Wilson Amador
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 18 | ROKDSL Astros Bl… | 230 | .173/.264/.262 | 0 | 14 | -8 | — | .111/.189/.169 |
| 2016 | 19 | ROKGreeneville A… | 151 | .261/.327/.381 | 1 | 7 | 31 | — | .190/.245/.277 |
| 2017 | 20 | ROKGreeneville A… | 186 | .270/.310/.356 | 1 | 20 | 30 | — | .198/.228/.254 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2014 | 17 | ROK | DSL Astros Orange | — | 294 | 246 | 60 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 24 | 66 | 17 | 29 | 13 | 244 | 352 | 301 | 653 | 57 | 324 | 22 | 8 | 302 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 18 | ROK | DSL Astros Blue | — | 230 | 202 | 35 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 17 | 52 | 8 | 14 | 3 | 173 | 264 | 262 | 527 | 89 | 230 | 23 | 7 | 243 | -8 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 19 | ROK | Greeneville Astros | — | 151 | 134 | 35 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 38 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 261 | 327 | 381 | 707 | 119 | 354 | 25 | 6 | 310 | 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 20 | ROK | Greeneville Astros | — | 186 | 174 | 47 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 43 | 2 | 20 | 6 | 270 | 310 | 356 | 666 | 86 | 351 | 23 | 4 | 297 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2014 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Astros Orange | — | 294 | 254 | 43 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 81 | 17 | 29 | 13 | 169 | 265 | 197 | 462 | 28 | 227 | 28 | 5 | 210 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Astros Blue | — | 230 | 207 | 23 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 12 | 63 | 8 | 14 | 3 | 111 | 189 | 169 | 359 | 58 | 148 | 27 | 5 | 156 | -8 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 19 | ROK MLE | Greeneville Astros | — | 151 | 137 | 26 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 54 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 190 | 245 | 277 | 522 | 88 | 275 | 36 | 4 | 214 | 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 20 | ROK MLE | Greeneville Astros | — | 186 | 177 | 35 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 61 | 2 | 20 | 6 | 198 | 228 | 254 | 482 | 56 | 290 | 33 | 3 | 212 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Astros Orange | — | 294 | 254 | 43 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 81 | 17 | 29 | 13 | 169 | 265 | 197 | 462 | 28 | 244 | 28 | 5 | 210 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 17 | ROK RAW | DSL Astros Orange | — | 294 | 246 | 60 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 24 | 66 | 17 | 29 | 13 | 244 | 352 | 301 | 653 | 57 | 324 | 22 | 8 | 302 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Astros Blue | — | 230 | 207 | 23 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 12 | 63 | 8 | 14 | 3 | 111 | 189 | 169 | 359 | 58 | 158 | 27 | 5 | 156 | -8 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 18 | ROK RAW | DSL Astros Blue | — | 230 | 202 | 35 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 17 | 52 | 8 | 14 | 3 | 173 | 264 | 262 | 527 | 89 | 230 | 23 | 7 | 243 | -8 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 19 | ROK MLE | Greeneville Astros | — | 151 | 137 | 26 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 54 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 190 | 245 | 277 | 522 | 88 | 301 | 36 | 4 | 214 | 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 19 | ROK RAW | Greeneville Astros | — | 151 | 134 | 35 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 38 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 261 | 327 | 381 | 707 | 119 | 354 | 25 | 6 | 310 | 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 20 | ROK MLE | Greeneville Astros | — | 186 | 177 | 35 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 61 | 2 | 20 | 6 | 198 | 228 | 254 | 482 | 56 | 293 | 33 | 3 | 212 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 20 | ROK RAW | Greeneville Astros | — | 186 | 174 | 47 | 8 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 43 | 2 | 20 | 6 | 270 | 310 | 356 | 666 | 86 | 351 | 23 | 4 | 297 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Astros Orange | — | 294 | 259 | 43 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 16 | 81 | 17 | 29 | 13 | 166 | 265 | 193 | 458 | 27 | 227 | 28 | 5 | 210 | 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 18 | ROK MLE | DSL Astros Blue | — | 230 | 208 | 23 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 12 | 63 | 8 | 14 | 3 | 111 | 189 | 168 | 358 | 58 | 148 | 27 | 5 | 156 | -8 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 19 | ROK MLE | Greeneville Astros | — | 151 | 140 | 26 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 54 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 186 | 245 | 271 | 516 | 86 | 275 | 36 | 4 | 214 | 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 20 | ROK MLE | Greeneville Astros | — | 186 | 177 | 35 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 61 | 2 | 20 | 6 | 198 | 228 | 254 | 482 | 56 | 290 | 33 | 3 | 212 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 861 | 775 | 127 | 19 | 8 | 2 | 39 | 259 | 31 | 70 | 27 | 164 | 233 | 217 | 450 | 53 | 240 | 30 | 5 | 197 | 19 | -83 | +3 | +0 | +9 | +19 | -5.3 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 585 | 96 | 14 | 6 | 2 | 29 | 196 | 23 | 53 | 20 | 164 | 232 | 219 | 451 | 55 | 240 | 30 | 4 | 197 | 19 | -62 | +3 | +0 | +7 | +14 | -4.0 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2017 ROKGreeneville Astros · 186 PAwOBA .291 → .212 (−79)K% 23.1% → 32.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 23.12% | ÷1.000 | ×1.420 | — | — | 32.83% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 4.30% | ÷1.000 | ×0.640 | — | ×0.985 | 2.71% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.08% | — | ×0.740 | — | ×0.985 | 0.78% |
| Singles /BIP | 27.48% | ÷1.000 | ×0.840 | ×1.026 | ×0.985 | 23.33% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.11% | ÷1.000 | ×0.740 | ×1.026 | ×0.985 | 4.57% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.53% | ÷1.000 | ×0.740 | ×1.026 | ×0.985 | 1.14% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.76% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.985 | 0.60% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 19.5 → −1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.026.
Result: wOBA .291 → .212; ISO .086 → .059; BABIP .351 → .290. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2016 ROKGreeneville Astros · 151 PAwOBA .304 → .214 (−91)K% 25.2% → 35.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 25.17% | ÷1.000 | ×1.420 | — | — | 35.74% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.96% | ÷1.000 | ×0.640 | — | ×0.995 | 3.80% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.65% | — | ×0.740 | — | ×0.995 | 1.95% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.840 | ×0.967 | ×0.995 | 20.20% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.29% | ÷1.000 | ×0.740 | ×0.967 | ×0.995 | 5.19% |
| Triples /BIP | 3.12% | ÷1.000 | ×0.740 | ×0.967 | ×0.995 | 2.22% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.04% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.995 | 0.83% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 19.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.967.
Result: wOBA .304 → .214; ISO .119 → .080; BABIP .354 → .275. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 DSLDSL Astros Blue · 230 PAwOBA .240 → .156 (−83)K% 22.6% → 27.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 22.61% | ÷1.000 | ×1.220 | — | — | 27.58% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.39% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×0.995 | 5.15% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.48% | — | ×0.700 | — | ×0.995 | 2.42% |
| Singles /BIP | 15.33% | ÷1.000 | ×0.680 | ×0.990 | ×0.995 | 10.27% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×0.990 | ×0.995 | 2.36% |
| Triples /BIP | 4.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×0.990 | ×0.995 | 2.36% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.470 | — | ×0.995 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 18.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.990.
Result: wOBA .240 → .156; ISO .089 → .052; BABIP .230 → .148. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2014 DSLDSL Astros Orange · 294 PAwOBA .297 → .210 (−86)K% 22.4% → 27.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 22.45% | ÷1.000 | ×1.220 | — | — | 27.39% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.82% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.008 | 5.52% |
| HBP% /PA | 5.78% | — | ×0.700 | — | ×1.008 | 4.08% |
| Singles /BIP | 27.78% | ÷1.000 | ×0.680 | ×1.044 | ×1.008 | 19.87% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.89% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×1.044 | ×1.008 | 2.45% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.11% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×1.044 | ×1.008 | 0.70% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.56% | ÷1.000 | ×0.470 | — | ×1.008 | 0.26% |
Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 18.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.044.
Result: wOBA .297 → .210; ISO .057 → .035; BABIP .324 → .227. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).