Jonathan Matute

Pos2B

B/TR/R

Born1997-04-28

Age (2027)30

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

ROKLAST SEASON 2017

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2015	18	ROKGCL Astros	77	.203/.311/.234	0	1	14	—	.162/.230/.191
2016	19	ROKGreeneville A…	158	.206/.333/.254	0	2	21	—	.150/.247/.180
2017	20	ROKGCL Astros	153	.235/.397/.311	1	4	45	—	.177/.291/.238

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2014	17	ROK	DSL Astros Blue	—	320	256	63	12	0	3	43	53	9	12	5	246	373	328	702	82	296	17	13	318	36	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	18	ROK	GCL Astros	—	77	64	13	2	0	0	10	15	0	1	1	203	311	234	545	31	265	19	13	253	14	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	19	ROK	Greeneville Astros	—	158	126	26	6	0	0	20	39	4	2	0	206	333	254	587	48	289	25	13	270	21	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	20	ROK	GCL Astros	—	153	119	28	4	1	1	29	32	3	4	1	235	397	311	708	76	310	21	19	335	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2014	17	ROK MLE	DSL Astros Blue	—	320	268	46	8	0	2	31	65	9	12	5	172	279	224	503	52	199	20	10	222	36	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	18	ROK MLE	GCL Astros	—	77	68	11	2	0	0	6	22	0	1	1	162	230	191	421	29	222	29	8	189	14	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	19	ROK MLE	Greeneville Astros	—	158	133	20	4	0	0	13	55	4	2	0	150	247	180	427	30	230	35	8	199	21	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	20	ROK MLE	GCL Astros	—	153	130	23	3	1	1	18	46	3	4	1	177	291	238	530	62	244	30	12	234	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	17	ROK MLE	DSL Astros Blue	—	320	268	46	8	0	2	31	65	9	12	5	172	279	224	503	52	216	20	10	222	36	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	17	ROK RAW	DSL Astros Blue	—	320	256	63	12	0	3	43	53	9	12	5	246	373	328	702	82	296	17	13	318	36	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	18	ROK MLE	GCL Astros	—	77	68	11	2	0	0	6	22	0	1	1	162	230	191	421	29	239	29	8	189	14	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	18	ROK RAW	GCL Astros	—	77	64	13	2	0	0	10	15	0	1	1	203	311	234	545	31	265	19	13	253	14	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	19	ROK MLE	Greeneville Astros	—	158	133	20	4	0	0	13	55	4	2	0	150	247	180	427	30	247	35	8	199	21	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	19	ROK RAW	Greeneville Astros	—	158	126	26	6	0	0	20	39	4	2	0	206	333	254	587	48	289	25	13	270	21	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	20	ROK MLE	GCL Astros	—	153	130	23	3	1	1	18	46	3	4	1	177	291	238	530	62	262	30	12	234	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	20	ROK RAW	GCL Astros	—	153	119	28	4	1	1	29	32	3	4	1	235	397	311	708	76	310	21	19	335	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	17	ROK MLE	DSL Astros Blue	—	320	277	46	8	0	2	31	65	9	12	5	166	279	217	496	51	199	20	10	222	36	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	18	ROK MLE	GCL Astros	—	77	71	11	2	0	0	6	22	0	1	1	155	230	183	413	28	222	29	8	189	14	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	19	ROK MLE	Greeneville Astros	—	158	140	20	4	0	0	13	55	4	2	0	143	247	171	418	29	230	35	8	199	21	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	20	ROK MLE	GCL Astros	—	153	131	23	3	1	1	18	46	3	4	1	176	291	237	528	61	244	30	12	234	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	708	599	100	17	1	3	68	188	16	19	7	167	269	214	483	47	234	27	10	216	32	-57	+1	+0	+3	+15	-3.9
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	550	93	16	1	3	62	173	15	17	6	169	271	218	489	49	237	27	10	216	32	-52	+1	+0	+2	+14	-3.6

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2017 ROKGCL Astros · 153 PAwOBA .330 → .234 (−95)K% 20.9% → 30.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	20.92%	÷1.000	×1.440	—	—	30.12%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	18.95%	÷1.000	×0.620	—	×0.995	11.69%
HBP% /PA	1.96%	—	×0.720	—	×0.995	1.40%
Singles /BIP	25.29%	÷1.000	×0.820	×0.987	×0.995	20.36%
Doubles /BIP	4.60%	÷1.000	×0.720	×0.987	×0.995	3.25%
Triples /BIP	1.15%	÷1.000	×0.720	×0.987	×0.995	0.81%
Home runs /BIP	1.15%	÷1.000	×0.780	—	×0.995	0.89%

Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 19.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.987.

Result: wOBA .330 → .234; ISO .076 → .055; BABIP .310 → .244. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 ROKGreeneville Astros · 158 PAwOBA .269 → .199 (−71)K% 24.7% → 35.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	24.68%	÷1.000	×1.420	—	—	35.05%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	12.66%	÷1.000	×0.640	—	×1.008	8.16%
HBP% /PA	2.53%	—	×0.740	—	×1.008	1.89%
Singles /BIP	22.99%	÷1.000	×0.840	×0.968	×1.008	18.83%
Doubles /BIP	6.90%	÷1.000	×0.740	×0.968	×1.008	4.98%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.000	×0.740	×0.968	×1.008	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.000	×0.800	—	×1.008	0.00%

Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 19.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.968.

Result: wOBA .269 → .199; ISO .048 → .034; BABIP .289 → .230. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 ROKGCL Astros · 77 PAwOBA .248 → .189 (−59)K% 19.5% → 28.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	19.48%	÷1.000	×1.440	—	—	28.05%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	12.99%	÷1.000	×0.620	—	×1.022	8.23%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.720	—	×1.022	0.00%
Singles /BIP	22.45%	÷1.000	×0.820	×1.019	×1.022	19.17%
Doubles /BIP	4.08%	÷1.000	×0.720	×1.019	×1.022	3.06%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.000	×0.720	×1.019	×1.022	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.000	×0.780	—	×1.022	0.00%

Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 19.5 → +2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.019.

Result: wOBA .248 → .189; ISO .031 → .023; BABIP .265 → .222. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 DSLDSL Astros Blue · 320 PAwOBA .313 → .222 (−92)K% 16.6% → 20.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	16.56%	÷1.000	×1.220	—	—	20.21%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	13.44%	÷1.000	×0.700	—	×1.022	9.62%
HBP% /PA	2.81%	—	×0.700	—	×1.022	2.01%
Singles /BIP	23.65%	÷1.000	×0.680	×0.996	×1.022	16.38%
Doubles /BIP	5.91%	÷1.000	×0.600	×0.996	×1.022	3.61%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.000	×0.600	×0.996	×1.022	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	1.48%	÷1.000	×0.470	—	×1.022	0.71%

Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 17 vs a level average of 18.5 → +2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.996.

Result: wOBA .313 → .222; ISO .082 → .049; BABIP .296 → .199. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).