Joseph Monge

PosCF

B/TR/R

Born1995-05-18

Age (2027)32

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

INTLLAST SEASON 2022

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2019	24	AA/A+/ROK/INTL4 orgs	129	.192/.236/.208	0	2	-8	—	.140/.186/.151
2021	26	INTLCangrejeros d…	39	.133/.333/.167	0	0	66	—
2022	27	INTLCangrejeros d…	60	.204/.259/.296	1	2	52	—

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2013	18	ROK	GCL Red Sox	—	124	111	25	5	0	0	9	31	3	7	6	225	301	270	571	45	312	25	7	266	10	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	19	ROK	GCL Red Sox	—	77	64	17	4	1	2	9	14	4	5	1	266	390	453	843	188	312	18	12	379	62	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	19	INTL	Senadores de San Juan	—	17	16	1	0	0	0	1	8	0	0	0	62	118	62	180		125	47	6	94	-50	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	20	A	Greenville Drive	—	412	373	90	23	3	2	21	89	4	22	4	241	288	335	623	94	309	22	5	272	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	21	A+	Salem Red Sox	—	361	329	90	19	4	4	23	81	6	19	8	274	332	392	724	119	351	22	6	323	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	21	A	Greenville Drive	—	158	142	48	11	0	3	12	35	2	5	7	338	397	479	876	141	425	22	8	386	103	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	21	INTL	Cangrejeros de Santurce	—	53	49	13	2	0	0	2	11	0	1	0	265	294	306	600	41	342	21	4	263	64	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	22	AA	Portland Sea Dogs	—	214	193	46	10	1	2	10	49	9	5	2	238	307	332	638	93	310	23	5	290	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	24	AA	Portland Sea Dogs	—	34	32	6	0	0	0	1	13	1	1	0	188	235	188	423		316	38	3	202	-4	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	24	A+	Salem Red Sox	—	41	39	10	2	0	0	2	13	0	1	0	256	293	308	600	51	385	32	5	273	10	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	24	ROK	GCL Red Sox	—	22	19	2	0	0	0	2	5	1	0	0	105	227	105	333		143	23	9	179	-34	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	24	INTL	Atenienses de Manati	—	32	30	5	0	0	0	0	5	0	0	1	167	167	167	333		192	16	0	141	-18	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	26	INTL	Cangrejeros de Santurce	—	39	30	4	1	0	0	7	7	2	0	0	133	333	167	500	33	174	18	18	265	66	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	27	INTL	Cangrejeros de Santurce	—	60	54	11	2	0	1	3	17	1	2	2	204	259	296	555	93	278	28	5	245	52	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2013	18	ROK MLE	GCL Red Sox	—	124	114	18	3	0	0	6	45	3	7	6	158	220	184	404	26	253	36	5	183	10	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	19	ROK MLE	GCL Red Sox	—	77	67	14	3	1	2	6	20	4	5	1	209	312	373	685	164	233	26	8	260	62	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	20	A MLE	Greenville Drive	—	412	381	85	19	3	2	14	117	4	22	4	223	258	304	563	81	297	28	3	237	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	21	A+ MLE	Salem Red Sox	—	361	337	75	14	3	4	15	121	6	19	8	223	268	318	586	95	324	34	4	253	57	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	21	A MLE	Greenville Drive	—	158	146	42	9	0	2	8	45	2	5	7	288	333	390	724	103	389	28	5	320	103	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	22	AA MLE	Portland Sea Dogs	—	214	196	43	8	1	2	7	61	9	5	2	219	278	301	579	82	297	29	3	246	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	24	AA MLE	Portland Sea Dogs	—	34	32	5	0	0	0	1	16	1	1	0	156	206	156	362		305	47	3	162	-4	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	24	A+ MLE	Salem Red Sox	—	41	40	7	1	0	0	1	19	0	1	0	175	195	200	395	25	344	46	2	183	10	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	24	ROK MLE	GCL Red Sox	—	22	20	1	0	0	0	1	7	1	0	0	50	136	50	186		112	32	5	118	-34	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	18	ROK MLE	GCL Red Sox	—	124	114	18	3	0	0	6	45	3	7	6	158	220	184	404	26	261	36	5	183	10	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	18	ROK RAW	GCL Red Sox	—	124	111	25	5	0	0	9	31	3	7	6	225	301	270	571	45	312	25	7	266	10	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	19	ROK MLE	2 teams	—	94	83	15	3	1	2	7	25	4	5	1	181	277	313	590	133	232	27	7	260	62	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	19	ROK RAW	2 teams	—	94	80	18	4	1	2	10	22	4	5	1	225	340	375	715	150	286	23	11	327	62	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	20	A MLE	Greenville Drive	—	412	381	85	19	3	2	14	117	4	22	4	223	258	304	563	81	313	28	3	237	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	20	A RAW	Greenville Drive	—	412	373	90	23	3	2	21	89	4	22	4	241	288	335	623	94	309	22	5	272	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	21	A+ MLE	3 teams	—	572	532	129	26	3	7	25	183	8	25	15	242	287	342	629	100	354	32	4	273	71	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	21	A+ RAW	3 teams	—	572	520	151	32	4	7	37	127	8	25	15	290	347	408	755	117	370	22	6	335	71	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	22	AA MLE	Portland Sea Dogs	—	214	196	43	8	1	2	7	61	9	5	2	219	278	301	579	82	308	29	3	246	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	22	AA RAW	Portland Sea Dogs	—	214	193	46	10	1	2	10	49	9	5	2	238	307	332	638	93	310	23	5	290	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	24	A+ MLE	4 teams	—	129	121	18	2	0	0	4	56	2	2	1	149	189	165	354	17	273	43	3	161	-5	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	24	A+ RAW	4 teams	—	129	120	23	2	0	0	5	36	2	2	1	192	236	208	445	17	271	28	4	206	-5	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	26	INTL MLE	Cangrejeros de Santurce	—	39	30	4	1	0	0	7	7	2	0	0	133	333	167	500	33	174	18	18	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	26	INTL RAW	Cangrejeros de Santurce	—	39	30	4	1	0	0	7	7	2	0	0	133	333	167	500	33	174	18	18	265	66	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	27	INTL MLE	Cangrejeros de Santurce	—	60	54	11	2	0	1	3	17	1	2	2	204	259	296	555	93	278	28	5	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	27	INTL RAW	Cangrejeros de Santurce	—	60	54	11	2	0	1	3	17	1	2	2	204	259	296	555	93	278	28	5	245	52	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	18	ROK MLE	GCL Red Sox	—	124	114	18	3	0	0	6	45	3	7	6	158	220	184	404	26	253	36	5	183	10	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	19	ROK MLE	2 teams	—	94	83	15	3	1	2	7	25	4	5	1	181	277	313	590	133	233	27	7	260	62	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	20	A MLE	Greenville Drive	—	412	391	85	19	3	2	14	117	4	22	4	217	258	297	555	79	297	28	3	237	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	21	A+ MLE	3 teams	—	572	534	129	26	3	7	25	183	8	25	15	242	287	341	628	99	344	32	4	273	71	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	22	AA MLE	Portland Sea Dogs	—	214	196	43	8	1	2	7	61	9	5	2	219	278	301	579	82	297	29	3	246	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	24	A+ MLE	4 teams	—	129	122	18	2	0	0	4	56	2	2	1	148	189	164	353	16	278	43	3	161	-5	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	1644	1511	323	64	8	14	73	511	33	68	31	214	265	295	560	81	311	31	4	228	40	-117	+1	+0	+6	+36	-7.6
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	597	128	25	3	6	29	202	13	27	12	214	266	296	563	82	311	31	4	228	40	-46	+1	+0	+2	+14	-3.0

