Joshua Fuentes

Pos3B

B/TR/R

Born1993-02-19

Age (2027)34

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AAALAST SEASON 2023

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2021	28	AAACOL	210	.269/.325/.492	9	1	54	—	.188/.234/.320
2021	28	MLBCOL	284	.225/.258/.351	7	0	59	-0.6
2022	29	AAATOR	112	.162/.207/.200	1	1	-14	—	.132/.171/.170
2023	30	AAAATL	260	.227/.302/.339	5	3	46	—	.197/.256/.276
2024	31	No MLB games played
2025	32	No MLB games played
2026	33	No MLB games played

Last 3 seasons WAR -0.6

Contract

No contract data on file.

Skills · percentileStatcast 2019-2021

Speed52

Barrel%10

xwOBA10

Avg EV10

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2015	22	A	Asheville Tourists	—	385	337	85	24	1	6	29	64	8	7	6	252	326	383	709	131	290	17	8	311	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	23	A+	Modesto Nuts	—	325	291	81	15	4	9	16	54	13	1	1	278	344	450	794	172	313	17	5	348	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	23	A	Asheville Tourists	—	108	93	37	14	0	4	4	22	5	2	4	398	451	677	1.128	280	478	20	4	463	124	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	24	AA	Hartford Yard Goats	—	450	414	127	28	7	15	24	92	6	8	5	307	354	517	871	210	362	20	5	376	95	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	24	INTL	Tomateros de Culiacan	—	193	184	50	10	1	4	5	46	2	5	4	272	298	402	701	130	341	24	3	308	94	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	25	AAA	Albuquerque Isotopes	—	586	551	180	39	12	14	21	103	6	3	5	327	358	517	875	191	376	18	4	378	92	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	25	INTL	Salt River Rafters	—	85	78	24	4	1	3	7	18	0	1	2	308	365	500	865	192	368	21	8	381	144	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	26	MLB	Colorado Rockies	—	56	55	12	1	0	3	1	20	0	1	0	218	232	400	632	182	281	36	2	276	61	-3	+0	+0	-9	+1	-1.0
2019	26	AAA	Albuquerque Isotopes	—	437	402	102	23	2	17	25	118	2	1	1	254	301	448	748	194	314	27	6	323	42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2020	27	MLB	Colorado Rockies	—	103	98	30	7	0	2	2	29	1	1	0	306	327	439	766	133	406	28	2	333	103	+0	+0	+3	-2	+2	0.4
2021	28	MLB	Colorado Rockies	—	284	271	61	11	1	7	12	65	0	0	0	225	258	351	609	125	270	23	4	270	59	-14	+0	+0	+2	+6	-0.6
2021	28	AAA	Albuquerque Isotopes	—	210	193	52	12	2	9	11	43	5	1	3	269	325	492	818	223	303	20	5	357	54	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	29	AAA	Buffalo Bisons	—	112	105	17	1	0	1	4	43	2	1	0	162	207	200	407	38	258	38	4	189	-14	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	30	AAA	Gwinnett Stripers	—	260	233	53	7	2	5	20	52	5	3	0	227	302	339	641	112	270	20	8	291	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals (raw MLB only — historical actual)
MLB Career	—			—	443	424	103	19	1	12	15	114	1	2	0	243	270	377	648	134	302	26	3	285	79	-11	+0	+3	-9	+10	-0.7
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2015	22	A MLE	Asheville Tourists	—	385	349	70	15	1	4	17	84	8	7	6	201	254	284	538	83	238	22	4	237	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	23	A+ MLE	Modesto Nuts	—	325	296	71	13	3	9	11	75	13	1	1	240	297	395	692	155	278	23	3	290	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	23	A MLE	Asheville Tourists	—	108	94	30	9	0	3	3	30	5	2	4	319	373	511	883	191	388	28	3	352	124	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	24	AA MLE	Hartford Yard Goats	—	450	422	111	23	7	10	16	107	6	8	5	263	300	422	721	159	324	24	4	309	95	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	25	AAA MLE	Albuquerque Isotopes	—	586	557	150	32	10	9	15	136	6	3	5	269	296	411	707	142	330	23	3	304	92	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	26	MLB MLE	Colorado Rockies	—	56	55	12	1	0	3	1	20	0	1	0	218	232	400	632	182	281	36	2	259	61	-3	+0	+0	-9	+1	-1.0
2019	26	AAA MLE	Albuquerque Isotopes	—	437	409	76	15	1	11	18	159	2	1	1	186	224	308	532	122	260	36	4	230	42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2020	27	MLB MLE	Colorado Rockies	—	103	98	29	7	0	2	2	29	1	1	0	296	317	429	745	133	406	28	2	320	103	+0	+0	+3	-2	+2	0.4
2021	28	MLB MLE	Colorado Rockies	—	284	272	59	11	1	6	11	65	0	0	0	217	247	331	578	114	270	23	4	255	59	-14	+0	+0	+2	+6	-0.6
2021	28	AAA MLE	Albuquerque Isotopes	—	210	197	37	9	1	5	7	54	5	1	3	188	234	320	554	132	234	26	3	248	54	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	29	AAA MLE	Buffalo Bisons	—	112	106	14	1	0	1	3	51	2	1	0	132	171	170	341	38	230	46	3	147	-14	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	30	AAA MLE	Gwinnett Stripers	—	260	239	47	6	2	3	14	62	5	3	0	197	256	276	532	79	243	24	5	236	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	22	A MLE	Asheville Tourists	—	385	349	70	15	1	4	17	84	8	7	6	201	254	284	538	83	248	22	4	237	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	22	A RAW	Asheville Tourists	—	385	337	85	24	1	6	29	64	8	7	6	252	326	383	709	131	290	17	8	311	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	23	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	433	390	102	22	3	12	14	106	18	3	5	262	318	426	743	164	326	24	3	305	93	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	23	A+ RAW	2 teams	—	433	384	118	29	4	13	20	76	18	3	5	307	370	505	875	198	351	18	5	377	93	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	24	AA MLE	2 teams	—	643	604	159	33	10	14	23	152	8	13	9	263	299	421	720	157	329	24	4	309	95	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	24	AA RAW	2 teams	—	643	598	177	38	8	19	29	138	8	13	9	296	337	482	819	186	356	21	5	356	95	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	25	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	671	640	172	37	11	11	17	156	6	4	7	269	294	412	707	144	335	23	3	304	92	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	25	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	671	629	204	43	13	17	28	121	6	4	7	324	359	515	874	191	376	18	4	379	92	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	26	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	493	464	86	16	1	13	19	179	2	2	1	185	221	308	529	123	264	36	4	233	44	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	26	AAA RAW	2 teams	—	493	457	114	24	2	20	26	138	2	2	1	249	293	442	735	193	310	28	5	318	44	—	—	—	—	—	—
2020	27	MLB MLE	Colorado Rockies	—	103	98	29	7	0	2	2	29	1	1	0	296	317	429	745	133	391	28	2	320	103	+0	+0	+3	-2	+2	0.4
2020	27	MLB RAW	Colorado Rockies	—	103	98	30	7	0	2	2	29	1	1	0	306	327	439	766	133	406	28	2	333	103	+0	+0	+3	-2	+2	0.4
2021	28	MLB MLE	2 teams	—	494	469	96	20	2	11	18	119	5	1	3	205	242	326	568	122	249	24	4	252	57	-25	-1	+0	+2	+11	-1.4
2021	28	MLB RAW	2 teams	—	494	464	113	23	3	16	23	108	5	1	3	244	287	409	696	166	284	22	5	307	57	-25	-1	+0	+2	+11	-1.4
2022	29	AAA MLE	Buffalo Bisons	—	112	106	14	1	0	1	3	51	2	1	0	132	171	170	341	38	236	46	3	147	-14	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	29	AAA RAW	Buffalo Bisons	—	112	105	17	1	0	1	4	43	2	1	0	162	207	200	407	38	258	38	4	189	-14	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	30	AAA MLE	Gwinnett Stripers	—	260	239	47	6	2	3	14	62	5	3	0	197	256	276	532	79	250	24	5	236	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	30	AAA RAW	Gwinnett Stripers	—	260	233	53	7	2	5	20	52	5	3	0	227	302	339	641	112	270	20	8	291	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	22	A MLE	Asheville Tourists	—	385	357	70	15	1	4	17	84	8	7	6	196	254	277	531	81	238	22	4	237	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	23	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	433	398	102	22	3	12	14	106	18	3	5	256	318	417	735	161	305	24	3	305	93	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	24	AA MLE	2 teams	—	643	607	159	33	10	14	23	152	8	13	9	262	299	418	718	157	324	24	4	309	95	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	25	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	671	643	172	37	11	11	17	156	6	4	7	267	294	411	705	143	330	23	3	304	92	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	26	AAA MLE	2 teams	—	493	469	86	16	1	13	19	179	2	2	1	183	221	305	526	122	262	36	4	233	44	—	—	—	—	—	—
2020	27	MLB MLE	Colorado Rockies	—	103	99	29	7	0	2	2	29	1	1	0	293	317	424	741	131	406	28	2	320	103	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	28	MLB MLE	2 teams	—	494	468	96	20	2	11	18	119	5	1	3	205	242	327	569	122	255	24	4	252	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	29	AAA MLE	Buffalo Bisons	—	112	106	14	1	0	1	3	51	2	1	0	132	171	170	341	38	230	46	3	147	-14	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	30	AAA MLE	Gwinnett Stripers	—	260	239	47	6	2	3	14	62	5	3	0	197	256	276	532	79	243	24	5	236	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected)
Career	—	A+C		—	443	424	103	19	1	12	15	114	1	2	0	243	270	377	648	134	302	26	3	285	70	-11	+0	+3	-9	+10	-0.7
/ 162G	—	A+C		—	650	622	151	28	1	18	22	167	1	3	0	243	269	378	647	135	302	26	3	285	70	-16	+1	+5	-13	+14	-1.0
Career	—	MLE		—	3594	3359	775	157	30	71	127	938	55	35	31	231	270	359	629	128	296	26	4	272	70	-11	+0	+3	-9	+10	-0.7
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	607	140	28	5	13	23	170	10	6	6	231	270	357	627	127	296	26	4	272	70	-16	+1	+5	-13	+14	-1.0

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2023 AAAGwinnett Stripers · 260 PAwOBA .285 → .236 (−49)K% 20.0% → 23.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	20.00%	÷1.005	×1.200	—	—	23.89%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.69%	÷0.997	×0.690	—	×0.972	5.18%
HBP% /PA	1.92%	—	×0.940	—	×0.972	1.76%
Singles /BIP	21.55%	÷0.968	×0.930	×0.982	×0.972	19.75%
Doubles /BIP	3.87%	÷0.933	×0.830	×0.982	×0.972	3.29%
Triples /BIP	1.10%	÷0.999	×0.970	×0.982	×0.972	1.02%
Home runs /BIP	2.76%	÷0.984	×0.700	—	×0.972	1.91%

Factors used: league row International League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 97, 1B 94, 2B 87, 3B 100, K 101, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 30 vs a level average of 27.2 → −2.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.982.

Result: wOBA .285 → .236; ISO .112 → .085; BABIP .270 → .243. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2022 AAABuffalo Bisons · 112 PAwOBA .186 → .147 (−39)K% 38.4% → 45.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	38.39%	÷1.018	×1.200	—	—	45.26%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	3.57%	÷1.032	×0.690	—	×0.982	2.34%
HBP% /PA	1.79%	—	×0.940	—	×0.982	1.65%
Singles /BIP	24.19%	÷0.960	×0.930	×0.951	×0.982	21.89%
Doubles /BIP	1.61%	÷0.984	×0.830	×0.951	×0.982	1.27%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.149	×0.970	×0.951	×0.982	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	1.61%	÷0.951	×0.700	—	×0.982	1.17%

Factors used: league row International League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 90, 1B 92, 2B 97, 3B 130, K 104, BB 106 — applied at half strength. Age: age 29 vs a level average of 27.2 → −1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.951.

Result: wOBA .186 → .147; ISO .038 → .026; BABIP .258 → .230. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2021 AAAAlbuquerque Isotopes · 210 PAwOBA .348 → .248 (−100)K% 20.5% → 25.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	20.48%	÷0.958	×1.200	—	—	25.65%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	5.24%	÷1.032	×0.690	—	×0.992	3.47%
HBP% /PA	2.38%	—	×0.940	—	×0.992	2.22%
Singles /BIP	19.33%	÷1.110	×0.930	×0.957	×0.992	15.38%
Doubles /BIP	8.00%	÷0.988	×0.830	×0.957	×0.992	6.38%
Triples /BIP	1.33%	÷1.150	×0.920	×0.957	×0.992	1.01%
Home runs /BIP	6.00%	÷1.172	×0.700	—	×0.992	3.55%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 134, 1B 122, 2B 98, 3B 130, K 92, BB 106 — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 27.2 → −0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.957.

