Cadyn Grenier

PosSS

B/TR/R

Born1996-10-31

Age (2027)30

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AAALAST SEASON 2022

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2019	22	A+/ABAL	456	.244/.358/.384	8	7	51	—	.184/.265/.294
2021	24	AAA/AA2 orgs	462	.221/.336/.344	9	12	49	—	.183/.268/.264
2022	25	AAABAL	392	.199/.339/.316	5	12	55	—	.185/.285/.280

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2018	21	A	Delmarva Shorebirds	—	183	162	35	12	2	1	17	53	2	3	2	216	298	333	632	117	312	29	9	285	27	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	22	A+	Frederick Keys	—	92	77	16	4	1	1	11	31	4	2	1	208	337	325	662	117	333	34	12	310	31	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	22	A	Delmarva Shorebirds	—	364	308	78	18	3	7	48	107	5	5	1	253	363	399	762	146	360	29	13	343	56	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	24	AAA	Norfolk Tides	—	17	13	1	0	0	0	4	5	0	0	0	77	294	77	371		125	29	24	217	-3	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	24	AA	Bowie Baysox	—	445	376	85	19	1	9	53	135	10	12	5	226	337	354	691	128	325	30	12	314	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	25	AAA	Norfolk Tides	—	392	316	63	18	2	5	62	99	5	12	4	199	339	316	656	117	270	25	16	301	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2018	21	A MLE	Delmarva Shorebirds	—	183	168	28	9	2	1	11	73	2	3	2	167	227	262	488	95	270	40	6	208	27	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	22	A+ MLE	Frederick Keys	—	92	82	13	3	1	1	6	44	4	2	1	159	250	256	506	98	301	48	7	214	31	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	22	A MLE	Delmarva Shorebirds	—	364	326	62	13	3	6	30	142	5	5	1	190	269	304	572	113	299	39	8	251	56	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	24	AAA MLE	Norfolk Tides	—	17	14	1	0	0	0	3	6	0	0	0	71	235	71	307		122	35	18	164	-3	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	24	AA MLE	Bowie Baysox	—	445	395	74	16	1	5	34	167	10	12	5	187	269	271	540	84	297	38	8	243	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	25	AAA MLE	Norfolk Tides	—	392	336	62	16	2	4	42	117	5	12	4	185	285	280	564	95	251	30	11	250	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	21	A MLE	Delmarva Shorebirds	—	183	168	28	9	2	1	11	73	2	3	2	167	227	262	488	95	284	40	6	208	27	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	21	A RAW	Delmarva Shorebirds	—	183	162	35	12	2	1	17	53	2	3	2	216	298	333	632	117	312	29	9	285	27	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	22	A MLE	2 teams	—	456	408	73	16	3	6	36	186	9	7	2	179	260	277	537	98	306	41	8	244	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	22	A RAW	2 teams	—	456	385	94	22	4	8	59	138	9	7	2	244	358	384	742	140	355	30	13	336	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	24	AA MLE	2 teams	—	462	409	75	16	1	5	37	173	10	12	5	183	268	264	532	81	300	37	8	240	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	24	AA RAW	2 teams	—	462	389	86	19	1	9	57	140	10	12	5	221	336	344	680	123	318	30	12	310	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	25	AAA MLE	Norfolk Tides	—	392	336	62	16	2	4	42	117	5	12	4	185	285	280	564	95	266	30	11	250	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	25	AAA RAW	Norfolk Tides	—	392	316	63	18	2	5	62	99	5	12	4	199	339	316	656	117	270	25	16	301	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	21	A MLE	Delmarva Shorebirds	—	183	168	28	9	2	1	11	73	2	3	2	167	227	262	488	95	270	40	6	208	27	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	22	A MLE	2 teams	—	456	408	73	16	3	6	36	186	9	7	2	179	260	277	537	98	299	41	8	244	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	24	AA MLE	2 teams	—	462	412	75	16	1	5	37	173	10	12	5	182	268	262	530	80	291	37	8	240	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	25	AAA MLE	Norfolk Tides	—	392	342	62	16	2	4	42	117	5	12	4	181	285	275	559	94	251	30	11	250	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	1493	1321	238	57	8	16	126	549	26	34	13	180	265	272	537	92	290	37	8	240	48	-92	+2	+0	+16	+32	-4.2
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	575	103	25	3	7	55	239	11	15	6	179	264	270	533	90	288	37	8	240	48	-40	+1	+0	+7	+14	-1.9

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2022 AAANorfolk Tides · 392 PAwOBA .297 → .250 (−46)K% 25.3% → 29.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	25.26%	÷1.017	×1.200	—	—	29.81%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	15.82%	÷1.048	×0.690	—	×1.018	10.60%
HBP% /PA	1.28%	—	×0.940	—	×1.018	1.22%
Singles /BIP	17.51%	÷0.952	×0.930	×0.992	×1.018	17.28%
Doubles /BIP	8.29%	÷1.000	×0.830	×0.992	×1.018	6.96%
Triples /BIP	0.92%	÷1.130	×0.970	×0.992	×1.018	0.80%
Home runs /BIP	2.30%	÷0.970	×0.700	—	×1.018	1.69%

Factors used: league row International League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 94, 1B 90, 2B 100, 3B 126, K 103, BB 110 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 27.2 → +1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.992.

Result: wOBA .297 → .250; ISO .117 → .099; BABIP .270 → .251. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2021 AABowie Baysox · 445 PAwOBA .308 → .243 (−65)K% 30.3% → 37.6%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	30.34%	÷0.983	×1.220	—	—	37.65%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.91%	÷1.065	×0.690	—	×0.998	7.70%
HBP% /PA	2.25%	—	×0.850	—	×0.998	1.91%
Singles /BIP	23.24%	÷0.978	×0.940	×0.988	×0.998	22.04%
Doubles /BIP	7.88%	÷0.995	×0.870	×0.988	×0.998	6.80%
Triples /BIP	0.41%	÷0.900	×0.920	×0.988	×0.998	0.42%
Home runs /BIP	3.73%	÷1.258	×0.780	—	×0.998	2.31%

Factors used: level-wide AA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 152, 1B 96, 2B 99, 3B 80, K 97, BB 113 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.988.

Result: wOBA .308 → .243; ISO .128 → .091; BABIP .325 → .297. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2021 AAANorfolk Tides · 17 PAwOBA .214 → .164 (−50)K% 29.4% → 35.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	29.41%	÷0.982	×1.200	—	—	35.95%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	23.53%	÷1.030	×0.690	—	×1.033	16.27%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.940	—	×1.033	0.00%
Singles /BIP	12.50%	÷0.981	×0.930	—	×1.033	12.25%
Doubles /BIP	0.00%	÷0.977	×0.830	—	×1.033	0.00%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.920	—	×1.033	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.009	×0.700	—	×1.033	0.00%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 102, 1B 96, 2B 95, 3B 130, K 96, BB 106 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 27.2 → +3.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr younger than average).

Result: wOBA .214 → .164; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .125 → .122. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2019 ADelmarva Shorebirds · 364 PAwOBA .338 → .251 (−87)K% 29.4% → 38.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	29.40%	÷1.013	×1.340	—	—	38.89%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	13.19%	÷1.033	×0.660	—	×0.990	8.34%
HBP% /PA	1.37%	—	×0.770	—	×0.990	1.05%
Singles /BIP	24.88%	÷1.009	×0.920	×0.950	×0.990	21.33%
Doubles /BIP	8.96%	÷1.013	×0.820	×0.950	×0.990	6.82%
Triples /BIP	1.49%	÷0.973	×0.940	×0.950	×0.990	1.36%
Home runs /BIP	3.48%	÷0.931	×0.820	—	×0.990	3.04%

Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 86, 1B 102, 2B 103, 3B 95, K 103, BB 107 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .338 → .251; ISO .146 → .114; BABIP .360 → .299. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2019 A+Frederick Keys · 92 PAwOBA .303 → .214 (−89)K% 33.7% → 47.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	33.70%	÷1.001	×1.420	—	—	47.78%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.96%	÷1.111	×0.630	—	×0.998	6.77%
HBP% /PA	4.35%	—	×0.860	—	×0.998	3.73%
Singles /BIP	21.74%	÷1.008	×0.940	—	×0.998	20.23%
Doubles /BIP	8.70%	÷0.969	×0.830	—	×0.998	7.44%
Triples /BIP	2.17%	÷0.900	×0.800	—	×0.998	1.93%
Home runs /BIP	2.17%	÷1.135	×0.900	—	×0.998	1.72%

Factors used: league row CAR. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 127, 1B 102, 2B 94, 3B 80, K 100, BB 122 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .303 → .214; ISO .117 → .082; BABIP .333 → .301. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 ADelmarva Shorebirds · 183 PAwOBA .279 → .208 (−71)K% 29.0% → 39.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	28.96%	÷0.977	×1.340	—	—	39.72%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.29%	÷1.036	×0.660	—	—	5.92%
HBP% /PA	1.09%	—	×0.770	—	—	0.84%
Singles /BIP	18.35%	÷0.974	×0.920	×0.952	—	16.50%
Doubles /BIP	11.01%	÷0.953	×0.820	×0.952	—	9.01%
Triples /BIP	1.83%	÷1.054	×0.940	×0.952	—	1.56%
Home runs /BIP	0.92%	÷0.872	×0.820	—	—	0.86%

Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 74, 1B 95, 2B 91, 3B 111, K 95, BB 107 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.952.

Result: wOBA .279 → .208; ISO .117 → .089; BABIP .312 → .270. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).