Daniel Brito

Pos2B

B/TL/R

Born1998-01-23

Age (2027)29

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AALAST SEASON 2021

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2019	21	A+PHI	379	.243/.300/.325	4	6	36	—	.193/.243/.262
2020	22	INTLAguilas del Z…	145	.277/.333/.438	3	5	111	—
2021	23	AAA/AAPHI	307	.295/.364/.473	8	3	98	—	.275/.325/.416

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2015	17	ROK	DSL Phillies	—	257	212	57	10	3	0	35	22	5	8	9	269	385	344	729	75	298	9	14	333	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	18	ROK	GCL Phillies	—	215	190	54	10	5	2	21	27	1	7	2	284	358	421	780	137	319	13	10	344	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	19	A	Lakewood BlueClaws	—	491	447	107	15	1	6	33	95	5	12	9	239	299	318	617	78	290	19	7	279	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	19	INTL	Aguilas del Zulia	—	49	44	12	0	1	0	4	11	0	0	1	273	333	318	652	45	364	22	8	293	84	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	20	A+	Clearwater Threshers	—	100	92	23	5	2	0	6	19	1	1	1	250	303	348	651	98	311	19	6	291	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	20	A	Lakewood BlueClaws	—	368	329	83	13	2	4	27	64	2	15	6	252	313	340	653	88	297	17	7	289	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	21	A+	Clearwater Threshers	—	379	342	83	14	1	4	22	73	6	6	10	243	300	325	625	82	293	19	6	279	36	—	—	—	—	—	—
2020	22	INTL	Aguilas del Zulia	—	145	130	36	6	3	3	9	20	2	5	0	277	333	438	772	162	303	14	6	333	111	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	23	AAA	Lehigh Valley IronPigs	—	32	28	8	1	1	2	4	7	0	0	1	286	375	607	982	321	316	22	12	421	113	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	23	AA	Reading Fightin Phils	—	275	247	73	14	4	6	23	46	3	3	3	296	363	457	820	162	344	17	8	362	96	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2015	17	ROK MLE	DSL Phillies	—	257	222	42	7	2	0	25	27	5	8	9	189	286	239	524	50	205	11	10	235	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	18	ROK MLE	GCL Phillies	—	215	198	44	7	4	2	13	39	1	7	2	222	274	328	602	106	255	18	6	256	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	19	A MLE	Lakewood BlueClaws	—	491	457	96	13	1	6	23	128	5	12	9	210	256	282	538	72	273	26	5	237	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	20	A+ MLE	Clearwater Threshers	—	100	93	21	4	2	0	5	27	1	1	1	226	273	312	585	86	305	27	5	252	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	20	A MLE	Lakewood BlueClaws	—	368	337	78	11	2	3	19	88	2	15	6	231	277	303	579	71	288	24	5	254	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	21	A+ MLE	Clearwater Threshers	—	379	347	67	10	1	4	17	108	6	6	10	193	243	262	505	69	251	28	4	221	36	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	23	AAA MLE	Lehigh Valley IronPigs	—	32	29	8	1	1	2	3	8	0	0	1	276	344	586	930	310	288	25	9	335	113	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	23	AA MLE	Reading Fightin Phils	—	275	255	70	13	3	4	15	57	3	3	3	275	322	396	718	122	335	21	5	310	96	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	17	ROK MLE	DSL Phillies	—	257	222	42	7	2	0	25	27	5	8	9	189	286	239	524	50	214	11	10	235	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	17	ROK RAW	DSL Phillies	—	257	212	57	10	3	0	35	22	5	8	9	269	385	344	729	75	298	9	14	333	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	18	ROK MLE	GCL Phillies	—	215	198	44	7	4	2	13	39	1	7	2	222	274	328	602	106	264	18	6	256	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	18	ROK RAW	GCL Phillies	—	215	190	54	10	5	2	21	27	1	7	2	284	358	421	780	137	319	13	10	344	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	19	A MLE	2 teams	—	540	503	106	15	1	6	25	141	5	12	10	211	255	280	535	70	279	26	5	237	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	19	A RAW	2 teams	—	540	491	119	15	2	6	37	106	5	12	10	242	302	318	620	75	297	20	7	280	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	20	A MLE	2 teams	—	468	431	98	15	3	3	23	115	3	16	7	227	271	297	568	70	298	25	5	254	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	20	A RAW	2 teams	—	468	421	106	18	4	4	33	83	3	16	7	252	311	342	653	90	300	18	7	290	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	21	A+ MLE	Clearwater Threshers	—	379	347	67	10	1	4	17	108	6	6	10	193	243	262	505	69	263	28	4	221	36	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	21	A+ RAW	Clearwater Threshers	—	379	342	83	14	1	4	22	73	6	6	10	243	300	325	625	82	293	19	6	279	36	—	—	—	—	—	—
2020	22	INTL MLE	Aguilas del Zulia	—	145	130	36	6	3	3	9	20	2	5	0	277	333	438	772	162	303	14	6	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2020	22	INTL RAW	Aguilas del Zulia	—	145	130	36	6	3	3	9	20	2	5	0	277	333	438	772	162	303	14	6	333	111	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	23	AA MLE	2 teams	—	307	284	76	14	4	5	18	65	3	3	4	268	318	398	716	130	332	21	6	313	98	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	23	AA RAW	2 teams	—	307	275	81	15	5	8	27	53	3	3	4	295	364	473	837	178	341	17	9	368	98	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	17	ROK MLE	DSL Phillies	—	257	225	42	7	2	0	25	27	5	8	9	187	286	236	521	49	205	11	10	235	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	18	ROK MLE	GCL Phillies	—	215	199	44	7	4	2	13	39	1	7	2	221	274	327	600	106	255	18	6	256	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	19	A MLE	2 teams	—	540	505	106	15	1	6	25	141	5	12	10	210	255	279	534	69	273	26	5	237	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	20	A MLE	2 teams	—	468	439	98	15	3	3	23	115	3	16	7	223	271	292	563	68	292	25	5	254	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	21	A+ MLE	Clearwater Threshers	—	379	353	67	10	1	4	17	108	6	6	10	190	243	258	501	68	251	28	4	221	36	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	23	AA MLE	2 teams	—	307	283	76	14	4	5	18	65	3	3	4	269	318	399	717	131	330	21	6	313	98	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	2311	2115	469	74	18	23	130	515	25	57	42	222	275	306	581	85	280	22	6	234	45	-152	-5	+0	+8	+50	-10.1
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	595	132	21	5	6	37	145	7	16	12	222	275	304	580	82	281	22	6	234	45	-43	-2	+0	+2	+14	-2.8

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2021 AAReading Fightin Phils · 275 PAwOBA .350 → .310 (−40)K% 16.7% → 20.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	16.73%	÷0.985	×1.220	—	—	20.72%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.64%	÷0.989	×0.690	—	×1.027	5.47%
HBP% /PA	1.09%	—	×0.850	—	×1.027	0.95%
Singles /BIP	24.38%	÷0.989	×0.940	×1.039	×1.027	24.72%
Doubles /BIP	6.97%	÷0.993	×0.870	×1.039	×1.027	6.51%
Triples /BIP	1.99%	÷1.150	×0.920	×1.039	×1.027	1.70%
Home runs /BIP	2.99%	÷1.344	×0.780	—	×1.027	1.78%

Factors used: level-wide AA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 169, 1B 98, 2B 99, 3B 130, K 97, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 24.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.039.

Result: wOBA .350 → .310; ISO .162 → .124; BABIP .344 → .335. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2021 AAALehigh Valley IronPigs · 32 PAwOBA .409 → .335 (−75)K% 21.9% → 26.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	21.88%	÷0.992	×1.200	—	—	26.47%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	12.50%	÷1.061	×0.690	—	×1.050	8.53%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.940	—	×1.050	0.00%
Singles /BIP	19.05%	÷1.016	×0.930	—	×1.050	18.30%
Doubles /BIP	4.76%	÷0.952	×0.830	—	×1.050	4.36%
Triples /BIP	4.76%	÷1.150	×0.920	—	×1.050	4.00%
Home runs /BIP	9.52%	÷0.957	×0.700	—	×1.050	7.31%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 91, 1B 103, 2B 90, 3B 130, K 98, BB 112 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 27.2 → +5.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (4.2 yr younger than average).

Result: wOBA .409 → .335; ISO .321 → .255; BABIP .316 → .288. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2019 A+Clearwater Threshers · 379 PAwOBA .275 → .221 (−54)K% 19.3% → 28.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	19.26%	÷0.960	×1.420	—	—	28.50%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	5.80%	÷0.964	×0.750	—	×1.027	4.64%
HBP% /PA	1.58%	—	×0.930	—	×1.027	1.51%
Singles /BIP	23.79%	÷1.014	×0.920	×0.950	×1.027	21.07%
Doubles /BIP	5.20%	÷1.242	×0.960	×0.950	×1.027	3.93%
Triples /BIP	0.37%	÷0.973	×0.810	×0.950	×1.027	0.30%
Home runs /BIP	1.49%	÷0.949	×0.880	—	×1.027	1.42%

Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 90, 1B 103, 2B 148, 3B 95, K 92, BB 93 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .275 → .221; ISO .082 → .064; BABIP .293 → .251. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 ALakewood BlueClaws · 368 PAwOBA .286 → .254 (−32)K% 17.4% → 23.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	17.39%	÷0.976	×1.340	—	—	23.89%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.34%	÷0.987	×0.660	—	×1.030	5.05%
HBP% /PA	0.54%	—	×0.770	—	×1.030	0.43%
Singles /BIP	24.15%	÷0.960	×0.920	×1.009	×1.030	24.04%
Doubles /BIP	4.91%	÷0.992	×0.820	×1.009	×1.030	4.21%
Triples /BIP	0.75%	÷1.086	×0.940	×1.009	×1.030	0.68%
Home runs /BIP	1.51%	÷0.966	×0.820	—	×1.030	1.32%

Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 93, 1B 92, 2B 98, 3B 117, K 95, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 22.0 → +3.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.009.

Result: wOBA .286 → .254; ISO .088 → .075; BABIP .297 → .288. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 A+Clearwater Threshers · 100 PAwOBA .286 → .252 (−34)K% 19.0% → 27.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	19.00%	÷0.995	×1.420	—	—	27.11%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.00%	÷1.005	×0.750	—	×1.042	4.66%
HBP% /PA	1.00%	—	×0.930	—	×1.042	0.97%
Singles /BIP	21.92%	÷0.950	×0.920	×0.994	×1.042	21.99%
Doubles /BIP	6.85%	÷1.028	×0.960	×0.994	×1.042	6.62%
Triples /BIP	2.74%	÷1.000	×0.810	×0.994	×1.042	2.30%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.197	×0.880	—	×1.042	0.00%

Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 139, 1B 90, 2B 106, 3B 100, K 99, BB 101 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 22.8 → +4.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.994.

Result: wOBA .286 → .252; ISO .098 → .082; BABIP .311 → .305. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 ALakewood BlueClaws · 491 PAwOBA .273 → .237 (−36)K% 19.3% → 26.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	19.35%	÷0.994	×1.340	—	—	26.07%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.72%	÷0.980	×0.660	—	×1.045	4.73%
HBP% /PA	1.02%	—	×0.770	—	×1.045	0.82%
Singles /BIP	24.15%	÷1.030	×0.920	×1.009	×1.045	22.75%
Doubles /BIP	4.26%	÷0.927	×0.820	×1.009	×1.045	3.98%
Triples /BIP	0.28%	÷1.021	×0.940	×1.009	×1.045	0.28%
Home runs /BIP	1.70%	÷0.854	×0.820	—	×1.045	1.71%

Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 71, 1B 106, 2B 85, 3B 104, K 99, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 22.0 → +4.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.009.

Result: wOBA .273 → .237; ISO .078 → .073; BABIP .290 → .273. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 ROKGCL Phillies · 215 PAwOBA .338 → .256 (−83)K% 12.6% → 18.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	12.56%	÷1.000	×1.440	—	—	18.08%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.77%	÷1.000	×0.620	—	×1.022	6.19%
HBP% /PA	0.47%	—	×0.720	—	×1.022	0.34%
Singles /BIP	22.70%	÷1.000	×0.820	×0.990	×1.022	18.85%
Doubles /BIP	6.13%	÷1.000	×0.720	×0.990	×1.022	4.47%
Triples /BIP	3.07%	÷1.000	×0.720	×0.990	×1.022	2.24%
Home runs /BIP	1.23%	÷1.000	×0.780	—	×1.022	0.98%

Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 19.5 → +2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.990.

Result: wOBA .338 → .256; ISO .137 → .101; BABIP .319 → .255. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 DSLDSL Phillies · 257 PAwOBA .327 → .235 (−91)K% 8.6% → 10.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	8.56%	÷1.000	×1.220	—	—	10.44%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	13.62%	÷1.000	×0.700	—	×1.022	9.75%
HBP% /PA	1.95%	—	×0.700	—	×1.022	1.39%
Singles /BIP	23.16%	÷1.000	×0.680	×1.016	×1.022	16.36%
Doubles /BIP	5.26%	÷1.000	×0.600	×1.016	×1.022	3.28%
Triples /BIP	1.58%	÷1.000	×0.600	×1.016	×1.022	0.98%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.000	×0.470	—	×1.022	0.00%

Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 17 vs a level average of 18.5 → +2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.016.

Result: wOBA .327 → .235; ISO .075 → .050; BABIP .298 → .205. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .