Danny Oh

PosRF

B/TL/L

Born1989-12-28

Age (2027)37

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

AALAST SEASON 2016

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR	MLE AVG/OBP/SLG
2014	24	A+Tampa Yankees	189	.265/.367/.327	0	2	68	—	.232/.314/.292
2015	25	AA/A+2 orgs	373	.305/.363/.408	1	13	86	—	.272/.312/.358
2016	26	AAOAK	310	.236/.306/.275	0	12	34	—	.204/.257/.236

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2013	23	A	Charleston RiverDogs	—	304	259	69	13	0	0	31	58	13	10	2	266	373	317	690	50	343	19	10	324	69	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	24	A+	Tampa Yankees	—	189	162	43	6	2	0	24	30	2	2	2	265	367	327	694	62	323	16	13	322	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	25	AA	Trenton Thunder	—	261	242	71	14	4	1	15	33	2	9	3	293	340	397	736	103	335	13	6	328	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	25	A+	Tampa Yankees	—	112	96	32	8	1	0	14	15	0	4	1	333	418	438	856	104	386	13	12	379	99	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	26	AA	Midland RockHounds	—	310	276	65	11	0	0	22	52	6	12	2	236	306	275	581	40	290	17	7	267	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2013	23	A MLE	Charleston RiverDogs	—	304	270	64	11	0	0	20	76	13	10	2	237	320	278	598	41	325	25	7	270	69	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	24	A+ MLE	Tampa Yankees	—	189	168	39	6	2	0	18	45	2	2	2	232	314	292	605	60	302	24	10	268	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	25	AA MLE	Trenton Thunder	—	261	249	67	12	3	1	8	42	2	9	3	269	297	353	651	84	320	16	3	287	80	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	25	A+ MLE	Tampa Yankees	—	112	100	28	7	1	0	10	21	0	4	1	280	345	370	715	90	337	19	9	315	99	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	26	AA MLE	Midland RockHounds	—	310	284	58	9	0	0	14	69	6	12	2	204	257	236	492	32	262	22	5	219	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	23	A MLE	Charleston RiverDogs	—	304	270	64	11	0	0	20	76	13	10	2	237	320	278	598	41	330	25	7	270	69	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	23	A RAW	Charleston RiverDogs	—	304	259	69	13	0	0	31	58	13	10	2	266	373	317	690	50	343	19	10	324	69	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	24	A+ MLE	Tampa Yankees	—	189	168	39	6	2	0	18	45	2	2	2	232	314	292	605	60	315	24	10	268	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	24	A+ RAW	Tampa Yankees	—	189	162	43	6	2	0	24	30	2	2	2	265	367	327	694	62	323	16	13	322	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	25	AA MLE	2 teams	—	373	349	96	20	4	1	18	63	2	13	4	275	314	364	678	89	330	17	5	295	86	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	25	AA RAW	2 teams	—	373	338	103	22	5	1	29	48	2	13	4	305	363	408	771	104	349	13	8	343	86	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	26	AA MLE	Midland RockHounds	—	310	284	58	9	0	0	14	69	6	12	2	204	257	236	492	32	270	22	5	219	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	26	AA RAW	Midland RockHounds	—	310	276	65	11	0	0	22	52	6	12	2	236	306	275	581	40	290	17	7	267	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
2013	23	A MLE	Charleston RiverDogs	—	304	268	64	11	0	0	20	76	13	10	2	239	320	280	600	41	325	25	7	270	69	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	24	A+ MLE	Tampa Yankees	—	189	167	39	6	2	0	18	45	2	2	2	234	314	293	607	60	302	24	10	268	68	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	25	AA MLE	2 teams	—	373	350	96	20	4	1	18	63	2	13	4	274	314	363	677	89	325	17	5	295	86	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	26	AA MLE	Midland RockHounds	—	310	287	58	9	0	0	14	69	6	12	2	202	257	233	490	31	262	22	5	219	34	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	1176	1071	257	46	6	1	70	253	23	37	10	240	301	297	598	57	312	22	6	264	65	-49	+3	+0	-13	+25	-3.3
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	592	142	25	3	1	39	140	13	20	6	240	301	297	599	57	311	22	6	264	65	-27	+2	+0	-7	+14	-1.9

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2016 AAMidland RockHounds · 310 PAwOBA .260 → .219 (−42)K% 16.8% → 22.3%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	16.77%	÷0.920	×1.220	—	—	22.25%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.10%	÷1.062	×0.700	—	×0.978	4.58%
HBP% /PA	1.94%	—	×0.870	—	×0.978	1.65%
Singles /BIP	24.11%	÷1.022	×0.920	×1.050	×0.978	22.28%
Doubles /BIP	4.91%	÷1.075	×0.840	×1.050	×0.978	3.94%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.150	×0.940	×1.050	×0.978	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.999	×0.800	—	×0.978	0.00%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 100, 1B 104, 2B 115, 3B 130, K 84, BB 112 — applied at half strength. Age: age 27 vs a level average of 24.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .260 → .219; ISO .040 → .032; BABIP .290 → .262. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 AATrenton Thunder · 261 PAwOBA .316 → .287 (−29)K% 12.6% → 16.2%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	12.64%	÷0.950	×1.220	—	—	16.23%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	4.60%	÷1.067	×0.700	—	×0.988	2.98%
HBP% /PA	0.77%	—	×0.850	—	×0.988	0.64%
Singles /BIP	24.88%	÷0.977	×0.970	×1.008	×0.988	24.59%
Doubles /BIP	6.70%	÷0.978	×0.860	×1.008	×0.988	5.86%
Triples /BIP	1.91%	÷1.150	×0.950	×1.008	×0.988	1.57%
Home runs /BIP	0.48%	÷1.153	×0.780	—	×0.988	0.32%

Factors used: league row EL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 131, 1B 95, 2B 96, 3B 130, K 90, BB 114 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 24.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.008.

Result: wOBA .316 → .287; ISO .103 → .086; BABIP .335 → .320. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 A+Tampa Yankees · 112 PAwOBA .377 → .315 (−62)K% 13.4% → 18.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	13.39%	÷1.016	×1.420	—	—	18.72%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	12.50%	÷1.015	×0.750	—	×0.968	8.94%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.930	—	×0.968	0.00%
Singles /BIP	28.40%	÷1.046	×0.920	×1.020	×0.968	24.67%
Doubles /BIP	9.88%	÷1.044	×0.960	×1.020	×0.968	8.97%
Triples /BIP	1.23%	÷1.150	×0.810	×1.020	×0.968	0.86%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.832	×0.880	—	×0.968	0.00%

Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 66, 1B 109, 2B 109, 3B 130, K 103, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 22.8 → −3.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.020.

Result: wOBA .377 → .315; ISO .104 → .090; BABIP .386 → .337. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 A+Tampa Yankees · 189 PAwOBA .316 → .268 (−48)K% 15.9% → 23.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	15.87%	÷0.950	×1.420	—	—	23.71%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	12.70%	÷0.978	×0.750	—	×0.978	9.52%
HBP% /PA	1.06%	—	×0.930	—	×0.978	0.96%
Singles /BIP	26.52%	÷1.019	×0.920	×1.050	×0.978	24.59%
Doubles /BIP	4.55%	÷1.003	×0.960	×1.050	×0.978	4.47%
Triples /BIP	1.52%	÷0.900	×0.810	×1.050	×0.978	1.40%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.882	×0.880	—	×0.978	0.00%

Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 76, 1B 104, 2B 101, 3B 80, K 90, BB 96 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 22.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .316 → .268; ISO .062 → .056; BABIP .323 → .302. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2013 ACharleston RiverDogs · 304 PAwOBA .315 → .270 (−46)K% 19.1% → 25.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	19.08%	÷1.019	×1.340	—	—	25.09%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.87%	÷0.956	×0.660	—	×0.980	6.67%
HBP% /PA	4.28%	—	×0.770	—	×0.980	3.23%
Singles /BIP	27.86%	÷0.988	×0.920	×1.050	×0.980	26.70%
Doubles /BIP	6.47%	÷0.946	×0.820	×1.050	×0.980	5.77%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷1.038	×0.940	×1.050	×0.980	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.951	×0.820	—	×0.980	0.00%

Factors used: league row SAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 90, 1B 98, 2B 89, 3B 108, K 104, BB 91 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.0 → −2.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .315 → .270; ISO .050 → .044; BABIP .343 → .325. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).