Charcer Burks

PosLF

B/TR/R

Born1995-03-09

Age (2027)32

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AALAST SEASON 2019

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2017	22	AA/INTL2 orgs	616	.265/.366/.386	10	18	83	—	.231/.311/.336
2018	23	AATennessee Smo…	513	.229/.333/.325	6	14	55	—	.198/.279/.278
2019	24	AATennessee Smo…	450	.237/.334/.320	2	16	47	—	.192/.261/.254

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2013	18	ROK	AZL Cubs	—	122	108	29	3	0	0	10	32	3	6	1	269	347	296	643	28	377	26	8	300	31	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	19	ROK	AZL Cubs	—	70	65	20	4	1	1	3	20	1	9	1	308	348	446	794	138	422	29	4	348	42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	20	A	South Bend Cubs	—	498	435	112	22	4	3	51	83	4	28	9	257	341	347	688	90	310	17	10	310	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	21	A+	Myrtle Beach Pelicans	—	531	445	110	28	5	11	66	116	11	23	7	247	358	407	765	160	308	22	12	340	56	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	22	AA	Tennessee Smokies	—	535	456	123	21	3	10	69	107	6	16	12	270	373	395	768	125	329	20	13	347	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	22	INTL	Mesa Solar Sox	—	81	72	17	7	0	0	8	19	1	2	0	236	321	333	654	97	321	23	10	301	90	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	23	AA	Tennessee Smokies	—	513	437	100	16	4	6	60	127	8	14	5	229	333	325	658	96	305	25	12	301	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	24	AA	Tennessee Smokies	—	450	384	91	16	5	2	49	102	7	16	5	237	334	320	654	83	310	23	11	297	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2013	18	ROK MLE	AZL Cubs	—	122	112	22	2	0	0	6	46	3	6	1	196	256	214	470	18	320	38	5	214	31	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	19	ROK MLE	AZL Cubs	—	70	66	14	2	1	1	2	29	1	9	1	212	246	318	565	106	335	41	3	231	42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	20	A MLE	South Bend Cubs	—	498	450	93	16	3	2	36	115	4	28	9	207	271	269	540	62	266	23	7	244	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	21	A+ MLE	Myrtle Beach Pelicans	—	531	471	89	23	4	7	40	171	11	23	7	189	268	299	568	110	266	32	8	251	56	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	22	AA MLE	Tennessee Smokies	—	535	476	110	19	2	9	49	133	6	16	12	231	311	336	647	105	295	25	9	290	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	23	AA MLE	Tennessee Smokies	—	513	454	90	15	3	5	43	159	8	14	5	198	279	278	557	79	279	31	8	249	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	24	AA MLE	Tennessee Smokies	—	450	402	77	14	4	1	31	128	7	16	5	192	261	254	515	62	264	28	7	237	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	18	ROK MLE	AZL Cubs	—	122	112	22	2	0	0	6	46	3	6	1	196	256	214	470	18	328	38	5	214	31	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	18	ROK RAW	AZL Cubs	—	122	108	29	3	0	0	10	32	3	6	1	269	347	296	643	28	377	26	8	300	31	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	19	ROK MLE	AZL Cubs	—	70	66	14	2	1	1	2	29	1	9	1	212	246	318	565	106	351	41	3	231	42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	19	ROK RAW	AZL Cubs	—	70	65	20	4	1	1	3	20	1	9	1	308	348	446	794	138	422	29	4	348	42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	20	A MLE	South Bend Cubs	—	498	450	93	16	3	2	36	115	4	28	9	207	271	269	540	62	271	23	7	244	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	20	A RAW	South Bend Cubs	—	498	435	112	22	4	3	51	83	4	28	9	257	341	347	688	90	310	17	10	310	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	21	A+ MLE	Myrtle Beach Pelicans	—	531	471	89	23	4	7	40	171	11	23	7	189	268	299	568	110	277	32	8	251	56	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	21	A+ RAW	Myrtle Beach Pelicans	—	531	445	110	28	5	11	66	116	11	23	7	247	358	407	765	160	308	22	12	340	56	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	22	AA MLE	2 teams	—	616	549	128	22	3	11	56	153	7	18	12	233	312	344	656	111	301	25	9	290	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	22	AA RAW	2 teams	—	616	528	140	28	3	10	77	126	7	18	12	265	366	386	752	121	328	20	12	341	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	23	AA MLE	Tennessee Smokies	—	513	454	90	15	3	5	43	159	8	14	5	198	279	278	557	79	289	31	8	249	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	23	AA RAW	Tennessee Smokies	—	513	437	100	16	4	6	60	127	8	14	5	229	333	325	658	96	305	25	12	301	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	24	AA MLE	Tennessee Smokies	—	450	402	77	14	4	1	31	128	7	16	5	192	261	254	515	62	271	28	7	237	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	24	AA RAW	Tennessee Smokies	—	450	384	91	16	5	2	49	102	7	16	5	237	334	320	654	83	310	23	11	297	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	18	ROK MLE	AZL Cubs	—	122	112	22	2	0	0	6	46	3	6	1	196	256	214	470	18	320	38	5	214	31	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	19	ROK MLE	AZL Cubs	—	70	67	14	2	1	1	2	29	1	9	1	209	246	313	560	104	335	41	3	231	42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	20	A MLE	South Bend Cubs	—	498	455	93	16	3	2	36	115	4	28	9	204	271	266	537	62	266	23	7	244	51	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	21	A+ MLE	Myrtle Beach Pelicans	—	531	475	89	23	4	7	40	171	11	23	7	187	268	297	565	109	266	32	8	251	56	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	22	AA MLE	2 teams	—	616	548	128	22	3	11	56	153	7	18	12	234	312	345	657	111	295	25	9	290	82	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	23	AA MLE	Tennessee Smokies	—	513	457	90	15	3	5	43	159	8	14	5	197	279	276	555	79	279	31	8	249	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	24	AA MLE	Tennessee Smokies	—	450	409	77	14	4	1	31	128	7	16	5	188	261	249	511	61	264	28	7	237	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	2800	2504	513	94	18	27	214	801	41	114	40	205	278	289	567	84	286	29	8	254	58	-141	+7	+0	-30	+61	-10.5
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	581	119	22	4	6	50	186	10	26	9	205	279	287	567	83	287	29	8	254	58	-33	+2	+0	-7	+14	-2.4

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2019 AATennessee Smokies · 450 PAwOBA .293 → .237 (−56)K% 22.7% → 28.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	22.67%	÷0.972	×1.220	—	—	28.44%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.44%	÷1.047	×0.680	—	×1.012	6.87%
HBP% /PA	1.56%	—	×0.840	—	×1.012	1.32%
Singles /BIP	24.11%	÷1.051	×0.920	×0.950	×1.012	20.29%
Doubles /BIP	5.67%	÷0.977	×0.910	×0.950	×1.012	5.08%
Triples /BIP	1.77%	÷0.957	×0.880	×0.950	×1.012	1.57%
Home runs /BIP	0.71%	÷1.142	×0.800	—	×1.012	0.50%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 128, 1B 110, 2B 95, 3B 91, K 94, BB 109 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .293 → .237; ISO .083 → .072; BABIP .310 → .264. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 AATennessee Smokies · 513 PAwOBA .296 → .249 (−47)K% 24.8% → 31.0%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	24.76%	÷0.975	×1.220	—	—	30.99%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.70%	÷0.982	×0.680	—	×1.027	8.32%
HBP% /PA	1.56%	—	×0.840	—	×1.027	1.35%
Singles /BIP	23.87%	÷0.990	×0.920	×0.963	×1.027	21.95%
Doubles /BIP	5.16%	÷0.966	×0.910	×0.963	×1.027	4.81%
Triples /BIP	1.29%	÷1.128	×0.880	×0.963	×1.027	1.00%
Home runs /BIP	1.94%	÷0.947	×0.800	—	×1.027	1.68%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 89, 1B 98, 2B 93, 3B 126, K 95, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 24.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.963.

