2.50%	÷1.000	×0.720	×1.001	×0.995	1.79%
Home runs /BIP	3.50%	÷1.000	×0.750	—	×0.995	2.61%

Factors used: league row PIO. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 19.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.001.

Result: wOBA .368 → .264; ISO .198 → .136; BABIP .361 → .280. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 ROKMissoula Osprey · 260 PAwOBA .348 → .270 (−78)K% 16.9% → 24.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	16.92%	÷1.000	×1.440	—	—	24.37%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.15%	÷1.000	×0.610	—	×1.008	6.85%
HBP% /PA	1.92%	—	×0.720	—	×1.008	1.40%
Singles /BIP	29.94%	÷1.000	×0.820	×1.050	×1.008	25.97%
Doubles /BIP	4.52%	÷1.000	×0.720	×1.050	×1.008	3.44%
Triples /BIP	1.13%	÷1.000	×0.720	×1.050	×1.008	0.86%
Home runs /BIP	1.69%	÷1.000	×0.750	—	×1.008	1.28%

Factors used: league row PIO. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 19.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .348 → .270; ISO .095 → .071; BABIP .356 → .301. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .