Yoan Aybar
P Charlotte Knights| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 22 | MIX2 levels | 44 | 0 | 57 | 4.58 | 3.03 | 27.7% | 16.2% | — | K 21.1% · BB 20.1% · FIP 4.14 | |
| 2021 | 24 | AACOL | 49 | 0 | 46 | 6.22 | 5.19 | 23.7% | 14.7% | — | K 19.2% · BB 16.2% · FIP 5.91 | |
| 2022 | 25 | MIX2 levels | 43 | 0 | 41 | 8.71 | 6.61 | 24.3% | 18.6% | — | K 20.9% · BB 19.7% · FIP 6.04 | |
| 2023 | 26 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2024 | 27 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2025 | 28 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 29 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2018 | 21 | ROK MLE | GCL Red Sox | 15 | 0 | 26 | 114 | 27 | 12 | 0 | 0% | 1.8 | 16.1% | 13.2% | 2.9% | 0.0% | 4.10 | 3.41 | — |
| 2018 | 21 | ROK RAW | GCL Red Sox | 15 | 0 | 26 | 114 | 27 | 12 | 0 | 0% | 1.8 | 23.7% | 10.5% | 13.2% | 0.0% | 4.10 | 2.42 | — |
| 2019 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 44 | 0 | 57 | 253 | 70 | 41 | 1 | 0% | 1.3 | 21.1% | 20.1% | 1.0% | 0.5% | 4.58 | 4.14 | — |
| 2019 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 44 | 0 | 57 | 253 | 70 | 41 | 1 | 0% | 1.3 | 27.7% | 16.2% | 11.5% | 0.4% | 4.58 | 3.03 | — |
| 2021 | 24 | AA MLE | Hartford Yard Goats | 49 | 0 | 46 | 224 | 53 | 33 | 8 | 0% | 0.9 | 19.2% | 16.2% | 3.0% | 4.3% | 6.22 | 5.91 | — |
| 2021 | 24 | AA RAW | Hartford Yard Goats | 49 | 0 | 46 | 224 | 53 | 33 | 8 | 0% | 0.9 | 23.7% | 14.7% | 8.9% | 3.6% | 6.22 | 5.19 | — |
| 2022 | 25 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 43 | 0 | 41 | 210 | 51 | 39 | 10 | 0% | 1.0 | 20.9% | 19.7% | 1.2% | 4.0% | 8.71 | 6.04 | — |
| 2022 | 25 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 43 | 0 | 41 | 210 | 51 | 39 | 10 | 0% | 1.0 | 24.3% | 18.6% | 5.7% | 4.8% | 8.71 | 6.61 | — |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | 151 | 0 | 171 | 801 | 158 | 143 | 19 | 0% | 1.1 | 19.8% | 17.9% | 1.9% | 2.4% | 5.95 | 5.03 | — | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 177 | 0 | 200 | 937 | 185 | 168 | 23 | 0% | 1.1 | 19.8% | 17.9% | 1.9% | 2.4% | 5.95 | 5.03 | -1.1 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2022 AAACharlotte Knights · 31 IPFIP 6.42 → 6.15 (−0.27)K% 22.6% → 19.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.64% | — | ×0.880 | 19.92% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 19.50% | — | ×1.050 | 20.47% |
| HR / BF /BF | 5.03% | ÷1.421 | ×1.100 | 3.89% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 184).
Result: FIP 6.42 → 6.15, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AABirmingham Barons · 10 IPFIP 4.76 → 5.72 (+0.96)K% 29.4% → 23.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 29.41% | — | ×0.810 | 23.82% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 15.69% | — | ×1.100 | 17.25% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.92% | ÷1.056 | ×1.200 | 4.46% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 111).
Result: FIP 4.76 → 5.72, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 AAHartford Yard Goats · 46 IPFIP 4.93 → 5.91 (+0.98)K% 23.7% → 19.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.66% | — | ×0.810 | 19.17% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 14.73% | — | ×1.100 | 16.21% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.57% | ÷0.990 | ×1.200 | 4.33% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 98).
Result: FIP 4.93 → 5.91, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 AGreenville Drive · 52 IPFIP 3.08 → 4.14 (+1.06)K% 28.5% → 21.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 28.51% | — | ×0.740 | 21.10% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 17.02% | — | ×1.180 | 20.09% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.43% | ÷1.091 | ×1.300 | 0.51% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 118).
Result: FIP 3.08 → 4.14, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 ROKGCL Red Sox · 26 IPFIP 2.43 → 3.41 (+0.97)K% 23.7% → 16.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 23.68% | — | ×0.680 | 16.11% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.53% | — | ×1.250 | 13.16% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 2.43 → 3.41, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).