Result: wOBA .296 → .249; ISO .096 → .083; BABIP .305 → .279. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 AATennessee Smokies · 535 PAwOBA .340 → .290 (−50)K% 20.0% → 24.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	20.00%	÷0.981	×1.220	—	—	24.87%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	12.52%	÷0.976	×0.680	—	×1.042	9.10%
HBP% /PA	1.12%	—	×0.840	—	×1.042	0.98%
Singles /BIP	25.50%	÷1.016	×0.920	×0.952	×1.042	22.91%
Doubles /BIP	6.02%	÷1.000	×0.910	×0.952	×1.042	5.43%
Triples /BIP	0.86%	÷1.150	×0.880	×0.952	×1.042	0.65%
Home runs /BIP	2.87%	÷0.882	×0.800	—	×1.042	2.71%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 76, 1B 103, 2B 100, 3B 130, K 96, BB 95 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 24.8 → +4.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.952.

Result: wOBA .340 → .290; ISO .125 → .113; BABIP .329 → .295. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 A+Myrtle Beach Pelicans · 531 PAwOBA .333 → .251 (−83)K% 21.8% → 32.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	21.85%	÷0.965	×1.420	—	—	32.15%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	12.24%	÷1.043	×0.630	—	×1.027	7.60%
HBP% /PA	2.07%	—	×0.860	—	×1.027	1.83%
Singles /BIP	20.06%	÷1.044	×0.940	×0.950	×1.027	17.61%
Doubles /BIP	8.51%	÷0.920	×0.830	×0.950	×1.027	7.49%
Triples /BIP	1.52%	÷1.038	×0.800	×0.950	×1.027	1.14%
Home runs /BIP	3.34%	÷1.311	×0.900	—	×1.027	2.36%

Factors used: league row CAR. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 162, 1B 109, 2B 84, 3B 108, K 93, BB 109 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .333 → .251; ISO .160 → .117; BABIP .308 → .266. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 ASouth Bend Cubs · 498 PAwOBA .305 → .244 (−61)K% 16.7% → 23.0%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	16.67%	÷0.984	×1.360	—	—	23.04%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	10.24%	÷1.006	×0.690	—	×1.030	7.24%
HBP% /PA	0.80%	—	×0.780	—	×1.030	0.65%
Singles /BIP	23.58%	÷1.036	×0.920	×0.975	×1.030	21.03%
Doubles /BIP	6.25%	÷1.109	×0.830	×0.975	×1.030	4.70%
Triples /BIP	1.14%	÷1.073	×0.910	×0.975	×1.030	0.97%
Home runs /BIP	0.85%	÷1.064	×0.800	—	×1.030	0.66%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 113, 1B 107, 2B 122, 3B 115, K 97, BB 101 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 22.0 → +3.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.975.

Result: wOBA .305 → .244; ISO .090 → .068; BABIP .310 → .266. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 ROKAZL Cubs · 70 PAwOBA .343 → .231 (−111)K% 28.6% → 41.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	28.57%	÷1.000	×1.440	—	—	41.14%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	4.29%	÷1.000	×0.620	—	×1.008	2.68%
HBP% /PA	1.43%	—	×0.720	—	×1.008	1.04%
Singles /BIP	31.11%	÷1.000	×0.820	—	×1.008	25.70%
Doubles /BIP	8.89%	÷1.000	×0.720	—	×1.008	6.45%
Triples /BIP	2.22%	÷1.000	×0.720	—	×1.008	1.61%
Home runs /BIP	2.22%	÷1.000	×0.780	—	×1.008	1.75%

Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 19.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average).

Result: wOBA .343 → .231; ISO .138 → .089; BABIP .422 → .335. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 ROKAZL Cubs · 122 PAwOBA .295 → .214 (−81)K% 26.2% → 37.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	26.23%	÷1.000	×1.440	—	—	37.77%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.20%	÷1.000	×0.620	—	×1.022	5.20%
HBP% /PA	2.46%	—	×0.720	—	×1.022	1.81%
Singles /BIP	34.21%	÷1.000	×0.820	×1.027	×1.022	29.46%
Doubles /BIP	3.95%	÷1.000	×0.720	×1.027	×1.022	2.98%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.000	×0.720	×1.027	×1.022	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.000	×0.780	—	×1.022	0.00%

Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 19.5 → +2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.027.

Result: wOBA .295 → .214; ISO .028 → .019; BABIP .377 → .320. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .