Hunter Parsons

P Binghamton Rumble Ponies

Age 30 RHP 6'2" / 215 lbs AA

Overview

AAPROSPECT

MLB%2%

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	G	GS	IP	ERA	FIP	K%	BB%	WAR	MLE rates
2023	26	MIX2 levels	37	0	56	4.82	4.17	26.8%	10.2%	—	K 22.5% · BB 10.0% · FIP 4.84
2024	27	MIX2 levels	10	1	12	8.25	6.18	32.8%	20.7%	—	K 32.8% · BB 20.7% · FIP 5.79
2025	28	AANYM	22	0	29	4.91	5.42	31.5%	15.0%	—	K 25.5% · BB 16.5% · FIP 6.70
2027PROJ	30	MLBNYM	16	0	17	4.90	4.90	24.5%	13.4%	-0.1
2028PROJ31% MLB	31	MLBNYM	6	0	6	4.96	5.04	24.0%	13.3%	-0.0

Next 2 projected WAR -0.1Projected rows: MLB playing time only, park and league context applied.

Contract

No contract data on file.

CompsJim Miller (age 30) · Joe Nelson (age 31) · Wirfin Obispo (age 30)

2027 FULL-SEASON PROJECTIONrates below = full-season projection

showingPROJ

wRC+ AGAINSTvL 126118vR 110

ERA4.90

FIP4.90

K%24.5%

BB%13.4%

K-BB%11.2%

Proj IP17

Value2027 · WAR

Runs saved vs league avg · 17 IP

Grades · Contract

Scouting Grades

K†6060

Contract

No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed

Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to industry-standard fWAR.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	G	GS	IP	BF	K	BB	HR	GS%	IP/G	K%	BB%	K-BB%	HR%	ERA	FIP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments)
▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year)
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far)
2021	24	MIX MLE	2 levels	28	1	49	213	66	26	5	4%	1.8	21.4%	15.3%	6.1%	3.9%	4.01	5.38	—
2021	24	MIX RAW	2 levels	28	1	49	213	66	26	5	4%	1.8	31.0%	12.2%	18.8%	2.3%	4.01	3.32	—
2022	25	MIX MLE	2 levels	36	1	59	253	67	30	6	3%	1.6	21.1%	13.1%	7.9%	3.2%	4.14	4.73	—
2022	25	MIX RAW	2 levels	36	1	59	253	67	30	6	3%	1.6	26.5%	11.9%	14.6%	2.4%	4.14	3.68	—
2023	26	MIX MLE	2 levels	37	0	56	246	66	25	9	0%	1.5	22.5%	10.0%	12.5%	4.3%	4.82	4.84	—
2023	26	MIX RAW	2 levels	37	0	56	246	66	25	9	0%	1.5	26.8%	10.2%	16.7%	3.7%	4.82	4.17	—
2024	27	MIX MLE	2 levels	10	1	12	58	19	12	3	10%	1.2	32.8%	20.7%	12.1%	5.2%	8.25	5.79	—
2024	27	MIX MLE	2 levels	10	1	12	58	19	12	3	10%	1.2	32.8%	20.7%	12.1%	5.2%	8.25	5.79	—
2024	27	MIX RAW	2 levels	10	1	12	58	19	12	3	10%	1.2	32.8%	20.7%	12.1%	5.2%	8.25	6.18	—
2025	28	AA MLE	Binghamton Rumble Ponies	22	0	29	127	40	19	7	0%	1.3	25.5%	16.5%	9.1%	6.7%	4.91	6.70	—
2025	28	AA MLE	Binghamton Rumble Ponies	22	0	29	127	40	19	7	0%	1.3	25.5%	16.5%	9.1%	6.7%	4.91	6.70	—
2025	28	AA RAW	Binghamton Rumble Ponies	22	0	29	127	40	19	7	0%	1.3	31.5%	15.0%	16.5%	5.5%	4.91	5.42	—
▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded)
2027	30	MLB	NYM	16	0	17	72	18	10	2	0%	1.1	24.5%	13.4%	11.2%	3.3%	4.90	4.90	-0.1
▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%)
2028	31	MLB MLE	NYM	19	0	20	84	20	11	3	0%	1.1	24.0%	13.3%	10.7%	3.5%	4.96	5.04	-0.1
2028	31	MLB CTX	NYM	6	0	6	25	6	3	1	0%	1.0	24.0%	13.3%	10.7%	3.5%	4.96	5.04	-0.0
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	RAW		6	0	6	26	6	4	1	0%	1.0	24.0%	13.3%	10.7%	3.5%	4.96	4.66	-0.0
/ 200 IP	—	RAW		190	0	200	844	192	128	32	0%	1.1	24.0%	13.3%	10.7%	3.5%	4.96	4.66	-0.3
Career	—	MLE		133	3	205	897	206	123	39	2%	1.5	22.9%	13.7%	9.2%	4.3%	4.65	5.26	-0.1
/ 200 IP	—	MLE		130	3	200	874	200	120	38	2%	1.5	22.9%	13.7%	9.2%	4.3%	4.65	5.26	-1.1

