Stephen Gaylor
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 23 | ARome Braves | 288 | .285/.373/.345 | 0 | 15 | 70 | — | .254/.317/.304 |
| 2016 | 24 | AA/A+2 orgs | 337 | .244/.317/.278 | 1 | 18 | 41 | — | .218/.266/.247 |
| 2017 | 25 | AAA/AA/A+3 orgs | 173 | .235/.304/.301 | 0 | 7 | 40 | — | .204/.256/.249 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2014 | 22 | ROK | GCL Braves | — | 43 | 40 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 325 | 357 | 400 | 757 | 75 | 406 | 19 | 2 | 332 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 23 | A | Rome Braves | — | 288 | 249 | 71 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 28 | 33 | 7 | 15 | 11 | 285 | 373 | 345 | 719 | 60 | 329 | 11 | 10 | 328 | 70 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 24 | AA | Mississippi Braves | — | 117 | 108 | 27 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 28 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 250 | 289 | 287 | 577 | 37 | 329 | 24 | 5 | 258 | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 24 | A+ | Carolina Mudcats | — | 220 | 191 | 46 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 24 | 38 | 2 | 14 | 5 | 241 | 332 | 272 | 604 | 31 | 299 | 17 | 11 | 282 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 25 | AAA | Gwinnett Braves | — | 44 | 40 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 250 | 318 | 300 | 618 | 50 | 303 | 16 | 9 | 286 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 25 | AA | Mississippi Braves | — | 56 | 50 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 180 | 241 | 200 | 441 | 20 | 220 | 16 | 7 | 202 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 25 | A+ | Florida Fire Frogs | — | 73 | 63 | 17 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 14 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 270 | 343 | 381 | 724 | 111 | 340 | 19 | 7 | 314 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2014 | 22 | ROK MLE | GCL Braves | — | 43 | 40 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 250 | 286 | 325 | 611 | 75 | 315 | 28 | 2 | 232 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 23 | A MLE | Rome Braves | — | 288 | 260 | 66 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 17 | 48 | 7 | 15 | 11 | 254 | 317 | 304 | 621 | 50 | 302 | 17 | 6 | 271 | 70 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 24 | AA MLE | Mississippi Braves | — | 117 | 111 | 26 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 33 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 234 | 254 | 270 | 525 | 36 | 311 | 28 | 3 | 225 | 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 24 | A+ MLE | Carolina Mudcats | — | 220 | 200 | 42 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 52 | 2 | 14 | 5 | 210 | 272 | 235 | 507 | 25 | 280 | 24 | 7 | 232 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 25 | AAA MLE | Gwinnett Braves | — | 44 | 41 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 220 | 273 | 268 | 541 | 49 | 283 | 18 | 7 | 244 | 51 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 25 | AA MLE | Mississippi Braves | — | 56 | 51 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 176 | 222 | 196 | 418 | 20 | 206 | 20 | 5 | 176 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 25 | A+ MLE | Florida Fire Frogs | — | 73 | 65 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 21 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 215 | 271 | 277 | 548 | 62 | 309 | 29 | 4 | 258 | 61 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 22 | ROK MLE | GCL Braves | — | 43 | 40 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 250 | 286 | 325 | 611 | 75 | 357 | 28 | 2 | 232 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 22 | ROK RAW | GCL Braves | — | 43 | 40 | 13 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 325 | 357 | 400 | 757 | 75 | 406 | 19 | 2 | 332 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 23 | A MLE | Rome Braves | — | 288 | 260 | 66 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 17 | 48 | 7 | 15 | 11 | 254 | 317 | 304 | 621 | 50 | 311 | 17 | 6 | 271 | 70 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 23 | A RAW | Rome Braves | — | 288 | 249 | 71 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 28 | 33 | 7 | 15 | 11 | 285 | 373 | 345 | 719 | 60 | 329 | 11 | 10 | 328 | 70 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 24 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 337 | 310 | 68 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 85 | 2 | 18 | 8 | 219 | 269 | 248 | 517 | 29 | 298 | 25 | 6 | 230 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 24 | A+ RAW | 2 teams | — | 337 | 299 | 73 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 30 | 66 | 2 | 18 | 8 | 244 | 317 | 278 | 595 | 33 | 309 | 20 | 9 | 274 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 25 | A+ MLE | 3 teams | — | 173 | 157 | 32 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 40 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 204 | 256 | 248 | 504 | 45 | 271 | 23 | 5 | 228 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 25 | A+ RAW | 3 teams | — | 173 | 153 | 36 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 13 | 30 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 235 | 304 | 301 | 604 | 65 | 290 | 17 | 8 | 271 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 22 | ROK MLE | GCL Braves | — | 43 | 41 | 10 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 244 | 286 | 317 | 603 | 73 | 315 | 28 | 2 | 232 | 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 23 | A MLE | Rome Braves | — | 288 | 262 | 66 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 17 | 48 | 7 | 15 | 11 | 252 | 317 | 302 | 618 | 50 | 302 | 17 | 6 | 271 | 70 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 24 | A+ MLE | 2 teams | — | 337 | 313 | 68 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 85 | 2 | 18 | 8 | 217 | 269 | 246 | 515 | 29 | 291 | 25 | 6 | 230 | 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 25 | A+ MLE | 3 teams | — | 173 | 160 | 32 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 40 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 200 | 256 | 244 | 500 | 44 | 269 | 23 | 5 | 228 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 841 | 767 | 176 | 17 | 6 | 1 | 46 | 185 | 12 | 42 | 21 | 229 | 284 | 271 | 555 | 42 | 300 | 22 | 5 | 244 | 51 | -49 | +0 | +0 | +3 | +18 | -2.8 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 593 | 136 | 13 | 5 | 1 | 36 | 143 | 9 | 32 | 16 | 229 | 284 | 273 | 557 | 44 | 299 | 22 | 6 | 244 | 51 | -38 | +0 | +0 | +2 | +14 | -2.2 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2017 A+Florida Fire Frogs · 73 PAwOBA .310 → .258 (−52)K% 19.2% → 28.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 19.18% | ÷0.963 | ×1.420 | — | — | 28.27% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 6.85% | ÷1.091 | ×0.750 | — | ×0.968 | 4.56% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.74% | — | ×0.930 | — | ×0.968 | 2.47% |
| Singles /BIP | 24.49% | ÷0.978 | ×0.920 | ×1.050 | ×0.968 | 23.42% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.12% | ÷1.148 | ×0.960 | ×1.050 | ×0.968 | 5.20% |
| Triples /BIP | 4.08% | ÷1.150 | ×0.810 | ×1.050 | ×0.968 | 2.92% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.929 | ×0.880 | — | ×0.968 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 86, 1B 96, 2B 130, 3B 130, K 93, BB 118 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 22.8 → −3.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .310 → .258; ISO .111 → .083; BABIP .340 → .309. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2017 AAMississippi Braves · 56 PAwOBA .197 → .176 (−21)K% 16.1% → 20.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 16.07% | ÷0.970 | ×1.220 | — | — | 20.20% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.14% | ÷0.989 | ×0.680 | — | ×0.988 | 4.85% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.840 | — | ×0.988 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 19.51% | ÷1.026 | ×0.920 | ×1.050 | ×0.988 | 18.16% |
| Doubles /BIP | 2.44% | ÷0.951 | ×0.910 | ×1.050 | ×0.988 | 2.42% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.146 | ×0.880 | ×1.050 | ×0.988 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.925 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.988 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 85, 1B 105, 2B 90, 3B 129, K 94, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 24.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .197 → .176; ISO .020 → .020; BABIP .220 → .206. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2017 AAAGwinnett Braves · 44 PAwOBA .279 → .244 (−35)K% 15.9% → 19.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 15.91% | ÷0.989 | ×1.200 | — | — | 19.31% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.09% | ÷0.999 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.018 | 6.39% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.940 | — | ×1.018 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 24.24% | ÷1.005 | ×0.930 | — | ×1.018 | 22.84% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.06% | ÷0.936 | ×0.830 | — | ×1.018 | 5.47% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.005 | ×0.970 | — | ×1.018 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.972 | ×0.840 | — | ×1.018 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row IL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 94, 1B 101, 2B 87, 3B 101, K 98, BB 100 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 27.2 → +1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr younger than average).
Result: wOBA .279 → .244; ISO .050 → .045; BABIP .303 → .283. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2016 A+Carolina Mudcats · 220 PAwOBA .277 → .232 (−45)K% 17.3% → 23.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 17.27% | ÷1.030 | ×1.420 | — | — | 23.81% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.91% | ÷0.970 | ×0.630 | — | ×0.978 | 6.93% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.91% | — | ×0.860 | — | ×0.978 | 0.76% |
| Singles /BIP | 26.80% | ÷1.018 | ×0.940 | ×1.050 | ×0.978 | 25.41% |
| Doubles /BIP | 2.61% | ÷1.004 | ×0.830 | ×1.050 | ×0.978 | 2.22% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.65% | ÷0.987 | ×0.800 | ×1.050 | ×0.978 | 0.54% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.362 | ×0.900 | — | ×0.978 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row CAR. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 172, 1B 104, 2B 101, 3B 97, K 106, BB 94 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 22.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .277 → .232; ISO .031 → .026; BABIP .299 → .280. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2016 AAMississippi Braves · 117 PAwOBA .247 → .225 (−23)K% 23.9% → 28.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 23.93% | ÷1.043 | ×1.220 | — | — | 27.99% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 4.27% | ÷0.997 | ×0.680 | — | ×0.998 | 2.91% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.840 | — | ×0.998 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 31.25% | ÷1.014 | ×0.920 | ×1.050 | ×0.998 | 29.70% |
| Doubles /BIP | 1.25% | ÷1.104 | ×0.910 | ×1.050 | ×0.998 | 1.08% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.150 | ×0.880 | ×1.050 | ×0.998 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.25% | ÷1.084 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.998 | 0.92% |
Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 117, 1B 103, 2B 121, 3B 130, K 109, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .247 → .225; ISO .037 → .029; BABIP .329 → .311. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 ARome Braves · 288 PAwOBA .320 → .271 (−49)K% 11.5% → 16.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 11.46% | ÷0.932 | ×1.340 | — | — | 16.47% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.72% | ÷1.077 | ×0.660 | — | ×0.980 | 5.84% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.43% | — | ×0.770 | — | ×0.980 | 1.83% |
| Singles /BIP | 27.78% | ÷1.026 | ×0.920 | ×1.050 | ×0.980 | 25.63% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.24% | ÷0.915 | ×0.820 | ×1.050 | ×0.980 | 2.99% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.85% | ÷1.150 | ×0.940 | ×1.050 | ×0.980 | 1.56% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.097 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.980 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 119, 1B 105, 2B 83, 3B 130, K 86, BB 115 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.0 → −2.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .320 → .271; ISO .060 → .054; BABIP .329 → .302. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2014 ROKGCL Braves · 43 PAwOBA .323 → .232 (−91)K% 18.6% → 26.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 18.60% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 26.79% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 2.33% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.965 | 1.39% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.33% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.965 | 1.62% |
| Singles /BIP | 34.38% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | — | ×0.965 | 27.20% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.12% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.965 | 2.17% |
| Triples /BIP | 3.12% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | — | ×0.965 | 2.17% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.965 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 19.5 → −3.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.5 yr older than average).
Result: wOBA .323 → .232; ISO .075 → .049; BABIP .406 → .315. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).