Sean Miller

PosSS

B/TR/R

Born1994-10-10

Age (2027)32

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

A+LAST SEASON 2019

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2017	22	A+/INTL2 orgs	542	.261/.301/.316	2	5	41	—	.220/.247/.265
2018	23	AAA/AA2 orgs	198	.197/.250/.240	1	1	13	—	.177/.214/.220
2019	24	AA/A+2 orgs	415	.245/.277/.297	0	0	19	—	.196/.216/.234

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2015	20	A	Cedar Rapids Kernels	—	107	102	29	4	0	0	4	15	0	1	0	284	311	324	635	39	333	14	4	286	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	20	ROK	Elizabethton Twins	—	47	43	9	0	1	0	2	7	1	0	2	209	261	256	517	47	250	15	4	234	4	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	21	A+	Fort Myers Miracle	—	63	59	11	3	0	0	1	12	1	1	1	186	213	237	450	51	229	19	2	199	9	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	21	A	Cedar Rapids Kernels	—	388	361	95	17	4	4	10	56	5	7	5	263	293	366	658	102	295	14	3	285	50	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	22	A+	Fort Myers Miracle	—	484	451	118	17	2	2	23	81	3	3	7	262	302	322	623	60	312	17	5	279	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	22	INTL	Surprise Saguaros	—	58	55	14	1	0	0	3	10	0	2	1	255	293	273	566	18	311	17	5	261	63	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	23	AAA	Rochester Red Wings	—	34	33	3	0	0	0	1	8	0	0	0	91	118	91	209		120	24	3	100	-57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	23	AA	Chattanooga Lookouts	—	164	150	33	5	0	1	10	36	2	1	0	220	278	273	551	53	283	22	6	252	27	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	24	AA	Bowie Baysox	—	56	54	5	0	0	0	1	20	0	0	0	93	109	93	202		147	36	2	93	-65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	24	A+	Frederick Keys	—	359	333	90	12	4	0	15	68	1	0	1	270	304	330	634	60	335	19	4	279	32	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2015	20	A MLE	Cedar Rapids Kernels	—	107	103	26	3	0	0	3	21	0	1	0	252	274	282	555	29	318	20	3	246	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	20	ROK MLE	Elizabethton Twins	—	47	44	7	0	1	0	1	10	1	0	2	159	196	205	400	45	204	21	2	174	4	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	21	A+ MLE	Fort Myers Miracle	—	63	59	10	3	0	0	1	17	1	1	1	169	197	220	417	51	228	27	2	182	9	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	21	A MLE	Cedar Rapids Kernels	—	388	365	85	13	4	3	6	76	5	7	5	233	255	315	570	82	268	20	2	242	50	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	22	A+ MLE	Fort Myers Miracle	—	484	460	101	13	1	2	14	121	3	3	7	220	247	265	513	46	284	25	3	225	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	23	AAA MLE	Rochester Red Wings	—	34	33	3	0	0	0	1	10	0	0	0	91	118	91	209		114	29	3	84	-57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	23	AA MLE	Chattanooga Lookouts	—	164	154	30	5	0	1	6	46	2	1	0	195	235	247	481	52	261	28	4	208	27	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	24	AA MLE	Bowie Baysox	—	56	54	4	0	0	0	1	26	0	0	0	74	91	74	165		138	46	2	72	-65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	24	A+ MLE	Frederick Keys	—	359	340	73	9	3	0	8	97	1	0	1	215	235	259	494	44	286	27	2	216	32	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	20	A MLE	2 teams	—	154	147	33	3	1	0	4	31	1	1	2	224	250	259	509	34	284	20	3	224	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	20	A RAW	2 teams	—	154	145	38	4	1	0	6	22	1	1	2	262	296	303	600	41	309	14	4	270	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	21	A MLE	2 teams	—	451	424	95	16	4	3	7	94	6	8	6	224	247	302	549	78	275	21	2	234	44	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	21	A RAW	2 teams	—	451	420	106	20	4	4	11	68	6	8	6	252	281	348	629	95	287	15	2	273	44	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	22	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	542	516	112	14	1	2	16	136	3	5	8	217	245	260	505	43	288	25	3	225	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	22	A+ RAW	2 teams	—	542	506	132	18	2	2	26	91	3	5	8	261	301	316	617	55	312	17	5	277	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	23	AA MLE	2 teams	—	198	187	32	5	0	1	7	56	2	1	0	171	209	214	423	43	238	28	4	187	13	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	23	AA RAW	2 teams	—	198	183	36	5	0	1	11	44	2	1	0	197	250	240	490	44	254	22	6	226	13	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	24	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	415	394	77	9	3	0	9	123	1	0	1	195	215	234	449	38	280	30	2	197	19	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	24	A+ RAW	2 teams	—	415	387	95	12	4	0	16	88	1	0	1	245	277	297	574	52	314	21	4	254	19	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	20	A MLE	2 teams	—	154	148	33	3	1	0	4	31	1	1	2	223	250	257	507	34	283	20	3	224	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	21	A MLE	2 teams	—	451	435	95	16	4	3	7	94	6	8	6	218	247	294	541	76	262	21	2	234	44	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	22	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	542	518	112	14	1	2	16	136	3	5	8	216	245	259	504	42	284	25	3	225	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	23	AA MLE	2 teams	—	198	187	32	5	0	1	7	56	2	1	0	171	209	214	423	43	236	28	4	187	13	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	24	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	415	402	77	9	3	0	9	123	1	0	1	192	215	229	444	37	266	30	2	197	19	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	1760	1668	349	47	9	6	43	440	13	15	17	209	235	259	494	50	277	25	2	216	32	-142	-4	+0	+19	+38	-9.0
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	616	128	17	3	2	16	162	5	6	6	208	234	255	489	47	275	25	2	216	32	-52	-1	+0	+7	+14	-3.3

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2019 A+Frederick Keys · 359 PAwOBA .274 → .216 (−59)K% 18.9% → 26.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	18.94%	÷1.001	×1.420	—	—	26.86%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	4.18%	÷1.111	×0.630	—	×0.978	2.32%
HBP% /PA	0.28%	—	×0.860	—	×0.978	0.23%
Singles /BIP	27.92%	÷1.008	×0.940	×0.950	×0.978	24.19%
Doubles /BIP	4.53%	÷0.969	×0.830	×0.950	×0.978	3.61%
Triples /BIP	1.51%	÷0.900	×0.800	×0.950	×0.978	1.25%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.135	×0.900	—	×0.978	0.00%

Factors used: league row CAR. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 127, 1B 102, 2B 94, 3B 80, K 100, BB 122 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 22.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .274 → .216; ISO .060 → .046; BABIP .335 → .286. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2019 AABowie Baysox · 56 PAwOBA .091 → .072 (−19)K% 35.7% → 46.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	35.71%	÷0.940	×1.220	—	—	46.36%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	1.79%	÷1.020	×0.700	—	×0.998	1.22%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.850	—	×0.998	0.00%
Singles /BIP	14.71%	÷1.031	×0.970	—	×0.998	13.80%
Doubles /BIP	0.00%	÷0.987	×0.860	—	×0.998	0.00%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.116	×0.950	—	×0.998	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.987	×0.780	—	×0.998	0.00%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 97, 1B 106, 2B 97, 3B 123, K 88, BB 104 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .091 → .072; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .147 → .138. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 AAChattanooga Lookouts · 164 PAwOBA .246 → .208 (−38)K% 22.0% → 27.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	21.95%	÷0.961	×1.220	—	—	27.88%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.10%	÷1.078	×0.680	—	×1.012	3.89%
HBP% /PA	1.22%	—	×0.840	—	×1.012	1.04%
Singles /BIP	23.68%	÷1.072	×0.920	×1.050	×1.012	21.59%
Doubles /BIP	4.39%	÷0.979	×0.910	×1.050	×1.012	4.33%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.900	×0.880	×1.050	×1.012	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.88%	÷0.975	×0.800	—	×1.012	0.73%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 95, 1B 114, 2B 96, 3B 80, K 92, BB 116 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .246 → .208; ISO .053 → .048; BABIP .283 → .261. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 AAARochester Red Wings · 34 PAwOBA .098 → .084 (−14)K% 23.5% → 28.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	23.53%	÷0.978	×1.200	—	—	28.88%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	2.94%	÷1.008	×0.690	—	×1.048	2.11%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.940	—	×1.048	0.00%
Singles /BIP	12.00%	÷1.023	×0.930	—	×1.048	11.43%
Doubles /BIP	0.00%	÷1.009	×0.830	—	×1.048	0.00%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.970	—	×1.048	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.879	×0.840	—	×1.048	0.00%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 76, 1B 105, 2B 102, 3B 130, K 96, BB 102 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 27.2 → +4.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr younger than average).

