Gabe Klobosits
P Iowa Cubs| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 28 | AAATOR | 14 | 1 | 19 | 4.74 | 5.78 | 14.6% | 14.6% | — | K 12.6% · BB 13.2% · FIP 6.12 |
| 2026 | 31 | AAACHC | 27 | 2 | 33 | 3.51 | 3.16 | 26.9% | 12.4% | — | K 23.1% · BB 11.2% · FIP 3.39 |
| 2027PROJ | 32 | MLBCHC | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4.34 | 4.34 | 23.2% | 10.7% | 0.0 | |
| 2028PROJ37% MLB | 33 | MLBCHC | 6 | 0 | 6 | 4.50 | 4.62 | 22.4% | 11.0% | -0.0 |
Grades · Statcast · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2017 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 5 | 0 | 9 | 32 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 1.8 | 50.0% | 6.2% | 43.8% | 0.0% | 1.00 | -0.33 | — |
| 2017 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 5 | 0 | 9 | 32 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 1.8 | 50.0% | 6.2% | 43.8% | 0.0% | 1.00 | 0.21 | — |
| 2018 | 23 | A+ MLE | Potomac Nationals | 11 | 0 | 16 | 76 | 18 | 11 | 0 | 0% | 1.5 | 18.2% | 16.6% | 1.6% | 0.0% | 2.20 | 3.67 | — |
| 2018 | 23 | A+ RAW | Potomac Nationals | 11 | 0 | 16 | 76 | 18 | 11 | 0 | 0% | 1.5 | 23.7% | 14.5% | 9.2% | 0.0% | 2.20 | 2.92 | — |
| 2019 | 24 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 18 | 0 | 27 | 104 | 19 | 11 | 1 | 0% | 1.5 | 18.3% | 10.6% | 7.7% | 1.0% | 2.02 | 3.42 | — |
| 2019 | 24 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 18 | 0 | 27 | 104 | 19 | 11 | 1 | 0% | 1.5 | 18.3% | 10.6% | 7.7% | 1.0% | 2.02 | 3.40 | — |
| 2021 | 26 | MIX MLE | 3 levels | 42 | 0 | 50 | 211 | 51 | 15 | 1 | 0% | 1.2 | 20.7% | 7.5% | 13.2% | 0.5% | 2.72 | 2.60 | +1.2 |
| 2021 | 26 | MIX RAW | 3 levels | 42 | 0 | 50 | 211 | 51 | 15 | 1 | 0% | 1.2 | 24.2% | 7.1% | 17.1% | 0.5% | 2.72 | 2.21 | +1.4 |
| 2022 | 27 | AAA MLE | Las Vegas Aviators | 11 | 0 | 11 | 51 | 12 | 6 | 3 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.7% | 12.4% | 8.4% | 6.0% | 7.59 | 6.22 | — |
| 2022 | 27 | AAA RAW | Las Vegas Aviators | 11 | 0 | 11 | 51 | 12 | 6 | 3 | 0% | 1.0 | 23.5% | 11.8% | 11.8% | 5.9% | 7.59 | 6.19 | — |
| 2023 | 28 | AAA MLE | Buffalo Bisons | 14 | 1 | 19 | 82 | 12 | 12 | 3 | 7% | 1.4 | 12.6% | 13.2% | -0.6% | 4.4% | 4.74 | 6.12 | — |
| 2023 | 28 | AAA RAW | Buffalo Bisons | 14 | 1 | 19 | 82 | 12 | 12 | 3 | 7% | 1.4 | 14.6% | 14.6% | 0.0% | 3.7% | 4.74 | 5.78 | — |
| 2026 | 31 | AAA MLE | Iowa Cubs | 27 | 2 | 33 | 145 | 39 | 18 | 2 | 7% | 1.2 | 23.1% | 11.2% | 12.0% | 1.5% | 3.51 | 3.39 | — |
| 2026 | 31 | AAA MLE | Iowa Cubs | 27 | 2 | 33 | 145 | 39 | 18 | 2 | 7% | 1.2 | 23.1% | 11.2% | 12.0% | 1.5% | 3.51 | 3.39 | — |
| 2026 | 31 | AAA RAW | Iowa Cubs | 27 | 2 | 33 | 145 | 39 | 18 | 2 | 7% | 1.2 | 26.9% | 12.4% | 14.5% | 1.4% | 3.51 | 3.16 | — |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 11 | 0 | 11 | 52 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 9.6% | 7.7% | 1.9% | 0.0% | 6.35 | 3.28 | +0.2 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 32 | MLB | CHC | 2 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 23.2% | 10.7% | 12.5% | 2.7% | 4.34 | 4.34 | +0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 33 | MLB MLE | CHC | 17 | 0 | 17 | 73 | 16 | 8 | 2 | 0% | 1.0 | 22.4% | 11.0% | 11.4% | 3.0% | 4.50 | 4.62 | -0.0 |
| 2028 | 33 | MLB CTX | CHC | 6 | 0 | 6 | 25 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 22.4% | 11.0% | 11.4% | 3.0% | 4.50 | 4.62 | -0.0 |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 17 | 0 | 18 | 79 | 11 | 7 | 1 | 0% | 1.0 | 14.0% | 8.8% | 5.2% | 1.0% | 5.68 | 3.60 | +0.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 193 | 0 | 200 | 891 | 124 | 79 | 11 | 0% | 1.0 | 14.0% | 8.8% | 5.2% | 1.0% | 5.68 | 3.60 | +2.3 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 128 | 3 | 165 | 701 | 147 | 75 | 11 | 2% | 1.3 | 21.0% | 10.7% | 10.3% | 1.6% | 3.17 | 3.54 | +0.2 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 155 | 4 | 200 | 851 | 178 | 91 | 13 | 2% | 1.3 | 21.0% | 10.7% | 10.3% | 1.6% | 3.17 | 3.54 | +1.1 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2026 AAAIowa Cubs · 33 IPFIP 3.16 → 3.39 (+0.24)K% 26.9% → 23.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 26.90% | — | ×0.860 | 23.13% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 12.41% | — | ×0.900 | 11.17% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.38% | ÷1.000 | ×1.100 | 1.52% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.16 → 3.39, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2023 AAABuffalo Bisons · 19 IPFIP 5.73 → 6.12 (+0.39)K% 14.6% → 12.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 14.63% | — | ×0.860 | 12.59% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 14.63% | — | ×0.900 | 13.17% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.66% | ÷0.916 | ×1.100 | 4.39% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 83).
Result: FIP 5.73 → 6.12, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AAALas Vegas Aviators · 11 IPFIP 5.83 → 6.22 (+0.39)K% 23.5% → 20.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.53% | — | ×0.880 | 20.71% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.76% | — | ×1.050 | 12.35% |
| HR / BF /BF | 5.88% | ÷1.075 | ×1.100 | 6.02% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 115).
Result: FIP 5.83 → 6.22, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 AAARochester Red Wings · 18 IPFIP 1.94 → 2.24 (+0.30)K% 25.0% → 22.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.00% | — | ×0.880 | 22.00% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 7.50% | — | ×1.050 | 7.88% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.968 | ×1.100 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 94).
Result: FIP 1.94 → 2.24, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 AAHarrisburg Senators · 20 IPFIP 1.82 → 2.53 (+0.72)K% 32.9% → 26.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 32.91% | — | ×0.810 | 26.66% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.33% | — | ×1.100 | 6.96% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.27% | ÷1.037 | ×1.200 | 1.46% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 107).
Result: FIP 1.82 → 2.53, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 A+Potomac Nationals · 12 IPFIP 2.72 → 3.24 (+0.51)K% 17.8% → 13.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 17.78% | — | ×0.770 | 13.69% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.89% | — | ×1.150 | 10.22% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.988 | ×1.250 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 98).
Result: FIP 2.72 → 3.24, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 ROKGCL Nationals · 9 IPFIP 4.47 → 5.74 (+1.27)K% 15.0% → 10.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 15.00% | — | ×0.680 | 10.20% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.00% | — | ×1.250 | 12.50% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.50% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 3.50% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 4.47 → 5.74, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 A+Potomac Nationals · 16 IPFIP 2.93 → 3.67 (+0.73)K% 23.7% → 18.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.68% | — | ×0.770 | 18.24% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 14.47% | — | ×1.150 | 16.64% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.017 | ×1.250 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 103).
Result: FIP 2.93 → 3.67, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).