Anderson Tejeda

PosSS

B/TS/R

Born1998-05-01

Age (2027)29

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AALAST SEASON 2021

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2019	21	A+Down East Woo…	181	.234/.320/.386	4	9	38	—	.171/.236/.280
2020	22	INTLTigres del Li…	43	.300/.349/.500	1	1	138	—
2020	22	MLBTEX	77	.253/.273/.453	3	4	97	0.2
2021	23	AAA/AA/ROK/INTL2 orgs	389	.203/.276/.370	14	14	38	—	.152/.206/.273
2021	23	MLBTEX	17	.062/.118/.062	0	1	-51	-0.0
2022	24	No MLB games played
2023	25	No MLB games played
2024	26	No MLB games played
2025	27	No MLB games played
2026	28	No MLB games played

Last 3 seasons WAR 0.2

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2015	17	ROK	DSL Rangers 2	—	235	205	64	19	6	4	25	49	3	9	7	312	395	522	917	210	392	21	11	399	54	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	18	ROK	AZL Rangers	—	189	175	50	14	9	2	13	40	0	6	0	286	335	503	838	217	358	21	7	362	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	19	A	Hickory Crawdads	—	446	401	99	24	9	8	36	132	2	10	7	247	312	411	724	165	343	30	8	316	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	20	A+	Down East Wood Ducks	—	522	467	121	17	5	19	49	142	3	11	4	259	333	439	772	180	330	27	9	341	54	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	21	A+	Down East Wood Ducks	—	181	158	37	10	1	4	17	58	3	9	4	234	320	386	706	152	333	32	9	314	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2020	22	MLB	Texas Rangers	—	77	75	19	4	1	3	2	30	0	4	1	253	273	453	726	200	381	39	3	316	97	-0	+0	-1	+1	+2	0.2
2020	22	INTL	Tigres del Licey	—	43	40	12	5	0	1	3	13	0	1	1	300	349	500	849	200	423	30	7	373	138	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	23	MLB	Texas Rangers	—	17	16	1	0	0	0	1	10	0	1	0	62	118	62	180		167	59	6	94	-51	-3	+0	+1	+1	+0	-0.0
2021	23	AAA	Round Rock Express	—	111	99	15	1	1	3	11	47	0	8	2	152	236	273	509	121	245	42	10	233	10	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	23	AA	Frisco RoughRiders	—	192	175	35	8	0	9	15	82	1	2	1	200	267	400	667	200	310	43	8	294	30	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	23	ROK	ACL Rangers	—	15	14	6	3	0	0	1	3	0	1	0	429	467	643	1.110	214	545	20	7	484	96	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	23	INTL	Tigres del Licey	—	71	61	15	2	0	2	7	23	0	3	0	246	324	377	701	131	342	32	10	304	92	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals (raw MLB only — historical actual)
MLB Career	—			—	94	91	20	4	1	3	3	40	0	5	1	220	245	385	629	165	354	43	3	276	73	-3	+1	-0	+3	+2	0.2
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2015	17	ROK MLE	DSL Rangers 2	—	235	212	41	11	4	2	18	60	3	9	7	193	266	311	577	118	249	26	8	248	54	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	18	ROK MLE	AZL Rangers	—	189	180	35	9	6	1	8	58	0	6	0	194	229	328	557	133	280	31	4	247	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	19	A MLE	Hickory Crawdads	—	446	412	79	17	7	6	25	175	2	10	7	192	241	311	552	119	303	39	6	240	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	20	A+ MLE	Down East Wood Ducks	—	522	486	97	13	4	11	30	204	3	11	4	200	250	311	561	111	310	39	6	248	54	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	21	A+ MLE	Down East Wood Ducks	—	181	164	28	7	1	3	11	82	3	9	4	171	236	280	516	110	288	45	6	224	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2020	22	MLB MLE	Texas Rangers	—	77	75	19	4	1	3	2	30	0	4	1	253	273	453	726	200	381	39	3	312	97	-0	+0	-1	+1	+2	0.2
2021	23	MLB MLE	Texas Rangers	—	17	16	1	0	0	0	1	10	0	1	0	62	118	62	180		167	59	6	93	-51	-3	+0	+1	+1	+0	-0.0
2021	23	AAA MLE	Round Rock Express	—	111	102	13	1	1	2	8	53	0	8	2	127	191	216	407	88	221	48	7	183	10	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	23	AA MLE	Frisco RoughRiders	—	192	180	28	7	0	6	10	96	1	2	1	156	204	294	499	139	272	50	5	212	30	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	23	ROK MLE	ACL Rangers	—	15	14	4	2	0	0	1	4	0	1	0	286	333	429	762	143	404	27	7	310	96	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	17	ROK MLE	DSL Rangers 2	—	235	212	41	11	4	2	18	60	3	9	7	193	266	311	577	118	258	26	8	248	54	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	17	ROK RAW	DSL Rangers 2	—	235	205	64	19	6	4	25	49	3	9	7	312	395	522	917	210	392	21	11	399	54	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	18	ROK MLE	AZL Rangers	—	189	180	35	9	6	1	8	58	0	6	0	194	229	328	557	133	279	31	4	247	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	18	ROK RAW	AZL Rangers	—	189	175	50	14	9	2	13	40	0	6	0	286	335	503	838	217	358	21	7	362	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	19	A MLE	Hickory Crawdads	—	446	412	79	17	7	6	25	175	2	10	7	192	241	311	552	119	311	39	6	240	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	19	A RAW	Hickory Crawdads	—	446	401	99	24	9	8	36	132	2	10	7	247	312	411	724	165	343	30	8	316	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	20	A+ MLE	Down East Wood Ducks	—	522	486	97	13	4	11	30	204	3	11	4	200	250	311	561	111	314	39	6	248	54	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	20	A+ RAW	Down East Wood Ducks	—	522	467	121	17	5	19	49	142	3	11	4	259	333	439	772	180	330	27	9	341	54	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	21	A+ MLE	Down East Wood Ducks	—	181	164	28	7	1	3	11	82	3	9	4	171	236	280	516	110	305	45	6	224	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	21	A+ RAW	Down East Wood Ducks	—	181	158	37	10	1	4	17	58	3	9	4	234	320	386	706	152	333	32	9	314	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2020	22	MLB MLE	2 teams	—	120	117	29	6	2	4	3	47	0	5	2	248	267	436	703	188	379	39	2	312	97	-0	+0	-1	+1	+3	0.3
2020	22	MLB RAW	2 teams	—	120	115	31	9	1	4	5	43	0	5	2	270	300	470	770	200	397	36	4	336	97	-0	+0	-1	+1	+3	0.3
2021	23	AA MLE	5 teams	—	406	377	55	11	1	10	23	197	1	15	3	146	197	260	457	114	262	49	6	201	22	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	23	AA RAW	5 teams	—	406	365	72	14	1	14	35	165	1	15	3	197	269	356	625	159	309	41	9	278	22	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	17	ROK MLE	DSL Rangers 2	—	235	212	41	11	4	2	18	60	3	9	7	193	266	311	577	118	249	26	8	248	54	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	18	ROK MLE	AZL Rangers	—	189	179	35	9	6	1	8	58	0	6	0	196	229	330	558	134	280	31	4	247	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	19	A MLE	Hickory Crawdads	—	446	416	79	17	7	6	25	175	2	10	7	190	241	308	549	118	303	39	6	240	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	20	A+ MLE	Down East Wood Ducks	—	522	484	97	13	4	11	30	204	3	11	4	200	250	312	562	112	310	39	6	248	54	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	21	A+ MLE	Down East Wood Ducks	—	181	165	28	7	1	3	11	82	3	9	4	170	236	279	515	109	288	45	6	224	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2020	22	MLB MLE	2 teams	—	120	116	29	6	2	4	3	47	0	5	2	250	267	440	706	190	381	39	2	312	97	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	23	AA MLE	5 teams	—	406	379	55	11	1	10	23	197	1	15	3	145	197	259	456	113	256	49	6	201	22	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	A+C		—	94	91	20	4	1	3	3	40	0	5	1	220	245	385	629	165	354	43	3	276	48	-3	+1	-0	+3	+2	0.2
/ 162G	—	A+C		—	650	629	139	28	7	21	21	277	0	35	7	221	246	388	634	167	356	43	3	276	48	-21	+4	-3	+19	+14	1.3
Career	—	MLE		—	2099	1948	364	74	25	37	118	823	12	65	27	187	238	307	545	121	297	39	6	239	48	-3	+1	-0	+3	+2	0.2
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	603	113	23	8	11	37	255	4	20	8	187	239	307	546	119	299	39	6	239	48	-21	+4	-3	+19	+14	1.3

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2021 AAFrisco RoughRiders · 192 PAwOBA .286 → .212 (−74)K% 42.7% → 49.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	42.71%	÷1.044	×1.220	—	—	49.88%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.81%	÷1.098	×0.690	—	×1.027	5.04%
HBP% /PA	0.52%	—	×0.850	—	×1.027	0.45%
Singles /BIP	19.35%	÷1.006	×0.940	×0.950	×1.027	17.65%
Doubles /BIP	8.60%	÷0.957	×0.870	×0.950	×1.027	7.63%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.995	×0.920	×0.950	×1.027	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	9.68%	÷1.114	×0.780	—	×1.027	6.96%

Factors used: level-wide AA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 123, 1B 101, 2B 91, 3B 99, K 109, BB 120 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 24.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .286 → .212; ISO .200 → .140; BABIP .310 → .272. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2021 AAARound Rock Express · 111 PAwOBA .227 → .183 (−44)K% 42.3% → 47.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	42.34%	÷1.072	×1.200	—	—	47.40%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.91%	÷0.975	×0.690	—	×1.050	7.36%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.940	—	×1.050	0.00%
Singles /BIP	19.23%	÷0.999	×0.930	×0.950	×1.050	17.86%
Doubles /BIP	1.92%	÷0.915	×0.830	×0.950	×1.050	1.74%
Triples /BIP	1.92%	÷1.150	×0.920	×0.950	×1.050	1.53%
Home runs /BIP	5.77%	÷0.958	×0.700	—	×1.050	4.42%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 92, 1B 100, 2B 83, 3B 130, K 114, BB 95 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 27.2 → +5.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (4.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .227 → .183; ISO .121 → .092; BABIP .245 → .221. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2021 ROKACL Rangers · 15 PAwOBA .471 → .310 (−161)K% 20.0% → 29.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	20.00%	÷0.988	×1.440	—	—	29.14%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.67%	÷1.071	×0.620	—	×0.965	3.72%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.720	—	×0.965	0.00%
Singles /BIP	27.27%	÷0.994	×0.820	—	×0.965	21.70%
Doubles /BIP	27.27%	÷1.015	×0.720	—	×0.965	18.68%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.064	×0.720	—	×0.965	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.015	×0.780	—	×0.965	0.00%

Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 103, 1B 99, 2B 103, 3B 113, K 98, BB 114 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 19.5 → −3.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.5 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .471 → .310; ISO .214 → .134; BABIP .545 → .404. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2019 A+Down East Wood Ducks · 181 PAwOBA .311 → .224 (−86)K% 32.0% → 45.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	32.04%	÷1.002	×1.420	—	—	45.42%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.39%	÷0.985	×0.630	—	×1.027	6.17%
HBP% /PA	1.66%	—	×0.860	—	×1.027	1.46%
Singles /BIP	22.00%	÷1.038	×0.940	×0.950	×1.027	19.43%
Doubles /BIP	10.00%	÷0.939	×0.830	×0.950	×1.027	8.62%
Triples /BIP	1.00%	÷0.900	×0.800	×0.950	×1.027	0.87%
Home runs /BIP	4.00%	÷1.152	×0.900	—	×1.027	3.21%

Factors used: league row CAR. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 130, 1B 108, 2B 88, 3B 80, K 100, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .311 → .224; ISO .152 → .108; BABIP .333 → .288. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 A+Down East Wood Ducks · 522 PAwOBA .333 → .248 (−85)K% 27.2% → 39.0%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	27.20%	÷0.991	×1.420	—	—	38.97%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.00%	÷1.042	×0.630	—	×1.042	5.67%
HBP% /PA	0.57%	—	×0.860	—	×1.042	0.52%
Singles /BIP	24.62%	÷0.991	×0.940	×0.989	×1.042	24.07%
Doubles /BIP	5.23%	÷0.970	×0.830	×0.989	×1.042	4.61%
Triples /BIP	1.54%	÷0.905	×0.800	×0.989	×1.042	1.40%
Home runs /BIP	5.85%	÷1.393	×0.900	—	×1.042	3.93%

Factors used: league row CAR. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 179, 1B 98, 2B 94, 3B 81, K 98, BB 108 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 22.8 → +4.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.989.

Result: wOBA .333 → .248; ISO .180 → .118; BABIP .330 → .310. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 AHickory Crawdads · 446 PAwOBA .311 → .240 (−71)K% 29.6% → 39.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	29.60%	÷1.010	×1.340	—	—	39.25%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.07%	÷1.002	×0.660	—	×1.045	5.56%
HBP% /PA	0.45%	—	×0.770	—	×1.045	0.36%
Singles /BIP	21.56%	÷0.988	×0.920	×0.964	×1.045	20.23%
Doubles /BIP	8.92%	÷1.045	×0.820	×0.964	×1.045	7.05%
Triples /BIP	3.35%	÷1.141	×0.940	×0.964	×1.045	2.78%
Home runs /BIP	2.97%	÷1.019	×0.820	—	×1.045	2.50%

Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 104, 1B 98, 2B 109, 3B 128, K 102, BB 100 — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 22.0 → +4.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.964.

Result: wOBA .311 → .240; ISO .165 → .123; BABIP .343 → .303. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 ROKAZL Rangers · 189 PAwOBA .354 → .247 (−107)K% 21.2% → 30.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	21.16%	÷1.000	×1.440	—	—	30.48%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.88%	÷1.000	×0.620	—	×1.022	4.36%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.720	—	×1.022	0.00%
Singles /BIP	18.52%	÷1.000	×0.820	×0.995	×1.022	15.46%
Doubles /BIP	10.37%	÷1.000	×0.720	×0.995	×1.022	7.60%
Triples /BIP	6.67%	÷1.000	×0.720	×0.995	×1.022	4.89%
Home runs /BIP	1.48%	÷1.000	×0.780	—	×1.022	1.18%

Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 19.5 → +2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.995.

Result: wOBA .354 → .247; ISO .217 → .147; BABIP .358 → .280. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 DSLDSL Rangers 2 · 235 PAwOBA .390 → .248 (−142)K% 20.9% → 25.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	20.85%	÷1.000	×1.220	—	—	25.44%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.64%	÷1.000	×0.700	—	×1.022	7.61%
HBP% /PA	1.28%	—	×0.700	—	×1.022	0.91%
Singles /BIP	22.44%	÷1.000	×0.680	×0.972	×1.022	15.16%
Doubles /BIP	12.18%	÷1.000	×0.600	×0.972	×1.022	7.26%
Triples /BIP	3.85%	÷1.000	×0.600	×0.972	×1.022	2.29%
Home runs /BIP	2.56%	÷1.000	×0.470	—	×1.022	1.23%

Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 17 vs a level average of 18.5 → +2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.972.

Result: wOBA .390 → .248; ISO .210 → .118; BABIP .392 → .249. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .