Ryan Boldt

PosCF

B/TL/R

Born1994-11-22

Age (2027)32

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AAALAST SEASON 2022

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2018	23	AA/INTL2 orgs	293	.274/.352/.448	7	12	93	—	.248/.304/.404
2021	26	AAATB	338	.260/.339/.453	11	12	77	—	.228/.286/.363
2022	27	AAATB	274	.236/.300/.380	7	8	42	—	.188/.238/.277

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2017	22	A+	Charlotte Stone Crabs	—	494	440	130	22	6	5	39	89	7	23	6	295	362	407	769	111	355	18	8	341	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	23	AA	Montgomery Biscuits	—	273	241	66	12	6	7	24	58	5	12	2	274	352	461	812	187	330	21	9	356	93	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	23	INTL	Peoria Javelinas	—	20	18	5	0	0	0	2	6	0	0	1	278	350	278	628		417	30	10	296	86	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	26	AAA	Durham Bulls	—	338	300	78	21	2	11	33	98	3	12	1	260	339	453	793	193	347	29	10	350	77	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	27	AAA	Durham Bulls	—	274	250	59	13	1	7	18	78	5	8	2	236	300	380	680	144	313	28	7	305	42	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2017	22	A+ MLE	Charlotte Stone Crabs	—	494	449	109	20	5	5	30	124	7	23	6	243	300	343	643	100	308	25	6	278	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	23	AA MLE	Montgomery Biscuits	—	273	250	62	11	5	6	15	67	5	12	2	248	304	404	708	156	305	25	5	306	93	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	26	AAA MLE	Durham Bulls	—	338	311	71	17	2	7	22	114	3	12	1	228	286	363	649	135	326	34	7	282	77	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	27	AAA MLE	Durham Bulls	—	274	256	48	9	1	4	12	94	5	8	2	188	238	277	515	90	274	34	4	231	42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	22	A+ MLE	Charlotte Stone Crabs	—	494	449	109	20	5	5	30	124	7	23	6	243	300	343	643	100	319	25	6	278	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	22	A+ RAW	Charlotte Stone Crabs	—	494	440	130	22	6	5	39	89	7	23	6	295	362	407	769	111	355	18	8	341	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	23	AA MLE	2 teams	—	293	269	67	12	6	6	16	72	5	12	3	249	303	405	709	156	314	25	5	306	93	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	23	AA RAW	2 teams	—	293	259	71	12	6	7	26	64	5	12	3	274	352	448	800	174	335	22	9	352	93	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	26	AAA MLE	Durham Bulls	—	338	311	71	17	2	7	22	114	3	12	1	228	286	363	649	135	333	34	7	282	77	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	26	AAA RAW	Durham Bulls	—	338	300	78	21	2	11	33	98	3	12	1	260	339	453	793	193	347	29	10	350	77	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	27	AAA MLE	Durham Bulls	—	274	256	48	9	1	4	12	94	5	8	2	188	238	277	515	90	277	34	4	231	42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	27	AAA RAW	Durham Bulls	—	274	250	59	13	1	7	18	78	5	8	2	236	300	380	680	144	313	28	7	305	42	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	22	A+ MLE	Charlotte Stone Crabs	—	494	454	109	20	5	5	30	124	7	23	6	240	300	339	640	99	308	25	6	278	74	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	23	AA MLE	2 teams	—	293	270	67	12	6	6	16	72	5	12	3	248	303	404	707	156	305	25	5	306	93	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	26	AAA MLE	Durham Bulls	—	338	310	71	17	2	7	22	114	3	12	1	229	286	365	650	135	326	34	7	282	77	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	27	AAA MLE	Durham Bulls	—	274	255	48	9	1	4	12	94	5	8	2	188	238	278	517	90	274	34	4	231	42	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	1399	1285	295	58	14	22	80	404	20	55	12	230	285	348	633	118	313	29	6	276	73	-45	+6	+0	+5	+30	-0.4
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	597	137	27	7	10	37	188	9	26	6	229	285	348	633	119	314	29	6	276	73	-21	+3	+0	+2	+14	-0.2

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2022 AAADurham Bulls · 274 PAwOBA .298 → .231 (−67)K% 28.5% → 34.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	28.47%	÷0.999	×1.200	—	—	34.20%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	6.57%	÷1.059	×0.690	—	×0.992	4.24%
HBP% /PA	1.82%	—	×0.940	—	×0.992	1.70%
Singles /BIP	22.09%	÷0.988	×0.930	×0.999	×0.992	20.61%
Doubles /BIP	7.56%	÷1.091	×0.830	×0.999	×0.992	5.70%
Triples /BIP	0.58%	÷1.150	×0.970	×0.999	×0.992	0.49%
Home runs /BIP	4.07%	÷1.034	×0.700	—	×0.992	2.73%

Factors used: league row International League. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 107, 1B 98, 2B 118, 3B 130, K 100, BB 112 — applied at half strength. Age: age 28 vs a level average of 27.2 → −0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.999.

Result: wOBA .298 → .231; ISO .144 → .098; BABIP .313 → .274. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2021 AAADurham Bulls · 338 PAwOBA .341 → .282 (−59)K% 29.0% → 33.8%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	28.99%	÷1.029	×1.200	—	—	33.82%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.47%	÷1.016	×0.690	—	×1.003	6.45%
HBP% /PA	0.89%	—	×0.940	—	×1.003	0.84%
Singles /BIP	21.78%	÷0.945	×0.930	×1.045	×1.003	22.46%
Doubles /BIP	10.40%	÷1.067	×0.830	×1.045	×1.003	8.47%
Triples /BIP	0.99%	÷1.150	×0.920	×1.045	×1.003	0.83%
Home runs /BIP	5.45%	÷1.059	×0.700	—	×1.003	3.61%

Factors used: level-wide AAA factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 112, 1B 89, 2B 113, 3B 130, K 106, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 27.2 → +0.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.045.

Result: wOBA .341 → .282; ISO .193 → .139; BABIP .347 → .326. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 AAMontgomery Biscuits · 273 PAwOBA .349 → .306 (−43)K% 21.2% → 24.6%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	21.25%	÷1.055	×1.220	—	—	24.56%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.42%	÷1.031	×0.680	—	×1.012	5.62%
HBP% /PA	1.83%	—	×0.840	—	×1.012	1.56%
Singles /BIP	22.40%	÷0.965	×0.920	×0.983	×1.012	21.27%
Doubles /BIP	6.56%	÷1.007	×0.910	×0.983	×1.012	5.90%
Triples /BIP	3.28%	÷1.010	×0.880	×0.983	×1.012	2.84%
Home runs /BIP	3.83%	÷0.984	×0.800	—	×1.012	3.15%

Factors used: league row SL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 97, 1B 93, 2B 101, 3B 102, K 111, BB 106 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 24.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.983.

Result: wOBA .349 → .306; ISO .187 → .163; BABIP .330 → .305. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 A+Charlotte Stone Crabs · 494 PAwOBA .336 → .278 (−58)K% 18.0% → 25.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	18.02%	÷1.017	×1.420	—	—	25.16%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.69%	÷0.967	×0.750	—	×0.998	5.95%
HBP% /PA	1.42%	—	×0.930	—	×0.998	1.32%
Singles /BIP	27.64%	÷1.073	×0.920	×1.000	×0.998	23.64%
Doubles /BIP	6.27%	÷1.007	×0.960	×1.000	×0.998	5.96%
Triples /BIP	1.71%	÷1.024	×0.810	×1.000	×0.998	1.35%
Home runs /BIP	1.42%	÷0.917	×0.880	—	×0.998	1.36%

Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 83, 1B 115, 2B 102, 3B 105, K 103, BB 93 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.000.

Result: wOBA .336 → .278; ISO .111 → .097; BABIP .355 → .308. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .