Jordan Gore
P Wichita Wind Surge| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 24 | MIX2 levels | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0.00 | 6.10 | 20.0% | 30.0% | — | K 20.0% · BB 30.0% · FIP 5.21 | |
| 2021 | 26 | MIX2 levels | 39 | 0 | 68 | 2.39 | 2.32 | 33.0% | 10.5% | — | K 25.8% · BB 11.9% · FIP 3.20 | |
| 2022 | 27 | MIX2 levels | 42 | 0 | 46 | 5.52 | 4.94 | 18.4% | 17.0% | — | K 15.2% · BB 18.5% · FIP 5.37 | |
| 2023 | 28 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2024 | 29 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2025 | 30 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 31 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2018 | 23 | A MLE | Cedar Rapids Kernels | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 0.0% | 50.0% | -50.0% | 0.0% | 9.00 | 9.43 | — |
| 2018 | 23 | A RAW | Cedar Rapids Kernels | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 0.0% | 50.0% | -50.0% | 0.0% | 9.00 | 12.10 | — |
| 2019 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0.6 | 20.0% | 30.0% | -10.0% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 5.21 | — |
| 2019 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 3 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0% | 0.6 | 20.0% | 30.0% | -10.0% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 6.10 | — |
| 2021 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 39 | 0 | 68 | 267 | 88 | 28 | 3 | 0% | 1.7 | 25.8% | 11.9% | 14.0% | 1.4% | 2.39 | 3.20 | — |
| 2021 | 26 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 39 | 0 | 68 | 267 | 88 | 28 | 3 | 0% | 1.7 | 33.0% | 10.5% | 22.5% | 1.1% | 2.39 | 2.32 | — |
| 2022 | 27 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 42 | 0 | 46 | 223 | 41 | 38 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 15.2% | 18.5% | -3.2% | 2.2% | 5.52 | 5.37 | — |
| 2022 | 27 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 42 | 0 | 46 | 223 | 41 | 38 | 4 | 0% | 1.1 | 18.4% | 17.0% | 1.3% | 1.8% | 5.52 | 4.94 | — |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | 85 | 0 | 116 | 506 | 105 | 79 | 9 | 0% | 1.4 | 20.7% | 15.6% | 5.2% | 1.7% | 3.65 | 4.27 | — | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 147 | 0 | 200 | 872 | 181 | 136 | 15 | 0% | 1.4 | 20.7% | 15.6% | 5.2% | 1.7% | 3.65 | 4.27 | +0.7 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2022 AAWichita Wind Surge · 30 IPFIP 4.26 → 5.00 (+0.74)K% 21.8% → 17.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.83% | — | ×0.810 | 17.68% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 17.61% | — | ×1.100 | 19.37% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.41% | ÷0.985 | ×1.200 | 1.72% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 97).
Result: FIP 4.26 → 5.00, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2022 AAASt. Paul Saints · 16 IPFIP 5.45 → 6.01 (+0.56)K% 12.3% → 10.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 12.35% | — | ×0.880 | 10.86% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 16.05% | — | ×1.050 | 16.85% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.47% | ÷0.881 | ×1.100 | 3.08% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 76).
Result: FIP 5.45 → 6.01, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 A+Cedar Rapids Kernels · 40 IPFIP 2.06 → 3.22 (+1.16)K% 36.5% → 28.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 36.48% | — | ×0.770 | 28.09% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.69% | — | ×1.150 | 12.30% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.26% | ÷0.920 | ×1.250 | 1.71% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 84).
Result: FIP 2.06 → 3.22, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2021 AAWichita Wind Surge · 28 IPFIP 2.55 → 3.17 (+0.62)K% 27.8% → 22.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.78% | — | ×0.810 | 22.50% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 10.19% | — | ×1.100 | 11.20% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.93% | ÷1.104 | ×1.200 | 1.01% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 121).
Result: FIP 2.55 → 3.17, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).