Casey Gillaspie

Pos1B

B/TS/L

Born1993-01-25

Age (2027)34

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AAALAST SEASON 2018

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2016	23	AAA/AATB	560	.284/.391/.479	18	5	99	—	.245/.324/.396
2017	24	AAACWS	515	.223/.301/.373	15	1	57	—	.199/.255/.315
2018	25	AAACWS	281	.220/.287/.325	3	0	30	—	.179/.226/.255

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2015	22	A+	Charlotte Stone Crabs	—	45	41	6	0	1	1	4	9	0	0	0	146	222	268	491	122	161	20	9	225	8	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	22	A	Bowling Green Hot Rods	—	268	234	65	11	0	16	28	43	3	4	0	278	362	530	892	252	275	16	10	386	83	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	22	INTL	Mesa Solar Sox	—	99	89	17	2	0	2	10	16	0	1	1	191	273	281	554	90	211	16	10	257	60	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	23	AAA	Durham Bulls	—	203	179	55	13	2	7	22	38	2	0	1	307	389	520	909	212	358	19	11	400	107	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	23	AA	Montgomery Biscuits	—	357	293	79	21	0	11	58	79	1	5	1	270	392	454	846	184	327	22	16	374	95	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	24	AAA	Charlotte Knights	—	515	458	102	20	2	15	50	100	1	1	1	223	301	373	674	151	249	19	10	300	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	25	AAA	Charlotte Knights	—	281	255	56	18	0	3	24	91	0	0	0	220	287	325	612	106	325	32	9	277	30	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2015	22	A+ MLE	Charlotte Stone Crabs	—	45	42	5	0	1	1	3	13	0	0	0	119	178	238	416	119	147	29	7	180	8	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	22	A MLE	Bowling Green Hot Rods	—	268	245	54	8	0	11	17	60	3	4	0	220	279	388	667	167	239	22	6	291	83	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	23	AAA MLE	Durham Bulls	—	203	186	49	10	2	5	15	46	2	0	1	263	325	419	744	156	328	23	7	327	107	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	23	AA MLE	Montgomery Biscuits	—	357	311	73	19	0	9	40	98	1	5	1	235	324	383	707	148	297	27	11	309	95	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	24	AAA MLE	Charlotte Knights	—	515	473	94	18	2	11	35	126	1	1	1	199	255	315	570	116	238	24	7	252	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	25	AAA MLE	Charlotte Knights	—	281	263	47	14	0	2	16	111	0	0	0	179	226	255	481	76	288	40	6	212	30	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	22	A MLE	3 teams	—	412	379	78	11	1	16	27	97	3	5	1	206	264	367	631	161	230	24	7	275	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	22	A RAW	3 teams	—	412	364	88	13	1	19	42	68	3	5	1	242	325	440	765	198	246	17	10	338	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	23	AA MLE	2 teams	—	560	497	122	29	2	14	55	144	3	5	2	245	324	396	721	151	314	26	10	316	100	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	23	AA RAW	2 teams	—	560	472	134	34	2	18	80	117	3	5	2	284	391	479	870	195	339	21	14	384	100	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	24	AAA MLE	Charlotte Knights	—	515	473	94	18	2	11	35	126	1	1	1	199	255	315	570	116	243	24	7	252	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	24	AAA RAW	Charlotte Knights	—	515	458	102	20	2	15	50	100	1	1	1	223	301	373	674	151	249	19	10	300	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	25	AAA MLE	Charlotte Knights	—	281	263	47	14	0	2	16	111	0	0	0	179	226	255	481	76	296	40	6	212	30	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	25	AAA RAW	Charlotte Knights	—	281	255	56	18	0	3	24	91	0	0	0	220	287	325	612	106	325	32	9	277	30	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	22	A MLE	3 teams	—	412	379	78	11	1	16	27	97	3	5	1	206	264	367	631	161	226	24	7	275	72	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	23	AA MLE	2 teams	—	560	497	122	29	2	14	55	144	3	5	2	245	324	396	721	151	308	26	10	316	100	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	24	AAA MLE	Charlotte Knights	—	515	474	94	18	2	11	35	126	1	1	1	198	255	314	570	116	238	24	7	252	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	25	AAA MLE	Charlotte Knights	—	281	263	47	14	0	2	16	111	0	0	0	179	226	255	481	76	288	40	6	212	30	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	1768	1612	341	72	5	43	133	478	7	11	4	212	275	342	617	131	269	27	8	271	70	-64	+1	+0	-32	+38	-5.8
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	593	125	26	2	16	49	176	3	4	1	211	275	342	617	132	268	27	8	271	70	-23	+0	+0	-12	+14	-2.1

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2018 AAACharlotte Knights · 281 PAwOBA .270 → .212 (−58)K% 32.4% → 39.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	32.38%	÷0.986	×1.200	—	—	39.39%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.19%	÷1.030	×0.690	—	×1.033	5.66%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.940	—	×1.033	0.00%
Singles /BIP	21.34%	÷1.030	×0.930	×1.007	×1.033	20.04%
Doubles /BIP	10.98%	÷1.077	×0.830	×1.007	×1.033	8.80%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.970	×1.007	×1.033	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	1.83%	÷1.319	×0.840	—	×1.033	1.20%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 164, 1B 106, 2B 115, 3B 130, K 97, BB 106 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 27.2 → +3.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.007.

Result: wOBA .270 → .212; ISO .106 → .075; BABIP .325 → .288. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 AAACharlotte Knights · 515 PAwOBA .294 → .252 (−42)K% 19.4% → 24.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	19.42%	÷0.952	×1.200	—	—	24.48%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.32%	÷1.008	×0.690	—	×1.048	6.69%
HBP% /PA	0.19%	—	×0.940	—	×1.048	0.19%
Singles /BIP	18.16%	÷1.012	×0.930	×1.014	×1.048	17.73%
Doubles /BIP	5.59%	÷0.958	×0.830	×1.014	×1.048	5.15%
Triples /BIP	0.56%	÷1.077	×0.970	×1.014	×1.048	0.53%
Home runs /BIP	4.19%	÷1.150	×0.840	—	×1.048	3.21%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 130, 1B 102, 2B 92, 3B 115, K 90, BB 102 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 27.2 → +4.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.014.

Result: wOBA .294 → .252; ISO .151 → .122; BABIP .249 → .238. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 AAMontgomery Biscuits · 357 PAwOBA .368 → .309 (−59)K% 22.1% → 27.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	22.13%	÷0.982	×1.220	—	—	27.50%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	15.69%	÷0.980	×0.680	—	×1.027	11.18%
HBP% /PA	0.28%	—	×0.840	—	×1.027	0.24%
Singles /BIP	21.96%	÷0.982	×0.920	×0.977	×1.027	20.63%
Doubles /BIP	9.81%	÷1.040	×0.910	×0.977	×1.027	8.61%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.994	×0.880	×0.977	×1.027	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	5.14%	÷1.081	×0.800	—	×1.027	3.91%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 116, 1B 96, 2B 108, 3B 99, K 96, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 24.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.977.

Result: wOBA .368 → .309; ISO .184 → .151; BABIP .327 → .297. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 AAADurham Bulls · 203 PAwOBA .389 → .327 (−62)K% 18.7% → 22.6%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	18.72%	÷0.994	×1.200	—	—	22.60%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.84%	÷1.082	×0.690	—	×1.050	7.26%
HBP% /PA	0.99%	—	×0.940	—	×1.050	0.97%
Singles /BIP	23.40%	÷1.010	×0.930	×0.999	×1.050	22.60%
Doubles /BIP	9.22%	÷1.093	×0.830	×0.999	×1.050	7.34%
Triples /BIP	1.42%	÷0.900	×0.970	×0.999	×1.050	1.60%
Home runs /BIP	4.96%	÷1.167	×0.840	—	×1.050	3.75%

Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 133, 1B 102, 2B 119, 3B 80, K 99, BB 116 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 27.2 → +5.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (4.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.999.

Result: wOBA .389 → .327; ISO .212 → .171; BABIP .358 → .328. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 ABowling Green Hot Rods · 268 PAwOBA .379 → .291 (−88)K% 16.0% → 22.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	16.04%	÷0.968	×1.360	—	—	22.54%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.07%	÷1.068	×0.690	—	—	6.51%
HBP% /PA	1.12%	—	×0.780	—	—	0.87%
Singles /BIP	19.90%	÷1.005	×0.920	×1.011	—	18.42%
Doubles /BIP	5.76%	÷1.090	×0.830	×1.011	—	4.43%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.972	×0.910	×1.011	—	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	8.38%	÷1.130	×0.800	—	—	5.93%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 126, 1B 101, 2B 118, 3B 94, K 94, BB 114 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.011.

Result: wOBA .379 → .291; ISO .252 → .178; BABIP .275 → .239. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 A+Charlotte Stone Crabs · 45 PAwOBA .219 → .180 (−39)K% 20.0% → 29.0%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	20.00%	÷0.979	×1.420	—	—	29.01%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.89%	÷0.994	×0.750	—	×1.012	6.78%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.930	—	×1.012	0.00%
Singles /BIP	12.50%	÷0.976	×0.920	—	×1.012	11.93%
Doubles /BIP	0.00%	÷0.978	×0.960	—	×1.012	0.00%
Triples /BIP	3.12%	÷1.150	×0.810	—	×1.012	2.23%
Home runs /BIP	3.12%	÷0.822	×0.880	—	×1.012	3.39%

Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 64, 1B 95, 2B 96, 3B 130, K 96, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average).

Result: wOBA .219 → .180; ISO .122 → .103; BABIP .161 → .147. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .