Nolan Earley
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 22 | ROKBristol White… | 248 | .310/.410/.424 | 2 | 2 | 82 | — | .251/.328/.342 |
| 2014 | 23 | AKannapolis In… | 80 | .306/.367/.458 | 1 | 1 | 93 | — | .270/.316/.405 |
| 2015 | 24 | A+/A2 orgs | 379 | .261/.341/.350 | 2 | 1 | 49 | — | .218/.267/.286 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 22 | ROK | Bristol White Sox | — | 248 | 203 | 63 | 13 | 2 | 2 | 32 | 26 | 5 | 2 | 8 | 310 | 410 | 424 | 833 | 113 | 341 | 10 | 13 | 370 | 82 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 23 | A | Kannapolis Intimidators | — | 80 | 72 | 22 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 13 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 306 | 367 | 458 | 825 | 153 | 362 | 16 | 6 | 362 | 93 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 24 | A+ | Winston-Salem Dash | — | 353 | 315 | 81 | 19 | 1 | 2 | 35 | 65 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 257 | 335 | 343 | 678 | 86 | 317 | 18 | 10 | 310 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 24 | A | Kannapolis Intimidators | — | 26 | 22 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 318 | 423 | 455 | 878 | 136 | 368 | 12 | 12 | 394 | 107 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 22 | ROK MLE | Bristol White Sox | — | 248 | 219 | 55 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 37 | 5 | 2 | 8 | 251 | 328 | 342 | 670 | 91 | 276 | 15 | 8 | 289 | 82 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 23 | A MLE | Kannapolis Intimidators | — | 80 | 74 | 20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 17 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 270 | 316 | 405 | 722 | 135 | 337 | 21 | 4 | 306 | 93 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 24 | A+ MLE | Winston-Salem Dash | — | 353 | 331 | 70 | 13 | 1 | 2 | 19 | 99 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 211 | 259 | 275 | 533 | 63 | 289 | 28 | 5 | 234 | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 24 | A MLE | Kannapolis Intimidators | — | 26 | 23 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 304 | 385 | 435 | 819 | 130 | 333 | 15 | 8 | 327 | 107 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 22 | ROK MLE | Bristol White Sox | — | 248 | 219 | 55 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 37 | 5 | 2 | 8 | 251 | 328 | 342 | 670 | 91 | 288 | 15 | 8 | 289 | 82 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 22 | ROK RAW | Bristol White Sox | — | 248 | 203 | 63 | 13 | 2 | 2 | 32 | 26 | 5 | 2 | 8 | 310 | 410 | 424 | 833 | 113 | 341 | 10 | 13 | 370 | 82 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 23 | A MLE | Kannapolis Intimidators | — | 80 | 74 | 20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 17 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 270 | 316 | 405 | 722 | 135 | 339 | 21 | 4 | 306 | 93 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 23 | A RAW | Kannapolis Intimidators | — | 80 | 72 | 22 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 13 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 306 | 367 | 458 | 825 | 153 | 362 | 16 | 6 | 362 | 93 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 24 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 379 | 354 | 75 | 13 | 2 | 2 | 21 | 103 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 212 | 262 | 277 | 539 | 65 | 292 | 27 | 6 | 240 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 24 | A+ RAW | 2 teams | — | 379 | 337 | 88 | 20 | 2 | 2 | 38 | 68 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 261 | 341 | 350 | 691 | 89 | 321 | 18 | 10 | 316 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 22 | ROK MLE | Bristol White Sox | — | 248 | 221 | 55 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 37 | 5 | 2 | 8 | 249 | 328 | 339 | 667 | 90 | 276 | 15 | 8 | 289 | 82 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 23 | A MLE | Kannapolis Intimidators | — | 80 | 75 | 20 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 17 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 267 | 316 | 400 | 716 | 133 | 337 | 21 | 4 | 306 | 93 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 24 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 379 | 352 | 75 | 13 | 2 | 2 | 21 | 103 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 213 | 262 | 278 | 540 | 65 | 292 | 27 | 6 | 240 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 707 | 647 | 150 | 26 | 6 | 5 | 44 | 157 | 10 | 4 | 11 | 232 | 291 | 314 | 605 | 82 | 296 | 22 | 6 | 265 | 65 | -29 | -4 | +0 | -8 | +15 | -2.5 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 595 | 139 | 24 | 6 | 5 | 40 | 144 | 9 | 4 | 10 | 234 | 292 | 319 | 611 | 86 | 297 | 22 | 6 | 265 | 65 | -27 | -3 | +0 | -7 | +14 | -2.3 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2015 A+Winston-Salem Dash · 353 PAwOBA .301 → .234 (−68)K% 18.4% → 28.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 18.41% | ÷0.932 | ×1.420 | — | — | 28.05% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.35% | ÷1.060 | ×0.630 | — | ×0.988 | 5.49% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.57% | — | ×0.860 | — | ×0.988 | 0.48% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.60% | ÷0.963 | ×0.940 | ×1.017 | ×0.988 | 23.14% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.60% | ÷1.175 | ×0.830 | ×1.017 | ×0.988 | 5.39% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.40% | ÷1.150 | ×0.800 | ×1.017 | ×0.988 | 0.28% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.80% | ÷1.090 | ×0.900 | — | ×0.988 | 0.65% |
Factors used: league row CAR. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 118, 1B 93, 2B 135, 3B 130, K 86, BB 112 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.017.
Result: wOBA .301 → .234; ISO .086 → .058; BABIP .317 → .289. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 AKannapolis Intimidators · 26 PAwOBA .385 → .327 (−58)K% 11.5% → 16.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 11.54% | ÷0.963 | ×1.340 | — | — | 16.06% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.54% | ÷1.029 | ×0.660 | — | ×0.980 | 7.26% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.85% | — | ×0.770 | — | ×0.980 | 2.90% |
| Singles /BIP | 26.32% | ÷1.008 | ×0.920 | — | ×0.980 | 23.53% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.26% | ÷0.940 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.980 | 4.50% |
| Triples /BIP | 5.26% | ÷0.914 | ×0.940 | — | ×0.980 | 5.31% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.848 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.980 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 70, 1B 102, 2B 88, 3B 83, K 93, BB 106 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.0 → −2.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .385 → .327; ISO .136 → .132; BABIP .368 → .333. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2014 AKannapolis Intimidators · 80 PAwOBA .353 → .306 (−46)K% 16.2% → 21.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 16.25% | ÷1.017 | ×1.340 | — | — | 21.41% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 6.25% | ÷0.990 | ×0.660 | — | ×0.990 | 4.12% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.50% | — | ×0.770 | — | ×0.990 | 1.91% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.42% | ÷0.982 | ×0.920 | ×1.039 | ×0.990 | 24.48% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.78% | ÷0.997 | ×0.820 | ×1.039 | ×0.990 | 5.73% |
| Triples /BIP | 3.39% | ÷1.118 | ×0.940 | ×1.039 | ×0.990 | 2.93% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.69% | ÷0.886 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.990 | 1.55% |
Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 77, 1B 96, 2B 99, 3B 124, K 103, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.039.
Result: wOBA .353 → .306; ISO .153 → .131; BABIP .362 → .337. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2013 ROKBristol White Sox · 248 PAwOBA .367 → .289 (−78)K% 10.5% → 14.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 10.48% | ÷1.000 | ×1.420 | — | — | 14.89% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 12.90% | ÷1.000 | ×0.640 | — | ×0.975 | 8.05% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.02% | — | ×0.740 | — | ×0.975 | 1.45% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.99% | ÷1.000 | ×0.840 | ×1.020 | ×0.975 | 21.71% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.34% | ÷1.000 | ×0.740 | ×1.020 | ×0.975 | 5.41% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.13% | ÷1.000 | ×0.740 | ×1.020 | ×0.975 | 0.83% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.13% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.975 | 0.88% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 19.5 → −2.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.020.
Result: wOBA .367 → .289; ISO .113 → .090; BABIP .341 → .276. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).