Joe Dunand

PosSS

B/TR/R

Born1995-09-20

Age (2027)31

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AAALAST SEASON 2023

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2021	25	AAA/A/INTL2 orgs	288	.201/.274/.347	8	0	43	—	.166/.228/.292
2022	26	AAAATL	340	.214/.313/.342	6	6	42	—	.172/.251/.266
2023	27	AAAATL	403	.268/.365/.481	17	3	86	—	.224/.300/.380

Contract

No contract data on file.

Skills · percentileMiLB Statcast 2023 AAA

Max EV84

BB%49

Speed45

Chase%32

Whiff%31

K%30

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2017	21	ROK	GCL Marlins	—	21	16	6	3	0	1	3	4	1	0	0	375	500	750	1.250	375	417	19	14	503	145	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	22	AA	Jacksonville Jumbo Shrimp	—	239	217	46	13	0	7	16	71	4	0	1	212	278	369	647	157	277	30	7	288	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	22	A+	Jupiter Hammerheads	—	273	243	64	8	1	7	20	54	5	2	0	263	332	391	723	128	305	20	7	321	69	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	23	AA	Jacksonville Jumbo Shrimp	—	525	462	112	25	1	5	38	119	15	2	1	242	320	333	654	91	307	23	7	295	54	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	23	INTL	Leones del Escogido	—	28	26	4	1	1	0	2	5	0	0	0	154	214	269	484	115	190	18	7	218	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
2020	24	INTL	Leones del Escogido	—	83	72	23	7	0	3	9	25	1	1	0	319	402	542	944	222	444	30	11	410	163	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	25	AAA	Jacksonville Jumbo Shrimp	—	229	204	41	9	1	8	17	70	5	0	0	201	279	373	651	172	258	31	7	289	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	25	A	Jupiter Hammerheads	—	15	14	2	0	0	0	0	7	1	0	0	143	200	143	343		286	47	0	170	-39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	25	INTL	Leones del Escogido	—	44	41	9	3	0	0	2	8	1	0	0	220	273	293	565	73	273	18	5	259	62	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	26	AAA	Gwinnett Stripers	—	340	295	63	18	1	6	37	105	6	6	1	214	313	342	655	129	308	31	11	299	42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	27	AAA	Gwinnett Stripers	—	403	347	93	19	2	17	45	107	8	3	2	268	365	481	846	213	336	27	11	372	86	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2017	21	ROK MLE	GCL Marlins	—	21	17	5	2	0	1	2	6	1	0	0	294	400	588	988	294	304	29	10	382	145	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	22	AA MLE	Jacksonville Jumbo Shrimp	—	239	223	40	13	0	5	10	82	4	0	1	179	228	305	533	126	251	34	4	236	46	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	22	A+ MLE	Jupiter Hammerheads	—	273	248	55	8	1	7	15	76	5	2	0	222	280	347	627	125	270	28	5	270	69	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	23	AA MLE	Jacksonville Jumbo Shrimp	—	525	475	98	22	1	4	25	144	15	2	1	206	268	282	550	76	271	27	5	248	54	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	25	AAA MLE	Jacksonville Jumbo Shrimp	—	229	209	36	8	1	6	12	85	5	0	0	172	235	306	541	134	240	37	5	234	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	25	A MLE	Jupiter Hammerheads	—	15	14	1	0	0	0	0	9	1	0	0	71	133	71	205		254	60	0	110	-39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	26	AAA MLE	Gwinnett Stripers	—	340	308	53	15	1	4	26	126	6	6	1	172	251	266	517	94	268	37	8	231	42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	27	AAA MLE	Gwinnett Stripers	—	403	361	81	16	2	12	31	128	8	3	2	224	300	380	680	155	301	32	8	295	86	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	21	ROK MLE	GCL Marlins	—	21	17	5	2	0	1	2	6	1	0	0	294	400	588	988	294	364	29	10	382	145	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	21	ROK RAW	GCL Marlins	—	21	16	6	3	0	1	3	4	1	0	0	375	500	750	1.250	375	417	19	14	503	145	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	22	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	512	471	95	21	1	12	25	158	9	2	1	202	255	327	582	125	269	31	5	254	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	22	A+ RAW	2 teams	—	512	460	110	21	1	14	36	125	9	2	1	239	307	380	687	141	293	24	7	305	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	23	AA MLE	2 teams	—	553	501	105	24	1	5	27	152	15	2	1	210	271	291	562	82	282	27	5	248	54	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	23	AA RAW	2 teams	—	553	488	116	26	2	5	40	124	15	2	1	238	315	330	645	92	301	22	7	291	54	—	—	—	—	—	—
2020	24	INTL MLE	Leones del Escogido	—	83	72	23	7	0	3	9	25	1	1	0	319	402	542	944	222	444	30	11	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2020	24	INTL RAW	Leones del Escogido	—	83	72	23	7	0	3	9	25	1	1	0	319	402	542	944	222	444	30	11	410	163	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	25	AAA MLE	3 teams	—	288	264	43	9	1	7	14	112	7	0	0	163	225	284	509	121	245	39	5	226	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	25	AAA RAW	3 teams	—	288	259	52	12	1	8	19	85	7	0	0	201	274	347	621	147	262	30	7	278	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	26	AAA MLE	Gwinnett Stripers	—	340	307	53	15	1	4	26	126	6	6	1	173	251	267	518	94	275	37	8	231	42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	26	AAA RAW	Gwinnett Stripers	—	340	295	63	18	1	6	37	105	6	6	1	214	313	342	655	129	308	31	11	299	42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	27	AAA MLE	Gwinnett Stripers	—	403	361	81	16	2	12	31	128	8	3	2	224	300	380	680	155	308	32	8	295	86	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	27	AAA RAW	Gwinnett Stripers	—	403	347	93	19	2	17	45	107	8	3	2	268	365	481	846	213	336	27	11	372	86	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	21	ROK MLE	GCL Marlins	—	21	18	5	2	0	1	2	6	1	0	0	278	400	556	956	278	304	29	10	382	145	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	22	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	512	473	95	21	1	12	25	158	9	2	1	201	255	326	581	125	261	31	5	254	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	23	AA MLE	2 teams	—	553	506	105	24	1	5	27	152	15	2	1	208	271	289	559	81	271	27	5	248	54	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	25	AAA MLE	3 teams	—	288	265	43	9	1	7	14	112	7	0	0	162	225	283	508	121	241	39	5	226	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	26	AAA MLE	Gwinnett Stripers	—	340	305	53	15	1	4	26	126	6	6	1	174	251	269	520	95	268	37	8	231	42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	27	AAA MLE	Gwinnett Stripers	—	403	361	81	16	2	12	31	128	8	3	2	224	300	380	680	155	301	32	8	295	86	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	2200	1993	405	94	6	44	134	707	47	14	5	203	270	323	592	119	285	32	6	245	52	-127	+1	+0	+21	+48	-5.8
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	589	120	28	2	13	40	209	14	4	1	204	271	324	595	121	286	32	6	245	52	-37	+0	+0	+6	+14	-1.7

