Eric Cole
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 21 | ROKBurlington Ro… | 187 | .281/.355/.389 | 1 | 6 | 52 | — | .214/.269/.289 |
| 2019 | 22 | ALexington Leg… | 543 | .240/.329/.382 | 11 | 7 | 53 | — | .196/.258/.304 |
| 2021 | 24 | A+KC | 437 | .240/.339/.393 | 12 | 9 | 58 | — | .187/.264/.304 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2018 | 21 | ROK | Burlington Royals | — | 187 | 167 | 47 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 17 | 27 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 281 | 355 | 389 | 744 | 108 | 329 | 14 | 9 | 335 | 52 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 22 | A | Lexington Legends | — | 543 | 466 | 112 | 21 | 6 | 11 | 62 | 90 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 240 | 329 | 382 | 711 | 142 | 273 | 17 | 11 | 317 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 24 | A+ | Quad Cities River Bandits | — | 437 | 366 | 88 | 14 | 3 | 12 | 53 | 72 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 240 | 339 | 393 | 732 | 153 | 260 | 16 | 12 | 321 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2018 | 21 | ROK MLE | Burlington Royals | — | 187 | 173 | 37 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 38 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 214 | 269 | 289 | 558 | 75 | 263 | 20 | 6 | 245 | 52 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 22 | A MLE | Lexington Legends | — | 543 | 496 | 97 | 17 | 5 | 9 | 39 | 113 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 196 | 258 | 304 | 563 | 109 | 228 | 21 | 7 | 247 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 24 | A+ MLE | Quad Cities River Bandits | — | 437 | 385 | 72 | 11 | 2 | 10 | 37 | 96 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 187 | 264 | 304 | 567 | 117 | 207 | 22 | 8 | 254 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 21 | ROK MLE | Burlington Royals | — | 187 | 173 | 37 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 38 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 214 | 269 | 289 | 558 | 75 | 267 | 20 | 6 | 245 | 52 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 21 | ROK RAW | Burlington Royals | — | 187 | 167 | 47 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 17 | 27 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 281 | 355 | 389 | 744 | 108 | 329 | 14 | 9 | 335 | 52 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 22 | A MLE | Lexington Legends | — | 543 | 496 | 97 | 17 | 5 | 9 | 39 | 113 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 196 | 258 | 304 | 563 | 109 | 232 | 21 | 7 | 247 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 22 | A RAW | Lexington Legends | — | 543 | 466 | 112 | 21 | 6 | 11 | 62 | 90 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 240 | 329 | 382 | 711 | 142 | 273 | 17 | 11 | 317 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 24 | A+ MLE | Quad Cities River Bandits | — | 437 | 385 | 72 | 11 | 2 | 10 | 37 | 96 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 187 | 264 | 304 | 567 | 117 | 215 | 22 | 8 | 254 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 24 | A+ RAW | Quad Cities River Bandits | — | 437 | 366 | 88 | 14 | 3 | 12 | 53 | 72 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 240 | 339 | 393 | 732 | 153 | 260 | 16 | 12 | 321 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 21 | ROK MLE | Burlington Royals | — | 187 | 172 | 37 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 38 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 215 | 269 | 291 | 560 | 76 | 263 | 20 | 6 | 245 | 52 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 22 | A MLE | Lexington Legends | — | 543 | 496 | 97 | 17 | 5 | 9 | 39 | 113 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 196 | 258 | 304 | 563 | 109 | 228 | 21 | 7 | 247 | 53 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 24 | A+ MLE | Quad Cities River Bandits | — | 437 | 394 | 72 | 11 | 2 | 10 | 37 | 96 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 183 | 264 | 297 | 560 | 114 | 207 | 22 | 8 | 254 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 1167 | 1054 | 206 | 36 | 8 | 20 | 87 | 247 | 8 | 22 | 5 | 195 | 262 | 302 | 564 | 106 | 232 | 21 | 7 | 249 | 55 | -63 | +2 | +0 | -7 | +25 | -4.3 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 587 | 114 | 20 | 4 | 11 | 48 | 138 | 4 | 12 | 3 | 194 | 259 | 298 | 558 | 104 | 230 | 21 | 7 | 249 | 55 | -35 | +1 | +0 | -4 | +14 | -2.4 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2021 A+Quad Cities River Bandits · 437 PAwOBA .320 → .254 (−66)K% 16.5% → 22.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 16.48% | ÷1.013 | ×1.350 | — | — | 21.95% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.90% | ÷0.988 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.988 | 8.44% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.69% | — | ×0.810 | — | ×0.988 | 0.55% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.07% | ÷1.059 | ×0.910 | ×0.950 | ×0.988 | 16.19% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.76% | ÷0.991 | ×0.830 | ×0.950 | ×0.988 | 3.74% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.02% | ÷0.988 | ×0.820 | ×0.950 | ×0.988 | 0.79% |
| Home runs /BIP | 4.08% | ÷1.013 | ×0.830 | — | ×0.988 | 3.31% |
Factors used: level-wide A+ factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 103, 1B 112, 2B 98, 3B 98, K 103, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .320 → .254; ISO .153 → .126; BABIP .260 → .207. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 ALexington Legends · 543 PAwOBA .312 → .247 (−65)K% 16.6% → 20.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 16.57% | ÷1.066 | ×1.340 | — | — | 20.83% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.42% | ÷1.047 | ×0.660 | — | — | 7.20% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.55% | — | ×0.770 | — | — | 0.43% |
| Singles /BIP | 19.68% | ÷1.015 | ×0.920 | ×0.950 | — | 16.94% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.59% | ÷1.020 | ×0.820 | ×0.950 | — | 4.26% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.60% | ÷1.013 | ×0.940 | ×0.950 | — | 1.41% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.93% | ÷1.095 | ×0.820 | — | — | 2.19% |
Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 119, 1B 103, 2B 104, 3B 103, K 113, BB 109 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .312 → .247; ISO .142 → .114; BABIP .273 → .228. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 ROKBurlington Royals · 187 PAwOBA .328 → .245 (−83)K% 14.4% → 20.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 14.44% | ÷1.000 | ×1.420 | — | — | 20.50% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.09% | ÷1.000 | ×0.640 | — | ×0.985 | 5.73% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.07% | — | ×0.740 | — | ×0.985 | 0.78% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.57% | ÷1.000 | ×0.840 | ×1.004 | ×0.985 | 19.59% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.86% | ÷1.000 | ×0.740 | ×1.004 | ×0.985 | 5.75% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.43% | ÷1.000 | ×0.740 | ×1.004 | ×0.985 | 1.05% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.71% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.985 | 0.56% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 19.5 → −1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.004.
Result: wOBA .328 → .245; ISO .108 → .078; BABIP .329 → .263. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).