Mike Salvatore

PosSS
B/TR/R
Born1996-12-27
Age (2027)30
No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.
Overview
A+LAST SEASON 2023
YearAgeLvl / TeamPAAVG/OBP/SLGHRSBwRC+WARMLE AVG/OBP/SLG
201922AWest Virginia…166.174/.241/.22811-1—.144/.191/.190
202225A+/ROKSEA229.171/.270/.307718—.120/.190/.202
202326AAA/A+SEA227.235/.339/.3423445—.181/.260/.254
Contract
No contract data on file.
Skills · percentileMiLB Statcast 2023 A+
Whiff%78
K%76
BB%76
Speed69
Z-Con%68
wOBA58

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

YearAge LvlTeam MLB% PAAB H2B3BHR BBSOHBP SBCS AVGOBPSLGOPS ISOBABIP K%BB% wOBAwRC+ BATRUNFLDPOSREP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
201922 AWest Virginia Power — 166149 26501 12291 10 174241228469 54203 177 215 -1 — — — — — —
202225 A+Everett AquaSox — 211184 31417 24521 10 168268315583 147189 2511 265 9 — — — — — —
202225 ROKACL Mariners — 1815 3000 240 00 200294200494 250 2211 228 -3 — — — — — —
202326 AAATacoma Rainiers — 2623 3100 340 00 130231174405 43158 1512 200 -4 — — — — — —
202326 A+Everett AquaSox — 201173 43533 26402 41 249353364717 116308 2013 329 51 — — — — — —
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
201922 A MLEWest Virginia Power — 166153 22401 8381 10 144191190381 46168 235 167 -1 — — — — — —
202225 A+ MLEEverett AquaSox — 211192 23314 16701 10 120191208400 89151 338 182 9 — — — — — —
202225 ROK MLEACL Mariners — 1816 2000 160 00 125176125301 190 336 164 -3 — — — — — —
202326 AAA MLETacoma Rainiers — 2624 3100 250 00 125192167359 42146 198 162 -4 — — — — — —
202326 A+ MLEEverett AquaSox — 201181 34422 18522 41 188269265534 77246 269 243 51 — — — — — —
201922 A MLEWest Virginia Power — 166153 22401 8381 10 144191190381 46178 235 167 -1 — — — — — —
201922 A RAWWest Virginia Power — 166149 26501 12291 10 174241228469 54203 177 215 -1 — — — — — —
202225 A+ MLE2 teams — 229208 25314 17751 10 120190202392 82159 337 181 8 — — — — — —
202225 A+ RAW2 teams — 229199 34417 26561 10 171270307576 136194 2411 262 8 — — — — — —
202326 A+ MLE2 teams — 227204 35422 21562 41 172256240496 69226 259 234 44 — — — — — —
202326 A+ RAW2 teams — 227196 46633 29442 41 235339342681 107289 1913 314 44 — — — — — —
201922 A MLEWest Virginia Power — 166156 22401 8381 10 141191186377 45168 235 167 -1 — — — — — —
202225 A+ MLE2 teams — 229209 25314 17751 10 120190201391 81154 337 181 8 — — — — — —
202326 A+ MLE2 teams — 227202 35422 21562 41 173256243498 69235 259 234 44 — — — — — —
▸ Career Totals
Career— MLE — 622565 821137 461694 61 145215212427 67189 277 196 19 -60 +1 +0 +7 +13 -4.0
/ 162G— MLE — 650590 851137 481774 61 144213208422 64189 277 196 19 -63 +1 +0 +7 +14 -4.2

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2023 A+Everett AquaSox · 201 PAwOBA .321 → .243 (−78)K% 19.9% → 25.7%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA19.90%÷1.046×1.350——25.69%
BB% (unintentional) /PA12.94%÷0.953×0.710—×0.9589.23%
HBP% /PA1.00%—×0.810—×0.9580.77%
Singles /BIP24.06%÷1.018×0.910×0.960×0.95819.77%
Doubles /BIP3.76%÷1.040×0.830×0.960×0.9582.76%
Triples /BIP2.26%÷1.023×0.820×0.960×0.9581.66%
Home runs /BIP2.26%÷1.012×0.830—×0.9581.77%

Factors used: level-wide A+ factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 102, 1B 104, 2B 108, 3B 105, K 109, BB 91 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 22.8 → −4.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (4.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.960.

Result: wOBA .321 → .243; ISO .116 → .085; BABIP .308 → .246. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2023 AAATacoma Rainiers · 26 PAwOBA .195 → .162 (−33)K% 15.4% → 18.0%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA15.38%÷1.024×1.200——18.03%
BB% (unintentional) /PA11.54%÷1.013×0.690—×1.0037.89%
HBP% /PA0.00%—×0.940—×1.0030.00%
Singles /BIP10.53%÷0.989×0.930—×1.0039.93%
Doubles /BIP5.26%÷0.940×0.830—×1.0034.66%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷0.900×0.970—×1.0030.00%
Home runs /BIP0.00%÷1.157×0.700—×1.0030.00%

Factors used: league row International League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 131, 1B 98, 2B 88, 3B 80, K 105, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 27.2 → +0.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr younger than average).

Result: wOBA .195 → .162; ISO .043 → .039; BABIP .158 → .146. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2022 A+Everett AquaSox · 211 PAwOBA .261 → .182 (−79)K% 24.6% → 33.0%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA24.64%÷1.007×1.350——33.03%
BB% (unintentional) /PA11.37%÷1.039×0.710—×0.9687.53%
HBP% /PA0.47%—×0.810—×0.9680.37%
Singles /BIP14.39%÷1.021×0.910×0.962×0.96811.95%
Doubles /BIP3.03%÷1.048×0.830×0.962×0.9682.24%
Triples /BIP0.76%÷0.900×0.820×0.962×0.9680.64%
Home runs /BIP5.30%÷1.237×0.830—×0.9683.44%

Factors used: level-wide A+ factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 147, 1B 104, 2B 110, 3B 80, K 101, BB 108 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 22.8 → −3.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.962.

Result: wOBA .261 → .182; ISO .147 → .094; BABIP .189 → .151. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2022 ROKACL Mariners · 18 PAwOBA .236 → .164 (−72)K% 22.2% → 32.5%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA22.22%÷0.984×1.440——32.53%
BB% (unintentional) /PA11.11%÷1.023×0.620—×0.9406.33%
HBP% /PA0.00%—×0.720—×0.9400.00%
Singles /BIP27.27%÷1.014×0.820—×0.94020.74%
Doubles /BIP0.00%÷1.132×0.720—×0.9400.00%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷0.900×0.720—×0.9400.00%
Home runs /BIP0.00%÷1.033×0.780—×0.9400.00%

Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 107, 1B 103, 2B 126, 3B 80, K 97, BB 105 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 19.5 → −6.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (6.5 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .236 → .164; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .250 → .190. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2019 AWest Virginia Power · 166 PAwOBA .215 → .167 (−48)K% 17.5% → 22.8%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA17.47%÷1.026×1.340——22.82%
BB% (unintentional) /PA7.23%÷1.013×0.660—×0.9904.66%
HBP% /PA0.60%—×0.770—×0.9900.46%
Singles /BIP16.67%÷1.030×0.920×0.950×0.99014.01%
Doubles /BIP4.17%÷0.977×0.820×0.950×0.9903.29%
Triples /BIP0.00%÷1.150×0.940×0.950×0.9900.00%
Home runs /BIP0.83%÷1.016×0.820—×0.9900.67%

Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 103, 1B 106, 2B 95, 3B 130, K 105, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .215 → .167; ISO .054 → .042; BABIP .203 → .168. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).