Carlos Ozuna
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 20 | ROKGCL Pirates | 162 | .204/.261/.261 | 0 | 2 | 3 | — | .158/.196/.192 |
| 2014 | 21 | ROKBristol Pirat… | 162 | .255/.315/.376 | 2 | 0 | 31 | — | .178/.228/.243 |
| 2015 | 22 | ROKBristol Pirat… | 131 | .218/.268/.319 | 1 | 1 | 13 | — | .156/.189/.221 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2012 | 19 | ROK | DSL Pirates 2 | — | 234 | 198 | 54 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 26 | 47 | 2 | 15 | 10 | 273 | 363 | 364 | 726 | 91 | 358 | 20 | 11 | 321 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 20 | ROK | GCL Pirates | — | 162 | 142 | 29 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 36 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 204 | 261 | 261 | 522 | 56 | 269 | 22 | 6 | 228 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 21 | ROK | Bristol Pirates | — | 162 | 149 | 38 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 44 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 255 | 315 | 376 | 691 | 121 | 350 | 27 | 5 | 311 | 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 22 | ROK | Bristol Pirates | — | 131 | 119 | 26 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 33 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 218 | 268 | 319 | 587 | 101 | 284 | 25 | 5 | 257 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2012 | 19 | ROK MLE | DSL Pirates 2 | — | 234 | 207 | 38 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 17 | 57 | 2 | 15 | 10 | 184 | 252 | 242 | 494 | 58 | 240 | 24 | 7 | 216 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 20 | ROK MLE | GCL Pirates | — | 162 | 146 | 23 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 52 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 158 | 196 | 192 | 388 | 34 | 224 | 32 | 4 | 173 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 21 | ROK MLE | Bristol Pirates | — | 162 | 152 | 27 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 63 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 178 | 228 | 243 | 472 | 66 | 292 | 39 | 3 | 214 | 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 22 | ROK MLE | Bristol Pirates | — | 131 | 122 | 19 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 47 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 156 | 189 | 221 | 410 | 66 | 235 | 36 | 3 | 188 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 19 | ROK MLE | DSL Pirates 2 | — | 234 | 207 | 38 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 17 | 57 | 2 | 15 | 10 | 184 | 252 | 242 | 494 | 58 | 253 | 24 | 7 | 216 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 19 | ROK RAW | DSL Pirates 2 | — | 234 | 198 | 54 | 12 | 3 | 0 | 26 | 47 | 2 | 15 | 10 | 273 | 363 | 364 | 726 | 91 | 358 | 20 | 11 | 321 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 20 | ROK MLE | GCL Pirates | — | 162 | 146 | 23 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 52 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 158 | 196 | 192 | 388 | 34 | 240 | 32 | 4 | 173 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 20 | ROK RAW | GCL Pirates | — | 162 | 142 | 29 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 36 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 204 | 261 | 261 | 522 | 56 | 269 | 22 | 6 | 228 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 21 | ROK MLE | Bristol Pirates | — | 162 | 152 | 27 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 63 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 178 | 228 | 243 | 472 | 66 | 295 | 39 | 3 | 214 | 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 21 | ROK RAW | Bristol Pirates | — | 162 | 149 | 38 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 44 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 255 | 315 | 376 | 691 | 121 | 350 | 27 | 5 | 311 | 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 22 | ROK MLE | Bristol Pirates | — | 131 | 122 | 19 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 47 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 156 | 189 | 221 | 410 | 66 | 234 | 36 | 3 | 188 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 22 | ROK RAW | Bristol Pirates | — | 131 | 119 | 26 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 33 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 218 | 268 | 319 | 587 | 101 | 284 | 25 | 5 | 257 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 19 | ROK MLE | DSL Pirates 2 | — | 234 | 213 | 38 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 17 | 57 | 2 | 15 | 10 | 178 | 252 | 235 | 487 | 56 | 240 | 24 | 7 | 216 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 20 | ROK MLE | GCL Pirates | — | 162 | 154 | 23 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 52 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 149 | 196 | 182 | 378 | 32 | 224 | 32 | 4 | 173 