Adrian Rondon
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 20 | ATB | 181 | .170/.211/.246 | 0 | 1 | -8 | — | .127/.161/.179 |
| 2019 | 21 | ABurlington Be… | 168 | .231/.281/.256 | 0 | 3 | 7 | — | .170/.210/.189 |
| 2021 | 23 | A+LAA | 272 | .237/.296/.337 | 4 | 0 | 30 | — | .180/.222/.258 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 17 | ROK | GCL Rays | — | 164 | 145 | 24 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 57 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 166 | 258 | 234 | 492 | 69 | 270 | 35 | 10 | 232 | -16 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 18 | ROK | Princeton Rays | — | 210 | 193 | 48 | 10 | 2 | 7 | 13 | 58 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 249 | 303 | 430 | 733 | 181 | 318 | 28 | 6 | 321 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 19 | A | Bowling Green Hot Rods | — | 438 | 394 | 87 | 12 | 2 | 9 | 33 | 129 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 221 | 289 | 330 | 619 | 109 | 299 | 29 | 8 | 278 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 20 | A | Bowling Green Hot Rods | — | 181 | 171 | 29 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 57 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 170 | 211 | 246 | 457 | 76 | 252 | 31 | 5 | 207 | -8 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 21 | A | Burlington Bees | — | 168 | 156 | 36 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 45 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 231 | 281 | 256 | 538 | 26 | 321 | 27 | 5 | 249 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 23 | A+ | Tri-City Dust Devils | — | 272 | 249 | 59 | 11 | 1 | 4 | 21 | 82 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 237 | 296 | 337 | 634 | 100 | 333 | 30 | 8 | 285 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 17 | ROK MLE | GCL Rays | — | 164 | 151 | 16 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 82 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 106 | 172 | 152 | 324 | 46 | 211 | 50 | 7 | 144 | -16 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 18 | ROK MLE | Princeton Rays | — | 210 | 197 | 35 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 9 | 82 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 178 | 221 | 299 | 521 | 122 | 268 | 39 | 4 | 226 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 19 | A MLE | Bowling Green Hot Rods | — | 438 | 403 | 75 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 24 | 180 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 186 | 241 | 270 | 511 | 84 | 292 | 41 | 5 | 220 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 20 | A MLE | Bowling Green Hot Rods | — | 181 | 173 | 22 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 77 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 127 | 161 | 179 | 340 | 52 | 234 | 43 | 4 | 156 | -8 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 21 | A MLE | Burlington Bees | — | 168 | 159 | 27 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 63 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 170 | 210 | 189 | 398 | 19 | 272 | 38 | 3 | 179 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 23 | A+ MLE | Tri-City Dust Devils | — | 272 | 256 | 46 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 108 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 180 | 222 | 258 | 480 | 78 | 285 | 40 | 5 | 212 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 17 | ROK MLE | GCL Rays | — | 164 | 151 | 16 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 82 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 106 | 172 | 152 | 324 | 46 | 229 | 50 | 7 | 144 | -16 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 17 | ROK RAW | GCL Rays | — | 164 | 145 | 24 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 57 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 166 | 258 | 234 | 492 | 69 | 270 | 35 | 10 | 232 | -16 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 18 | ROK MLE | Princeton Rays | — | 210 | 197 | 35 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 9 | 82 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 178 | 221 | 299 | 521 | 122 | 270 | 39 | 4 | 226 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 18 | ROK RAW | Princeton Rays | — | 210 | 193 | 48 | 10 | 2 | 7 | 13 | 58 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 249 | 303 | 430 | 733 | 181 | 318 | 28 | 6 | 321 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 19 | A MLE | Bowling Green Hot Rods | — | 438 | 403 | 75 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 24 | 180 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 186 | 241 | 270 | 511 | 84 | 308 | 41 | 5 | 220 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 19 | A RAW | Bowling Green Hot Rods | — | 438 | 394 | 87 | 12 | 2 | 9 | 33 | 129 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 221 | 289 | 330 | 619 | 109 | 299 | 29 | 8 | 278 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 20 | A MLE | Bowling Green Hot Rods | — | 181 | 173 | 22 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 77 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 127 | 161 | 179 | 340 | 52 | 227 | 43 | 4 | 156 | -8 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 20 | A RAW | Bowling Green Hot Rods | — | 181 | 171 | 29 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 57 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 170 | 211 | 246 | 457 | 76 | 252 | 31 | 5 | 207 | -8 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 21 | A MLE | Burlington Bees | — | 168 | 159 | 27 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 63 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 170 | 210 | 189 | 398 | 19 | 278 | 38 | 3 | 179 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 21 | A RAW | Burlington Bees | — | 168 | 156 | 36 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 45 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 231 | 281 | 256 | 538 | 26 | 321 | 27 | 5 | 249 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 23 | A+ MLE | Tri-City Dust Devils | — | 272 | 256 | 46 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 108 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 180 | 222 | 258 | 480 | 78 | 293 | 40 | 5 | 212 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 23 | A+ RAW | Tri-City Dust Devils | — | 272 | 249 | 59 | 11 | 1 | 4 | 21 | 82 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 237 | 296 | 337 | 634 | 100 | 333 | 30 | 8 | 285 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 17 | ROK MLE | GCL Rays | — | 164 | 151 | 16 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 82 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 106 | 172 | 152 | 324 | 46 | 211 | 50 | 7 | 144 | -16 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 18 | ROK MLE | Princeton Rays | — | 210 | 197 | 35 | 7 | 1 | 5 | 9 | 82 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 178 | 221 | 299 | 521 | 122 | 268 | 39 | 4 | 226 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 19 | A MLE | Bowling Green Hot Rods | — | 438 | 406 | 75 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 24 | 180 | 5 | 4 | 2 | 185 | 241 | 268 | 509 | 84 | 292 | 41 | 5 | 220 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 20 | A MLE | Bowling Green Hot Rods | — | 181 | 172 | 22 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 77 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 128 | 161 | 180 | 341 | 52 | 234 | 43 | 4 | 156 | -8 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 21 | A MLE | Burlington Bees | — | 168 | 158 | 27 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 63 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 171 | 210 | 190 | 399 | 19 | 272 | 38 | 3 | 179 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 23 | A+ MLE | Tri-City Dust Devils | — | 272 | 256 | 46 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 14 | 108 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 180 | 222 | 258 | 480 | 78 | 285 | 40 | 5 | 212 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 1433 | 1339 | 221 | 42 | 5 | 15 | 70 | 592 | 11 | 9 | 12 | 165 | 213 | 237 | 450 | 72 | 277 | 41 | 5 | 198 | 20 | -136 | -3 | +0 | +15 | +31 | -9.5 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 607 | 100 | 19 | 2 | 7 | 32 | 269 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 165 | 213 | 237 | 450 | 72 | 277 | 41 | 5 | 198 | 20 | -62 | -1 | +0 | +7 | +14 | -4.3 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2021 A+Tri-City Dust Devils · 272 PAwOBA .280 → .212 (−68)K% 30.1% → 39.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 30.15% | ÷1.028 | ×1.350 | — | — | 39.58% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.72% | ÷1.047 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.998 | 5.22% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.810 | — | ×0.998 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.75% | ÷1.069 | ×0.910 | ×0.999 | ×0.998 | 21.85% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.59% | ÷0.913 | ×0.830 | ×0.999 | ×0.998 | 5.97% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.60% | ÷1.150 | ×0.820 | ×0.999 | ×0.998 | 0.43% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.40% | ÷0.923 | ×0.830 | — | ×0.998 | 2.15% |
Factors used: level-wide A+ factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 85, 1B 114, 2B 83, 3B 130, K 106, BB 109 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.999.
Result: wOBA .280 → .212; ISO .100 → .080; BABIP .333 → .285. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 ABurlington Bees · 168 PAwOBA .244 → .179 (−65)K% 26.8% → 37.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 26.79% | ÷0.973 | ×1.360 | — | — | 37.44% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 4.76% | ÷1.081 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.015 | 3.09% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.79% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.015 | 1.41% |
| Singles /BIP | 28.83% | ÷1.036 | ×0.920 | ×0.950 | ×1.015 | 24.68% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.60% | ÷1.017 | ×0.830 | ×0.950 | ×1.015 | 2.84% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.967 | ×0.910 | ×0.950 | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.960 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 92, 1B 107, 2B 103, 3B 93, K 95, BB 116 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .244 → .179; ISO .026 → .018; BABIP .321 → .272. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 ABowling Green Hot Rods · 181 PAwOBA .203 → .156 (−47)K% 31.5% → 42.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 31.49% | ÷1.000 | ×1.360 | — | — | 42.85% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 4.97% | ÷0.991 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.030 | 3.57% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.030 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 14.04% | ÷1.004 | ×0.920 | ×1.050 | ×1.030 | 13.90% |
| Doubles /BIP | 11.40% | ÷1.057 | ×0.830 | ×1.050 | ×1.030 | 9.69% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.900 | ×0.910 | ×1.050 | ×1.030 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.037 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.030 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 107, 1B 101, 2B 111, 3B 80, K 100, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 22.0 → +3.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .203 → .156; ISO .076 → .055; BABIP .252 → .234. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2017 ABowling Green Hot Rods · 438 PAwOBA .274 → .220 (−54)K% 29.5% → 41.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 29.45% | ÷0.973 | ×1.360 | — | — | 41.18% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.53% | ÷1.013 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.045 | 5.36% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.14% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.045 | 0.93% |
| Singles /BIP | 24.15% | ÷0.978 | ×0.920 | ×1.036 | ×1.045 | 24.58% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.53% | ÷1.086 | ×0.830 | ×1.036 | ×1.045 | 3.75% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.75% | ÷1.121 | ×0.910 | ×1.036 | ×1.045 | 0.66% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.40% | ÷0.985 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.045 | 2.88% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 97, 1B 96, 2B 117, 3B 124, K 95, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 22.0 → +4.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.036.
Result: wOBA .274 → .220; ISO .109 → .080; BABIP .299 → .292. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2016 ROKPrinceton Rays · 210 PAwOBA .314 → .226 (−88)K% 27.6% → 39.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 27.62% | ÷1.000 | ×1.420 | — | — | 39.22% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 6.19% | ÷1.000 | ×0.640 | — | ×1.022 | 4.05% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.95% | — | ×0.740 | — | ×1.022 | 0.72% |
| Singles /BIP | 21.48% | ÷1.000 | ×0.840 | ×1.027 | ×1.022 | 18.96% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.41% | ÷1.000 | ×0.740 | ×1.027 | ×1.022 | 5.76% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.48% | ÷1.000 | ×0.740 | ×1.027 | ×1.022 | 1.15% |
| Home runs /BIP | 5.19% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.022 | 4.24% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 19.5 → +2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.027.
Result: wOBA .314 → .226; ISO .181 → .127; BABIP .318 → .268. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 ROKGCL Rays · 164 PAwOBA .228 → .144 (−85)K% 34.8% → 50.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 34.76% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 50.05% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.37% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×1.038 | 6.67% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.61% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×1.038 | 0.46% |
| Singles /BIP | 17.05% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | ×0.967 | ×1.038 | 14.02% |
| Doubles /BIP | 9.09% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×0.967 | ×1.038 | 6.56% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.14% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×0.967 | ×1.038 | 0.82% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.038 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 17 vs a level average of 19.5 → +3.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.967.
Result: wOBA .228 → .144; ISO .069 → .040; BABIP .270 → .211. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).