Brady Feigl
P St. Paul Saints| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 28 | MIX2 levels | 16 | 2 | 23 | 3.13 | 2.97 | 29.7% | 4.4% | — | K 25.4% · BB 3.8% · FIP 3.62 | |
| 2024 | 33 | MIX2 levels | 40 | 1 | 62 | 4.82 | 3.64 | 26.4% | 5.0% | 0.7 | K 23.7% · BB 4.7% · FIP 4.12 | |
| 2025 | 34 | MIX2 levels | 14 | 0 | 16 | 5.74 | 4.57 | 24.3% | 8.6% | — | K 22.2% · BB 7.3% · FIP 3.70 | |
| 2026 | 35 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2027PROJ | 36 | MLBMIN | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4.13 | 4.13 | 23.2% | 7.2% | 0.0 | ||
| 2028PROJMLE | 37 | MLBMIN | — | — | 0 | 4.37 | 4.52 | 22.4% | 8.0% | — | ||
Grades · Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Model inputs — neutral MLE (past 3 seasons + 2027 so far) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2015 | 24 | AAA MLE | Gwinnett Braves | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0.7 | 0.0% | 33.3% | -33.3% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 7.32 | — |
| 2015 | 24 | AAA RAW | Gwinnett Braves | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0% | 0.7 | 0.0% | 33.3% | -33.3% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 12.10 | — |
| 2016 | 25 | ROK MLE | Danville Braves | 6 | 0 | 6 | 22 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 27.3% | 4.5% | 22.7% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 1.37 | — |
| 2016 | 25 | ROK RAW | Danville Braves | 6 | 0 | 6 | 22 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 27.3% | 4.5% | 22.7% | 0.0% | 0.00 | 1.60 | — |
| 2017 | 26 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 41 | 0 | 59 | 263 | 59 | 16 | 5 | 0% | 1.4 | 17.8% | 6.8% | 11.0% | 2.2% | 3.81 | 3.67 | — |
| 2017 | 26 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 41 | 0 | 59 | 263 | 59 | 16 | 5 | 0% | 1.4 | 22.4% | 6.1% | 16.3% | 1.9% | 3.81 | 3.02 | — |
| 2018 | 27 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 42 | 0 | 59 | 227 | 37 | 13 | 0 | 0% | 1.4 | 14.0% | 6.1% | 7.9% | 0.0% | 1.53 | 2.69 | — |
| 2018 | 27 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 42 | 0 | 59 | 227 | 37 | 13 | 0 | 0% | 1.4 | 16.3% | 5.7% | 10.6% | 0.0% | 1.53 | 2.50 | — |
| 2019 | 28 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 16 | 2 | 23 | 91 | 27 | 4 | 3 | 12% | 1.4 | 25.4% | 3.8% | 21.7% | 4.0% | 3.13 | 3.62 | — |
| 2019 | 28 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 16 | 2 | 23 | 91 | 27 | 4 | 3 | 12% | 1.4 | 29.7% | 4.4% | 25.3% | 3.3% | 3.13 | 2.97 | — |
| 2024 | 33 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 40 | 1 | 62 | 258 | 68 | 13 | 10 | 2% | 1.5 | 23.7% | 4.7% | 18.9% | 4.4% | 4.82 | 4.12 | +0.3 |
| 2024 | 33 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 40 | 1 | 62 | 258 | 68 | 13 | 10 | 2% | 1.5 | 23.7% | 4.7% | 18.9% | 4.4% | 4.82 | 4.12 | +0.3 |
| 2024 | 33 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 40 | 1 | 62 | 258 | 68 | 13 | 10 | 2% | 1.5 | 26.4% | 5.0% | 21.3% | 3.9% | 4.82 | 3.64 | +0.7 |
| 2025 | 34 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 14 | 0 | 16 | 70 | 17 | 6 | 3 | 0% | 1.1 | 22.2% | 7.3% | 14.9% | 2.8% | 5.74 | 3.70 | — |
| 2025 | 34 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 14 | 0 | 16 | 70 | 17 | 6 | 3 | 0% | 1.1 | 22.2% | 7.3% | 14.9% | 2.8% | 5.74 | 3.70 | — |
| 2025 | 34 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 14 | 0 | 16 | 70 | 17 | 6 | 3 | 0% | 1.1 | 24.3% | 8.6% | 15.7% | 4.3% | 5.74 | 4.57 | — |
| ▸ Career totals (raw MLB only — as recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| MLB Career | — | 1 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 1.7 | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 9.1% | 32.40 | 10.90 | -0.1 | ||
| ▸ 2027 season — projected remainder (no 2027 stats recorded) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2027 | 36 | MLB | MIN | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 1.0 | 23.2% | 7.2% | 16.0% | 3.1% | 4.13 | 4.13 | +0.0 |
| ▸ Career projection (2028+) — MLB context, MLB playing time (IP × MLB%) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2028 | 37 | MLB MLE | MIN | 16 | 0 | 17 | 73 | 16 | 6 | 3 | 0% | 1.1 | 22.4% | 8.0% | 14.4% | 3.5% | 4.37 | 4.52 | +0.0 |
| 2028 | 37 | MLB CTX | MIN | — | — | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22.4% | 8.0% | 14.4% | 3.5% | 4.37 | 4.52 | — |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | RAW | 1 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0% | 1.8 | 1.4% | 0.5% | 0.9% | 8.7% | 29.76 | 7.84 | -0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | RAW | 127 | 0 | 200 | 1275 | 0 | 0 | 109 | 0% | 1.6 | 1.4% | 0.5% | 0.9% | 8.7% | 29.76 | 7.84 | -7.5 | |
| Career | — | MLE | 160 | 3 | 225 | 937 | 184 | 55 | 23 | 2% | 1.4 | 19.7% | 5.9% | 13.8% | 2.4% | 3.45 | 3.52 | -0.1 | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 142 | 3 | 200 | 834 | 164 | 49 | 20 | 2% | 1.4 | 19.7% | 5.9% | 13.8% | 2.4% | 3.45 | 3.52 | -1.2 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2025 AAASt. Paul Saints · 14 IPFIP 3.71 → 3.70 (−0.01)K% 25.8% → 22.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 25.81% | — | ×0.860 | 22.19% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 8.06% | — | ×0.900 | 7.26% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.23% | ÷1.253 | ×1.100 | 2.83% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 151).
Result: FIP 3.71 → 3.70, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2024 AAAIndianapolis Indians · 60 IPFIP 3.44 → 4.12 (+0.68)K% 27.5% → 23.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.53% | — | ×0.860 | 23.68% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.26% | — | ×0.900 | 4.74% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.64% | ÷0.909 | ×1.100 | 4.41% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors (Triple-A 2023+ robo-zone set: walks improve on promotion) — K ×0.86, BB ×0.90, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 82).
Result: FIP 3.44 → 4.12, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 AAANashville Sounds · 21 IPFIP 3.10 → 3.62 (+0.52)K% 28.9% → 25.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 28.92% | — | ×0.880 | 25.45% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 3.61% | — | ×1.050 | 3.80% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.61% | ÷0.998 | ×1.100 | 3.99% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 3.10 → 3.62, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 AAARound Rock Express · 42 IPFIP 2.60 → 2.79 (+0.19)K% 14.7% → 12.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 14.71% | — | ×0.880 | 12.94% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.88% | — | ×1.050 | 6.18% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷0.978 | ×1.100 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AAA level factors — K ×0.88, BB ×1.05, HR ×1.10. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 96).
Result: FIP 2.60 → 2.79, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 AAFrisco RoughRiders · 16 IPFIP 1.99 → 2.39 (+0.40)K% 21.1% → 17.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 21.05% | — | ×0.810 | 17.05% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 5.26% | — | ×1.100 | 5.79% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.088 | ×1.200 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 118).
Result: FIP 1.99 → 2.39, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2017 AAFrisco RoughRiders · 35 IPFIP 2.97 → 3.51 (+0.54)K% 22.4% → 18.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.42% | — | ×0.810 | 18.16% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.06% | — | ×1.100 | 6.67% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.82% | ÷1.089 | ×1.200 | 2.00% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 118).
Result: FIP 2.97 → 3.51, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2017 A+Down East Wood Ducks · 24 IPFIP 3.10 → 3.94 (+0.84)K% 22.4% → 17.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.45% | — | ×0.770 | 17.29% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 6.12% | — | ×1.150 | 7.04% |
| HR / BF /BF | 2.04% | ÷0.995 | ×1.250 | 2.56% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 99).
Result: FIP 3.10 → 3.94, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2016 ROKDanville Braves · 6 IPFIP 1.37 → 2.25 (+0.88)K% 27.3% → 18.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 27.27% | — | ×0.680 | 18.55% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 4.55% | — | ×1.250 | 5.68% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×1.400 | 0.00% |
Factors used: pitcher ROK level factors — K ×0.68, BB ×1.25, HR ×1.40. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 100).
Result: FIP 1.37 → 2.25, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).