Isaac Rodriguez
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 33 | INTLCaneros de lo… | 295 | .280/.420/.331 | 1 | 6 | 125 | — |
| 2025 | 34 | INTLCaneros de lo… | 295 | .202/.340/.223 | 0 | 14 | 67 | — |
| 2026 | 35 | INTLCaneros de lo… | 50 | .220/.333/.220 | 0 | 1 | 64 | — |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 24 | AAA | Toros de Tijuana | — | 24 | 22 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 273 | 333 | 364 | 697 | 91 | 316 | 12 | 8 | 316 | 71 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 25 | AAA | Toros de Tijuana | — | 312 | 280 | 86 | 15 | 1 | 2 | 21 | 38 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 307 | 366 | 389 | 755 | 82 | 349 | 12 | 7 | 336 | 105 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 25 | INTL | Mexico | — | 306 | 268 | 83 | 14 | 0 | 4 | 31 | 33 | 3 | 8 | 8 | 310 | 387 | 407 | 794 | 97 | 341 | 11 | 10 | 356 | 127 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 26 | AAA | Toros de Tijuana | — | 323 | 280 | 76 | 10 | 1 | 3 | 28 | 40 | 5 | 14 | 4 | 271 | 348 | 346 | 695 | 75 | 304 | 12 | 9 | 310 | 78 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 26 | INTL | Caneros de los Mochis | — | 244 | 220 | 55 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 33 | 2 | 7 | 4 | 250 | 304 | 309 | 613 | 59 | 289 | 14 | 6 | 273 | 71 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 27 | INTL | Caneros de los Mochis | — | 292 | 245 | 78 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 37 | 32 | 2 | 9 | 6 | 318 | 412 | 392 | 804 | 73 | 360 | 11 | 13 | 358 | 129 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 28 | AAA | Toros de Tijuana | — | 505 | 437 | 138 | 24 | 1 | 8 | 45 | 69 | 11 | 23 | 7 | 316 | 394 | 430 | 824 | 114 | 355 | 14 | 9 | 364 | 92 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 28 | INTL | Caneros de los Mochis | — | 301 | 256 | 87 | 9 | 0 | 4 | 30 | 38 | 3 | 12 | 5 | 340 | 415 | 422 | 837 | 82 | 386 | 13 | 10 | 365 | 133 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 29 | INTL | Caneros de los Mochis | — | 228 | 199 | 58 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 21 | 29 | 5 | 10 | 5 | 291 | 373 | 387 | 760 | 95 | 321 | 13 | 9 | 343 | 118 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 30 | INTL | Mexico | — | 309 | 281 | 80 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 32 | 4 | 14 | 7 | 285 | 337 | 359 | 696 | 75 | 317 | 10 | 6 | 310 | 96 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 31 | INTL | Caneros de los Mochis | — | 301 | 263 | 74 | 15 | 3 | 3 | 28 | 40 | 4 | 10 | 5 | 281 | 359 | 395 | 755 | 114 | 321 | 13 | 9 | 335 | 113 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 32 | INTL | Caneros de los Mochis | — | 275 | 224 | 61 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 38 | 32 | 4 | 14 | 0 | 272 | 387 | 330 | 718 | 58 | 309 | 12 | 14 | 326 | 107 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 33 | INTL | Caneros de los Mochis | — | 295 | 236 | 66 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 51 | 34 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 280 | 420 | 331 | 750 | 51 | 322 | 12 | 17 | 353 | 125 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 34 | INTL | Caneros de los Mochis | — | 295 | 233 | 47 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 41 | 48 | 8 | 14 | 4 | 202 | 340 | 223 | 564 | 21 | 251 | 16 | 14 | 268 | 67 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 35 | INTL | Caneros de los Mochis | — | 50 | 41 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 220 | 333 | 220 | 553 | 281 | 18 | 10 | 262 | 64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 24 | AAA MLE | Toros de Tijuana | — | 24 | 23 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 261 | 292 | 348 | 639 | 87 | 298 | 17 | 4 | 273 | 71 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 25 | AAA MLE | Toros de Tijuana | — | 312 | 288 | 90 | 15 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 43 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 312 | 353 | 382 | 735 | 69 | 358 | 14 | 4 | 324 | 105 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 26 | AAA MLE | Toros de Tijuana | — | 323 | 289 | 77 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 19 | 48 | 5 | 14 | 4 | 266 | 323 | 336 | 658 | 69 | 294 | 15 | 6 | 283 | 78 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 28 | AAA MLE | Toros de Tijuana | — | 505 | 452 | 125 | 19 | 1 | 6 | 30 | 75 | 11 | 23 | 7 | 277 | 337 | 363 | 700 | 86 | 303 | 15 | 6 | 304 | 92 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 24 | AAA MLE | Toros de Tijuana | — | 24 | 23 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 261 | 292 | 348 | 639 | 87 | 316 | 17 | 4 | 273 | 71 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 24 | AAA RAW | Toros de Tijuana | — | 24 | 22 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 273 | 333 | 364 | 697 | 91 | 316 | 12 | 8 | 316 | 71 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 25 | AAA MLE | 2 teams | — | 618 | 573 | 180 | 30 | 2 | 2 | 27 | 85 | 8 | 16 | 13 | 314 | 354 | 384 | 738 | 70 | 365 | 14 | 4 | 324 | 105 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 25 | AAA RAW | 2 teams | — | 618 | 548 | 169 | 29 | 1 | 6 | 52 | 71 | 8 | 16 | 13 | 308 | 377 | 398 | 774 | 89 | 345 | 11 | 8 | 346 | 105 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 26 | AAA MLE | 2 teams | — | 567 | 510 | 134 | 16 | 2 | 4 | 33 | 84 | 7 | 21 | 8 | 263 | 316 | 325 | 642 | 63 | 305 | 15 | 6 | 283 | 78 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 26 | AAA RAW | 2 teams | — | 567 | 500 | 131 | 16 | 3 | 4 | 43 | 73 | 7 | 21 | 8 | 262 | 329 | 330 | 659 | 68 | 297 | 13 | 8 | 294 | 78 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 27 | INTL MLE | Caneros de los Mochis | — | 292 | 245 | 78 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 37 | 32 | 2 | 9 | 6 | 318 | 412 | 392 | 804 | 73 | 360 | 11 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 27 | INTL RAW | Caneros de los Mochis | — | 292 | 245 | 78 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 37 | 32 | 2 | 9 | 6 | 318 | 412 | 392 | 804 | 73 | 360 | 11 | 13 | 358 | 129 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 28 | AAA MLE | 2 teams | — | 806 | 720 | 197 | 30 | 1 | 9 | 48 | 119 | 14 | 35 | 12 | 274 | 331 | 356 | 687 | 82 | 314 | 15 | 6 | 304 | 92 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 28 | AAA RAW | 2 teams | — | 806 | 693 | 225 | 33 | 1 | 12 | 75 | 107 | 14 | 35 | 12 | 325 | 402 | 427 | 829 | 102 | 367 | 13 | 9 | 364 | 92 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 29 | INTL MLE | Caneros de los Mochis | — | 228 | 199 | 58 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 21 | 29 | 5 | 10 | 5 | 291 | 373 | 387 | 760 | 95 | 321 | 13 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 29 | INTL RAW | Caneros de los Mochis | — | 228 | 199 | 58 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 21 | 29 | 5 | 10 | 5 | 291 | 373 | 387 | 760 | 95 | 321 | 13 | 9 | 343 | 118 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 30 | INTL MLE | Mexico | — | 309 | 281 | 80 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 32 | 4 | 14 | 7 | 285 | 337 | 359 | 696 | 75 | 317 | 10 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 30 | INTL RAW | Mexico | — | 309 | 281 | 80 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 32 | 4 | 14 | 7 | 285 | 337 | 359 | 696 | 75 | 317 | 10 | 6 | 310 | 96 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 31 | INTL MLE | Caneros de los Mochis | — | 301 | 263 | 74 | 15 | 3 | 3 | 28 | 40 | 4 | 10 | 5 | 281 | 359 | 395 | 755 | 114 | 321 | 13 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 31 | INTL RAW | Caneros de los Mochis | — | 301 | 263 | 74 | 15 | 3 | 3 | 28 | 40 | 4 | 10 | 5 | 281 | 359 | 395 | 755 | 114 | 321 | 13 | 9 | 335 | 113 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 32 | INTL MLE | Caneros de los Mochis | — | 275 | 224 | 61 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 38 | 32 | 4 | 14 | 0 | 272 | 387 | 330 | 718 | 58 | 309 | 12 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 32 | INTL RAW | Caneros de los Mochis | — | 275 | 224 | 61 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 38 | 32 | 4 | 14 | 0 | 272 | 387 | 330 | 718 | 58 | 309 | 12 | 14 | 326 | 107 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 33 | INTL MLE | Caneros de los Mochis | — | 295 | 236 | 66 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 51 | 34 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 280 | 420 | 331 | 750 | 51 | 322 | 12 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 33 | INTL RAW | Caneros de los Mochis | — | 295 | 236 | 66 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 51 | 34 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 280 | 420 | 331 | 750 | 51 | 322 | 12 | 17 | 353 | 125 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 34 | INTL MLE | Caneros de los Mochis | — | 295 | 233 | 47 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 41 | 48 | 8 | 14 | 4 | 202 | 340 | 223 | 564 | 21 | 251 | 16 | 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 34 | INTL RAW | Caneros de los Mochis | — | 295 | 233 | 47 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 41 | 48 | 8 | 14 | 4 | 202 | 340 | 223 | 564 | 21 | 251 | 16 | 14 | 268 | 67 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2026 | 35 | INTL MLE | Caneros de los Mochis | — | 50 | 41 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 220 | 333 | 220 | 553 | 281 | 18 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2026 | 35 | INTL RAW | Caneros de los Mochis | — | 50 | 41 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 220 | 333 | 220 | 553 | 281 | 18 | 10 | 262 | 64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| 2015 | 24 | AAA MLE | Toros de Tijuana | — | 24 | 23 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 261 | 292 | 348 | 639 | 87 | 298 | 17 | 4 | 273 | 71 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 25 | AAA MLE | 2 teams | — | 618 | 578 | 180 | 30 | 2 | 2 | 27 | 85 | 8 | 16 | 13 | 311 | 354 | 381 | 734 | 69 | 358 | 14 | 4 | 324 | 105 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 26 | AAA MLE | 2 teams | — | 567 | 522 | 134 | 16 | 2 | 4 | 33 | 84 | 7 | 21 | 8 | 257 | 316 | 318 | 634 | 61 | 294 | 15 | 6 | 283 | 78 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 28 | AAA MLE | 2 teams | — | 806 | 738 | 197 | 30 | 1 | 9 | 48 | 119 | 14 | 35 | 12 | 267 | 331 | 347 | 678 | 80 | 303 | 15 | 6 | 304 | 92 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 4060 | 3548 | 990 | 144 | 13 | 27 | 348 | 548 | 64 | 150 | 64 | 279 | 354 | 350 | 704 | 71 | 321 | 13 | 9 | 151 | -12 | -540 | +4 | +0 | +14 | +88 | -44.2 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 568 | 158 | 23 | 2 | 4 | 56 | 88 | 10 | 24 | 10 | 278 | 353 | 347 | 700 | 69 | 321 | 14 | 9 | 151 | -12 | -86 | +1 | +0 | +2 | +14 | -7.1 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2019 AAAToros de Tijuana · 505 PAwOBA .358 → .304 (−54)K% 13.7% → 14.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 13.66% | ÷1.111 | ×1.200 | — | — | 14.75% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.71% | ÷1.007 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.992 | 5.92% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.18% | — | ×0.940 | — | ×0.992 | 2.03% |
| Singles /BIP | 28.53% | ÷0.989 | ×0.930 | ×0.950 | ×0.992 | 25.28% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.52% | ÷1.051 | ×0.830 | ×0.950 | ×0.992 | 4.85% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.27% | ÷0.993 | ×0.920 | ×0.950 | ×0.992 | 0.24% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.17% | ÷1.023 | ×0.700 | — | ×0.992 | 1.48% |
Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 105, 1B 98, 2B 110, 3B 99, K 122, BB 101 — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 27.2 → −0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .358 → .304; ISO .114 → .087; BABIP .355 → .303. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2017 AAAToros de Tijuana · 323 PAwOBA .305 → .283 (−22)K% 12.4% → 14.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 12.38% | ÷0.999 | ×1.200 | — | — | 14.88% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.67% | ÷1.033 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.018 | 5.89% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.55% | — | ×0.940 | — | ×1.018 | 1.48% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.83% | ÷0.988 | ×0.930 | ×1.029 | ×1.018 | 25.48% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.17% | ÷1.007 | ×0.830 | ×1.029 | ×1.018 | 3.60% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.42% | ÷1.150 | ×0.920 | ×1.029 | ×1.018 | 0.35% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.25% | ÷0.892 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.018 | 1.00% |
Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 78, 1B 98, 2B 101, 3B 130, K 100, BB 107 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 27.2 → +1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.029.
Result: wOBA .305 → .283; ISO .075 → .065; BABIP .304 → .294. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2016 AAAToros de Tijuana · 312 PAwOBA .327 → .324 (−4)K% 12.2% → 13.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 12.18% | ÷1.062 | ×1.200 | — | — | 13.77% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 6.41% | ÷1.055 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.033 | 4.33% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.60% | — | ×0.940 | — | ×1.033 | 1.56% |
| Singles /BIP | 28.10% | ÷0.967 | ×0.930 | ×1.050 | ×1.033 | 29.31% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.20% | ÷0.926 | ×0.830 | ×1.050 | ×1.033 | 6.02% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.41% | ÷0.941 | ×0.920 | ×1.050 | ×1.033 | 0.44% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.83% | ÷1.278 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.033 | 0.47% |
Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 156, 1B 93, 2B 85, 3B 88, K 112, BB 111 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 27.2 → +3.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .327 → .324; ISO .082 → .074; BABIP .349 → .358. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 AAAToros de Tijuana · 24 PAwOBA .291 → .273 (−18)K% 12.5% → 15.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 12.50% | ÷0.978 | ×1.200 | — | — | 15.34% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 4.17% | ÷1.013 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.048 | 2.97% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.940 | — | ×1.048 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 21.05% | ÷0.982 | ×0.930 | — | ×1.048 | 20.88% |
| Doubles /BIP | 10.53% | ÷1.026 | ×0.830 | — | ×1.048 | 8.93% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.046 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.048 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.208 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.048 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 142, 1B 96, 2B 105, 3B 109, K 96, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 27.2 → +4.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .291 → .273; ISO .091 → .080; BABIP .316 → .298. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .