Yeuris Ramirez
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 20 | ROKGCL Astros | 51 | .184/.392/.395 | 2 | 4 | 49 | — | .098/.275/.195 |
| 2021 | 22 | AHOU | 174 | .257/.351/.388 | 3 | 18 | 53 | — | .204/.282/.299 |
| 2022 | 23 | AHOU | 254 | .199/.313/.319 | 6 | 12 | 23 | — | .138/.234/.219 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2016 | 17 | ROK | DSL Astros Orange | — | 142 | 118 | 21 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 18 | 38 | 5 | 11 | 2 | 178 | 312 | 254 | 566 | 76 | 263 | 27 | 13 | 272 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 18 | ROK | DSL Astros Blue | — | 232 | 178 | 39 | 10 | 1 | 3 | 35 | 54 | 18 | 4 | 5 | 219 | 398 | 337 | 735 | 118 | 295 | 23 | 15 | 349 | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 19 | ROK | GCL Astros | — | 150 | 128 | 22 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 13 | 42 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 172 | 279 | 320 | 599 | 148 | 224 | 28 | 9 | 270 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 20 | ROK | GCL Astros | — | 51 | 38 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 15 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 184 | 392 | 395 | 787 | 211 | 238 | 29 | 16 | 367 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 22 | A | Fayetteville Woodpeckers | — | 174 | 152 | 39 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 16 | 54 | 6 | 18 | 5 | 257 | 351 | 388 | 739 | 132 | 379 | 31 | 9 | 336 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 23 | A | Fayetteville Woodpeckers | — | 254 | 216 | 43 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 25 | 97 | 11 | 12 | 4 | 199 | 313 | 319 | 633 | 120 | 322 | 38 | 10 | 293 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2016 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Astros Orange | — | 142 | 124 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 46 | 5 | 11 | 2 | 105 | 213 | 145 | 358 | 40 | 164 | 32 | 8 | 172 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Astros Blue | — | 232 | 189 | 25 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 24 | 66 | 18 | 4 | 5 | 132 | 290 | 190 | 481 | 58 | 181 | 28 | 10 | 224 | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 19 | ROK MLE | GCL Astros | — | 150 | 134 | 16 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 60 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 119 | 197 | 216 | 414 | 97 | 179 | 40 | 5 | 184 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 20 | ROK MLE | GCL Astros | — | 51 | 41 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 22 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 98 | 275 | 195 | 470 | 98 | 179 | 43 | 10 | 241 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 22 | A MLE | Fayetteville Woodpeckers | — | 174 | 157 | 32 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 74 | 6 | 18 | 5 | 204 | 282 | 299 | 581 | 96 | 350 | 43 | 6 | 246 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 23 | A MLE | Fayetteville Woodpeckers | — | 254 | 224 | 31 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 17 | 135 | 11 | 12 | 4 | 138 | 234 | 219 | 453 | 80 | 291 | 53 | 7 | 202 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Astros Orange | — | 142 | 124 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 46 | 5 | 11 | 2 | 105 | 213 | 145 | 358 | 40 | 167 | 32 | 8 | 172 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 17 | ROK RAW | DSL Astros Orange | — | 142 | 118 | 21 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 18 | 38 | 5 | 11 | 2 | 178 | 312 | 254 | 566 | 76 | 263 | 27 | 13 | 272 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Astros Blue | — | 232 | 189 | 25 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 24 | 66 | 18 | 4 | 5 | 132 | 290 | 190 | 481 | 58 | 195 | 28 | 10 | 224 | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 18 | ROK RAW | DSL Astros Blue | — | 232 | 178 | 39 | 10 | 1 | 3 | 35 | 54 | 18 | 4 | 5 | 219 | 398 | 337 | 735 | 118 | 295 | 23 | 15 | 349 | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 19 | ROK MLE | GCL Astros | — | 150 | 134 | 16 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 60 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 119 | 197 | 216 | 414 | 97 | 189 | 40 | 5 | 184 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 19 | ROK RAW | GCL Astros | — | 150 | 128 | 22 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 13 | 42 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 172 | 279 | 320 | 599 | 148 | 224 | 28 | 9 | 270 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 20 | ROK MLE | GCL Astros | — | 51 | 41 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 22 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 98 | 275 | 195 | 470 | 98 | 167 | 43 | 10 | 241 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 20 | ROK RAW | GCL Astros | — | 51 | 38 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 15 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 184 | 392 | 395 | 787 | 211 | 238 | 29 | 16 | 367 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 22 | A MLE | Fayetteville Woodpeckers | — | 174 | 157 | 32 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 74 | 6 | 18 | 5 | 204 | 282 | 299 | 581 | 96 | 370 | 43 | 6 | 246 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 22 | A RAW | Fayetteville Woodpeckers | — | 174 | 152 | 39 | 7 | 2 | 3 | 16 | 54 | 6 | 18 | 5 | 257 | 351 | 388 | 739 | 132 | 379 | 31 | 9 | 336 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 23 | A MLE | Fayetteville Woodpeckers | — | 254 | 224 | 31 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 17 | 135 | 11 | 12 | 4 | 138 | 234 | 219 | 453 | 80 | 310 | 53 | 7 | 202 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 23 | A RAW | Fayetteville Woodpeckers | — | 254 | 216 | 43 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 25 | 97 | 11 | 12 | 4 | 199 | 313 | 319 | 633 | 120 | 322 | 38 | 10 | 293 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Astros Orange | — | 142 | 124 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 46 | 5 | 11 | 2 | 105 | 213 | 145 | 358 | 40 | 164 | 32 | 8 | 172 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Astros Blue | — | 232 | 188 | 25 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 24 | 66 | 18 | 4 | 5 | 133 | 290 | 191 | 482 | 59 | 181 | 28 | 10 | 224 | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 19 | ROK MLE | GCL Astros | — | 150 | 136 | 16 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 60 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 118 | 197 | 213 | 411 | 96 | 179 | 40 | 5 | 184 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 20 | ROK MLE | GCL Astros | — | 51 | 41 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 22 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 98 | 275 | 195 | 470 | 98 | 179 | 43 | 10 | 241 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 22 | A MLE | Fayetteville Woodpeckers | — | 174 | 155 | 32 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 74 | 6 | 18 | 5 | 206 | 282 | 303 | 585 | 97 | 350 | 43 | 6 | 246 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 23 | A MLE | Fayetteville Woodpeckers | — | 254 | 224 | 31 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 17 | 135 | 11 | 12 | 4 | 138 | 234 | 219 | 453 | 80 | 291 | 53 | 7 | 202 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 1003 | 869 | 121 | 22 | 7 | 10 | 76 | 403 | 51 | 53 | 19 | 139 | 249 | 215 | 464 | 76 | 241 | 40 | 8 | 210 | 28 | -86 | +3 | +0 | +11 | +22 | -5.1 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 563 | 78 | 14 | 5 | 6 | 49 | 261 | 33 | 34 | 12 | 139 | 248 | 213 | 461 | 75 | 241 | 40 | 8 | 210 | 28 | -56 | +2 | +0 | +7 | +14 | -3.3 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2022 AFayetteville Woodpeckers · 254 PAwOBA .288 → .202 (−86)K% 38.2% → 53.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 38.19% | ÷0.976 | ×1.360 | — | — | 53.20% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.84% | ÷0.999 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.980 | 6.67% |
| HBP% /PA | 4.33% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.980 | 3.31% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.21% | ÷0.992 | ×0.920 | ×1.021 | ×0.980 | 23.38% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.04% | ÷0.930 | ×0.830 | ×1.021 | ×0.980 | 4.50% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.84% | ÷1.150 | ×0.910 | ×1.021 | ×0.980 | 0.67% |
| Home runs /BIP | 5.04% | ÷0.949 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.980 | 4.16% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 90, 1B 98, 2B 86, 3B 130, K 95, BB 100 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.0 → −2.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.021.
Result: wOBA .288 → .202; ISO .120 → .079; BABIP .322 → .291. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 AFayetteville Woodpeckers · 174 PAwOBA .328 → .246 (−81)K% 31.0% → 42.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 31.03% | ÷0.997 | ×1.360 | — | — | 42.34% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.20% | ÷0.985 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.990 | 6.37% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.45% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.990 | 2.66% |
| Singles /BIP | 27.55% | ÷0.987 | ×0.920 | ×1.050 | ×0.990 | 26.70% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.14% | ÷1.066 | ×0.830 | ×1.050 | ×0.990 | 5.78% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.04% | ÷1.084 | ×0.910 | ×1.050 | ×0.990 | 1.78% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.06% | ÷1.176 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.990 | 2.06% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 135, 1B 97, 2B 113, 3B 117, K 99, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .328 → .246; ISO .132 → .086; BABIP .379 → .350. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 ROKGCL Astros · 51 PAwOBA .358 → .241 (−117)K% 29.4% → 42.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 29.41% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 42.35% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 15.69% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.985 | 9.58% |
| HBP% /PA | 9.80% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.985 | 6.95% |
| Singles /BIP | 13.04% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.985 | 10.54% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.70% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.985 | 6.17% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.985 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 8.70% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.985 | 6.68% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 19.5 → −1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .358 → .241; ISO .211 → .145; BABIP .238 → .179. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 ROKGCL Astros · 150 PAwOBA .264 → .184 (−80)K% 28.0% → 40.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 28.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 40.32% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.995 | 4.94% |
| HBP% /PA | 4.00% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.995 | 2.87% |
| Singles /BIP | 13.95% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | ×1.040 | ×0.995 | 11.84% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.65% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×1.040 | ×0.995 | 3.46% |
| Triples /BIP | 3.49% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×1.040 | ×0.995 | 2.60% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.49% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.995 | 2.71% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 19.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.040.
Result: wOBA .264 → .184; ISO .148 → .102; BABIP .224 → .179. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2017 DSLDSL Astros Blue · 232 PAwOBA .343 → .224 (−118)K% 23.3% → 28.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 23.28% | ÷1.000 | ×1.220 | — | — | 28.40% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 15.09% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×0.995 | 10.51% |
| HBP% /PA | 7.76% | — | ×0.700 | — | ×0.995 | 5.40% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.16% | ÷1.000 | ×0.680 | ×0.950 | ×0.995 | 12.96% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.06% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×0.950 | ×0.995 | 4.57% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.81% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×0.950 | ×0.995 | 0.46% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.42% | ÷1.000 | ×0.470 | — | ×0.995 | 1.13% |
Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 18.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .343 → .224; ISO .118 → .064; BABIP .295 → .181. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2016 DSLDSL Astros Orange · 142 PAwOBA .263 → .172 (−91)K% 26.8% → 32.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 26.76% | ÷1.000 | ×1.220 | — | — | 32.65% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.97% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.008 | 8.44% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.52% | — | ×0.700 | — | ×1.008 | 2.48% |
| Singles /BIP | 17.50% | ÷1.000 | ×0.680 | ×0.950 | ×1.008 | 11.39% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.25% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×0.950 | ×1.008 | 3.59% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.50% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×0.950 | ×1.008 | 1.44% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.470 | — | ×1.008 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 18.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .263 → .172; ISO .076 → .044; BABIP .263 → .164. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).