Ray-Patrick Didder

PosCF

B/TR/R

Born1994-10-01

Age (2027)32

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AALAST SEASON 2024

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2022	27	AAA/AA/INTL2 orgs	481	.239/.335/.361	12	26	53	—	.189/.266/.274
2023	28	AAA/AA/INTL2 orgs	441	.232/.368/.398	13	35	73	—	.196/.309/.327
2024	29	AA/INTL2 orgs	524	.174/.324/.296	10	32	43	—	.129/.247/.224

Contract

No contract data on file.

Skills · percentileMiLB Statcast 2024 AA

BB%83

Chase%81

Speed76

ISO55

wRC+45

Whiff%41

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2013	18	ROK	DSL Braves	—	180	135	35	2	1	0	31	34	7	8	3	259	422	289	711	30	343	19	17	333	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	19	ROK	GCL Braves	—	184	157	43	6	5	0	15	33	5	4	4	274	356	376	732	102	344	18	8	320	48	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	20	ROK	Danville Braves	—	259	223	55	5	7	0	20	51	14	10	7	247	346	332	678	85	320	20	8	312	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	21	A	Rome Braves	—	571	478	131	15	9	6	50	100	39	37	12	274	388	381	769	107	334	18	9	352	77	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	22	A+	Florida Fire Frogs	—	495	418	96	17	5	5	44	123	21	25	13	230	333	330	663	100	310	25	9	301	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	23	AA	Mississippi Braves	—	154	131	36	6	2	1	16	37	5	9	2	275	375	374	749	99	372	24	10	340	76	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	23	A+	Florida Fire Frogs	—	285	244	51	3	5	3	28	77	8	18	3	209	311	299	610	90	289	27	10	280	32	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	23	INTL	Peoria Javelinas	—	67	57	13	1	0	0	7	13	3	5	2	228	343	246	589	18	295	19	10	287	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	24	AA	Mississippi Braves	—	407	340	69	14	1	4	51	120	15	28	8	203	333	285	618	82	300	29	13	294	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	24	INTL	Atenienses de Manati	—	115	96	17	5	2	0	14	29	4	7	1	177	307	271	578	94	250	25	12	273	71	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	26	AA	Rocket City Trash Pandas	—	378	329	79	21	5	5	37	84	9	16	8	240	333	380	713	140	305	22	10	321	63	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	27	AAA	Jacksonville Jumbo Shrimp	—	114	104	25	2	0	2	7	36	3	4	1	240	307	317	624	77	348	32	6	288	28	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	27	AA	Pensacola Blue Wahoos	—	333	286	69	8	1	10	27	83	17	22	4	241	342	381	724	140	301	25	8	328	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	27	INTL	Curacao	—	34	28	6	3	0	0	4	5	2	0	0	214	353	321	674	107	261	15	12	318	102	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	28	AAA	El Paso Chihuahuas	—	202	163	47	12	0	7	31	45	8	19	3	288	426	491	917	202	360	22	15	410	102	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	28	AA	San Antonio Missions	—	190	157	31	6	0	6	29	52	4	13	5	197	337	350	687	153	253	27	15	319	52	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	28	INTL	Aguilas de Mexicali	—	49	42	6	3	0	0	6	13	0	3	0	143	250	214	464	71	200	27	12	219	35	—	—	—	—	—	—
2024	29	AA	San Antonio Missions	—	441	360	61	16	1	9	57	116	21	28	5	169	317	294	612	125	218	26	13	290	33	—	—	—	—	—	—
2024	29	INTL	Aguilas de Mexicali	—	83	65	13	4	0	1	14	21	2	4	1	200	358	308	666	108	279	25	17	310	96	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2013	18	ROK MLE	DSL Braves	—	180	144	27	1	1	0	22	41	7	8	3	188	324	208	532	21	237	23	12	240	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	19	ROK MLE	GCL Braves	—	184	163	35	4	4	0	9	47	5	4	4	215	277	288	565	74	279	26	5	239	48	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	20	ROK MLE	Danville Braves	—	259	230	42	3	5	0	13	73	14	10	7	183	268	239	508	57	259	28	5	224	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	21	A MLE	Rome Braves	—	571	497	115	13	8	5	31	139	39	37	12	231	326	320	646	89	301	24	5	282	77	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	22	A+ MLE	Florida Fire Frogs	—	495	432	78	13	3	4	30	181	21	25	13	181	267	252	519	72	280	37	6	235	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	23	AA MLE	Mississippi Braves	—	154	137	33	5	2	1	10	46	5	9	2	241	316	328	644	88	337	30	6	281	76	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	23	A+ MLE	Florida Fire Frogs	—	285	252	40	2	3	2	20	114	8	18	3	159	243	214	457	56	271	40	7	216	32	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	24	AA MLE	Mississippi Braves	—	407	356	56	13	1	3	35	150	15	28	8	157	261	225	486	67	253	37	9	226	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	26	AA MLE	Rocket City Trash Pandas	—	378	341	71	19	4	3	25	101	9	16	8	208	280	314	594	106	278	27	7	262	63	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	27	AAA MLE	Jacksonville Jumbo Shrimp	—	114	106	19	2	0	1	5	45	3	4	1	179	237	226	463	47	292	39	4	210	28	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	27	AA MLE	Pensacola Blue Wahoos	—	333	296	57	6	1	7	17	105	17	22	4	193	276	291	566	98	261	32	5	253	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	28	AAA MLE	El Paso Chihuahuas	—	202	172	41	10	0	5	22	55	8	19	3	238	351	384	735	145	314	27	11	319	102	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	28	AA MLE	San Antonio Missions	—	190	165	25	4	0	5	21	64	4	13	5	152	263	267	530	115	206	34	11	245	52	—	—	—	—	—	—
2024	29	AA MLE	San Antonio Missions	—	441	379	49	13	1	7	38	143	21	28	5	129	247	224	471	95	176	32	9	217	33	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	18	ROK MLE	DSL Braves	—	180	144	27	1	1	0	22	41	7	8	3	188	324	208	532	21	260	23	12	240	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	18	ROK RAW	DSL Braves	—	180	135	35	2	1	0	31	34	7	8	3	259	422	289	711	30	343	19	17	333	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	19	ROK MLE	GCL Braves	—	184	163	35	4	4	0	9	47	5	4	4	215	277	288	565	74	299	26	5	239	48	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	19	ROK RAW	GCL Braves	—	184	157	43	6	5	0	15	33	5	4	4	274	356	376	732	102	344	18	8	320	48	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	20	ROK MLE	Danville Braves	—	259	230	42	3	5	0	13	73	14	10	7	183	268	239	508	57	268	28	5	224	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	20	ROK RAW	Danville Braves	—	259	223	55	5	7	0	20	51	14	10	7	247	346	332	678	85	320	20	8	312	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	21	A MLE	Rome Braves	—	571	497	115	13	8	5	31	139	39	37	12	231	326	320	646	89	310	24	5	282	77	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	21	A RAW	Rome Braves	—	571	478	131	15	9	6	50	100	39	37	12	274	388	381	769	107	334	18	9	352	77	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	22	A+ MLE	Florida Fire Frogs	—	495	432	78	13	3	4	30	181	21	25	13	181	267	252	519	72	295	37	6	235	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	22	A+ RAW	Florida Fire Frogs	—	495	418	96	17	5	5	44	123	21	25	13	230	333	330	663	100	310	25	9	301	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	23	A+ MLE	3 teams	—	506	449	86	9	6	4	34	184	16	32	7	192	273	265	538	73	311	36	7	239	48	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	23	A+ RAW	3 teams	—	506	432	100	10	7	4	51	127	16	32	7	231	335	315	649	83	316	25	10	299	48	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	24	AA MLE	2 teams	—	522	456	71	16	1	4	45	193	19	35	9	156	260	221	481	66	257	37	9	226	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	24	AA RAW	2 teams	—	522	436	86	19	3	4	65	149	19	35	9	197	327	282	609	85	288	29	12	290	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	26	AA MLE	Rocket City Trash Pandas	—	378	341	71	19	4	3	25	101	9	16	8	208	280	314	594	106	283	27	7	262	63	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	26	AA RAW	Rocket City Trash Pandas	—	378	329	79	21	5	5	37	84	9	16	8	240	333	380	713	140	305	22	10	321	63	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	27	AA MLE	3 teams	—	481	433	83	9	1	9	23	161	22	26	5	192	268	279	547	88	278	33	5	242	50	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	27	AA RAW	3 teams	—	481	418	100	13	1	12	38	124	22	26	5	239	335	361	696	122	309	26	8	318	50	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	28	AAA MLE	3 teams	—	441	380	73	15	0	11	48	134	12	35	8	192	302	318	621	126	263	30	11	283	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	28	AAA RAW	3 teams	—	441	362	84	21	0	13	66	110	12	35	8	232	368	398	766	166	296	25	15	350	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2024	29	AA MLE	2 teams	—	524	450	58	15	1	8	46	170	23	32	6	129	245	220	465	91	182	32	9	217	33	—	—	—	—	—	—
2024	29	AA RAW	2 teams	—	524	425	74	20	1	10	71	137	23	32	6	174	324	296	620	122	228	26	14	293	33	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	18	ROK MLE	DSL Braves	—	180	149	27	1	1	0	22	41	7	8	3	181	324	201	525	20	237	23	12	240	49	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	19	ROK MLE	GCL Braves	—	184	168	35	4	4	0	9	47	5	4	4	208	277	280	557	71	279	26	5	239	48	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	20	ROK MLE	Danville Braves	—	259	230	42	3	5	0	13	73	14	10	7	183	268	239	508	57	259	28	5	224	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	21	A MLE	Rome Braves	—	571	496	115	13	8	5	31	139	39	37	12	232	326	321	647	89	301	24	5	282	77	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	22	A+ MLE	Florida Fire Frogs	—	495	441	78	13	3	4	30	181	21	25	13	177	267	247	514	70	280	37	6	235	45	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	23	A+ MLE	3 teams	—	506	451	86	9	6	4	34	184	16	32	7	191	273	264	536	73	294	36	7	239	48	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	24	AA MLE	2 teams	—	522	453	71	16	1	4	45	193	19	35	9	157	260	223	483	66	253	37	9	226	39	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	26	AA MLE	Rocket City Trash Pandas	—	378	341	71	19	4	3	25	101	9	16	8	208	280	314	594	106	278	27	7	262	63	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	27	AA MLE	3 teams	—	481	433	83	9	1	9	23	161	22	26	5	192	268	279	547	88	269	33	5	242	50	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	28	AAA MLE	3 teams	—	441	378	73	15	0	11	48	134	12	35	8	193	302	320	622	127	262	30	11	283	78	—	—	—	—	—	—
2024	29	AA MLE	2 teams	—	524	450	58	15	1	8	46	170	23	32	6	129	245	220	465	91	176	32	9	217	33	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons)
2024	29	AA MLE	2 teams	—	524	450	58	15	1	8	46	170	23	32	6	129	245	220	465	91	176	32	9	217	33	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	4541	3975	739	117	34	48	326	1424	187	260	82	186	279	269	548	83	274	31	7	246	52	-257	+19	+0	+16	+98	-12.6
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	569	106	17	5	7	47	204	27	37	12	186	280	271	551	84	274	31	7	246	52	-37	+3	+0	+2	+14	-1.8

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2024 AASan Antonio Missions · 441 PAwOBA .285 → .217 (−68)K% 26.3% → 32.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	26.30%	÷0.987	×1.220	—	—	32.52%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	12.93%	÷0.987	×0.700	—	×0.948	8.69%
HBP% /PA	4.76%	—	×0.870	—	×0.948	3.93%
Singles /BIP	14.34%	÷1.015	×0.920	×0.955	×0.948	11.77%
Doubles /BIP	6.56%	÷0.957	×0.840	×0.955	×0.948	5.21%
Triples /BIP	0.41%	÷1.150	×0.940	×0.955	×0.948	0.30%
Home runs /BIP	3.69%	÷0.953	×0.800	—	×0.948	2.93%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 91, 1B 103, 2B 91, 3B 130, K 97, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 30 vs a level average of 24.8 → −5.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (5.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.955.

Result: wOBA .285 → .217; ISO .125 → .098; BABIP .218 → .176. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2023 AAAEl Paso Chihuahuas · 202 PAwOBA .400 → .319 (−81)K% 22.3% → 27.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	22.28%	÷0.985	×1.200	—	—	27.15%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	15.35%	÷0.963	×0.690	—	×0.982	10.79%
HBP% /PA	3.96%	—	×0.940	—	×0.982	3.66%
Singles /BIP	23.73%	÷0.958	×0.930	×0.971	×0.982	21.97%
Doubles /BIP	10.17%	÷0.975	×0.830	×0.971	×0.982	8.26%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.970	×0.971	×0.982	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	5.93%	÷1.052	×0.700	—	×0.982	3.87%

Factors used: league row International League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 110, 1B 92, 2B 95, 3B 130, K 97, BB 93 — applied at half strength. Age: age 29 vs a level average of 27.2 → −1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.971.

Result: wOBA .400 → .319; ISO .202 → .144; BABIP .360 → .314. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2023 AASan Antonio Missions · 190 PAwOBA .311 → .245 (−66)K% 27.4% → 33.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	27.37%	÷0.987	×1.220	—	—	33.84%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	15.26%	÷0.927	×0.700	—	×0.958	11.04%
HBP% /PA	2.11%	—	×0.870	—	×0.958	1.75%
Singles /BIP	18.10%	÷0.986	×0.920	×0.960	×0.958	15.53%
Doubles /BIP	5.71%	÷1.116	×0.840	×0.960	×0.958	3.96%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.010	×0.940	×0.960	×0.958	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	5.71%	÷0.820	×0.800	—	×0.958	5.34%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 64, 1B 97, 2B 123, 3B 102, K 97, BB 85 — applied at half strength. Age: age 29 vs a level average of 24.8 → −4.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (4.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.960.

Result: wOBA .311 → .245; ISO .153 → .129; BABIP .253 → .206. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2022 AAPensacola Blue Wahoos · 333 PAwOBA .322 → .253 (−69)K% 24.9% → 31.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	24.92%	÷0.964	×1.220	—	—	31.54%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.81%	÷1.021	×0.680	—	×0.968	5.03%
HBP% /PA	5.11%	—	×0.840	—	×0.968	4.15%
Singles /BIP	24.63%	÷0.981	×0.920	×0.981	×0.968	21.93%
Doubles /BIP	3.94%	÷1.056	×0.910	×0.981	×0.968	3.22%
Triples /BIP	0.49%	÷1.150	×0.880	×0.981	×0.968	0.36%
Home runs /BIP	4.93%	÷1.048	×0.800	—	×0.968	3.64%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 110, 1B 96, 2B 111, 3B 130, K 93, BB 104 — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 24.8 → −3.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.981.

Result: wOBA .322 → .253; ISO .140 → .103; BABIP .301 → .261. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2022 AAAJacksonville Jumbo Shrimp · 114 PAwOBA .280 → .210 (−70)K% 31.6% → 39.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	31.58%	÷0.966	×1.200	—	—	39.24%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.14%	÷0.978	×0.690	—	×0.992	4.30%
HBP% /PA	2.63%	—	×0.940	—	×0.992	2.45%
Singles /BIP	30.88%	÷1.054	×0.930	×0.963	×0.992	26.04%
Doubles /BIP	2.94%	÷0.898	×0.830	×0.963	×0.992	2.60%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.930	×0.970	×0.963	×0.992	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	2.94%	÷1.032	×0.700	—	×0.992	1.98%

Factors used: league row International League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 106, 1B 111, 2B 80, 3B 86, K 93, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 27.2 → −0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.963.

Result: wOBA .280 → .210; ISO .077 → .051; BABIP .348 → .292. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2021 AARocket City Trash Pandas · 378 PAwOBA .315 → .262 (−53)K% 22.2% → 26.6%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	22.22%	÷1.018	×1.220	—	—	26.63%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.79%	÷0.992	×0.690	—	×0.978	6.66%
HBP% /PA	2.38%	—	×0.850	—	×0.978	1.98%
Singles /BIP	19.59%	÷0.985	×0.940	×1.008	×0.978	18.43%
Doubles /BIP	8.57%	÷0.947	×0.870	×1.008	×0.978	7.77%
Triples /BIP	2.04%	÷1.150	×0.920	×1.008	×0.978	1.61%
Home runs /BIP	2.04%	÷1.249	×0.780	—	×0.978	1.25%

Factors used: level-wide AA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 150, 1B 97, 2B 89, 3B 130, K 104, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 24.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.008.

Result: wOBA .315 → .262; ISO .140 → .110; BABIP .305 → .278. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2019 AAMississippi Braves · 407 PAwOBA .287 → .226 (−62)K% 29.5% → 36.9%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	29.48%	÷0.975	×1.220	—	—	36.88%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	12.29%	÷0.967	×0.680	—	×0.998	8.62%
HBP% /PA	3.69%	—	×0.840	—	×0.998	3.09%
Singles /BIP	22.73%	÷1.068	×0.920	×0.950	×0.998	18.55%
Doubles /BIP	6.36%	÷0.906	×0.910	×0.950	×0.998	6.06%
Triples /BIP	0.45%	÷0.900	×0.880	×0.950	×0.998	0.42%
Home runs /BIP	1.82%	÷0.900	×0.800	—	×0.998	1.61%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 80, 1B 114, 2B 81, 3B 80, K 95, BB 93 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .287 → .226; ISO .082 → .072; BABIP .300 → .253. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 A+Florida Fire Frogs · 285 PAwOBA .274 → .216 (−58)K% 27.0% → 40.0%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	27.02%	÷0.960	×1.420	—	—	39.97%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.47%	÷1.017	×0.750	—	×0.988	6.90%
HBP% /PA	2.81%	—	×0.930	—	×0.988	2.58%
Singles /BIP	23.95%	÷0.949	×0.920	×1.004	×0.988	23.03%
Doubles /BIP	1.80%	÷1.037	×0.960	×1.004	×0.988	1.65%
Triples /BIP	2.99%	÷1.026	×0.810	×1.004	×0.988	2.35%
Home runs /BIP	1.80%	÷0.974	×0.880	—	×0.988	1.60%

Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 95, 1B 90, 2B 107, 3B 105, K 92, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.004.

Result: wOBA .274 → .216; ISO .090 → .066; BABIP .289 → .271. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .