Christian Donahue
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 24 | AATennessee Smo… | 370 | .208/.270/.290 | 3 | 9 | 21 | — | .174/.217/.241 |
| 2021 | 26 | AATennessee Smo… | 56 | .196/.327/.239 | 0 | 3 | 35 | — | .184/.273/.224 |
| 2022 | 27 | AAA/AA2 orgs | 92 | .159/.242/.207 | 1 | 2 | -3 | — | .143/.209/.189 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2018 | 23 | A+ | Myrtle Beach Pelicans | — | 46 | 39 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 282 | 391 | 513 | 904 | 231 | 360 | 26 | 13 | 399 | 88 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | A | South Bend Cubs | — | 318 | 282 | 81 | 18 | 1 | 2 | 29 | 63 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 287 | 356 | 379 | 735 | 92 | 359 | 20 | 9 | 328 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | AA | Tennessee Smokies | — | 370 | 331 | 69 | 14 | 2 | 3 | 27 | 76 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 208 | 270 | 290 | 560 | 82 | 258 | 21 | 7 | 249 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 26 | AA | Tennessee Smokies | — | 56 | 46 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 16 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 196 | 327 | 239 | 566 | 43 | 300 | 29 | 12 | 272 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 27 | AAA | Iowa Cubs | — | 18 | 17 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 176 | 222 | 353 | 575 | 176 | 250 | 44 | 6 | 255 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 27 | AA | Tennessee Smokies | — | 74 | 65 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 22 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 154 | 247 | 169 | 416 | 15 | 233 | 30 | 11 | 203 | -4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2018 | 23 | A+ MLE | Myrtle Beach Pelicans | — | 46 | 41 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 17 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 220 | 304 | 415 | 719 | 195 | 317 | 37 | 9 | 299 | 88 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | A MLE | South Bend Cubs | — | 318 | 291 | 69 | 13 | 1 | 2 | 20 | 85 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 237 | 288 | 309 | 598 | 72 | 311 | 27 | 6 | 259 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | AA MLE | Tennessee Smokies | — | 370 | 340 | 59 | 13 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 95 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 174 | 217 | 241 | 458 | 68 | 219 | 26 | 5 | 199 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 26 | AA MLE | Tennessee Smokies | — | 56 | 49 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 184 | 273 | 224 | 497 | 41 | 280 | 36 | 7 | 220 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 27 | AAA MLE | Iowa Cubs | — | 18 | 17 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 176 | 222 | 353 | 575 | 176 | 228 | 56 | 6 | 170 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 27 | AA MLE | Tennessee Smokies | — | 74 | 67 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 28 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 134 | 205 | 149 | 355 | 15 | 220 | 38 | 8 | 163 | -4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 364 | 333 | 76 | 15 | 1 | 3 | 23 | 102 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 228 | 282 | 306 | 588 | 78 | 316 | 28 | 6 | 264 | 65 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 364 | 321 | 92 | 21 | 1 | 4 | 35 | 75 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 287 | 360 | 396 | 756 | 109 | 359 | 21 | 10 | 337 | 65 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | AA MLE | Tennessee Smokies | — | 370 | 340 | 59 | 13 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 95 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 174 | 217 | 241 | 458 | 68 | 231 | 26 | 5 | 199 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | AA RAW | Tennessee Smokies | — | 370 | 331 | 69 | 14 | 2 | 3 | 27 | 76 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 208 | 270 | 290 | 560 | 82 | 258 | 21 | 7 | 249 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 26 | AA MLE | Tennessee Smokies | — | 56 | 49 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 184 | 273 | 224 | 497 | 41 | 310 | 36 | 7 | 220 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 26 | AA RAW | Tennessee Smokies | — | 56 | 46 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 16 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 196 | 327 | 239 | 566 | 43 | 300 | 29 | 12 | 272 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 27 | AA MLE | 2 teams | — | 92 | 85 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 38 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 141 | 198 | 188 | 386 | 47 | 239 | 41 | 7 | 164 | -3 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 27 | AA RAW | 2 teams | — | 92 | 82 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 30 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 159 | 242 | 207 | 449 | 49 | 235 | 33 | 10 | 213 | -3 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 364 | 336 | 76 | 15 | 1 | 3 | 23 | 102 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 226 | 282 | 304 | 586 | 77 | 312 | 28 | 6 | 264 | 65 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | AA MLE | Tennessee Smokies | — | 370 | 348 | 59 | 13 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 95 | 1 | 9 | 4 | 170 | 217 | 236 | 453 | 66 | 219 | 26 | 5 | 199 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 26 | AA MLE | Tennessee Smokies | — | 56 | 50 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 180 | 273 | 220 | 493 | 40 | 280 | 36 | 7 | 220 | 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2022 | 27 | AA MLE | 2 teams | — | 92 | 86 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 38 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 140 | 198 | 186 | 384 | 47 | 222 | 41 | 7 | 164 | -3 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 882 | 807 | 156 | 31 | 3 | 6 | 51 | 255 | 5 | 17 | 9 | 193 | 246 | 261 | 507 | 68 | 271 | 29 | 6 | 224 | 37 | -66 | -0 | +0 | +3 | +19 | -4.4 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 595 | 114 | 23 | 2 | 4 | 38 | 188 | 4 | 13 | 7 | 192 | 245 | 257 | 502 | 66 | 270 | 29 | 6 | 224 | 37 | -48 | -0 | +0 | +2 | +14 | -3.3 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2022 AATennessee Smokies · 74 PAwOBA .198 → .163 (−36)K% 29.7% → 37.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 29.73% | ÷0.958 | ×1.220 | — | — | 37.88% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.81% | ÷0.940 | ×0.680 | — | ×0.978 | 7.65% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.840 | — | ×0.978 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.93% | ÷0.982 | ×0.920 | ×1.028 | ×0.978 | 19.71% |
| Doubles /BIP | 2.33% | ÷0.929 | ×0.910 | ×1.028 | ×0.978 | 2.29% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.973 | ×0.880 | ×1.028 | ×0.978 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.010 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.978 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 102, 1B 96, 2B 86, 3B 95, K 92, BB 88 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 24.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.028.
Result: wOBA .198 → .163; ISO .015 → .014; BABIP .233 → .220. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AAAIowa Cubs · 18 PAwOBA .247 → .170 (−77)K% 44.4% → 54.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 44.44% | ÷0.988 | ×1.200 | — | — | 53.98% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.56% | ÷1.048 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.003 | 3.67% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.940 | — | ×1.003 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.22% | ÷0.985 | ×0.930 | — | ×1.003 | 21.04% |
| Doubles /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.967 | ×0.830 | — | ×1.003 | 0.00% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.118 | ×0.970 | — | ×1.003 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 11.11% | ÷0.996 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.003 | 7.83% |
Factors used: league row International League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 99, 1B 97, 2B 93, 3B 124, K 98, BB 110 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 27.2 → +0.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .247 → .170; ISO .176 → .105; BABIP .250 → .228. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 AATennessee Smokies · 56 PAwOBA .267 → .220 (−46)K% 28.6% → 35.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 28.57% | ÷0.990 | ×1.220 | — | — | 35.22% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 12.50% | ÷1.066 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.988 | 8.00% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.57% | — | ×0.850 | — | ×0.988 | 3.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.33% | ÷0.970 | ×0.940 | — | ×0.988 | 22.35% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.67% | ÷1.015 | ×0.870 | — | ×0.988 | 5.65% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.920 | — | ×0.988 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.050 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.988 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide AA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 110, 1B 94, 2B 103, 3B 130, K 98, BB 113 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 24.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .267 → .220; ISO .043 → .037; BABIP .300 → .280. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 AATennessee Smokies · 370 PAwOBA .246 → .199 (−47)K% 20.5% → 25.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 20.54% | ÷0.972 | ×1.220 | — | — | 25.77% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.30% | ÷1.047 | ×0.680 | — | ×1.012 | 4.80% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.27% | — | ×0.840 | — | ×1.012 | 0.23% |
| Singles /BIP | 19.61% | ÷1.051 | ×0.920 | ×0.950 | ×1.012 | 16.50% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.49% | ÷0.977 | ×0.910 | ×0.950 | ×1.012 | 4.92% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.78% | ÷0.957 | ×0.880 | ×0.950 | ×1.012 | 0.69% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.18% | ÷1.142 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.012 | 0.83% |
Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 128, 1B 110, 2B 95, 3B 91, K 94, BB 109 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .246 → .199; ISO .082 → .068; BABIP .258 → .219. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 ASouth Bend Cubs · 318 PAwOBA .321 → .259 (−62)K% 19.8% → 26.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 19.81% | ÷1.005 | ×1.360 | — | — | 26.82% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.81% | ÷0.968 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.990 | 6.22% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.31% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.990 | 0.24% |
| Singles /BIP | 27.40% | ÷0.982 | ×0.920 | ×0.977 | ×0.990 | 24.83% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.22% | ÷1.092 | ×0.830 | ×0.977 | ×0.990 | 6.04% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.46% | ÷1.000 | ×0.910 | ×0.977 | ×0.990 | 0.40% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.91% | ÷0.881 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.990 | 0.82% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 76, 1B 96, 2B 118, 3B 100, K 101, BB 94 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.977.
Result: wOBA .321 → .259; ISO .092 → .070; BABIP .359 → .311. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 A+Myrtle Beach Pelicans · 46 PAwOBA .389 → .299 (−90)K% 26.1% → 37.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 26.09% | ÷0.987 | ×1.420 | — | — | 37.54% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 13.04% | ÷1.032 | ×0.630 | — | ×0.998 | 7.95% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.17% | — | ×0.860 | — | ×0.998 | 1.87% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.22% | ÷1.078 | ×0.940 | — | ×0.998 | 19.34% |
| Doubles /BIP | 11.11% | ÷0.915 | ×0.830 | — | ×0.998 | 10.06% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.924 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.998 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 7.41% | ÷0.933 | ×0.900 | — | ×0.998 | 7.13% |
Factors used: league row CAR. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 87, 1B 116, 2B 83, 3B 85, K 97, BB 106 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .389 → .299; ISO .231 → .195; BABIP .360 → .317. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).