Marty Gantt
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 23 | ATB | 496 | .267/.344/.391 | 7 | 19 | 60 | — | .221/.274/.316 |
| 2014 | 24 | A+Charlotte Sto… | 332 | .262/.364/.397 | 4 | 9 | 78 | — | .223/.309/.337 |
| 2015 | 25 | A+Charlotte Sto… | 284 | .235/.330/.348 | 4 | 9 | 59 | — | .200/.277/.298 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 23 | A | Bowling Green Hot Rods | — | 496 | 435 | 116 | 23 | 5 | 7 | 46 | 110 | 5 | 19 | 3 | 267 | 344 | 391 | 734 | 124 | 335 | 22 | 9 | 325 | 60 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 24 | A+ | Charlotte Stone Crabs | — | 332 | 282 | 74 | 14 | 6 | 4 | 38 | 62 | 7 | 9 | 5 | 262 | 364 | 397 | 761 | 135 | 320 | 19 | 11 | 340 | 78 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 25 | A+ | Charlotte Stone Crabs | — | 284 | 247 | 58 | 12 | 2 | 4 | 32 | 48 | 3 | 9 | 4 | 235 | 330 | 348 | 678 | 113 | 274 | 17 | 11 | 309 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 23 | A MLE | Bowling Green Hot Rods | — | 496 | 453 | 100 | 18 | 5 | 5 | 28 | 156 | 5 | 19 | 3 | 221 | 274 | 316 | 589 | 95 | 306 | 31 | 6 | 257 | 60 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 24 | A+ MLE | Charlotte Stone Crabs | — | 332 | 291 | 65 | 13 | 4 | 4 | 29 | 90 | 7 | 9 | 5 | 223 | 309 | 337 | 646 | 113 | 296 | 27 | 9 | 283 | 78 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 25 | A+ MLE | Charlotte Stone Crabs | — | 284 | 255 | 51 | 11 | 1 | 4 | 24 | 70 | 3 | 9 | 4 | 200 | 277 | 298 | 575 | 98 | 252 | 25 | 8 | 256 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 23 | A MLE | Bowling Green Hot Rods | — | 496 | 453 | 100 | 18 | 5 | 5 | 28 | 156 | 5 | 19 | 3 | 221 | 274 | 316 | 589 | 95 | 318 | 31 | 6 | 257 | 60 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 23 | A RAW | Bowling Green Hot Rods | — | 496 | 435 | 116 | 23 | 5 | 7 | 46 | 110 | 5 | 19 | 3 | 267 | 344 | 391 | 734 | 124 | 335 | 22 | 9 | 325 | 60 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 24 | A+ MLE | Charlotte Stone Crabs | — | 332 | 291 | 65 | 13 | 4 | 4 | 29 | 90 | 7 | 9 | 5 | 223 | 309 | 337 | 646 | 113 | 305 | 27 | 9 | 283 | 78 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 24 | A+ RAW | Charlotte Stone Crabs | — | 332 | 282 | 74 | 14 | 6 | 4 | 38 | 62 | 7 | 9 | 5 | 262 | 364 | 397 | 761 | 135 | 320 | 19 | 11 | 340 | 78 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 25 | A+ MLE | Charlotte Stone Crabs | — | 284 | 255 | 51 | 11 | 1 | 4 | 24 | 70 | 3 | 9 | 4 | 200 | 277 | 298 | 575 | 98 | 257 | 25 | 8 | 256 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 25 | A+ RAW | Charlotte Stone Crabs | — | 284 | 247 | 58 | 12 | 2 | 4 | 32 | 48 | 3 | 9 | 4 | 235 | 330 | 348 | 678 | 113 | 274 | 17 | 11 | 309 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 23 | A MLE | Bowling Green Hot Rods | — | 496 | 460 | 100 | 18 | 5 | 5 | 28 | 156 | 5 | 19 | 3 | 217 | 274 | 311 | 585 | 93 | 306 | 31 | 6 | 257 | 60 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 24 | A+ MLE | Charlotte Stone Crabs | — | 332 | 293 | 65 | 13 | 4 | 4 | 29 | 90 | 7 | 9 | 5 | 222 | 309 | 334 | 643 | 113 | 296 | 27 | 9 | 283 | 78 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 25 | A+ MLE | Charlotte Stone Crabs | — | 284 | 255 | 51 | 11 | 1 | 4 | 24 | 70 | 3 | 9 | 4 | 200 | 277 | 298 | 575 | 98 | 252 | 25 | 8 | 256 | 59 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 1112 | 999 | 216 | 42 | 10 | 13 | 81 | 316 | 15 | 37 | 12 | 216 | 285 | 317 | 602 | 101 | 298 | 28 | 7 | 265 | 65 | -46 | +3 | +0 | -12 | +24 | -3.2 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 584 | 127 | 25 | 6 | 8 | 47 | 185 | 9 | 22 | 7 | 217 | 286 | 322 | 608 | 104 | 299 | 28 | 7 | 265 | 65 | -27 | +2 | +0 | -7 | +14 | -1.9 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2015 A+Charlotte Stone Crabs · 284 PAwOBA .303 → .256 (−47)K% 16.9% → 24.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 16.90% | ÷0.979 | ×1.420 | — | — | 24.52% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.27% | ÷0.994 | ×0.750 | — | ×0.978 | 8.31% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.06% | — | ×0.930 | — | ×0.978 | 0.96% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.10% | ÷0.976 | ×0.920 | ×0.997 | ×0.978 | 18.48% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.03% | ÷0.978 | ×0.960 | ×0.997 | ×0.978 | 5.77% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.01% | ÷1.150 | ×0.810 | ×0.997 | ×0.978 | 0.69% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.01% | ÷0.822 | ×0.880 | — | ×0.978 | 2.11% |
Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 64, 1B 95, 2B 96, 3B 130, K 96, BB 99 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 22.8 → −2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.997.
Result: wOBA .303 → .256; ISO .113 → .103; BABIP .274 → .252. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2014 A+Charlotte Stone Crabs · 332 PAwOBA .335 → .283 (−52)K% 18.7% → 27.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 18.67% | ÷0.977 | ×1.420 | — | — | 27.14% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 11.45% | ÷0.985 | ×0.750 | — | ×0.988 | 8.61% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.11% | — | ×0.930 | — | ×0.988 | 1.94% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.73% | ÷0.996 | ×0.920 | ×1.021 | ×0.988 | 21.18% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.36% | ÷0.977 | ×0.960 | ×1.021 | ×0.988 | 6.30% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.73% | ÷1.109 | ×0.810 | ×1.021 | ×0.988 | 2.01% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.82% | ÷0.899 | ×0.880 | — | ×0.988 | 1.76% |
Factors used: league row FSL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 80, 1B 99, 2B 95, 3B 122, K 95, BB 97 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.021.
Result: wOBA .335 → .283; ISO .135 → .114; BABIP .320 → .296. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2013 ABowling Green Hot Rods · 496 PAwOBA .321 → .257 (−64)K% 22.2% → 31.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 22.18% | ÷0.958 | ×1.360 | — | — | 31.47% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.07% | ÷1.098 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.990 | 5.64% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.01% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.990 | 0.78% |
| Singles /BIP | 24.92% | ÷1.004 | ×0.920 | ×1.038 | ×0.990 | 23.47% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.08% | ÷1.038 | ×0.830 | ×1.038 | ×0.990 | 5.81% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.54% | ÷0.974 | ×0.910 | ×1.038 | ×0.990 | 1.48% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.15% | ÷1.044 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.990 | 1.63% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 109, 1B 101, 2B 108, 3B 95, K 92, BB 120 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.038.
Result: wOBA .321 → .257; ISO .124 → .097; BABIP .335 → .306. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).