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2023 AAAGwinnett Stripers · 403 PAwOBA .365 → .295 (−70)K% 26.6% → 31.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	26.55%	÷1.005	×1.200	—	—	31.71%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.17%	÷0.997	×0.690	—	×0.992	7.67%
HBP% /PA	1.99%	—	×0.940	—	×0.992	1.85%
Singles /BIP	22.92%	÷0.968	×0.930	×0.979	×0.992	21.36%
Doubles /BIP	7.92%	÷0.933	×0.830	×0.979	×0.992	6.84%
Triples /BIP	0.83%	÷0.999	×0.970	×0.979	×0.992	0.79%
Home runs /BIP	7.08%	÷0.984	×0.700	—	×0.992	5.00%

Factors used: league row International League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 97, 1B 94, 2B 87, 3B 100, K 101, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 27.2 → −0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.979.

Result: wOBA .365 → .295; ISO .213 → .160; BABIP .336 → .301. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2022 AAAGwinnett Stripers · 340 PAwOBA .293 → .231 (−62)K% 30.9% → 37.0%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	30.88%	÷1.002	×1.200	—	—	36.99%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.88%	÷0.998	×0.690	—	×1.003	7.55%
HBP% /PA	1.76%	—	×0.940	—	×1.003	1.66%
Singles /BIP	20.00%	÷1.018	×0.930	×0.978	×1.003	17.94%
Doubles /BIP	9.47%	÷0.966	×0.830	×0.978	×1.003	7.99%
Triples /BIP	0.53%	÷1.150	×0.970	×0.978	×1.003	0.44%
Home runs /BIP	3.16%	÷0.981	×0.700	—	×1.003	2.26%

Factors used: league row International League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 96, 1B 104, 2B 93, 3B 130, K 100, BB 100 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 27.2 → +0.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.978.