Result: wOBA .098 → .084; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .120 → .114. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 A+Fort Myers Miracle · 484 PAwOBA .274 → .225 (−50)K% 16.7% → 25.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	16.74%	÷0.947	×1.420	—	—	25.10%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	4.75%	÷1.209	×0.750	—	×0.998	2.94%
HBP% /PA	0.62%	—	×0.930	—	×0.998	0.58%
Singles /BIP	26.22%	÷0.982	×0.920	×1.000	×0.998	24.51%
Doubles /BIP	4.59%	÷1.178	×0.960	×1.000	×0.998	3.73%
Triples /BIP	0.54%	÷1.150	×0.810	×1.000	×0.998	0.38%
Home runs /BIP	0.54%	÷0.942	×0.880	—	×0.998	0.50%

Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 88, 1B 96, 2B 136, 3B 130, K 89, BB 142 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.000.

Result: wOBA .274 → .225; ISO .060 → .046; BABIP .312 → .284. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 ACedar Rapids Kernels · 388 PAwOBA .281 → .242 (−39)K% 14.4% → 19.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	14.43%	÷0.996	×1.360	—	—	19.71%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	2.32%	÷1.008	×0.690	—	—	1.59%
HBP% /PA	1.29%	—	×0.780	—	—	1.01%
Singles /BIP	22.95%	÷1.002	×0.920	×1.018	—	21.45%
Doubles /BIP	5.57%	÷1.055	×0.830	×1.018	—	4.47%
Triples /BIP	1.31%	÷0.951	×0.910	×1.018	—	1.28%
Home runs /BIP	1.31%	÷1.232	×0.800	—	—	0.85%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 146, 1B 100, 2B 111, 3B 90, K 99, BB 102 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.018.

Result: wOBA .281 → .242; ISO .102 → .080; BABIP .295 → .268. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 A+Fort Myers Miracle · 63 PAwOBA .197 → .182 (−15)K% 19.0% → 27.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	19.05%	÷0.983	×1.420	—	—	27.52%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	1.59%	÷0.974	×0.750	—	×1.012	1.24%
HBP% /PA	1.59%	—	×0.930	—	×1.012	1.49%
Singles /BIP	17.02%	÷0.985	×0.920	×1.050	×1.012	16.89%
Doubles /BIP	6.38%	÷1.012	×0.960	×1.050	×1.012	6.43%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.907	×0.810	×1.050	×1.012	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.881	×0.880	—	×1.012	0.00%

Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 76, 1B 97, 2B 102, 3B 81, K 97, BB 95 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .197 → .182; ISO .051 → .048; BABIP .229 → .228. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 ACedar Rapids Kernels · 107 PAwOBA .278 → .246 (−32)K% 14.0% → 19.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	14.02%	÷0.959	×1.360	—	—	19.89%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	3.74%	÷1.008	×0.690	—	×1.015	2.60%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.780	—	×1.015	0.00%
Singles /BIP	28.74%	÷1.015	×0.920	×1.050	×1.015	27.76%
Doubles /BIP	4.60%	÷1.010	×0.830	×1.050	×1.015	4.03%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.910	×1.050	×1.015	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.134	×0.800	—	×1.015	0.00%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 127, 1B 103, 2B 102, 3B 130, K 92, BB 102 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .278 → .246; ISO .039 → .033; BABIP .333 → .318. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .