Sean Godfrey
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 22 | A+/A/ROK3 orgs | 272 | .321/.360/.464 | 3 | 18 | 81 | — | .273/.303/.398 |
| 2015 | 23 | AA/A+2 orgs | 448 | .257/.289/.360 | 6 | 15 | 51 | — | .230/.254/.316 |
| 2016 | 24 | AA/A+/ROK3 orgs | 103 | .274/.310/.442 | 2 | 2 | 52 | — | .238/.260/.392 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2014 | 22 | A+ | Lynchburg Hillcats | — | 47 | 42 | 14 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 333 | 391 | 476 | 867 | 143 | 424 | 19 | 2 | 379 | 95 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 22 | A | Rome Braves | — | 153 | 142 | 39 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 27 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 275 | 313 | 408 | 722 | 134 | 321 | 18 | 5 | 314 | 62 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 22 | ROK | Danville Braves | — | 72 | 68 | 28 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 412 | 437 | 574 | 1.010 | 162 | 467 | 12 | 3 | 439 | 114 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 23 | AA | Mississippi Braves | — | 195 | 180 | 35 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 36 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 194 | 232 | 272 | 504 | 78 | 236 | 18 | 4 | 221 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 23 | A+ | Carolina Mudcats | — | 253 | 240 | 73 | 12 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 41 | 2 | 10 | 6 | 304 | 332 | 425 | 757 | 121 | 349 | 16 | 3 | 333 | 71 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 24 | AA | Mississippi Braves | — | 25 | 23 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 304 | 333 | 478 | 812 | 174 | 438 | 28 | 4 | 340 | 77 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 24 | A+ | Carolina Mudcats | — | 56 | 52 | 14 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 269 | 296 | 423 | 719 | 154 | 325 | 20 | 4 | 305 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 24 | ROK | GCL Braves | — | 22 | 20 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 250 | 318 | 450 | 768 | 200 | 286 | 23 | 9 | 340 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2014 | 22 | A+ MLE | Lynchburg Hillcats | — | 47 | 42 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 286 | 348 | 405 | 753 | 119 | 387 | 28 | 2 | 308 | 95 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 22 | A MLE | Rome Braves | — | 153 | 145 | 35 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 37 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 241 | 267 | 366 | 632 | 124 | 292 | 24 | 3 | 260 | 62 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 22 | ROK MLE | Danville Braves | — | 72 | 69 | 23 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 333 | 352 | 464 | 816 | 130 | 382 | 18 | 1 | 336 | 114 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 23 | AA MLE | Mississippi Braves | — | 195 | 183 | 34 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 43 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 186 | 216 | 262 | 478 | 77 | 229 | 22 | 3 | 206 | 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 23 | A+ MLE | Carolina Mudcats | — | 253 | 243 | 64 | 9 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 57 | 2 | 10 | 6 | 263 | 284 | 358 | 642 | 95 | 320 | 23 | 2 | 273 | 71 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 24 | AA MLE | Mississippi Braves | — | 25 | 23 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 304 | 333 | 478 | 812 | 174 | 382 | 32 | 4 | 282 | 77 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 24 | A+ MLE | Carolina Mudcats | — | 56 | 53 | 12 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 226 | 241 | 358 | 599 | 132 | 284 | 27 | 2 | 237 | 47 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 24 | ROK MLE | GCL Braves | — | 22 | 21 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 190 | 227 | 381 | 608 | 190 | 213 | 32 | 5 | 219 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 22 | A MLE | 3 teams | — | 272 | 256 | 69 | 13 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 63 | 5 | 18 | 2 | 270 | 300 | 387 | 686 | 117 | 346 | 23 | 2 | 288 | 81 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 22 | A RAW | 3 teams | — | 272 | 252 | 81 | 17 | 5 | 3 | 10 | 45 | 5 | 18 | 2 | 321 | 360 | 464 | 824 | 143 | 380 | 17 | 4 | 358 | 81 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 23 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 448 | 426 | 98 | 14 | 4 | 5 | 11 | 100 | 3 | 15 | 11 | 230 | 255 | 317 | 571 | 87 | 288 | 22 | 2 | 244 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 23 | A+ RAW | 2 teams | — | 448 | 420 | 108 | 17 | 4 | 6 | 16 | 77 | 3 | 15 | 11 | 257 | 289 | 360 | 648 | 102 | 301 | 17 | 4 | 284 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 24 | A+ MLE | 3 teams | — | 103 | 97 | 22 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 31 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 227 | 250 | 351 | 601 | 124 | 323 | 30 | 3 | 244 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 24 | A+ RAW | 3 teams | — | 103 | 95 | 26 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 23 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 274 | 310 | 442 | 752 | 168 | 343 | 22 | 5 | 321 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 22 | A MLE | 3 teams | — | 272 | 259 | 69 | 13 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 63 | 5 | 18 | 2 | 266 | 300 | 382 | 682 | 116 | 332 | 23 | 2 | 288 | 81 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 23 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 448 | 431 | 98 | 14 | 4 | 5 | 11 | 100 | 3 | 15 | 11 | 227 | 255 | 313 | 568 | 86 | 280 | 22 | 2 | 244 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 24 | A+ MLE | 3 teams | — | 103 | 99 | 22 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 31 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 222 | 250 | 343 | 593 | 121 | 293 | 30 | 3 | 244 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 823 | 779 | 189 | 32 | 10 | 9 | 20 | 194 | 8 | 35 | 13 | 243 | 269 | 344 | 613 | 101 | 311 | 24 | 2 | 259 | 61 | -38 | +2 | +0 | +3 | +18 | -1.6 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 615 | 149 | 25 | 8 | 7 | 16 | 153 | 6 | 28 | 10 | 242 | 268 | 343 | 611 | 101 | 311 | 24 | 2 | 259 | 61 | -30 | +2 | +0 | +2 | +14 | -1.2 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2016 A+Carolina Mudcats · 56 PAwOBA .297 → .237 (−60)K% 19.6% → 27.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 19.64% | ÷1.030 | ×1.420 | — | — | 27.08% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 3.57% | ÷0.970 | ×0.630 | — | ×0.988 | 2.29% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.860 | — | ×0.988 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 21.95% | ÷1.018 | ×0.940 | — | ×0.988 | 20.03% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.32% | ÷1.004 | ×0.830 | — | ×0.988 | 5.98% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.44% | ÷0.987 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.988 | 1.95% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.44% | ÷1.362 | ×0.900 | — | ×0.988 | 1.59% |
Factors used: league row CAR. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 172, 1B 104, 2B 101, 3B 97, K 106, BB 94 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .297 → .237; ISO .154 → .112; BABIP .325 → .284. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2016 AAMississippi Braves · 25 PAwOBA .331 → .282 (−49)K% 28.0% → 32.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 28.00% | ÷1.043 | ×1.220 | — | — | 32.75% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 4.00% | ÷0.997 | ×0.680 | — | ×1.012 | 2.76% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.840 | — | ×1.012 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.00% | ÷1.014 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.012 | 22.94% |
| Doubles /BIP | 12.50% | ÷1.104 | ×0.910 | — | ×1.012 | 10.43% |
| Triples /BIP | 6.25% | ÷1.150 | ×0.880 | — | ×1.012 | 4.84% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.084 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.012 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 117, 1B 103, 2B 121, 3B 130, K 109, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .331 → .282; ISO .174 → .141; BABIP .438 → .382. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2016 ROKGCL Braves · 22 PAwOBA .330 → .219 (−111)K% 22.7% → 32.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 22.73% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 32.73% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.09% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.955 | 5.38% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.955 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.955 | 15.66% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.67% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.955 | 4.58% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.955 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 6.67% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.955 | 4.97% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 19.5 → −4.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (4.5 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .330 → .219; ISO .200 → .133; BABIP .286 → .213. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 A+Carolina Mudcats · 253 PAwOBA .325 → .273 (−52)K% 16.2% → 22.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 16.21% | ÷1.012 | ×1.420 | — | — | 22.74% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 3.16% | ÷1.042 | ×0.630 | — | ×0.998 | 1.91% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.79% | — | ×0.860 | — | ×0.998 | 0.68% |
| Singles /BIP | 27.64% | ÷1.014 | ×0.940 | ×1.028 | ×0.998 | 26.27% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.03% | ÷1.083 | ×0.830 | ×1.028 | ×0.998 | 4.74% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.50% | ÷0.952 | ×0.800 | ×1.028 | ×0.998 | 0.43% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.51% | ÷1.039 | ×0.900 | — | ×0.998 | 2.17% |
Factors used: league row CAR. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 108, 1B 103, 2B 117, 3B 90, K 102, BB 108 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.028.
Result: wOBA .325 → .273; ISO .121 → .095; BABIP .349 → .320. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 AAMississippi Braves · 195 PAwOBA .217 → .206 (−11)K% 18.5% → 21.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 18.46% | ÷1.031 | ×1.220 | — | — | 21.85% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 4.10% | ÷0.965 | ×0.680 | — | ×1.027 | 2.97% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.51% | — | ×0.840 | — | ×1.027 | 0.44% |
| Singles /BIP | 18.06% | ÷1.019 | ×0.920 | ×1.036 | ×1.027 | 17.35% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.47% | ÷0.927 | ×0.910 | ×1.036 | ×1.027 | 3.63% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.08% | ÷1.005 | ×0.880 | ×1.036 | ×1.027 | 1.94% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.69% | ÷0.784 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.027 | 0.73% |
Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 57, 1B 104, 2B 85, 3B 101, K 106, BB 93 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 24.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.036.
Result: wOBA .217 → .206; ISO .078 → .079; BABIP .236 → .229. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2014 ARome Braves · 153 PAwOBA .303 → .260 (−43)K% 17.6% → 24.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 17.65% | ÷0.966 | ×1.340 | — | — | 24.47% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 3.92% | ÷0.972 | ×0.660 | — | — | 2.66% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.65% | — | ×0.770 | — | — | 0.50% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.22% | ÷1.012 | ×0.920 | ×1.012 | — | 23.19% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.48% | ÷0.965 | ×0.820 | ×1.012 | — | 2.99% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.61% | ÷1.066 | ×0.940 | ×1.012 | — | 2.33% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.61% | ÷0.873 | ×0.820 | — | — | 2.45% |
Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 75, 1B 102, 2B 93, 3B 113, K 93, BB 94 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.012.
Result: wOBA .303 → .260; ISO .134 → .117; BABIP .321 → .292. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2014 ROKDanville Braves · 72 PAwOBA .433 → .336 (−96)K% 12.5% → 17.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 12.50% | ÷1.000 | ×1.420 | — | — | 17.75% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 2.78% | ÷1.000 | ×0.640 | — | ×0.975 | 1.73% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.39% | — | ×0.740 | — | ×0.975 | 1.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 30.51% | ÷1.000 | ×0.840 | ×1.045 | ×0.975 | 26.12% |
| Doubles /BIP | 15.25% | ÷1.000 | ×0.740 | ×1.045 | ×0.975 | 11.50% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.69% | ÷1.000 | ×0.740 | ×1.045 | ×0.975 | 1.28% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.975 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 19.5 → −2.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.045.
Result: wOBA .433 → .336; ISO .162 → .118; BABIP .467 → .382. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2014 A+Lynchburg Hillcats · 47 PAwOBA .369 → .308 (−61)K% 19.1% → 27.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 19.15% | ÷0.979 | ×1.420 | — | — | 27.77% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 2.13% | ÷0.948 | ×0.630 | — | ×1.012 | 1.43% |
| HBP% /PA | 6.38% | — | ×0.860 | — | ×1.012 | 5.56% |
| Singles /BIP | 27.27% | ÷0.990 | ×0.940 | — | ×1.012 | 26.21% |
| Doubles /BIP | 12.12% | ÷1.041 | ×0.830 | — | ×1.012 | 9.78% |
| Triples /BIP | 3.03% | ÷0.900 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.012 | 2.73% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.139 | ×0.900 | — | ×1.012 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row CAR. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 128, 1B 98, 2B 108, 3B 80, K 96, BB 90 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .369 → .308; ISO .143 → .111; BABIP .424 → .387. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).