Career Path Comps

What happened to similar pitchers from this age · Y-axis: ERA+ (100 = league avg, 150 = elite, 80 = below) · Bands: P10–P90 outer, P25–P75 inner · Gold: OGILVIE projection

			Profile at Match Age					Next 3 Yrs				Career
Comp	Age	Role	FIP	K%	BB%	HR/BF	BABIP	FIP	K%	K-BB%	IP	ΔFIP	Low FIP	IP	Match
Hunter Parsons (OGILVIE)	—	—	4.90	24.5%	13.4%	3.3%	—	5.04	24.0%	10.7%	20	+0.14	—	—	—
Jim Miller R 2012 · 4.56 FIP	30	SU	4.56	20.9%	11.8%	3.1%	.243	3.95	18.8%	14.7%	74	-0.61	3.95	140	84
Joe Nelson R 2006 · 3.91 FIP	31	SU	3.91	22.8%	10.4%	2.6%	.258	4.05	23.4%	12.8%	94	+0.14	3.08	139	83
Wirfin Obispo R 2015 · 4.80 FIP	30	SU	4.80	18.6%	12.2%	3.1%	.292	1.31	28.6%	24.5%	126	-3.49	1.30	218	81
Dustin Molleken R 2015 · 3.74 FIP	30	SU	3.74	20.4%	11.7%	1.6%	.287	3.90	20.6%	8.4%	77	+0.16	3.38	129	79
Erik Davis R 2017 · 4.25 FIP	30	SU	4.25	22.2%	11.1%	3.0%	.349	3.52	17.4%	8.5%	65	-0.73	3.05	227	77
Hirokazu Sawamura R 2021 · 4.48 FIP	33	SU	4.48	26.2%	11.2%	4.0%	.263	4.02	18.1%	6.8%	51	-0.46	4.02	104	75
Neil Wagner R 2013 · 4.02 FIP	29	SU	4.02	20.5%	7.5%	3.1%	.306	4.05	19.8%	7.5%	43	+0.03	3.11	135	75
Cody Hall R 2018 · 3.92 FIP	30	SU	3.92	25.9%	17.5%	1.5%	.244	—	—	—	—	—	3.51	134	74
Esteban Haro R 2016 · 4.55 FIP	30	SU	4.55	17.1%	10.2%	2.9%	.338	3.83	11.6%	6.3%	75	-0.72	3.76	164	72
Andrew Robinson R 2017 · 4.32 FIP	29	SU	4.32	23.4%	8.8%	3.8%	.245	—	—	—	—	—	3.19	160	72
Javy Guerra R 2016 · 4.29 FIP	30	SU	4.29	21.3%	13.9%	2.3%	.303	3.95	19.5%	13.0%	193	-0.34	2.94	409	71
Taylor Williams R 2021 · 5.96 FIP	30	SU	5.96	19.9%	14.1%	5.0%	.261	3.79	18.8%	9.0%	101	-2.17	2.51	309	71
Scott Atchison R 2007 · 4.55 FIP	31	SU	4.55	19.1%	7.6%	3.8%	.297	4.59	16.2%	9.5%	60	+0.04	2.52	340	70
Dalier Hinojosa R 2016 · 4.30 FIP	30	SU	4.30	18.7%	12.6%	2.2%	.329	—	—	—	—	—	3.41	104	70
Mike Broadway R 2017 · 4.73 FIP	30	SU	4.73	18.3%	10.2%	3.4%	.245	4.65	23.0%	12.4%	49	-0.08	1.74	195	70
Chris Smith R 2018 · 3.72 FIP	29	SU	3.72	24.1%	9.3%	2.7%	.319	—	—	—	—	—	2.17	199	69
Kazuhiro Sasaki R 2000 · 3.93 FIP	32	SU	3.93	29.4%	9.8%	3.8%	.212	2.88	24.9%	19.3%	161	-1.05	2.76	223	69
Dennis Sarfate R 2009 · 4.81 FIP	28	SU	4.81	19.8%	13.9%	3.0%	.281	—	—	—	—	—	4.42	103	69
Jason Bulger R 2009 · 3.78 FIP	30	SU	3.78	26.0%	11.1%	2.7%	.247	4.36	22.5%	9.0%	24	+0.58	3.78	106	69
Wil Browning R 2017 · 4.44 FIP	28	SU	4.44	17.9%	13.1%	2.2%	.359	—	—	—	—	—	2.14	162	68