Result: wOBA .293 → .231; ISO .129 → .097; BABIP .308 → .268. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2021 AAAJacksonville Jumbo Shrimp · 229 PAwOBA .284 → .234 (−49)K% 30.6% → 37.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	30.57%	÷0.985	×1.200	—	—	37.25%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.42%	÷0.994	×0.690	—	×1.018	5.25%
HBP% /PA	2.18%	—	×0.940	—	×1.018	2.09%
Singles /BIP	17.16%	÷0.971	×0.930	×0.990	×1.018	16.56%
Doubles /BIP	6.72%	÷0.933	×0.830	×0.990	×1.018	6.02%
Triples /BIP	0.75%	÷1.109	×0.920	×0.990	×1.018	0.62%
Home runs /BIP	5.97%	÷0.886	×0.700	—	×1.018	4.80%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 77, 1B 94, 2B 87, 3B 122, K 97, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 27.2 → +1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.990.

Result: wOBA .284 → .234; ISO .172 → .135; BABIP .258 → .240. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2021 AJupiter Hammerheads · 15 PAwOBA .165 → .110 (−56)K% 46.7% → 62.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	46.67%	÷1.021	×1.360	—	—	62.13%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	0.00%	÷0.993	×0.690	—	×0.960	0.00%
HBP% /PA	6.67%	—	×0.780	—	×0.960	4.99%
Singles /BIP	28.57%	÷0.993	×0.920	—	×0.960	25.42%
Doubles /BIP	0.00%	÷1.226	×0.830	—	×0.960	0.00%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.996	×0.910	—	×0.960	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.891	×0.800	—	×0.960	0.00%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 78, 1B 99, 2B 145, 3B 99, K 104, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 22.0 → −4.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (4.0 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .165 → .110; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .286 → .254. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2019 AAJacksonville Jumbo Shrimp · 525 PAwOBA .293 → .248 (−45)K% 22.7% → 27.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	22.67%	÷1.007	×1.220	—	—	27.47%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.05%	÷1.015	×0.680	—	×1.012	4.78%
HBP% /PA	2.86%	—	×0.840	—	×1.012	2.43%
Singles /BIP	23.62%	÷1.008	×0.920	×0.950	×1.012	20.73%
Doubles /BIP	7.29%	÷0.975	×0.910	×0.950	×1.012	6.54%
Triples /BIP	0.29%	÷0.900	×0.880	×0.950	×1.012	0.27%
Home runs /BIP	1.46%	÷0.918	×0.800	—	×1.012	1.28%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 84, 1B 102, 2B 95, 3B 80, K 101, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .293 → .248; ISO .091 → .081; BABIP .307 → .271. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 A+Jupiter Hammerheads · 273 PAwOBA .317 → .270 (−46)K% 19.8% → 27.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	19.78%	÷1.009	×1.420	—	—	27.82%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.96%	÷0.967	×0.750	—	×0.998	5.39%
HBP% /PA	1.83%	—	×0.930	—	×0.998	1.70%
Singles /BIP	25.40%	÷1.018	×0.920	×0.961	×0.998	22.03%
Doubles /BIP	4.23%	÷0.903	×0.960	×0.961	×0.998	4.32%
Triples /BIP	0.53%	÷1.150	×0.810	×0.961	×0.998	0.36%
Home runs /BIP	3.70%	÷0.850	×0.880	—	×0.998	3.83%

Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 70, 1B 104, 2B 80, 3B 130, K 102, BB 93 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.961.

Result: wOBA .317 → .270; ISO .128 → .121; BABIP .305 → .270. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 AAJacksonville Jumbo Shrimp · 239 PAwOBA .283 → .236 (−47)K% 29.7% → 34.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	29.71%	÷1.052	×1.220	—	—	34.45%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.69%	÷1.122	×0.680	—	×1.027	4.17%
HBP% /PA	1.67%	—	×0.840	—	×1.027	1.44%
Singles /BIP	17.81%	÷1.050	×0.920	×0.959	×1.027	15.36%
Doubles /BIP	8.90%	÷0.875	×0.910	×0.959	×1.027	9.12%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.900	×0.880	×0.959	×1.027	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	4.79%	÷1.041	×0.800	—	×1.027	3.78%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 108, 1B 110, 2B 75, 3B 80, K 110, BB 124 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 24.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.959.

Result: wOBA .283 → .236; ISO .157 → .135; BABIP .277 → .251. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 ROKGCL Marlins · 21 PAwOBA .515 → .382 (−132)K% 19.0% → 27.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	19.05%	÷1.000	×1.440	—	—	27.43%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	14.29%	÷1.000	×0.620	—	×0.975	8.64%
HBP% /PA	4.76%	—	×0.720	—	×0.975	3.34%
Singles /BIP	16.67%	÷1.000	×0.820	—	×0.975	13.32%
Doubles /BIP	25.00%	÷1.000	×0.720	—	×0.975	17.55%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.000	×0.720	—	×0.975	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	8.33%	÷1.000	×0.780	—	×0.975	6.34%

Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 19.5 → −2.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.5 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .515 → .382; ISO .375 → .291; BABIP .417 → .304. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .