Melvin Mercedes

PosIF

B/TS/R

Born1992-01-13

Age (2027)35

No MLB projection yet. Career stats below are historical.

Overview

INTLPROSPECT

MLB%0%

Year	Age	Lvl / Team	PA	AVG/OBP/SLG	HR	SB	wRC+	WAR
2022	30	INTLGigantes del …	48	.184/.326/.237	0	0	65	—
2023	31	INTLGigantes del …	41	.229/.341/.314	0	2	93	—
2025	33	INTLGigantes del …	72	.182/.357/.273	1	2	88	—

Contract

No contract data on file.

Career Stats + Projections

Real MLB stats plus park-adjusted projections — this season (so far / rest / full), then future seasons and career totals.

show model inputsbasis chips: RAW = as recorded · CTX = with park/league context · A+C = actual + context combined · MLE = level/park-neutral

Methodology▸ how these numbers are built

All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.

Year	Age	Lvl	Team	MLB%	PA	AB	H	2B	3B	HR	BB	SO	HBP	SB	CS	AVG	OBP	SLG	OPS	ISO	BABIP	K%	BB%	wOBA	wRC+	BAT	RUN	FLD	POS	REP	WAR
▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments)
2012	20	ROK	AZL Athletics	—	118	105	40	10	1	0	10	15	1	1	0	381	440	495	935	114	444	13	8	410	99	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	22	A	Beloit Snappers	—	414	361	80	14	7	2	41	70	4	12	4	222	308	316	624	94	264	17	10	282	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	23	A+	Stockton Ports	—	324	282	70	13	1	0	27	45	3	11	2	248	321	301	622	53	292	14	8	278	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	23	A	Beloit Snappers	—	53	49	14	1	0	0	4	14	0	1	1	286	340	306	646	20	400	26	8	299	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	A+	Stockton Ports	—	426	358	93	12	5	1	56	71	2	7	8	260	363	330	693	70	322	17	13	314	66	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	INTL	Gigantes del Cibao	—	96	73	19	2	0	0	17	19	1	6	0	260	407	288	694	27	345	20	18	318	101	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	AAA	Nashville Sounds	—	220	181	43	5	2	0	29	36	5	5	2	238	358	287	645	50	293	16	13	301	62	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	AA	Midland RockHounds	—	23	20	6	1	0	0	3	0	0	0	0	300	391	350	741	50	300	0	13	344	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	INTL	Gigantes del Cibao	—	146	127	30	2	0	0	13	25	1	2	4	236	312	252	564	16	291	17	9	258	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	26	AAA	Nashville Sounds	—	167	142	33	3	3	0	20	31	3	1	3	232	339	296	635	63	295	19	12	295	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	26	A+	Stockton Ports	—	103	82	19	4	1	1	20	21	0	2	3	232	382	341	724	110	295	20	19	335	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	26	INTL	Gigantes del Cibao	—	78	62	8	2	0	0	12	17	2	0	1	129	289	161	451	32	178	22	15	229	41	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	27	INTL	Gigantes del Cibao	—	149	122	32	6	3	0	19	18	1	3	3	262	366	361	727	98	302	12	13	318	101	—	—	—	—	—	—
2020	28	INTL	Gigantes del Cibao	—	28	21	4	0	0	0	6	3	0	0	0	190	370	190	561		222	11	21	279	75	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	29	INTL	Gigantes del Cibao	—	52	45	11	2	0	0	7	14	0	4	0	244	346	289	635	44	355	27	13	300	89	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	30	INTL	Gigantes del Cibao	—	48	38	7	2	0	0	7	15	1	0	0	184	326	237	563	53	304	31	15	265	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	31	INTL	Gigantes del Cibao	—	41	35	8	1	1	0	5	12	1	2	0	229	341	314	656	86	348	29	12	306	93	—	—	—	—	—	—
2025	33	INTL	Gigantes del Cibao	—	72	55	10	2	0	1	15	10	0	2	1	182	357	273	630	91	205	14	21	298	88	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents)
2012	20	ROK MLE	AZL Athletics	—	118	109	33	7	1	0	6	22	1	1	0	303	345	385	730	83	368	19	5	314	99	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	22	A MLE	Beloit Snappers	—	414	375	73	11	7	1	27	98	4	12	4	195	256	269	525	75	247	24	7	237	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	23	A+ MLE	Stockton Ports	—	324	290	69	11	1	0	19	56	3	11	2	238	292	283	574	45	277	17	6	250	55	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	23	A MLE	Beloit Snappers	—	53	50	11	1	0	0	3	19	0	1	1	220	264	240	504	20	355	36	6	224	38	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	A+ MLE	Stockton Ports	—	426	377	90	11	4	1	37	92	2	7	8	239	310	297	607	58	301	22	9	266	66	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	AAA MLE	Nashville Sounds	—	220	189	41	4	2	0	21	46	5	5	2	217	312	259	571	42	272	21	10	260	62	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	AA MLE	Midland RockHounds	—	23	21	5	1	0	0	2	0	0	0	0	238	304	286	590	48	244	0	9	272	70	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	26	AAA MLE	Nashville Sounds	—	167	147	31	3	2	0	15	38	3	1	3	211	297	259	555	48	275	23	9	254	58	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	26	A+ MLE	Stockton Ports	—	103	89	18	4	1	1	13	29	0	2	3	202	304	303	607	101	272	28	13	265	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	20	ROK MLE	AZL Athletics	—	118	109	33	7	1	0	6	22	1	1	0	303	345	385	730	83	379	19	5	314	99	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	20	ROK RAW	AZL Athletics	—	118	105	40	10	1	0	10	15	1	1	0	381	440	495	935	114	444	13	8	410	99	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	22	A MLE	Beloit Snappers	—	414	375	73	11	7	1	27	98	4	12	4	195	256	269	525	75	254	24	7	237	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	22	A RAW	Beloit Snappers	—	414	361	80	14	7	2	41	70	4	12	4	222	308	316	624	94	264	17	10	282	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	23	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	377	340	80	12	1	0	22	76	3	12	3	235	288	276	564	41	300	20	6	246	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	23	A+ RAW	2 teams	—	377	331	84	14	1	0	31	59	3	12	3	254	323	302	625	48	305	16	8	281	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	522	459	110	14	5	1	45	113	3	13	8	240	312	298	610	59	315	22	9	266	66	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	A+ RAW	2 teams	—	522	431	112	14	5	1	73	90	3	13	8	260	371	323	693	63	326	17	14	315	66	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	AAA MLE	3 teams	—	389	337	73	8	3	0	36	74	6	7	6	217	303	258	562	42	274	19	9	261	63	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	AAA RAW	3 teams	—	389	328	79	8	2	0	45	61	6	7	6	241	343	277	620	37	293	16	12	287	63	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	26	AAA MLE	3 teams	—	348	302	62	8	4	1	36	86	5	3	7	205	300	268	569	63	281	25	10	258	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	26	AAA RAW	3 teams	—	348	286	60	9	4	1	52	69	5	3	7	210	341	280	621	70	271	20	15	292	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	27	INTL MLE	Gigantes del Cibao	—	149	122	32	6	3	0	19	18	1	3	3	262	366	361	727	98	302	12	13	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2019	27	INTL RAW	Gigantes del Cibao	—	149	122	32	6	3	0	19	18	1	3	3	262	366	361	727	98	302	12	13	318	101	—	—	—	—	—	—
2020	28	INTL MLE	Gigantes del Cibao	—	28	21	4	0	0	0	6	3	0	0	0	190	370	190	561		222	11	21	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2020	28	INTL RAW	Gigantes del Cibao	—	28	21	4	0	0	0	6	3	0	0	0	190	370	190	561		222	11	21	279	75	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	29	INTL MLE	Gigantes del Cibao	—	52	45	11	2	0	0	7	14	0	4	0	244	346	289	635	44	355	27	13	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2021	29	INTL RAW	Gigantes del Cibao	—	52	45	11	2	0	0	7	14	0	4	0	244	346	289	635	44	355	27	13	300	89	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	30	INTL MLE	Gigantes del Cibao	—	48	38	7	2	0	0	7	15	1	0	0	184	326	237	563	53	304	31	15	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2022	30	INTL RAW	Gigantes del Cibao	—	48	38	7	2	0	0	7	15	1	0	0	184	326	237	563	53	304	31	15	265	65	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	31	INTL MLE	Gigantes del Cibao	—	41	35	8	1	1	0	5	12	1	2	0	229	341	314	656	86	348	29	12	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2023	31	INTL RAW	Gigantes del Cibao	—	41	35	8	1	1	0	5	12	1	2	0	229	341	314	656	86	348	29	12	306	93	—	—	—	—	—	—
2025	33	INTL MLE	Gigantes del Cibao	—	72	55	10	2	0	1	15	10	0	2	1	182	357	273	630	91	205	14	21	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
2025	33	INTL RAW	Gigantes del Cibao	—	72	55	10	2	0	1	15	10	0	2	1	182	357	273	630	91	205	14	21	298	88	—	—	—	—	—	—
2012	20	ROK MLE	AZL Athletics	—	118	110	33	7	1	0	6	22	1	1	0	300	345	382	727	82	368	19	5	314	99	—	—	—	—	—	—
2014	22	A MLE	Beloit Snappers	—	414	380	73	11	7	1	27	98	4	12	4	192	256	266	522	74	247	24	7	237	47	—	—	—	—	—	—
2015	23	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	377	349	80	12	1	0	22	76	3	12	3	229	288	269	557	40	288	20	6	246	53	—	—	—	—	—	—
2016	24	A+ MLE	2 teams	—	522	469	110	14	5	1	45	113	3	13	8	235	312	292	604	58	301	22	9	266	66	—	—	—	—	—	—
2017	25	AAA MLE	3 teams	—	389	344	73	8	3	0	36	74	6	7	6	212	303	253	556	41	269	19	9	261	63	—	—	—	—	—	—
2018	26	AAA MLE	3 teams	—	348	304	62	8	4	1	36	86	5	3	7	204	300	266	567	63	274	25	10	258	61	—	—	—	—	—	—
▸ Career Totals
Career	—	MLE		—	2558	2238	503	73	25	4	231	541	25	59	32	225	304	285	589	60	292	21	9	218	34	-201	-1	+0	+0	+55	-15.0
/ 162G	—	MLE		—	650	569	128	19	6	1	59	137	6	15	8	225	305	285	590	60	291	21	9	218	34	-51	-0	+0	+0	+14	-3.8

How the minor-league lines were translated

One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.

2018 AAANashville Sounds · 167 PAwOBA .290 → .254 (−36)K% 18.6% → 22.7%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	18.56%	÷1.055	×1.290	—	—	22.69%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	11.98%	÷0.966	×0.710	—	×1.018	8.96%
HBP% /PA	1.80%	—	×0.980	—	×1.018	1.79%
Singles /BIP	24.32%	÷0.986	×0.900	×1.032	×1.018	23.34%
Doubles /BIP	2.70%	÷0.937	×0.810	×1.032	×1.018	2.46%
Triples /BIP	2.70%	÷1.150	×0.810	×1.032	×1.018	2.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.988	×0.780	—	×1.018	0.00%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 98, 1B 97, 2B 87, 3B 130, K 111, BB 93 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 27.2 → +1.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.032.

Result: wOBA .290 → .254; ISO .063 → .051; BABIP .295 → .275. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2018 A+Stockton Ports · 103 PAwOBA .331 → .265 (−66)K% 20.4% → 28.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	20.39%	÷0.972	×1.340	—	—	28.10%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	19.42%	÷1.035	×0.710	—	×0.968	12.90%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.790	—	×0.968	0.00%
Singles /BIP	21.31%	÷0.978	×0.910	×1.050	×0.968	20.16%
Doubles /BIP	6.56%	÷0.926	×0.820	×1.050	×0.968	5.90%
Triples /BIP	1.64%	÷1.006	×0.760	×1.050	×0.968	1.26%
Home runs /BIP	1.64%	÷1.244	×0.920	—	×0.968	1.17%

Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 149, 1B 96, 2B 85, 3B 101, K 94, BB 107 — applied at half strength. Age: age 26 vs a level average of 22.8 → −3.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.

Result: wOBA .331 → .265; ISO .110 → .088; BABIP .295 → .272. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 AAANashville Sounds · 220 PAwOBA .297 → .260 (−37)K% 16.4% → 21.1%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	16.36%	÷1.003	×1.290	—	—	21.05%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	13.18%	÷1.029	×0.710	—	×1.033	9.39%
HBP% /PA	2.27%	—	×0.980	—	×1.033	2.30%
Singles /BIP	24.83%	÷0.984	×0.900	×1.001	×1.033	23.49%
Doubles /BIP	3.45%	÷1.021	×0.810	×1.001	×1.033	2.83%
Triples /BIP	1.38%	÷0.900	×0.810	×1.001	×1.033	1.28%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.868	×0.780	—	×1.033	0.00%

Factors used: league row PCL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 74, 1B 97, 2B 104, 3B 80, K 101, BB 106 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 27.2 → +3.3% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.2 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.001.

Result: wOBA .297 → .260; ISO .050 → .044; BABIP .293 → .272. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2017 AAMidland RockHounds · 23 PAwOBA .335 → .272 (−63)K% 0.0% → 0.0%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	0.00%	÷0.939	×1.220	—	—	0.00%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	13.04%	÷0.990	×0.700	—	×0.998	9.21%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.870	—	×0.998	0.00%
Singles /BIP	25.00%	÷1.142	×0.920	—	×0.998	20.11%
Doubles /BIP	5.00%	÷0.987	×0.840	—	×0.998	4.25%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.977	×0.940	—	×0.998	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷0.862	×0.800	—	×0.998	0.00%

Factors used: league row TL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 72, 1B 128, 2B 97, 3B 95, K 88, BB 98 — applied at half strength. Age: age 25 vs a level average of 24.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .335 → .272; ISO .050 → .044; BABIP .300 → .244. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2016 A+Stockton Ports · 426 PAwOBA .307 → .266 (−41)K% 16.7% → 21.6%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	16.67%	÷1.035	×1.340	—	—	21.57%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	13.15%	÷1.065	×0.710	—	×0.988	8.65%
HBP% /PA	0.47%	—	×0.790	—	×0.988	0.37%
Singles /BIP	26.13%	÷0.978	×0.910	×1.038	×0.988	24.93%
Doubles /BIP	4.18%	÷0.939	×0.820	×1.038	×0.988	3.74%
Triples /BIP	1.74%	÷0.990	×0.760	×1.038	×0.988	1.37%
Home runs /BIP	0.35%	÷1.066	×0.920	—	×0.988	0.30%

Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 113, 1B 96, 2B 88, 3B 98, K 107, BB 113 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.038.

Result: wOBA .307 → .266; ISO .070 → .061; BABIP .322 → .301. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 A+Stockton Ports · 324 PAwOBA .274 → .250 (−23)K% 13.9% → 17.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	13.89%	÷1.072	×1.340	—	—	17.35%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	8.33%	÷1.000	×0.710	—	×0.998	5.90%
HBP% /PA	0.93%	—	×0.790	—	×0.998	0.73%
Singles /BIP	23.63%	÷0.959	×0.910	×1.039	×0.998	23.24%
Doubles /BIP	5.49%	÷1.047	×0.820	×1.039	×0.998	4.46%
Triples /BIP	0.42%	÷0.926	×0.760	×1.039	×0.998	0.36%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.715	×0.920	—	×0.998	0.00%

Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 243, 1B 92, 2B 109, 3B 85, K 114, BB 100 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.8 → −0.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.039.

Result: wOBA .274 → .250; ISO .053 → .045; BABIP .292 → .277. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2015 ABeloit Snappers · 53 PAwOBA .291 → .224 (−67)K% 26.4% → 36.4%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	26.42%	÷0.987	×1.360	—	—	36.40%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	7.55%	÷0.936	×0.690	—	×0.990	5.51%
HBP% /PA	0.00%	—	×0.780	—	×0.990	0.00%
Singles /BIP	37.14%	÷1.018	×0.920	—	×0.990	33.22%
Doubles /BIP	2.86%	÷1.021	×0.830	—	×0.990	2.30%
Triples /BIP	0.00%	÷0.900	×0.910	—	×0.990	0.00%
Home runs /BIP	0.00%	÷1.084	×0.800	—	×0.990	0.00%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 117, 1B 104, 2B 104, 3B 80, K 97, BB 87 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average).

Result: wOBA .291 → .224; ISO .020 → .014; BABIP .400 → .355. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

2014 ABeloit Snappers · 414 PAwOBA .278 → .237 (−42)K% 16.9% → 23.6%

Component	Raw	Park ÷	Level factor ×	GB/FB ×	Age ×	= MLE
K% /PA	16.91%	÷0.974	×1.360	—	—	23.61%
BB% (unintentional) /PA	9.66%	÷1.003	×0.690	—	—	6.65%
HBP% /PA	0.97%	—	×0.780	—	—	0.75%
Singles /BIP	19.59%	÷0.987	×0.920	×1.036	—	18.90%
Doubles /BIP	4.81%	÷1.060	×0.830	×1.036	—	3.90%
Triples /BIP	2.41%	÷0.942	×0.910	×1.036	—	2.41%
Home runs /BIP	0.69%	÷1.155	×0.800	—	—	0.48%

Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 131, 1B 97, 2B 112, 3B 88, K 95, BB 101 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.0 → +0.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.036.

Result: wOBA .278 → .237; ISO .094 → .080; BABIP .264 → .247. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).

Not traceable per stint: some stints lack the counting stats the component translation needs. Level-wide factors that apply instead — .