Jodd Carter

PosLF

B/TR/R

Born1996-07-20

Age (2027)31

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

A+LAST SEASON 2019

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2017	21	A+Lynchburg Hil…	443	.239/.328/.387	11	9	61	—	.205/.264/.324
2018	22	AA/A+2 orgs	498	.251/.337/.392	11	11	61	—	.209/.269/.322
2019	23	A+Lynchburg Hil…	403	.243/.349/.398	11	9	65	—	.198/.276/.331

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2014	18	ROK	AZL Indians	—	147	127	37	5	0	1	15	28	1	7	2	291	371	354	725	63	356	19	10	325	56	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	19	ROK	AZL Indians	—	69	55	15	6	0	1	9	14	3	1	0	273	403	436	839	164	333	20	13	370	71	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	20	A	Lake County Captains	—	167	145	40	5	0	2	20	36	2	2	0	276	371	352	723	76	355	22	12	335	63	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	21	A+	Lynchburg Hillcats	—	443	385	92	18	3	11	47	125	4	9	5	239	328	387	715	148	323	28	11	318	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	22	AA	Akron RubberDucks	—	75	69	20	0	1	1	3	12	2	0	0	290	338	362	700	72	339	16	4	314	95	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	22	A+	Lynchburg Hillcats	—	423	365	89	20	3	10	47	96	4	11	6	244	337	397	734	153	302	23	11	326	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	23	A+	Lynchburg Hillcats	—	403	342	83	18	1	11	52	96	4	9	5	243	349	398	747	155	304	24	13	334	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2014	18	ROK MLE	AZL Indians	—	147	132	31	4	0	1	10	40	1	7	2	235	294	288	582	53	302	27	7	251	56	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	19	ROK MLE	AZL Indians	—	69	58	12	4	0	1	6	20	3	1	0	207	313	328	641	121	260	29	9	273	71	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	20	A MLE	Lake County Captains	—	167	151	34	4	0	1	14	47	2	2	0	225	299	272	571	46	319	28	8	262	63	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	21	A+ MLE	Lynchburg Hillcats	—	443	404	83	14	2	10	28	169	4	9	5	205	264	324	588	119	310	38	6	258	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	22	AA MLE	Akron RubberDucks	—	75	70	21	0	1	1	2	15	2	0	0	300	338	371	709	71	362	20	3	309	95	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	22	A+ MLE	Lynchburg Hillcats	—	423	383	74	15	2	9	29	130	4	11	6	193	257	313	571	120	254	31	7	249	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	23	A+ MLE	Lynchburg Hillcats	—	403	359	71	13	1	11	35	130	4	9	5	198	276	331	608	134	263	32	9	265	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	18	ROK MLE	AZL Indians	—	147	132	31	4	0	1	10	40	1	7	2	235	294	288	582	53	319	27	7	251	56	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	18	ROK RAW	AZL Indians	—	147	127	37	5	0	1	15	28	1	7	2	291	371	354	725	63	356	19	10	325	56	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	19	ROK MLE	AZL Indians	—	69	58	12	4	0	1	6	20	3	1	0	207	313	328	641	121	282	29	9	273	71	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	19	ROK RAW	AZL Indians	—	69	55	15	6	0	1	9	14	3	1	0	273	403	436	839	164	333	20	13	370	71	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	20	A MLE	Lake County Captains	—	167	151	34	4	0	1	14	47	2	2	0	225	299	272	571	46	320	28	8	262	63	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	20	A RAW	Lake County Captains	—	167	145	40	5	0	2	20	36	2	2	0	276	371	352	723	76	355	22	12	335	63	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	21	A+ MLE	Lynchburg Hillcats	—	443	404	83	14	2	10	28	169	4	9	5	205	264	324	588	119	322	38	6	258	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	21	A+ RAW	Lynchburg Hillcats	—	443	385	92	18	3	11	47	125	4	9	5	239	328	387	715	148	323	28	11	318	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	22	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	498	452	95	15	3	10	32	145	6	11	6	210	271	323	594	113	283	29	6	258	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	22	A+ RAW	2 teams	—	498	434	109	20	4	11	50	108	6	11	6	251	337	392	728	141	308	22	10	324	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	23	A+ MLE	Lynchburg Hillcats	—	403	359	71	13	1	11	35	130	4	9	5	198	276	331	608	134	273	32	9	265	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	23	A+ RAW	Lynchburg Hillcats	—	403	342	83	18	1	11	52	96	4	9	5	243	349	398	747	155	304	24	13	334	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	18	ROK MLE	AZL Indians	—	147	135	31	4	0	1	10	40	1	7	2	230	294	281	575	52	302	27	7	251	56	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	19	ROK MLE	AZL Indians	—	69	60	12	4	0	1	6	20	3	1	0	200	313	317	630	117	260	29	9	273	71	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	20	A MLE	Lake County Captains	—	167	149	34	4	0	1	14	47	2	2	0	228	299	275	575	47	319	28	8	262	63	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	21	A+ MLE	Lynchburg Hillcats	—	443	408	83	14	2	10	28	169	4	9	5	203	264	321	585	118	310	38	6	258	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	22	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	498	457	95	15	3	10	32	145	6	11	6	208	271	319	591	112	270	29	6	258	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	23	A+ MLE	Lynchburg Hillcats	—	403	361	71	13	1	11	35	130	4	9	5	197	276	330	606	133	263	32	9	265	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	1727	1556	326	54	6	34	125	551	20	39	18	210	277	317	594	108	297	32	7	260	62	-78	+1	+0	-19	+37	-5.9
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	586	122	20	2	13	47	207	8	15	7	208	277	316	592	108	294	32	7	260	62	-29	+0	+0	-7	+14	-2.2

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2019 A+Lynchburg Hillcats · 403 PAwOBA .328 → .265 (−63)K% 23.8% → 32.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	23.82%	÷1.046	×1.420	—	—	32.32%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	12.90%	÷0.921	×0.630	—	×0.998	8.81%
HBP% /PA	0.99%	—	×0.860	—	×0.998	0.85%
Singles /BIP	21.54%	÷0.984	×0.940	×0.950	×0.998	19.52%
Doubles /BIP	7.32%	÷1.065	×0.830	×0.950	×0.998	5.40%
Triples /BIP	0.41%	÷0.999	×0.800	×0.950	×0.998	0.31%
Home runs /BIP	4.47%	÷0.850	×0.900	—	×0.998	4.72%

Factors used: league row CAR. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 70, 1B 97, 2B 113, 3B 100, K 109, BB 84 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .328 → .265; ISO .155 → .138; BABIP .304 → .263. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 A+Lynchburg Hillcats · 423 PAwOBA .320 → .249 (−71)K% 22.7% → 30.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	22.70%	÷1.047	×1.420	—	—	30.77%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.11%	÷1.025	×0.630	—	×1.012	6.91%
HBP% /PA	0.95%	—	×0.860	—	×1.012	0.82%
Singles /BIP	20.82%	÷1.044	×0.940	×0.965	×1.012	18.29%
Doubles /BIP	7.43%	÷1.054	×0.830	×0.965	×1.012	5.72%
Triples /BIP	1.12%	÷1.150	×0.800	×0.965	×1.012	0.76%
Home runs /BIP	3.72%	÷0.967	×0.900	—	×1.012	3.50%

Factors used: league row CAR. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 93, 1B 109, 2B 111, 3B 130, K 110, BB 105 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.965.

Result: wOBA .320 → .249; ISO .153 → .126; BABIP .302 → .254. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 AAAkron RubberDucks · 75 PAwOBA .306 → .309 (+3)K% 16.0% → 19.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	16.00%	÷1.004	×1.220	—	—	19.45%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	4.00%	÷0.941	×0.700	—	×1.042	3.10%
HBP% /PA	2.67%	—	×0.850	—	×1.042	2.36%
Singles /BIP	31.58%	÷0.968	×0.970	×1.025	×1.042	33.78%
Doubles /BIP	0.00%	÷0.922	×0.860	×1.025	×1.042	0.00%
Triples /BIP	1.75%	÷0.980	×0.950	×1.025	×1.042	1.82%
Home runs /BIP	1.75%	÷0.840	×0.780	—	×1.042	1.70%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 68, 1B 94, 2B 84, 3B 96, K 101, BB 88 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 24.8 → +4.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.025.

Result: wOBA .306 → .309; ISO .072 → .071; BABIP .339 → .362. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 A+Lynchburg Hillcats · 443 PAwOBA .309 → .258 (−50)K% 28.2% → 38.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	28.22%	÷1.048	×1.420	—	—	38.24%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.93%	÷1.008	×0.630	—	×1.027	6.37%
HBP% /PA	0.90%	—	×0.860	—	×1.027	0.80%
Singles /BIP	23.08%	÷0.978	×0.940	×1.028	×1.027	23.41%
Doubles /BIP	6.92%	÷1.084	×0.830	×1.028	×1.027	5.60%
Triples /BIP	1.15%	÷1.070	×0.800	×1.028	×1.027	0.91%
Home runs /BIP	4.23%	÷0.902	×0.900	—	×1.027	4.34%

Factors used: league row CAR. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 80, 1B 96, 2B 117, 3B 114, K 110, BB 102 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.028.

Result: wOBA .309 → .258; ISO .148 → .128; BABIP .323 → .310. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 ALake County Captains · 167 PAwOBA .326 → .262 (−64)K% 21.6% → 28.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	21.56%	÷1.033	×1.360	—	—	28.38%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.98%	÷0.986	×0.690	—	×1.030	8.63%
HBP% /PA	1.20%	—	×0.780	—	×1.030	0.96%
Singles /BIP	30.28%	÷1.001	×0.920	×0.964	×1.030	27.62%
Doubles /BIP	4.59%	÷0.973	×0.830	×0.964	×1.030	3.88%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.981	×0.910	×0.964	×1.030	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	1.83%	÷1.274	×0.800	—	×1.030	1.19%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 155, 1B 100, 2B 95, 3B 96, K 107, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 22.0 → +3.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.964.

Result: wOBA .326 → .262; ISO .076 → .053; BABIP .355 → .319. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 ROKAZL Indians · 69 PAwOBA .371 → .273 (−99)K% 20.3% → 29.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	20.29%	÷1.000	×1.440	—	—	29.22%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	13.04%	÷1.000	×0.620	—	×1.008	8.15%
HBP% /PA	4.35%	—	×0.720	—	×1.008	3.15%
Singles /BIP	19.51%	÷1.000	×0.820	—	×1.008	16.12%
Doubles /BIP	14.63%	÷1.000	×0.720	—	×1.008	10.62%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.000	×0.720	—	×1.008	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	2.44%	÷1.000	×0.780	—	×1.008	1.92%

Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 19.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average).

Result: wOBA .371 → .273; ISO .164 → .122; BABIP .333 → .260. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 ROKAZL Indians · 147 PAwOBA .323 → .251 (−72)K% 19.0% → 27.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	19.05%	÷1.000	×1.440	—	—	27.43%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.20%	÷1.000	×0.620	—	×1.022	6.47%
HBP% /PA	0.68%	—	×0.720	—	×1.022	0.50%
Singles /BIP	31.31%	÷1.000	×0.820	×1.030	×1.022	27.05%
Doubles /BIP	5.05%	÷1.000	×0.720	×1.030	×1.022	3.83%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.000	×0.720	×1.030	×1.022	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	1.01%	÷1.000	×0.780	—	×1.022	0.81%

Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 19.5 → +2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.030.

Result: wOBA .323 → .251; ISO .063 → .047; BABIP .356 → .302. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).