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 21 | ROK MLE | Bristol Pirates | — | 162 | 151 | 27 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 63 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 179 | 228 | 245 | 473 | 66 | 292 | 39 | 3 | 214 | 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 22 | ROK MLE | Bristol Pirates | — | 131 | 125 | 19 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 47 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 152 | 189 | 216 | 405 | 64 | 235 | 36 | 3 | 188 | 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 689 | 627 | 107 | 19 | 5 | 2 | 32 | 219 | 9 | 18 | 13 | 171 | 222 | 226 | 448 | 56 | 255 | 32 | 5 | 200 | 22 | -64 | -2 | +0 | +7 | +15 | -4.4 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 592 | 101 | 18 | 5 | 2 | 30 | 207 | 8 | 17 | 12 | 171 | 221 | 228 | 449 | 57 | 255 | 32 | 5 | 200 | 22 | -61 | -1 | +0 | +7 | +14 | -4.2 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2015 ROKBristol Pirates · 131 PAwOBA .256 → .188 (−68)K% 25.2% → 35.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 25.19% | ÷1.000 | ×1.420 | — | — | 35.77% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.34% | ÷1.000 | ×0.640 | — | ×0.975 | 3.33% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.76% | — | ×0.740 | — | ×0.975 | 0.55% |
| Singles /BIP | 20.93% | ÷1.000 | ×0.840 | ×1.050 | ×0.975 | 18.00% |
| Doubles /BIP | 5.81% | ÷1.000 | ×0.740 | ×1.050 | ×0.975 | 4.40% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.33% | ÷1.000 | ×0.740 | ×1.050 | ×0.975 | 1.76% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.16% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.975 | 0.91% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 19.5 → −2.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .256 → .188; ISO .101 → .071; BABIP .284 → .235. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2014 ROKBristol Pirates · 162 PAwOBA .303 → .214 (−89)K% 27.2% → 38.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 27.16% | ÷1.000 | ×1.420 | — | — | 38.57% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 4.94% | ÷1.000 | ×0.640 | — | ×0.985 | 3.11% |
| HBP% /PA | 3.09% | — | ×0.740 | — | ×0.985 | 2.25% |
| Singles /BIP | 24.76% | ÷1.000 | ×0.840 | ×1.050 | ×0.985 | 21.51% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.62% | ÷1.000 | ×0.740 | ×1.050 | ×0.985 | 5.83% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.90% | ÷1.000 | ×0.740 | ×1.050 | ×0.985 | 1.46% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.90% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.985 | 1.50% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 19.5 → −1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .303 → .214; ISO .121 → .081; BABIP .350 → .292. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2013 ROKGCL Pirates · 162 PAwOBA .225 → .173 (−52)K% 22.2% → 32.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 22.22% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 32.00% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 6.17% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×0.995 | 3.81% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.62% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.995 | 0.44% |
| Singles /BIP | 21.70% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | ×1.050 | ×0.995 | 18.59% |
| Doubles /BIP | 3.77% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×1.050 | ×0.995 | 2.84% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.89% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×1.050 | ×0.995 | 1.42% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×0.995 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 19.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .225 → .173; ISO .056 → .041; BABIP .269 → .224. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2012 DSLDSL Pirates 2 · 234 PAwOBA .310 → .216 (−94)K% 20.1% → 24.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 20.09% | ÷1.000 | ×1.220 | — | — | 24.50% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.26% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×0.995 | 7.14% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.85% | — | ×0.700 | — | ×0.995 | 0.60% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.83% | ÷1.000 | ×0.680 | ×1.026 | ×0.995 | 17.93% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.95% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×1.026 | ×0.995 | 4.87% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.99% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×1.026 | ×0.995 | 1.22% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.470 | — | ×0.995 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 18.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.026.
Result: wOBA .310 → .216; ISO .091 → .058; BABIP .358 → .240. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).