Seaver Whalen
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 22 | ROKPrinceton Rays | 143 | .248/.355/.355 | 2 | 3 | 49 | — | .194/.291/.282 |
| 2019 | 24 | A+/A2 orgs | 378 | .224/.318/.344 | 7 | 4 | 39 | — | .176/.256/.260 |
| 2021 | 26 | AATB | 217 | .214/.307/.385 | 6 | 5 | 55 | — | .174/.259/.311 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2017 | 22 | ROK | Princeton Rays | — | 143 | 121 | 30 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 17 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 248 | 355 | 355 | 710 | 107 | 272 | 12 | 5 | 326 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | A+ | Charlotte Stone Crabs | — | 99 | 85 | 16 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 31 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 188 | 281 | 294 | 575 | 106 | 283 | 31 | 6 | 260 | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | A | Bowling Green Hot Rods | — | 279 | 241 | 57 | 12 | 0 | 6 | 20 | 43 | 14 | 4 | 1 | 237 | 331 | 361 | 692 | 124 | 262 | 15 | 7 | 313 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 26 | AA | Montgomery Biscuits | — | 217 | 187 | 40 | 12 | 1 | 6 | 8 | 43 | 17 | 5 | 3 | 214 | 307 | 385 | 692 | 171 | 239 | 20 | 4 | 307 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2017 | 22 | ROK MLE | Princeton Rays | — | 143 | 124 | 24 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 24 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 194 | 291 | 282 | 573 | 89 | 211 | 17 | 3 | 240 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | A+ MLE | Charlotte Stone Crabs | — | 99 | 87 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 43 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 149 | 229 | 241 | 471 | 92 | 257 | 43 | 4 | 205 | 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | A MLE | Bowling Green Hot Rods | — | 279 | 248 | 46 | 8 | 0 | 4 | 13 | 62 | 14 | 4 | 1 | 185 | 265 | 266 | 532 | 81 | 219 | 22 | 5 | 233 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 26 | AA MLE | Montgomery Biscuits | — | 217 | 190 | 33 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 54 | 17 | 5 | 3 | 174 | 259 | 311 | 570 | 137 | 202 | 25 | 2 | 250 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 22 | ROK MLE | Princeton Rays | — | 143 | 124 | 24 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 24 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 194 | 291 | 282 | 573 | 89 | 222 | 17 | 3 | 240 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 22 | ROK RAW | Princeton Rays | — | 143 | 121 | 30 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 17 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 248 | 355 | 355 | 710 | 107 | 272 | 12 | 5 | 326 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 378 | 334 | 58 | 11 | 1 | 4 | 18 | 105 | 19 | 4 | 1 | 174 | 256 | 249 | 505 | 75 | 237 | 28 | 5 | 226 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | A RAW | 2 teams | — | 378 | 326 | 73 | 16 | 1 | 7 | 26 | 74 | 19 | 4 | 1 | 224 | 318 | 344 | 662 | 120 | 266 | 20 | 7 | 299 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 26 | AA MLE | Montgomery Biscuits | — | 217 | 190 | 33 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 54 | 17 | 5 | 3 | 174 | 259 | 311 | 570 | 137 | 207 | 25 | 2 | 250 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 26 | AA RAW | Montgomery Biscuits | — | 217 | 187 | 40 | 12 | 1 | 6 | 8 | 43 | 17 | 5 | 3 | 214 | 307 | 385 | 692 | 171 | 239 | 20 | 4 | 307 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 22 | ROK MLE | Princeton Rays | — | 143 | 125 | 24 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 24 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 192 | 291 | 280 | 571 | 88 | 211 | 17 | 3 | 240 | 49 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 24 | A MLE | 2 teams | — | 378 | 338 | 58 | 11 | 1 | 4 | 18 | 105 | 19 | 4 | 1 | 172 | 256 | 246 | 502 | 74 | 229 | 28 | 5 | 226 | 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 26 | AA MLE | Montgomery Biscuits | — | 217 | 193 | 33 | 9 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 54 | 17 | 5 | 3 | 171 | 259 | 306 | 565 | 135 | 202 | 25 | 2 | 250 | 55 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 738 | 648 | 115 | 25 | 2 | 11 | 27 | 183 | 49 | 12 | 5 | 177 | 264 | 273 | 537 | 96 | 225 | 25 | 4 | 236 | 46 | -48 | +0 | +0 | +8 | +16 | -2.4 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 571 | 102 | 22 | 2 | 10 | 24 | 161 | 43 | 11 | 4 | 179 | 265 | 277 | 542 | 98 | 226 | 25 | 4 | 236 | 46 | -42 | +1 | +0 | +7 | +14 | -2.1 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2021 AAMontgomery Biscuits · 217 PAwOBA .304 → .250 (−54)K% 19.8% → 24.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 19.82% | ÷0.970 | ×1.220 | — | — | 24.93% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 3.69% | ÷1.015 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.988 | 2.48% |
