Trey Vavra
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 23 | A/INTL2 orgs | 397 | .307/.384/.480 | 13 | 7 | 116 | — | .281/.335/.419 |
| 2016 | 24 | A+Fort Myers Mi… | 488 | .230/.318/.326 | 8 | 6 | 49 | — | .186/.262/.266 |
| 2017 | 25 | A+Fort Myers Mi… | 126 | .132/.264/.179 | 1 | 0 | -5 | — | .090/.192/.126 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2014 | 22 | ROK | Elizabethton Twins | — | 209 | 185 | 59 | 20 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 37 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 319 | 394 | 454 | 848 | 135 | 392 | 18 | 9 | 378 | 72 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 23 | A | Cedar Rapids Kernels | — | 176 | 156 | 54 | 10 | 1 | 6 | 13 | 30 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 346 | 410 | 538 | 949 | 192 | 393 | 17 | 7 | 412 | 103 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 23 | INTL | Melbourne Aces | — | 221 | 192 | 53 | 9 | 0 | 7 | 23 | 23 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 276 | 364 | 432 | 796 | 156 | 282 | 10 | 10 | 356 | 127 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 24 | A+ | Fort Myers Miracle | — | 488 | 430 | 99 | 17 | 0 | 8 | 38 | 83 | 17 | 6 | 4 | 230 | 318 | 326 | 643 | 95 | 267 | 17 | 8 | 296 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 25 | A+ | Fort Myers Miracle | — | 126 | 106 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 31 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 132 | 264 | 179 | 443 | 47 | 173 | 25 | 10 | 223 | -5 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2014 | 22 | ROK MLE | Elizabethton Twins | — | 209 | 192 | 46 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 52 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 240 | 298 | 339 | 637 | 99 | 317 | 25 | 5 | 274 | 72 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 23 | A MLE | Cedar Rapids Kernels | — | 176 | 160 | 45 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 9 | 43 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 281 | 335 | 419 | 754 | 138 | 343 | 24 | 5 | 321 | 103 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 24 | A+ MLE | Fort Myers Miracle | — | 488 | 440 | 82 | 14 | 0 | 7 | 28 | 120 | 17 | 6 | 4 | 186 | 262 | 266 | 528 | 80 | 236 | 25 | 6 | 240 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 25 | A+ MLE | Fort Myers Miracle | — | 126 | 111 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 46 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 90 | 192 | 126 | 318 | 36 | 146 | 37 | 6 | 161 | -5 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 22 | ROK MLE | Elizabethton Twins | — | 209 | 192 | 46 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 52 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 240 | 298 | 339 | 637 | 99 | 321 | 25 | 5 | 274 | 72 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 22 | ROK RAW | Elizabethton Twins | — | 209 | 185 | 59 | 20 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 37 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 319 | 394 | 454 | 848 | 135 | 392 | 18 | 9 | 378 | 72 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 23 | INTL MLE | 2 teams | — | 397 | 365 | 102 | 18 | 2 | 9 | 20 | 96 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 279 | 331 | 414 | 744 | 134 | 354 | 24 | 5 | 321 | 103 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 23 | INTL RAW | 2 teams | — | 397 | 348 | 107 | 19 | 1 | 13 | 36 | 53 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 307 | 384 | 480 | 864 | 172 | 330 | 13 | 9 | 380 | 103 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 24 | A+ MLE | Fort Myers Miracle | — | 488 | 440 | 82 | 14 | 0 | 7 | 28 | 120 | 17 | 6 | 4 | 186 | 262 | 266 | 528 | 80 | 238 | 25 | 6 | 240 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 24 | A+ RAW | Fort Myers Miracle | — | 488 | 430 | 99 | 17 | 0 | 8 | 38 | 83 | 17 | 6 | 4 | 230 | 318 | 326 | 643 | 95 | 267 | 17 | 8 | 296 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 25 | A+ MLE | Fort Myers Miracle | — | 126 | 111 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 46 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 90 | 192 | 126 | 318 | 36 | 138 | 37 | 6 | 161 | -5 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 25 | A+ RAW | Fort Myers Miracle | — | 126 | 106 | 14 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 31 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 132 | 264 | 179 | 443 | 47 | 173 | 25 | 10 | 223 | -5 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 22 | ROK MLE | Elizabethton Twins | — | 209 | 191 | 46 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 52 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 241 | 298 | 340 | 638 | 99 | 317 | 25 | 5 | 274 | 72 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 23 | INTL MLE | 2 teams | — | 397 | 366 | 102 | 18 | 2 | 9 | 20 | 96 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 279 | 331 | 413 | 743 | 134 | 343 | 24 | 5 | 321 | 103 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 24 | A+ MLE | Fort Myers Miracle | — | 488 | 440 | 82 | 14 | 0 | 7 | 28 | 120 | 17 | 6 | 4 | 186 | 262 | 266 | 528 | 80 | 236 | 25 | 6 | 240 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 25 | A+ MLE | Fort Myers Miracle | — | 126 | 111 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 46 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 90 | 192 | 126 | 318 | 36 | 146 | 37 | 6 | 161 | -5 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 1220 | 1108 | 240 | 47 | 3 | 18 | 66 | 314 | 37 | 14 | 6 | 217 | 283 | 313 | 596 | 97 | 284 | 26 | 5 | 264 | 65 | -51 | +0 | +0 | -22 | +26 | -4.7 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 590 | 129 | 25 | 2 | 10 | 35 | 167 | 20 | 7 | 3 | 219 | 285 | 319 | 604 | 100 | 285 | 26 | 5 | 264 | 65 | -27 | +0 | +0 | -12 | +14 | -2.5 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2017 A+Fort Myers Miracle · 126 PAwOBA .220 → .161 (−59)K% 24.6% → 36.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 24.60% | ÷0.947 | ×1.420 | — | — | 36.90% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.52% | ÷1.209 | ×0.750 | — | ×0.968 | 5.72% |
| HBP% /PA | 5.56% | — | ×0.930 | — | ×0.968 | 5.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 14.67% | ÷0.982 | ×0.920 | ×0.950 | ×0.968 | 12.64% |
| Doubles /BIP | 2.67% | ÷1.178 | ×0.960 | ×0.950 | ×0.968 | 2.00% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.810 | ×0.950 | ×0.968 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.33% | ÷0.942 | ×0.880 | — | ×0.968 | 1.21% |
Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 88, 1B 96, 2B 136, 3B 130, K 89, BB 142 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 22.8 → −3.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .220 → .161; ISO .047 → .035; BABIP .173 → .146. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2016 A+Fort Myers Miracle · 488 PAwOBA .289 → .240 (−49)K% 17.0% → 24.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 17.01% | ÷0.983 | ×1.420 | — | — | 24.57% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.58% | ÷0.974 | ×0.750 | — | ×0.978 | 5.71% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.48% | — | ×0.930 | — | ×0.978 | 3.17% |
| Singles /BIP | 21.33% | ÷0.985 | ×0.920 | ×0.966 | ×0.978 | 18.82% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.90% | ÷1.012 | ×0.960 | ×0.966 | ×0.978 | 4.39% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.907 | ×0.810 | ×0.966 | ×0.978 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.31% | ÷0.881 | ×0.880 | — | ×0.978 | 2.25% |
Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 76, 1B 97, 2B 102, 3B 81, K 97, BB 95 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 22.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.966.
Result: wOBA .289 → .240; ISO .095 → .084; BABIP .267 → .236. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 ACedar Rapids Kernels · 176 PAwOBA .405 → .321 (−84)K% 17.0% → 24.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 17.05% | ÷0.959 | ×1.360 | — | — | 24.18% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.39% | ÷1.008 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.980 | 4.96% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.27% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.980 | 1.74% |
| Singles /BIP | 29.37% | ÷1.015 | ×0.920 | ×1.019 | ×0.980 | 26.58% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.94% | ÷1.010 | ×0.830 | ×1.019 | ×0.980 | 6.51% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.79% | ÷1.150 | ×0.910 | ×1.019 | ×0.980 | 0.63% |
| Home runs /BIP | 4.76% | ÷1.134 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.980 | 3.29% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 127, 1B 103, 2B 102, 3B 130, K 92, BB 102 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.0 → −2.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.019.
Result: wOBA .405 → .321; ISO .192 → .138; BABIP .393 → .343. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2014 ROKElizabethton Twins · 209 PAwOBA .370 → .274 (−96)K% 17.7% → 25.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 17.70% | ÷1.000 | ×1.420 | — | — | 25.14% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.61% | ÷1.000 | ×0.640 | — | ×0.965 | 5.32% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.39% | — | ×0.740 | — | ×0.965 | 1.71% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.840 | ×1.044 | ×0.965 | 21.16% |
| Doubles /BIP | 13.51% | ÷1.000 | ×0.740 | ×1.044 | ×0.965 | 10.08% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.68% | ÷1.000 | ×0.740 | ×1.044 | ×0.965 | 0.50% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.68% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.965 | 0.52% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 19.5 → −3.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.044.
Result: wOBA .370 → .274; ISO .135 → .097; BABIP .392 → .317. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .