Mitchell Gunsolus
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 23 | A+/A2 orgs | 435 | .211/.320/.336 | 11 | 5 | 47 | — | .184/.255/.283 |
| 2017 | 24 | ABOS | 431 | .205/.351/.286 | 2 | 9 | 34 | — | .159/.262/.215 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2016 | 23 | A+ | Salem Red Sox | — | 30 | 23 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 43 | 241 | 87 | 328 | 43 | 56 | 17 | 20 | 182 | -37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 23 | A | Greenville Drive | — | 405 | 346 | 77 | 12 | 0 | 11 | 50 | 98 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 223 | 326 | 353 | 678 | 130 | 275 | 24 | 12 | 307 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 24 | A | Greenville Drive | — | 431 | 346 | 71 | 20 | 1 | 2 | 69 | 140 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 205 | 351 | 286 | 638 | 81 | 330 | 32 | 16 | 301 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2016 | 23 | A+ MLE | Salem Red Sox | — | 30 | 26 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 38 | 138 | 77 | 215 | 38 | 45 | 23 | 10 | 113 | -37 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 23 | A MLE | Greenville Drive | — | 405 | 365 | 71 | 11 | 0 | 9 | 31 | 127 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 195 | 263 | 299 | 562 | 104 | 257 | 31 | 8 | 246 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 24 | A MLE | Greenville Drive | — | 431 | 372 | 59 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 43 | 188 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 159 | 262 | 215 | 477 | 56 | 291 | 44 | 10 | 219 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 23 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 435 | 391 | 72 | 12 | 0 | 9 | 34 | 135 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 184 | 255 | 284 | 539 | 100 | 252 | 31 | 8 | 237 | 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 23 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 435 | 369 | 78 | 13 | 0 | 11 | 56 | 103 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 211 | 320 | 336 | 656 | 125 | 260 | 24 | 13 | 298 | 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 24 | A MLE | Greenville Drive | — | 431 | 372 | 59 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 43 | 188 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 159 | 262 | 215 | 477 | 56 | 309 | 44 | 10 | 219 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 24 | A RAW | Greenville Drive | — | 431 | 346 | 71 | 20 | 1 | 2 | 69 | 140 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 205 | 351 | 286 | 638 | 81 | 330 | 32 | 16 | 301 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 23 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 435 | 395 | 72 | 12 | 0 | 9 | 34 | 135 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 182 | 255 | 281 | 536 | 99 | 242 | 31 | 8 | 237 | 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 24 | A MLE | Greenville Drive | — | 431 | 376 | 59 | 16 | 1 | 1 | 43 | 188 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 157 | 262 | 213 | 475 | 56 | 291 | 44 | 10 | 219 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 866 | 763 | 131 | 28 | 1 | 10 | 77 | 323 | 12 | 14 | 7 | 172 | 258 | 250 | 509 | 79 | 276 | 37 | 9 | 228 | 40 | -61 | +0 | +0 | +3 | +19 | -4.0 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 573 | 99 | 21 | 1 | 8 | 58 | 242 | 9 | 11 | 5 | 173 | 260 | 255 | 515 | 82 | 277 | 37 | 9 | 228 | 40 | -46 | +0 | +0 | +2 | +14 | -3.0 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2017 AGreenville Drive · 431 PAwOBA .296 → .219 (−77)K% 32.5% → 43.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 32.48% | ÷0.995 | ×1.340 | — | — | 43.74% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 15.55% | ÷1.020 | ×0.660 | — | ×0.980 | 9.86% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.09% | — | ×0.770 | — | ×0.980 | 1.58% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.30% | ÷0.999 | ×0.920 | ×1.008 | ×0.980 | 21.20% |
| Doubles /BIP | 9.71% | ÷0.972 | ×0.820 | ×1.008 | ×0.980 | 8.09% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.49% | ÷1.092 | ×0.940 | ×1.008 | ×0.980 | 0.41% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.97% | ÷1.534 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.980 | 0.51% |
Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 207, 1B 100, 2B 94, 3B 118, K 99, BB 104 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.0 → −2.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.008.
Result: wOBA .296 → .219; ISO .081 → .058; BABIP .330 → .291. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2016 AGreenville Drive · 405 PAwOBA .300 → .246 (−55)K% 24.2% → 31.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 24.20% | ÷1.034 | ×1.340 | — | — | 31.37% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 12.10% | ÷1.044 | ×0.660 | — | ×0.990 | 7.57% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.74% | — | ×0.770 | — | ×0.990 | 0.56% |
| Singles /BIP | 21.77% | ÷0.978 | ×0.920 | ×1.021 | ×0.990 | 20.71% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.84% | ÷0.908 | ×0.820 | ×1.021 | ×0.990 | 4.42% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.940 | ×1.021 | ×0.990 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 4.44% | ÷1.001 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.990 | 3.60% |
Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 100, 1B 96, 2B 82, 3B 130, K 107, BB 109 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.021.
Result: wOBA .300 → .246; ISO .130 → .108; BABIP .275 → .257. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2016 A+Salem Red Sox · 30 PAwOBA .162 → .113 (−49)K% 16.7% → 24.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 16.67% | ÷0.951 | ×1.420 | — | — | 24.88% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 16.67% | ÷0.989 | ×0.630 | — | ×0.998 | 10.60% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.860 | — | ×0.998 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.940 | — | ×0.998 | 0.00% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.56% | ÷1.030 | ×0.830 | — | ×0.998 | 4.47% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.998 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.787 | ×0.900 | — | ×0.998 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row CAR. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 57, 1B 100, 2B 106, 3B 130, K 90, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .162 → .113; ISO .043 → .038; BABIP .056 → .045. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).