| HBP% /PA | 7.83% | — | ×0.850 | — | ×0.988 | 6.58% |
| Singles /BIP | 14.58% | ÷1.019 | ×0.940 | ×0.963 | ×0.988 | 12.81% |
| Doubles /BIP | 8.33% | ÷1.046 | ×0.870 | ×0.963 | ×0.988 | 6.60% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.69% | ÷0.950 | ×0.920 | ×0.963 | ×0.988 | 0.64% |
| Home runs /BIP | 4.17% | ÷0.938 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.988 | 3.42% |
Factors used: level-wide AA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 88, 1B 104, 2B 109, 3B 90, K 94, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 24.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.963.
Result: wOBA .304 → .250; ISO .171 → .139; BABIP .239 → .202. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 ABowling Green Hot Rods · 279 PAwOBA .309 → .233 (−76)K% 15.4% → 22.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 15.41% | ÷0.944 | ×1.360 | — | — | 22.21% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.17% | ÷1.012 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.980 | 4.79% |
| HBP% /PA | 5.02% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.980 | 3.84% |
| Singles /BIP | 19.70% | ÷0.960 | ×0.920 | ×0.950 | ×0.980 | 17.58% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.06% | ÷1.103 | ×0.830 | ×0.950 | ×0.980 | 4.25% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.124 | ×0.910 | ×0.950 | ×0.980 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 3.03% | ÷1.270 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.980 | 1.87% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 154, 1B 92, 2B 121, 3B 125, K 89, BB 102 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.0 → −2.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .309 → .233; ISO .124 → .079; BABIP .262 → .219. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 A+Charlotte Stone Crabs · 99 PAwOBA .254 → .205 (−49)K% 31.3% → 43.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 31.31% | ÷1.033 | ×1.420 | — | — | 43.05% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 6.06% | ÷1.018 | ×0.750 | — | ×0.988 | 4.41% |
| HBP% /PA | 5.05% | — | ×0.930 | — | ×0.988 | 4.64% |
| Singles /BIP | 18.52% | ÷1.008 | ×0.920 | — | ×0.988 | 16.69% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.41% | ÷1.011 | ×0.960 | — | ×0.988 | 6.95% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.85% | ÷0.900 | ×0.810 | — | ×0.988 | 1.65% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.85% | ÷0.939 | ×0.880 | — | ×0.988 | 1.72% |
Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 88, 1B 102, 2B 102, 3B 80, K 107, BB 104 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .254 → .205; ISO .106 → .086; BABIP .283 → .257. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2017 ROKPrinceton Rays · 143 PAwOBA .320 → .240 (−79)K% 11.9% → 16.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 11.89% | ÷1.000 | ×1.420 | — | — | 16.88% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 4.90% | ÷1.000 | ×0.640 | — | ×0.975 | 3.05% |
| HBP% /PA | 9.09% | — | ×0.740 | — | ×0.975 | 6.56% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.19% | ÷1.000 | ×0.840 | ×0.979 | ×0.975 | 16.19% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.73% | ÷1.000 | ×0.740 | ×0.979 | ×0.975 | 4.75% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.740 | ×0.979 | ×0.975 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.92% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.975 | 1.50% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 19.5 → −2.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.979.
Result: wOBA .320 → .240; ISO .107 → .080; BABIP .272 → .211. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).