Dillon Moyer
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 22 | ROKOgden Raptors | 157 | .167/.248/.254 | 1 | 2 | -16 | — | .111/.163/.174 |
| 2014 | 23 | A+/A2 orgs | 426 | .221/.304/.296 | 1 | 16 | 34 | — | .186/.253/.247 |
| 2015 | 24 | A+LAA | 344 | .175/.229/.242 | 0 | 4 | -25 | — | .107/.152/.141 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 22 | ROK | Ogden Raptors | — | 157 | 138 | 23 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 45 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 167 | 248 | 254 | 502 | 87 | 229 | 29 | 9 | 228 | -16 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 23 | A+ | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 133 | 117 | 24 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 38 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 205 | 285 | 282 | 567 | 77 | 295 | 29 | 7 | 259 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 23 | A | Great Lakes Loons | — | 293 | 254 | 58 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 28 | 60 | 3 | 16 | 6 | 228 | 312 | 303 | 615 | 75 | 299 | 20 | 10 | 277 | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 24 | A+ | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 344 | 314 | 55 | 13 | 4 | 0 | 20 | 135 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 175 | 229 | 242 | 471 | 67 | 302 | 39 | 6 | 212 | -25 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 22 | ROK MLE | Ogden Raptors | — | 157 | 144 | 16 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 65 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 111 | 163 | 174 | 337 | 62 | 165 | 41 | 5 | 144 | -16 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 23 | A+ MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 133 | 119 | 20 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 49 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 168 | 238 | 235 | 474 | 67 | 258 | 37 | 5 | 203 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 23 | A MLE | Great Lakes Loons | — | 293 | 262 | 51 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 20 | 75 | 3 | 16 | 6 | 195 | 260 | 252 | 512 | 57 | 262 | 26 | 7 | 225 | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 24 | A+ MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 344 | 319 | 34 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 186 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 107 | 152 | 141 | 293 | 34 | 233 | 54 | 4 | 131 | -25 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 22 | ROK MLE | Ogden Raptors | — | 157 | 144 | 16 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 65 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 111 | 163 | 174 | 337 | 62 | 183 | 41 | 5 | 144 | -16 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 22 | ROK RAW | Ogden Raptors | — | 157 | 138 | 23 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 14 | 45 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 167 | 248 | 254 | 502 | 87 | 229 | 29 | 9 | 228 | -16 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 23 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 426 | 382 | 70 | 15 | 2 | 1 | 26 | 125 | 7 | 16 | 7 | 183 | 248 | 241 | 489 | 58 | 270 | 29 | 6 | 218 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 23 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 426 | 371 | 82 | 19 | 3 | 1 | 37 | 98 | 7 | 16 | 7 | 221 | 304 | 296 | 600 | 75 | 298 | 23 | 9 | 272 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 24 | A+ MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 344 | 319 | 34 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 186 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 107 | 152 | 141 | 293 | 34 | 250 | 54 | 4 | 131 | -25 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 24 | A+ RAW | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 344 | 314 | 55 | 13 | 4 | 0 | 20 | 135 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 175 | 229 | 242 | 471 | 67 | 302 | 39 | 6 | 212 | -25 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 22 | ROK MLE | Ogden Raptors | — | 157 | 147 | 16 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 65 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 109 | 163 | 170 | 333 | 61 | 165 | 41 | 5 | 144 | -16 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 23 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 426 | 390 | 70 | 15 | 2 | 1 | 26 | 125 | 7 | 16 | 7 | 179 | 248 | 236 | 484 | 56 | 261 | 29 | 6 | 218 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 24 | A+ MLE | Rancho Cucamonga Quakes | — | 344 | 324 | 34 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 15 | 186 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 105 | 152 | 139 | 291 | 34 | 233 | 54 | 4 | 131 | -25 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 927 | 845 | 120 | 26 | 5 | 2 | 49 | 376 | 10 | 22 | 11 | 142 | 198 | 192 | 390 | 50 | 249 | 41 | 5 | 173 | 3 | -107 | +0 | +0 | +10 | +20 | -7.8 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 593 | 84 | 18 | 4 | 1 | 34 | 264 | 7 | 15 | 8 | 142 | 197 | 191 | 388 | 49 | 249 | 41 | 5 | 173 | 3 | -75 | -0 | +0 | +7 | +14 | -5.5 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2015 A+Rancho Cucamonga Quakes · 344 PAwOBA .209 → .131 (−77)K% 39.2% → 54.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 39.24% | ÷0.970 | ×1.340 | — | — | 54.22% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.81% | ÷0.958 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.988 | 4.26% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.58% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×0.988 | 0.45% |
| Singles /BIP | 21.23% | ÷1.046 | ×0.910 | ×0.950 | ×0.988 | 17.34% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.26% | ÷1.109 | ×0.820 | ×0.950 | ×0.988 | 5.04% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.23% | ÷1.150 | ×0.760 | ×0.950 | ×0.988 | 1.39% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.898 | ×0.920 | — | ×0.988 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 80, 1B 109, 2B 122, 3B 130, K 94, BB 92 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .209 → .131; ISO .067 → .035; BABIP .302 → .233. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2014 AGreat Lakes Loons · 293 PAwOBA .271 → .225 (−46)K% 20.5% → 25.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 20.48% | ÷1.083 | ×1.360 | — | — | 25.72% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.56% | ÷0.973 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.990 | 6.71% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.02% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.990 | 0.79% |
| Singles /BIP | 21.65% | ÷1.017 | ×0.920 | ×1.008 | ×0.990 | 19.53% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.70% | ÷1.022 | ×0.830 | ×1.008 | ×0.990 | 5.43% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.55% | ÷1.150 | ×0.910 | ×1.008 | ×0.990 | 1.22% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.002 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.990 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 100, 1B 103, 2B 104, 3B 130, K 117, BB 95 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.008.
Result: wOBA .271 → .225; ISO .075 → .061; BABIP .299 → .262. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2014 A+Rancho Cucamonga Quakes · 133 PAwOBA .252 → .203 (−50)K% 28.6% → 37.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 28.57% | ÷1.036 | ×1.340 | — | — | 36.96% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 6.77% | ÷0.979 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.998 | 4.90% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.01% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×0.998 | 2.37% |
| Singles /BIP | 21.52% | ÷1.034 | ×0.910 | ×1.014 | ×0.998 | 19.15% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.59% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | ×1.014 | ×0.998 | 6.30% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.998 | ×0.760 | ×1.014 | ×0.998 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.27% | ÷0.934 | ×0.920 | — | ×0.998 | 1.24% |
Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 87, 1B 107, 2B 100, 3B 100, K 107, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.014.
Result: wOBA .252 → .203; ISO .077 → .064; BABIP .295 → .258. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2013 ROKOgden Raptors · 157 PAwOBA .229 → .144 (−84)K% 28.7% → 41.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 28.66% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 41.27% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.92% | ÷1.000 | ×0.610 | — | ×0.975 | 5.30% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.64% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.975 | 0.45% |
| Singles /BIP | 15.05% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | ×0.950 | ×0.975 | 11.43% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.53% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×0.950 | ×0.975 | 5.02% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.08% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×0.950 | ×0.975 | 0.72% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.08% | ÷1.000 | ×0.750 | — | ×0.975 | 0.79% |
Factors used: league row PIO. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 19.5 → −2.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .229 → .144; ISO .087 → .053; BABIP .229 → .165. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).