Matt McPhearson
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 21 | AKane County C… | 88 | .219/.337/.247 | 0 | 9 | 46 | — | .208/.291/.234 |
| 2017 | 22 | A+ARI | 445 | .278/.334/.340 | 0 | 31 | 56 | — | .239/.284/.287 |
| 2018 | 23 | ATB | 126 | .266/.365/.358 | 0 | 10 | 56 | — | .216/.278/.293 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 18 | ROK | ACL D-backs | — | 154 | 130 | 26 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 21 | 45 | 0 | 15 | 3 | 200 | 307 | 238 | 546 | 38 | 306 | 29 | 14 | 260 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 19 | ROK | ACL D-backs | — | 191 | 160 | 45 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 43 | 4 | 23 | 3 | 281 | 385 | 294 | 679 | 13 | 378 | 23 | 12 | 317 | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 20 | ROK | Missoula Osprey | — | 196 | 173 | 41 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 53 | 3 | 30 | 7 | 237 | 320 | 254 | 574 | 17 | 339 | 27 | 9 | 270 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 21 | A | Kane County Cougars | — | 88 | 73 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 21 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 219 | 337 | 247 | 584 | 27 | 302 | 24 | 15 | 276 | 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 22 | A+ | Visalia Rawhide | — | 445 | 406 | 113 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 30 | 86 | 4 | 31 | 11 | 278 | 334 | 340 | 674 | 62 | 351 | 19 | 7 | 304 | 56 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | A | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 126 | 109 | 29 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 17 | 31 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 266 | 365 | 358 | 723 | 92 | 372 | 25 | 13 | 332 | 56 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 18 | ROK MLE | ACL D-backs | — | 154 | 140 | 20 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 65 | 0 | 15 | 3 | 143 | 216 | 171 | 387 | 29 | 264 | 42 | 8 | 182 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 19 | ROK MLE | ACL D-backs | — | 191 | 169 | 37 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 62 | 4 | 23 | 3 | 219 | 294 | 225 | 519 | 6 | 326 | 32 | 7 | 239 | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 20 | ROK MLE | Missoula Osprey | — | 196 | 180 | 31 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 76 | 3 | 30 | 7 | 172 | 232 | 189 | 421 | 17 | 283 | 39 | 6 | 188 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 21 | A MLE | Kane County Cougars | — | 88 | 77 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 28 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 208 | 291 | 234 | 524 | 26 | 295 | 32 | 10 | 236 | 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 22 | A+ MLE | Visalia Rawhide | — | 445 | 414 | 99 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 22 | 121 | 4 | 31 | 11 | 239 | 284 | 287 | 572 | 48 | 328 | 27 | 5 | 251 | 56 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 126 | 116 | 25 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 42 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 216 | 278 | 293 | 571 | 78 | 334 | 33 | 8 | 251 | 56 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 18 | ROK MLE | ACL D-backs | — | 154 | 140 | 20 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 65 | 0 | 15 | 3 | 143 | 216 | 171 | 387 | 29 | 267 | 42 | 8 | 182 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 18 | ROK RAW | ACL D-backs | — | 154 | 130 | 26 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 21 | 45 | 0 | 15 | 3 | 200 | 307 | 238 | 546 | 38 | 306 | 29 | 14 | 260 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 19 | ROK MLE | ACL D-backs | — | 191 | 169 | 37 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 62 | 4 | 23 | 3 | 219 | 294 | 225 | 519 | 6 | 339 | 32 | 7 | 239 | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 19 | ROK RAW | ACL D-backs | — | 191 | 160 | 45 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 23 | 43 | 4 | 23 | 3 | 281 | 385 | 294 | 679 | 13 | 378 | 23 | 12 | 317 | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 20 | ROK MLE | Missoula Osprey | — | 196 | 180 | 31 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 76 | 3 | 30 | 7 | 172 | 232 | 189 | 421 | 17 | 295 | 39 | 6 | 188 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 20 | ROK RAW | Missoula Osprey | — | 196 | 173 | 41 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 53 | 3 | 30 | 7 | 237 | 320 | 254 | 574 | 17 | 339 | 27 | 9 | 270 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 21 | A MLE | Kane County Cougars | — | 88 | 77 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 28 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 208 | 291 | 234 | 524 | 26 | 320 | 32 | 10 | 236 | 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 21 | A RAW | Kane County Cougars | — | 88 | 73 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 13 | 21 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 219 | 337 | 247 | 584 | 27 | 302 | 24 | 15 | 276 | 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 22 | A+ MLE | Visalia Rawhide | — | 445 | 414 | 99 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 22 | 121 | 4 | 31 | 11 | 239 | 284 | 287 | 572 | 48 | 336 | 27 | 5 | 251 | 56 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 22 | A+ RAW | Visalia Rawhide | — | 445 | 406 | 113 | 15 | 5 | 0 | 30 | 86 | 4 | 31 | 11 | 278 | 334 | 340 | 674 | 62 | 351 | 19 | 7 | 304 | 56 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 126 | 116 | 25 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 42 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 216 | 278 | 293 | 571 | 78 | 338 | 33 | 8 | 251 | 56 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | A RAW | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 126 | 109 | 29 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 17 | 31 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 266 | 365 | 358 | 723 | 92 | 372 | 25 | 13 | 332 | 56 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 18 | ROK MLE | ACL D-backs | — | 154 | 140 | 20 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 65 | 0 | 15 | 3 | 143 | 216 | 171 | 387 | 29 | 264 | 42 | 8 | 182 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 19 | ROK MLE | ACL D-backs | — | 191 | 171 | 37 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 62 | 4 | 23 | 3 | 216 | 294 | 222 | 516 | 6 | 326 | 32 | 7 | 239 | 48 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 20 | ROK MLE | Missoula Osprey | — | 196 | 180 | 31 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 76 | 3 | 30 | 7 | 172 | 232 | 189 | 421 | 17 | 283 | 39 | 6 | 188 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 21 | A MLE | Kane County Cougars | — | 88 | 79 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 28 | 0 | 9 | 3 | 203 | 291 | 228 | 519 | 25 | 295 | 32 | 10 | 236 | 46 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 22 | A+ MLE | Visalia Rawhide | — | 445 | 416 | 99 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 22 | 121 | 4 | 31 | 11 | 238 | 284 | 286 | 570 | 48 | 328 | 27 | 5 | 251 | 56 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 23 | A MLE | Charleston RiverDogs | — | 126 | 115 | 25 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 42 | 0 | 10 | 2 | 217 | 278 | 296 | 573 | 78 | 334 | 33 | 8 | 251 | 56 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 1200 | 1096 | 228 | 23 | 8 | 0 | 79 | 394 | 11 | 118 | 29 | 208 | 268 | 244 | 512 | 36 | 322 | 33 | 7 | 229 | 41 | -84 | +12 | +0 | -13 | +26 | -6.0 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 594 | 123 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 43 | 213 | 6 | 64 | 16 | 207 | 267 | 241 | 508 | 34 | 320 | 33 | 7 | 229 | 41 | -46 | +6 | +0 | -7 | +14 | -3.3 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2018 ACharleston RiverDogs · 126 PAwOBA .324 → .251 (−73)K% 24.6% → 33.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 24.60% | ÷0.991 | ×1.340 | — | — | 33.27% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 13.49% | ÷1.092 | ×0.660 | — | ×0.990 | 8.07% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.770 | — | ×0.990 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 26.92% | ÷1.020 | ×0.920 | ×1.024 | ×0.990 | 24.61% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.69% | ÷0.961 | ×0.820 | ×1.024 | ×0.990 | 6.65% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.56% | ÷1.150 | ×0.940 | ×1.024 | ×0.990 | 2.12% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.811 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.990 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 62, 1B 104, 2B 92, 3B 130, K 98, BB 118 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.024.
Result: wOBA .324 → .251; ISO .092 → .074; BABIP .372 → .334. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2017 A+Visalia Rawhide · 445 PAwOBA .298 → .251 (−47)K% 19.3% → 27.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 19.33% | ÷0.952 | ×1.340 | — | — | 27.19% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 6.74% | ÷0.996 | ×0.710 | — | ×1.012 | 4.86% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.90% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×1.012 | 0.72% |
| Singles /BIP | 29.06% | ÷1.016 | ×0.910 | ×1.050 | ×1.012 | 27.66% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.69% | ÷1.038 | ×0.820 | ×1.050 | ×1.012 | 3.94% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.56% | ÷0.900 | ×0.760 | ×1.050 | ×1.012 | 1.40% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.048 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.012 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 110, 1B 103, 2B 108, 3B 80, K 90, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .298 → .251; ISO .062 → .050; BABIP .351 → .328. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2016 AKane County Cougars · 88 PAwOBA .273 → .236 (−38)K% 23.9% → 31.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 23.86% | ÷1.029 | ×1.360 | — | — | 31.53% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 14.77% | ÷0.995 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.015 | 10.40% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 26.92% | ÷0.988 | ×0.920 | ×1.050 | ×1.015 | 26.72% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.85% | ÷1.000 | ×0.830 | ×1.050 | ×1.015 | 3.40% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.008 | ×0.910 | ×1.050 | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.975 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 95, 1B 98, 2B 100, 3B 102, K 106, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .273 → .236; ISO .027 → .024; BABIP .302 → .295. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 ROKMissoula Osprey · 196 PAwOBA .265 → .188 (−78)K% 27.0% → 38.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 27.04% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 38.94% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.18% | ÷1.000 | ×0.610 | — | ×0.995 | 5.57% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.53% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.995 | 1.10% |
| Singles /BIP | 32.50% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | ×1.031 | ×0.995 | 27.34% |
| Doubles /BIP | 0.83% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×1.031 | ×0.995 | 0.62% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.83% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×1.031 | ×0.995 | 0.62% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.750 | — | ×0.995 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row PIO. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 19.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.031.
Result: wOBA .265 → .188; ISO .017 → .011; BABIP .339 → .283. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2014 ROKACL D-backs · 191 PAwOBA .311 → .239 (−72)K% 22.5% → 32.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 22.51% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 32.42% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.52% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×1.008 | 7.19% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.09% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×1.008 | 1.52% |
| Singles /BIP | 36.75% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | ×1.050 | ×1.008 | 31.88% |
| Doubles /BIP | 1.71% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×1.050 | ×1.008 | 1.30% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×1.050 | ×1.008 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.008 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 19.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .311 → .239; ISO .013 → .009; BABIP .378 → .326. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2013 ROKACL D-backs · 154 PAwOBA .254 → .182 (−72)K% 29.2% → 42.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 29.22% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 42.08% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 13.64% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×1.022 | 8.64% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×1.022 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.88% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | ×1.050 | ×1.022 | 22.79% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.53% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×1.050 | ×1.022 | 2.73% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.18% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×1.050 | ×1.022 | 0.91% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.022 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 19.5 → +2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .254 → .182; ISO .038 → .027; BABIP .306 → .264. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).