Result: wOBA .348 → .248; ISO .223 → .142; BABIP .303 → .234. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2019 AAAAlbuquerque Isotopes · 437 PAwOBA .316 → .230 (−87)K% 27.0% → 36.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	27.00%	÷0.957	×1.290	—	—	36.41%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	5.49%	÷0.974	×0.710	—	×1.018	4.08%
HBP% /PA	0.46%	—	×0.980	—	×1.018	0.46%
Singles /BIP	21.13%	÷0.974	×0.900	×0.950	×1.018	18.89%
Doubles /BIP	8.10%	÷1.071	×0.810	×0.950	×1.018	5.92%
Triples /BIP	0.70%	÷1.150	×0.810	×0.950	×1.018	0.48%
Home runs /BIP	5.99%	÷1.136	×0.780	—	×1.018	4.18%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 127, 1B 95, 2B 114, 3B 130, K 91, BB 95 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 27.2 → +1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .316 → .230; ISO .194 → .125; BABIP .314 → .260. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 AAAAlbuquerque Isotopes · 586 PAwOBA .372 → .304 (−68)K% 17.6% → 23.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	17.58%	÷0.978	×1.290	—	—	23.19%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	3.58%	÷1.024	×0.710	—	×1.033	2.57%
HBP% /PA	1.02%	—	×0.980	—	×1.033	1.04%
Singles /BIP	25.67%	÷1.034	×0.900	×0.996	×1.033	22.99%
Doubles /BIP	8.71%	÷0.960	×0.810	×0.996	×1.033	7.56%
Triples /BIP	2.68%	÷0.973	×0.810	×0.996	×1.033	2.29%
Home runs /BIP	3.12%	÷1.162	×0.780	—	×1.033	2.17%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 132, 1B 107, 2B 92, 3B 95, K 96, BB 105 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 27.2 → +3.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.996.

Result: wOBA .372 → .304; ISO .191 → .145; BABIP .376 → .330. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 AAHartford Yard Goats · 450 PAwOBA .367 → .309 (−58)K% 20.4% → 23.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	20.44%	÷1.051	×1.220	—	—	23.72%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	5.11%	÷1.017	×0.700	—	×1.012	3.56%
HBP% /PA	1.33%	—	×0.850	—	×1.012	1.15%
Singles /BIP	23.91%	÷1.026	×0.970	×0.968	×1.012	22.15%
Doubles /BIP	8.70%	÷1.014	×0.860	×0.968	×1.012	7.23%
Triples /BIP	2.17%	÷0.900	×0.950	×0.968	×1.012	2.25%
Home runs /BIP	4.66%	÷1.183	×0.780	—	×1.012	3.11%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 137, 1B 105, 2B 103, 3B 80, K 110, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.968.

Result: wOBA .367 → .309; ISO .210 → .164; BABIP .362 → .324. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 A+Modesto Nuts · 325 PAwOBA .341 → .290 (−50)K% 16.6% → 23.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	16.62%	÷0.960	×1.340	—	—	23.19%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	4.92%	÷1.006	×0.710	—	×0.998	3.47%
HBP% /PA	4.00%	—	×0.790	—	×0.998	3.15%
Singles /BIP	22.36%	÷0.990	×0.910	×0.992	×0.998	20.34%
Doubles /BIP	6.33%	÷0.933	×0.820	×0.992	×0.998	5.51%
Triples /BIP	1.69%	÷1.150	×0.760	×0.992	×0.998	1.10%
Home runs /BIP	3.80%	÷0.877	×0.920	—	×0.998	3.98%

Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 75, 1B 98, 2B 87, 3B 130, K 92, BB 101 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.992.

Result: wOBA .341 → .290; ISO .172 → .154; BABIP .313 → .278. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 AAsheville Tourists · 108 PAwOBA .458 → .352 (−106)K% 20.4% → 28.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	20.37%	÷0.969	×1.340	—	—	28.17%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	3.70%	÷0.987	×0.660	—	×0.990	2.45%
HBP% /PA	4.63%	—	×0.770	—	×0.990	3.53%
Singles /BIP	26.76%	÷0.964	×0.920	×1.015	×0.990	25.65%
Doubles /BIP	19.72%	÷1.267	×0.820	×1.015	×0.990	12.82%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.900	×0.940	×1.015	×0.990	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	5.63%	÷1.232	×0.820	—	×0.990	3.71%

Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 146, 1B 93, 2B 153, 3B 80, K 94, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.015.

Result: wOBA .458 → .352; ISO .280 → .183; BABIP .478 → .388. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .