Max George

PosSS

B/TR/R

Born1996-04-07

Age (2027)31

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AALAST SEASON 2022

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2019	23	AHOU	96	.247/.383/.286	0	8	40	—	.193/.287/.217
2021	25	AACOL	245	.191/.337/.377	9	11	55	—	.152/.267/.295
2022	26	AACOL	20	.056/.150/.111	0	0	-42	—	.056/.150/.111

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2014	18	ROK	Grand Junction Rockies	—	176	136	41	8	1	4	25	44	8	10	3	301	438	463	901	162	411	25	14	391	75	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	19	A	Asheville Tourists	—	142	114	18	5	1	1	20	39	4	8	0	158	304	246	550	88	227	27	14	260	17	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	20	A	Asheville Tourists	—	442	347	86	25	2	8	54	104	17	10	8	248	376	401	776	153	326	24	12	336	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	21	A	Asheville Tourists	—	492	416	105	27	3	13	46	82	14	30	10	252	347	425	772	173	284	17	9	335	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	22	A+	Lancaster JetHawks	—	370	297	62	15	3	14	44	87	19	27	6	209	347	421	768	212	241	24	12	338	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	23	A	Asheville Tourists	—	96	77	19	3	0	0	14	22	3	8	1	247	383	286	669	39	345	23	15	316	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	25	AA	Hartford Yard Goats	—	245	199	38	6	2	9	35	89	9	11	2	191	337	377	714	186	284	36	14	325	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	26	AA	Hartford Yard Goats	—	20	18	1	1	0	0	0	7	2	0	0	56	150	111	261	56	91	35	0	138	-42	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2014	18	ROK MLE	Grand Junction Rockies	—	176	146	32	6	1	3	15	63	8	10	3	219	325	336	661	116	314	36	9	279	75	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	19	A MLE	Asheville Tourists	—	142	121	15	3	1	1	13	51	4	8	0	124	232	190	422	66	191	36	9	194	17	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	20	A MLE	Asheville Tourists	—	442	364	73	16	2	6	37	144	17	10	8	201	304	305	609	104	271	33	8	257	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	21	A MLE	Asheville Tourists	—	492	431	86	20	3	9	31	108	14	30	10	200	275	323	598	123	229	22	6	255	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	22	A+ MLE	Lancaster JetHawks	—	370	311	46	11	2	8	30	124	19	27	6	148	264	273	537	125	193	34	8	235	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	23	A MLE	Asheville Tourists	—	96	83	16	2	0	0	8	30	3	8	1	193	287	217	504	24	287	31	8	228	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	25	AA MLE	Hartford Yard Goats	—	245	210	32	5	2	7	24	106	9	11	2	152	267	295	563	143	247	43	10	249	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	26	AA MLE	Hartford Yard Goats	—	20	18	1	1	0	0	0	8	2	0	0	56	150	111	261	56	75	40	0	106	-42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	18	ROK MLE	Grand Junction Rockies	—	176	146	32	6	1	3	15	63	8	10	3	219	325	336	661	116	354	36	9	279	75	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	18	ROK RAW	Grand Junction Rockies	—	176	136	41	8	1	4	25	44	8	10	3	301	438	463	901	162	411	25	14	391	75	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	19	A MLE	Asheville Tourists	—	142	121	15	3	1	1	13	51	4	8	0	124	232	190	422	66	200	36	9	194	17	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	19	A RAW	Asheville Tourists	—	142	114	18	5	1	1	20	39	4	8	0	158	304	246	550	88	227	27	14	260	17	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	20	A MLE	Asheville Tourists	—	442	364	73	16	2	6	37	144	17	10	8	201	304	305	609	104	307	33	8	257	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	20	A RAW	Asheville Tourists	—	442	347	86	25	2	8	54	104	17	10	8	248	376	401	776	153	326	24	12	336	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	21	A MLE	Asheville Tourists	—	492	431	86	20	3	9	31	108	14	30	10	200	275	323	598	123	243	22	6	255	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	21	A RAW	Asheville Tourists	—	492	416	105	27	3	13	46	82	14	30	10	252	347	425	772	173	284	17	9	335	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	22	A+ MLE	Lancaster JetHawks	—	370	311	46	11	2	8	30	124	19	27	6	148	264	273	537	125	209	34	8	235	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	22	A+ RAW	Lancaster JetHawks	—	370	297	62	15	3	14	44	87	19	27	6	209	347	421	768	212	241	24	12	338	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	23	A MLE	Asheville Tourists	—	96	83	16	2	0	0	8	30	3	8	1	193	287	217	504	24	302	31	8	228	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	23	A RAW	Asheville Tourists	—	96	77	19	3	0	0	14	22	3	8	1	247	383	286	669	39	345	23	15	316	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	25	AA MLE	Hartford Yard Goats	—	245	210	32	5	2	7	24	106	9	11	2	152	267	295	563	143	255	43	10	249	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	25	AA RAW	Hartford Yard Goats	—	245	199	38	6	2	9	35	89	9	11	2	191	337	377	714	186	284	36	14	325	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	26	AA MLE	Hartford Yard Goats	—	20	18	1	1	0	0	0	8	2	0	0	56	150	111	261	56	100	40	0	106	-42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	26	AA RAW	Hartford Yard Goats	—	20	18	1	1	0	0	0	7	2	0	0	56	150	111	261	56	91	35	0	138	-42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	18	ROK MLE	Grand Junction Rockies	—	176	151	32	6	1	3	15	63	8	10	3	212	325	325	650	113	314	36	9	279	75	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	19	A MLE	Asheville Tourists	—	142	124	15	3	1	1	13	51	4	8	0	121	232	185	417	65	191	36	9	194	17	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	20	A MLE	Asheville Tourists	—	442	385	73	16	2	6	37	144	17	10	8	190	304	288	592	99	271	33	8	257	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	21	A MLE	Asheville Tourists	—	492	444	86	20	3	9	31	108	14	30	10	194	275	313	588	119	229	22	6	255	59	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	22	A+ MLE	Lancaster JetHawks	—	370	318	46	11	2	8	30	124	19	27	6	145	264	267	531	123	193	34	8	235	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	23	A MLE	Asheville Tourists	—	96	85	16	2	0	0	8	30	3	8	1	188	287	212	499	24	287	31	8	228	40	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	25	AA MLE	Hartford Yard Goats	—	245	210	32	5	2	7	24	106	9	11	2	152	267	295	563	143	247	43	10	249	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	26	AA MLE	Hartford Yard Goats	—	20	18	1	1	0	0	0	8	2	0	0	56	150	111	261	56	75	40	0	106	-42	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	1983	1684	301	64	11	34	158	634	76	104	30	179	279	290	569	112	259	32	8	246	53	-112	+9	+0	+21	+43	-4.0
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	552	99	21	4	11	52	208	25	34	10	179	280	292	572	112	260	32	8	246	53	-37	+3	+0	+7	+14	-1.3