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2019 A+Salem Red Sox · 41 PAwOBA .266 → .183 (−83)K% 31.7% → 47.0%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	31.71%	÷0.958	×1.420	—	—	47.00%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	4.88%	÷0.968	×0.630	—	×0.988	3.14%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.860	—	×0.988	0.00%
Singles /BIP	30.77%	÷1.003	×0.940	—	×0.988	28.50%
Doubles /BIP	7.69%	÷1.070	×0.830	—	×0.988	5.89%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.972	×0.800	—	×0.988	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.080	×0.900	—	×0.988	0.00%

Factors used: league row CAR. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 116, 1B 101, 2B 114, 3B 94, K 92, BB 94 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .266 → .183; ISO .051 → .031; BABIP .385 → .344. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2019 AAPortland Sea Dogs · 34 PAwOBA .197 → .162 (−34)K% 38.2% → 47.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	38.24%	÷0.991	×1.220	—	—	47.08%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	2.94%	÷0.997	×0.700	—	×1.012	2.09%
HBP% /PA	2.94%	—	×0.850	—	×1.012	2.53%
Singles /BIP	31.58%	÷1.016	×0.970	—	×1.012	30.51%
Doubles /BIP	0.00%	÷1.158	×0.860	—	×1.012	0.00%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.950	—	×1.012	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.953	×0.780	—	×1.012	0.00%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 91, 1B 103, 2B 132, 3B 130, K 98, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average).

Result: wOBA .197 → .162; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .316 → .305. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2019 ROKGCL Red Sox · 22 PAwOBA .176 → .118 (−58)K% 22.7% → 32.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	22.73%	÷1.000	×1.440	—	—	32.73%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.09%	÷1.000	×0.620	—	×0.955	5.38%
HBP% /PA	4.55%	—	×0.720	—	×0.955	3.13%
Singles /BIP	14.29%	÷1.000	×0.820	—	×0.955	11.19%
Doubles /BIP	0.00%	÷1.000	×0.720	—	×0.955	0.00%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.000	×0.720	—	×0.955	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.000	×0.780	—	×0.955	0.00%

Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 19.5 → −4.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (4.5 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .176 → .118; ISO .000 → .000; BABIP .143 → .112. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 AAPortland Sea Dogs · 214 PAwOBA .283 → .246 (−37)K% 22.9% → 28.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	22.90%	÷0.974	×1.220	—	—	28.67%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	4.67%	÷1.067	×0.700	—	×1.042	3.19%
HBP% /PA	4.21%	—	×0.850	—	×1.042	3.72%
Singles /BIP	22.92%	÷0.984	×0.970	×0.980	×1.042	23.05%
Doubles /BIP	6.94%	÷1.085	×0.860	×0.980	×1.042	5.62%
Triples /BIP	0.69%	÷1.010	×0.950	×0.980	×1.042	0.67%
Home runs /BIP	1.39%	÷1.020	×0.780	—	×1.042	1.11%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 104, 1B 97, 2B 117, 3B 102, K 95, BB 114 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 24.8 → +4.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.980.

Result: wOBA .283 → .246; ISO .093 → .073; BABIP .310 → .297. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 A+Salem Red Sox · 361 PAwOBA .316 → .253 (−63)K% 22.4% → 33.5%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	22.44%	÷0.951	×1.420	—	—	33.50%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.37%	÷0.989	×0.630	—	×1.027	4.17%
HBP% /PA	1.66%	—	×0.860	—	×1.027	1.47%
Singles /BIP	25.40%	÷1.000	×0.940	×0.997	×1.027	24.45%
Doubles /BIP	7.66%	÷1.030	×0.830	×0.997	×1.027	6.32%
Triples /BIP	1.61%	÷1.150	×0.800	×0.997	×1.027	1.15%
Home runs /BIP	1.61%	÷0.787	×0.900	—	×1.027	1.89%

Factors used: league row CAR. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 57, 1B 100, 2B 106, 3B 130, K 90, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.8 → +2.7% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.997.

Result: wOBA .316 → .253; ISO .119 → .096; BABIP .351 → .324. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 AGreenville Drive · 158 PAwOBA .380 → .320 (−60)K% 22.2% → 28.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	22.15%	÷1.034	×1.340	—	—	28.72%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.59%	÷1.044	×0.660	—	×1.015	4.87%
HBP% /PA	1.27%	—	×0.770	—	×1.015	0.99%
Singles /BIP	31.78%	÷0.978	×0.920	×0.974	×1.015	29.58%
Doubles /BIP	10.28%	÷0.908	×0.820	×0.974	×1.015	9.18%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.940	×0.974	×1.015	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	2.80%	÷1.001	×0.820	—	×1.015	2.33%

Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 100, 1B 96, 2B 82, 3B 130, K 107, BB 109 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.974.

Result: wOBA .380 → .320; ISO .141 → .118; BABIP .425 → .389. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 AGreenville Drive · 412 PAwOBA .267 → .237 (−30)K% 21.6% → 28.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	21.60%	÷1.019	×1.340	—	—	28.40%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	5.10%	÷0.993	×0.660	—	×1.030	3.49%
HBP% /PA	0.97%	—	×0.770	—	×1.030	0.77%
Singles /BIP	21.83%	÷0.981	×0.920	×1.047	×1.030	22.08%
Doubles /BIP	8.10%	÷1.063	×0.820	×1.047	×1.030	6.74%
Triples /BIP	1.06%	÷1.069	×0.940	×1.047	×1.030	1.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.70%	÷0.979	×0.820	—	×1.030	0.61%

Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 96, 1B 96, 2B 113, 3B 114, K 104, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 22.0 → +3.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.047.

Result: wOBA .267 → .237; ISO .094 → .079; BABIP .309 → .297. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 ROKGCL Red Sox · 77 PAwOBA .370 → .260 (−109)K% 18.2% → 26.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	18.18%	÷1.000	×1.440	—	—	26.18%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.69%	÷1.000	×0.620	—	×1.008	7.30%
HBP% /PA	5.19%	—	×0.720	—	×1.008	3.77%
Singles /BIP	20.00%	÷1.000	×0.820	×0.950	×1.008	15.70%
Doubles /BIP	8.00%	÷1.000	×0.720	×0.950	×1.008	5.51%
Triples /BIP	2.00%	÷1.000	×0.720	×0.950	×1.008	1.38%
Home runs /BIP	4.00%	÷1.000	×0.780	—	×1.008	3.14%

Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 19.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.

Result: wOBA .370 → .260; ISO .188 → .134; BABIP .312 → .233. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .