Reynaldo Rivera
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 21 | ADET | 454 | .237/.300/.390 | 9 | 3 | 40 | — | .178/.226/.290 |
| 2019 | 22 | A+/ADET | 320 | .213/.289/.345 | 7 | 3 | 30 | — | .163/.223/.264 |
| 2021 | 24 | A+DET | 369 | .207/.295/.449 | 21 | 0 | 44 | — | .144/.215/.318 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2018 | 21 | A | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 454 | 410 | 97 | 28 | 4 | 9 | 36 | 119 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 237 | 300 | 390 | 690 | 154 | 304 | 26 | 8 | 303 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 22 | A+ | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 99 | 90 | 16 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 8 | 34 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 178 | 253 | 344 | 597 | 167 | 245 | 34 | 8 | 268 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 22 | A | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 221 | 197 | 45 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 20 | 72 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 228 | 306 | 345 | 651 | 117 | 336 | 33 | 9 | 294 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 24 | A+ | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 369 | 323 | 67 | 15 | 0 | 21 | 33 | 135 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 207 | 295 | 449 | 744 | 241 | 266 | 37 | 9 | 323 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2018 | 21 | A MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 454 | 421 | 75 | 20 | 3 | 7 | 25 | 167 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 178 | 226 | 290 | 516 | 112 | 262 | 37 | 6 | 228 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 22 | A+ MLE | Lakeland Flying Tigers | — | 99 | 92 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 48 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 130 | 192 | 250 | 442 | 120 | 222 | 48 | 6 | 192 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 22 | A MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 221 | 203 | 36 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 14 | 92 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 177 | 237 | 271 | 508 | 94 | 289 | 42 | 6 | 222 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 24 | A+ MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 369 | 333 | 48 | 10 | 0 | 16 | 23 | 190 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 144 | 215 | 318 | 533 | 174 | 229 | 51 | 6 | 233 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 21 | A MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 454 | 421 | 75 | 20 | 3 | 7 | 25 | 167 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 178 | 226 | 290 | 516 | 112 | 268 | 37 | 6 | 228 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 21 | A RAW | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 454 | 410 | 97 | 28 | 4 | 9 | 36 | 119 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 237 | 300 | 390 | 690 | 154 | 304 | 26 | 8 | 303 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 22 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 320 | 295 | 46 | 9 | 2 | 5 | 20 | 140 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 156 | 217 | 251 | 468 | 95 | 272 | 44 | 6 | 213 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 22 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 320 | 287 | 61 | 11 | 3 | 7 | 28 | 106 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 213 | 289 | 345 | 634 | 132 | 309 | 33 | 9 | 286 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 24 | A+ MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 369 | 333 | 48 | 10 | 0 | 16 | 23 | 190 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 144 | 215 | 318 | 533 | 174 | 241 | 51 | 6 | 233 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 24 | A+ RAW | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 369 | 323 | 67 | 15 | 0 | 21 | 33 | 135 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 207 | 295 | 449 | 744 | 241 | 266 | 37 | 9 | 323 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 21 | A MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 454 | 425 | 75 | 20 | 3 | 7 | 25 | 167 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 176 | 226 | 287 | 513 | 111 | 262 | 37 | 6 | 228 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 22 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 320 | 294 | 46 | 9 | 2 | 5 | 20 | 140 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 156 | 217 | 252 | 469 | 95 | 268 | 44 | 6 | 213 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 24 | A+ MLE | West Michigan Whitecaps | — | 369 | 336 | 48 | 10 | 0 | 16 | 23 | 190 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 143 | 215 | 315 | 530 | 173 | 229 | 51 | 6 | 233 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 1143 | 1049 | 169 | 39 | 5 | 28 | 68 | 497 | 11 | 6 | 3 | 161 | 220 | 288 | 508 | 127 | 262 | 43 | 6 | 225 | 39 | -83 | +0 | +0 | -12 | +25 | -7.2 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 597 | 96 | 22 | 3 | 16 | 39 | 283 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 161 | 220 | 288 | 508 | 127 | 261 | 44 | 6 | 225 | 39 | -47 | -0 | +0 | -7 | +14 | -4.1 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2021 A+West Michigan Whitecaps · 369 PAwOBA .318 → .233 (−85)K% 36.6% → 51.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 36.59% | ÷0.959 | ×1.350 | — | — | 51.49% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.67% | ÷1.000 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.988 | 6.08% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.90% | — | ×0.810 | — | ×0.988 | 1.52% |
| Singles /BIP | 16.49% | ÷1.001 | ×0.910 | ×0.976 | ×0.988 | 14.46% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.98% | ÷0.935 | ×0.830 | ×0.976 | ×0.988 | 6.83% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.009 | ×0.820 | ×0.976 | ×0.988 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 11.17% | ÷0.841 | ×0.830 | — | ×0.988 | 10.89% |
Factors used: level-wide A+ factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 68, 1B 100, 2B 87, 3B 102, K 92, BB 100 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.976.
Result: wOBA .318 → .233; ISO .241 → .185; BABIP .266 → .229. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 AWest Michigan Whitecaps · 221 PAwOBA .288 → .222 (−66)K% 32.6% → 41.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 32.58% | ÷1.063 | ×1.360 | — | — | 41.69% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.05% | ÷0.974 | ×0.690 | — | — | 6.41% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.90% | — | ×0.780 | — | — | 0.71% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.60% | ÷1.025 | ×0.920 | ×0.950 | — | 21.83% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.60% | ÷0.885 | ×0.830 | ×0.950 | — | 4.99% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.60% | ÷0.904 | ×0.910 | ×0.950 | — | 1.53% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.20% | ÷0.895 | ×0.800 | — | — | 2.86% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 79, 1B 105, 2B 77, 3B 81, K 113, BB 95 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .288 → .222; ISO .117 → .095; BABIP .336 → .289. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 A+Lakeland Flying Tigers · 99 PAwOBA .261 → .192 (−69)K% 34.3% → 48.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 34.34% | ÷1.005 | ×1.420 | — | — | 48.53% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.08% | ÷0.958 | ×0.750 | — | ×1.012 | 6.40% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.01% | — | ×0.930 | — | ×1.012 | 0.95% |
| Singles /BIP | 14.29% | ÷1.026 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.012 | 12.97% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.14% | ÷1.037 | ×0.960 | — | ×1.012 | 6.69% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.79% | ÷1.004 | ×0.810 | — | ×1.012 | 1.46% |
| Home runs /BIP | 5.36% | ÷0.963 | ×0.880 | — | ×1.012 | 4.95% |
Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 93, 1B 105, 2B 107, 3B 101, K 101, BB 92 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .261 → .192; ISO .167 → .119; BABIP .245 → .222. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 AWest Michigan Whitecaps · 454 PAwOBA .300 → .228 (−72)K% 26.2% → 36.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 26.21% | ÷0.971 | ×1.360 | — | — | 36.71% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.93% | ÷0.988 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.015 | 5.62% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.22% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.015 | 0.17% |
| Singles /BIP | 19.24% | ÷1.017 | ×0.920 | ×0.976 | ×1.015 | 17.24% |
| Doubles /BIP | 9.62% | ÷1.024 | ×0.830 | ×0.976 | ×1.015 | 7.73% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.37% | ÷1.045 | ×0.910 | ×0.976 | ×1.015 | 1.19% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.09% | ÷0.942 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.015 | 2.67% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 88, 1B 103, 2B 105, 3B 109, K 94, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.976.
Result: wOBA .300 → .228; ISO .154 → .115; BABIP .304 → .262. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).