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2022 AAHartford Yard Goats · 20 PAwOBA .134 → .106 (−28)K% 35.0% → 42.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	35.00%	÷1.006	×1.220	—	—	42.47%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	0.00%	÷1.002	×0.700	—	×0.988	0.00%
HBP% /PA	10.00%	—	×0.850	—	×0.988	8.40%
Singles /BIP	0.00%	÷1.032	×0.970	—	×0.988	0.00%
Doubles /BIP	9.09%	÷1.035	×0.860	—	×0.988	7.46%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.950	—	×0.988	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.992	×0.780	—	×0.988	0.00%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 98, 1B 106, 2B 107, 3B 130, K 101, BB 100 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 24.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .134 → .106; ISO .056 → .041; BABIP .091 → .075. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2021 AAHartford Yard Goats · 245 PAwOBA .319 → .249 (−69)K% 36.3% → 43.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	36.33%	÷1.022	×1.220	—	—	43.37%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	14.29%	÷1.020	×0.690	—	×0.998	9.64%
HBP% /PA	3.67%	—	×0.850	—	×0.998	3.12%
Singles /BIP	19.09%	÷1.047	×0.940	×0.990	×0.998	16.94%
Doubles /BIP	5.45%	÷1.010	×0.870	×0.990	×0.998	4.64%
Triples /BIP	1.82%	÷0.956	×0.920	×0.990	×0.998	1.73%
Home runs /BIP	8.18%	÷0.990	×0.780	—	×0.998	6.43%

Factors used: level-wide AA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 98, 1B 109, 2B 102, 3B 91, K 104, BB 104 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.990.

Result: wOBA .319 → .249; ISO .186 → .148; BABIP .284 → .247. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2019 AAsheville Tourists · 96 PAwOBA .309 → .228 (−81)K% 22.9% → 31.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	22.92%	÷0.968	×1.340	—	—	31.71%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	14.58%	÷1.148	×0.660	—	×0.990	8.30%
HBP% /PA	3.12%	—	×0.770	—	×0.990	2.38%
Singles /BIP	29.09%	÷1.063	×0.920	—	×0.990	24.92%
Doubles /BIP	5.45%	÷1.188	×0.820	—	×0.990	3.73%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.940	—	×0.990	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.249	×0.820	—	×0.990	0.00%

Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 150, 1B 113, 2B 138, 3B 130, K 94, BB 130 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .309 → .228; ISO .039 → .027; BABIP .345 → .287. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 A+Lancaster JetHawks · 370 PAwOBA .332 → .235 (−97)K% 23.5% → 33.6%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	23.51%	÷0.938	×1.340	—	—	33.58%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.89%	÷1.073	×0.710	—	×1.012	7.96%
HBP% /PA	5.14%	—	×0.790	—	×1.012	4.11%
Singles /BIP	14.29%	÷1.007	×0.910	×0.950	×1.012	12.41%
Doubles /BIP	7.14%	÷1.025	×0.820	×0.950	×1.012	5.49%
Triples /BIP	1.43%	÷1.130	×0.760	×0.950	×1.012	0.92%
Home runs /BIP	6.67%	÷1.531	×0.920	—	×1.012	4.05%

Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 206, 1B 101, 2B 105, 3B 126, K 88, BB 115 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .332 → .235; ISO .212 → .132; BABIP .241 → .193. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 AAsheville Tourists · 492 PAwOBA .329 → .255 (−74)K% 16.7% → 21.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	16.67%	÷1.018	×1.340	—	—	21.94%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.35%	÷0.987	×0.660	—	×1.015	6.35%
HBP% /PA	2.85%	—	×0.770	—	×1.015	2.22%
Singles /BIP	18.56%	÷1.048	×0.920	×0.950	×1.015	15.71%
Doubles /BIP	8.08%	÷1.085	×0.820	×0.950	×1.015	5.89%
Triples /BIP	0.90%	÷0.900	×0.940	×0.950	×1.015	0.90%
Home runs /BIP	3.89%	÷1.243	×0.820	—	×1.015	2.61%

Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 149, 1B 110, 2B 117, 3B 80, K 104, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .329 → .255; ISO .173 → .128; BABIP .284 → .229. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 AAsheville Tourists · 442 PAwOBA .330 → .257 (−73)K% 23.5% → 32.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	23.53%	÷0.969	×1.340	—	—	32.54%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	12.22%	÷0.987	×0.660	—	×1.030	8.41%
HBP% /PA	3.85%	—	×0.770	—	×1.030	3.05%
Singles /BIP	20.99%	÷0.964	×0.920	×0.950	×1.030	19.60%
Doubles /BIP	10.29%	÷1.267	×0.820	×0.950	×1.030	6.52%
Triples /BIP	0.82%	÷0.900	×0.940	×0.950	×1.030	0.84%
Home runs /BIP	3.29%	÷1.232	×0.820	—	×1.030	2.26%

Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 146, 1B 93, 2B 153, 3B 80, K 94, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 22.0 → +3.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .330 → .257; ISO .153 → .107; BABIP .326 → .271. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 AAsheville Tourists · 142 PAwOBA .256 → .194 (−62)K% 27.5% → 35.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	27.46%	÷1.025	×1.340	—	—	35.91%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	14.08%	÷1.033	×0.660	—	×1.045	9.40%
HBP% /PA	2.82%	—	×0.770	—	×1.045	2.27%
Singles /BIP	14.67%	÷0.991	×0.920	×0.950	×1.045	13.52%
Doubles /BIP	6.67%	÷1.267	×0.820	×0.950	×1.045	4.28%
Triples /BIP	1.33%	÷0.936	×0.940	×0.950	×1.045	1.33%
Home runs /BIP	1.33%	÷1.172	×0.820	—	×1.045	0.98%

Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 134, 1B 98, 2B 153, 3B 87, K 105, BB 107 — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 22.0 → +4.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .256 → .194; ISO .088 → .064; BABIP .227 → .191. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 ROKGrand Junction Rockies · 176 PAwOBA .385 → .279 (−105)K% 25.0% → 36.0%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	25.00%	÷1.000	×1.440	—	—	36.00%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	13.64%	÷1.000	×0.610	—	×1.022	8.51%
HBP% /PA	4.55%	—	×0.720	—	×1.022	3.35%
Singles /BIP	30.43%	÷1.000	×0.820	×0.950	×1.022	24.24%
Doubles /BIP	8.70%	÷1.000	×0.720	×0.950	×1.022	6.08%
Triples /BIP	1.09%	÷1.000	×0.720	×0.950	×1.022	0.76%
Home runs /BIP	4.35%	÷1.000	×0.750	—	×1.022	3.33%

Factors used: league row PIO. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 19.5 → +2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .385 → .279; ISO .162 → .119; BABIP .411 → .314. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).