Connor Oliver

PosCF
B/TL/R
Born1993-10-13
Age (2027)33
No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.
Overview
A+LAST SEASON 2016
YearAgeLvl / TeamPAAVG/OBP/SLGHRSBwRC+WARMLE AVG/OBP/SLG
201420ARome Braves455.252/.328/.35131355—.213/.273/.297
201521A+/A2 orgs293.188/.277/.2691914—.143/.202/.199
201622A+Tampa Yankees30.154/.241/.23102-8—.111/.172/.185
Contract
No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.
basis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

YearAge LvlTeam MLB% PAAB H2B3BHR BBSOHBP SBCS AVGOBPSLGOPS ISOBABIP K%BB% wOBAwRC+ BATRUNFLDPOSREP WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
201319 ROKGCL Braves — 143129 27320 11270 52 209271264535 54262 198 242 7 — — — — — —
201420 ARome Braves — 455405 1021963 38958 138 252328351679 99320 218 307 55 — — — — — —
201521 A+Carolina Mudcats — 123109 19031 14220 22 174268257525 83209 1811 246 13 — — — — — —
201521 ARome Braves — 170151 30820 18430 76 199284278562 79275 2511 260 14 — — — — — —
201622 A+Tampa Yankees — 3026 4010 390 20 154241231472 77235 3010 214 -8 — — — — — —
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
201319 ROK MLEGCL Braves — 143133 21210 7390 52 158200188388 30219 275 179 7 — — — — — —
201420 A MLERome Braves — 455417 891653 261328 138 213273297570 84297 296 250 55 — — — — — —
201521 A+ MLECarolina Mudcats — 123114 16021 9310 22 140203202405 61189 257 187 13 — — — — — —
201521 A MLERome Braves — 170158 23610 11620 76 146201196397 51242 366 189 14 — — — — — —
201622 A+ MLETampa Yankees — 3027 3010 2130 20 111172185358 74205 437 156 -8 — — — — — —
201319 ROK MLEGCL Braves — 143133 21210 7390 52 158200188388 30221 275 179 7 — — — — — —
201319 ROK RAWGCL Braves — 143129 27320 11270 52 209271264535 54262 198 242 7 — — — — — —
201420 A MLERome Braves — 455417 891653 261328 138 213273297570 84303 296 250 55 — — — — — —
201420 A RAWRome Braves — 455405 1021963 38958 138 252328351679 99320 218 307 55 — — — — — —
201521 A MLE2 teams — 293272 40641 20930 98 147205210415 62218 327 188 14 — — — — — —
201521 A RAW2 teams — 293260 49851 32650 98 188277269547 81246 2211 254 14 — — — — — —
201622 A+ MLETampa Yankees — 3027 3010 2130 20 111172185358 74214 437 156 -8 — — — — — —
201622 A+ RAWTampa Yankees — 3026 4010 390 20 154241231472 77235 3010 214 -8 — — — — — —
201319 ROK MLEGCL Braves — 143135 21210 7390 52 156200185385 30219 275 179 7 — — — — — —
201420 A MLERome Braves — 455418 891653 261328 138 213273297569 84297 296 250 55 — — — — — —
201521 A MLE2 teams — 293271 40641 20930 98 148205210416 63220 327 188 14 — — — — — —
201622 A+ MLETampa Yankees — 3028 3010 2130 20 107172179351 71205 437 156 -8 — — — — — —
▸ Career Totals
Career— MLE — 921849 15324114 552778 2918 180237249485 68260 306 216 33 -74 -1 +0 +3 +20 -5.3
/ 162G— MLE — 650599 1081783 391956 2013 180238250488 70260 306 216 33 -52 -1 +0 +2 +14 -3.8

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2016 A+Tampa Yankees · 30 PAwOBA .209 → .156 (−54)K% 30.0% → 43.1%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA30.00%÷0.988×1.420——43.10%
BB% (unintentional) /PA10.00%÷1.021×0.750—×0.9987.33%
HBP% /PA0.00%—×0.930—×0.9980.00%
Singles /BIP17.65%÷1.022×0.920—×0.99815.85%
Doubles /BIP0.00%÷0.953×0.960—×0.9980.00%
Triples /BIP5.88%÷1.032×0.810—×0.9984.61%
Home runs /BIP0.00%÷0.862×0.880—×0.9980.00%

Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 72, 1B 104, 2B 91, 3B 106, K 98, BB 104 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .209 → .156; ISO .077 → .053; BABIP .235 → .205. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 ARome Braves · 170 PAwOBA .255 → .189 (−66)K% 25.3% → 36.4%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA25.29%÷0.932×1.340——36.35%
BB% (unintentional) /PA10.59%÷1.077×0.660——6.49%
HBP% /PA0.00%—×0.770——0.00%
Singles /BIP18.52%÷1.026×0.920×0.990—16.43%
Doubles /BIP7.41%÷0.915×0.820×0.990—6.57%
Triples /BIP1.85%÷1.150×0.940×0.990—1.50%
Home runs /BIP0.00%÷1.097×0.820——0.00%

Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 119, 1B 105, 2B 83, 3B 130, K 86, BB 115 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.990.

Result: wOBA .255 → .189; ISO .079 → .062; BABIP .275 → .242. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 A+Carolina Mudcats · 123 PAwOBA .240 → .187 (−53)K% 17.9% → 25.1%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA17.89%÷1.012×1.420——25.10%
BB% (unintentional) /PA11.38%÷1.042×0.630—×1.0126.97%
HBP% /PA0.00%—×0.860—×1.0120.00%
Singles /BIP17.24%÷1.014×0.940×0.979×1.01215.84%
Doubles /BIP0.00%÷1.083×0.830×0.979×1.0120.00%
Triples /BIP3.45%÷0.952×0.800×0.979×1.0122.87%
Home runs /BIP1.15%÷1.039×0.900—×1.0121.01%

Factors used: league row CAR. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 108, 1B 103, 2B 117, 3B 90, K 102, BB 108 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.979.

Result: wOBA .240 → .187; ISO .083 → .067; BABIP .209 → .189. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 ARome Braves · 455 PAwOBA .301 → .250 (−51)K% 20.9% → 29.0%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA20.88%÷0.966×1.340——28.95%
BB% (unintentional) /PA8.35%÷0.972×0.660—×1.0155.75%
HBP% /PA1.76%—×0.770—×1.0151.37%
Singles /BIP23.87%÷1.012×0.920×1.022×1.01522.49%
Doubles /BIP6.13%÷0.965×0.820×1.022×1.0155.40%
Triples /BIP1.94%÷1.066×0.940×1.022×1.0151.77%
Home runs /BIP0.97%÷0.873×0.820—×1.0150.92%

Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 75, 1B 102, 2B 93, 3B 113, K 93, BB 94 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.022.

Result: wOBA .301 → .250; ISO .099 → .084; BABIP .320 → .297. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 ROKGCL Braves · 143 PAwOBA .238 → .179 (−59)K% 18.9% → 27.2%
ComponentRawPark ÷Level factor ×GB/FB ×Age ×= MLE
K% /PA18.88%÷1.000×1.440——27.19%
BB% (unintentional) /PA7.69%÷1.000×0.620—×0.9954.75%
HBP% /PA0.00%—×0.720—×0.9950.00%
Singles /BIP21.57%÷1.000×0.820×1.050×0.99518.48%
Doubles /BIP2.94%÷1.000×0.720×1.050×0.9952.21%
Triples /BIP1.96%÷1.000×0.720×1.050×0.9951.47%
Home runs /BIP0.00%÷1.000×0.780—×0.9950.00%

Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 19.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .238 → .179; ISO .054 → .039; BABIP .262 → .219. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).