Jordan Tarsovich

Pos3B
B/TR/R
Born1991-06-20
Age (2027)36
No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.
Overview
AALAST SEASON 2017
YearAgeLvl / TeamPAAVG/OBP/SLGHRSBwRC+WARMLE AVG/OBP/SLG
201524A/ROK2 orgs159.269/.372/.3733253—.191/.269/.255
201625AA/A+2 orgs318.221/.327/.3719753—.177/.260/.290
201726AAOAK399.240/.339/.32831345—.189/.265/.268
Contract
No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

YearAge LvlTeam MLB% PAAB H2B3BHR BBSOHBP SBCS AVGOBPSLGOPS ISOBABIP K%BB% wOBAwRC+ BATRUNFLDPOSREP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
201524 AGreat Lakes Loons — 7767 18201 7172 21 269355343699 75340 229 319 52 — — — — — —
201524 ROKOgden Raptors — 8267 18302 11132 00 269388403790 134302 1613 353 54 — — — — — —
201625 AATulsa Drillers — 198169 37904 26321 62 219327343670 124246 1613 305 54 — — — — — —
201625 A+Rancho Cucamonga Quakes — 120103 23125 13303 12 223328417745 194261 2511 331 51 — — — — — —
201726 AAMidland RockHounds — 399341 821533 48793 135 240339328668 88300 2012 304 45 — — — — — —
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
201524 A MLEGreat Lakes Loons — 7769 14101 5222 21 203276261537 58282 296 245 52 — — — — — —
201524 ROK MLEOgden Raptors — 8272 13201 6192 00 181263250512 69226 237 248 54 — — — — — —
201625 AA MLETulsa Drillers — 198176 32803 19391 62 182265278544 97214 2010 248 54 — — — — — —
201625 A+ MLERancho Cucamonga Quakes — 120107 18114 9413 12 168252308561 140210 348 244 51 — — — — — —
201726 AA MLEMidland RockHounds — 399355 671333 341033 135 189265268533 79243 269 235 45 — — — — — —
201524 ROK MLE2 teams — 159141 29402 11414 21 206282277559 71270 267 247 53 — — — — — —
201524 ROK RAW2 teams — 159134 36503 18304 21 269372373745 104320 1911 336 53 — — — — — —
201625 AA MLE2 teams — 318284 50917 27804 74 176257289546 113216 258 246 53 — — — — — —
201625 AA RAW2 teams — 318272 601029 39624 74 221327371698 151251 1912 315 53 — — — — — —
201726 AA MLEMidland RockHounds — 399355 671333 341033 135 189265268533 79253 269 235 45 — — — — — —
201726 AA RAWMidland RockHounds — 399341 821533 48793 135 240339328668 88300 2012 304 45 — — — — — —
201524 ROK MLE2 teams — 159143 29402 11414 21 203282273555 70253 267 247 53 — — — — — —
201625 AA MLE2 teams — 318284 50917 27804 74 176257289546 113212 258 246 53 — — — — — —
201726 AA MLEMidland RockHounds — 399359 671333 341033 135 187265265530 78243 269 235 45 — — — — — —
▸ Career Totals
Career— MLE — 876780 14626412 7222411 2210 187265277542 90243 268 241 49 -53 +0 +0 +3 +19 -3.1
/ 162G— MLE — 650579 1081939 531668 167 187264276540 90241 268 241 49 -39 +0 +0 +2 +14 -2.3

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2017 AAMidland RockHounds · 399 PAwOBA .300 → .235 (−65)K% 19.8% → 25.7%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA19.80%÷0.939×1.220——25.74%
BB% (unintentional) /PA12.03%÷0.990×0.700—×0.9888.40%
HBP% /PA0.75%—×0.870—×0.9880.65%
Singles /BIP23.28%÷1.142×0.920×0.998×0.98818.50%
Doubles /BIP5.73%÷0.987×0.840×0.998×0.9884.81%
Triples /BIP1.15%÷0.977×0.940×0.998×0.9881.09%
Home runs /BIP1.15%÷0.862×0.800—×0.9881.05%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 72, 1B 128, 2B 97, 3B 95, K 88, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 24.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.998.

Result: wOBA .300 → .235; ISO .088 → .077; BABIP .300 → .243. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 AATulsa Drillers · 198 PAwOBA .298 → .248 (−50)K% 16.2% → 19.8%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA16.16%÷0.996×1.220——19.79%
BB% (unintentional) /PA12.63%÷0.935×0.700—×0.9989.43%
HBP% /PA0.51%—×0.870—×0.9980.44%
Singles /BIP17.52%÷0.990×0.920×0.950×0.99815.44%
Doubles /BIP6.57%÷0.926×0.840×0.950×0.9985.65%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷0.900×0.940×0.950×0.9980.00%
Home runs /BIP2.92%÷1.020×0.800—×0.9982.29%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 104, 1B 98, 2B 85, 3B 80, K 99, BB 87 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .298 → .248; ISO .124 → .103; BABIP .246 → .214. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 A+Rancho Cucamonga Quakes · 120 PAwOBA .326 → .244 (−81)K% 25.0% → 34.2%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA25.00%÷0.979×1.340——34.21%
BB% (unintentional) /PA10.83%÷1.046×0.710—×0.9787.19%
HBP% /PA2.50%—×0.790—×0.9781.93%
Singles /BIP20.55%÷1.043×0.910×0.977×0.97817.14%
Doubles /BIP1.37%÷0.938×0.820×0.977×0.9781.14%
Triples /BIP2.74%÷1.142×0.760×0.977×0.9781.74%
Home runs /BIP6.85%÷1.003×0.920—×0.9786.14%

Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 101, 1B 109, 2B 88, 3B 128, K 96, BB 109 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 22.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.977.

Result: wOBA .326 → .244; ISO .194 → .152; BABIP .261 → .210. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 ROKOgden Raptors · 82 PAwOBA .348 → .248 (−100)K% 15.9% → 22.8%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA15.85%÷1.000×1.440——22.83%
BB% (unintentional) /PA13.41%÷1.000×0.610—×0.9557.81%
HBP% /PA2.44%—×0.720—×0.9551.68%
Singles /BIP24.07%÷1.000×0.820×0.990×0.95518.67%
Doubles /BIP5.56%÷1.000×0.720×0.990×0.9553.78%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷1.000×0.720×0.990×0.9550.00%
Home runs /BIP3.70%÷1.000×0.750—×0.9552.65%

Factors used: league row PIO. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 19.5 → −4.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (4.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.990.

Result: wOBA .348 → .248; ISO .134 → .097; BABIP .302 → .226. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 AGreat Lakes Loons · 77 PAwOBA .315 → .245 (−70)K% 22.1% → 28.9%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA22.08%÷1.039×1.360——28.89%
BB% (unintentional) /PA9.09%÷1.028×0.690—×0.9805.98%
HBP% /PA2.60%—×0.780—×0.9801.99%
Singles /BIP30.00%÷1.028×0.920×0.959×0.98025.24%
Doubles /BIP4.00%÷1.026×0.830×0.959×0.9803.04%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷0.978×0.910×0.959×0.9800.00%
Home runs /BIP2.00%÷0.894×0.800—×0.9801.75%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 79, 1B 106, 2B 105, 3B 96, K 108, BB 106 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.0 → −2.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.959.

Result: wOBA .315 → .245; ISO .075 → .060; BABIP .340 → .282. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).