Amaurys Minier
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 19 | ROKElizabethton … | 207 | .199/.286/.282 | 2 | 0 | 4 | — | .133/.197/.181 |
| 2016 | 20 | ROKElizabethton … | 192 | .222/.319/.449 | 10 | 0 | 34 | — | .142/.209/.290 |
| 2017 | 21 | AMIN | 140 | .144/.273/.280 | 3 | 0 | 7 | — | .090/.201/.172 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 17 | ROK | GCL Twins | — | 119 | 112 | 24 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 29 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 214 | 254 | 455 | 710 | 241 | 231 | 24 | 5 | 305 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 18 | ROK | GCL Twins | — | 205 | 171 | 50 | 11 | 2 | 8 | 29 | 52 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 292 | 407 | 520 | 927 | 228 | 375 | 25 | 14 | 407 | 72 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 19 | ROK | Elizabethton Twins | — | 207 | 181 | 36 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 68 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 199 | 286 | 282 | 567 | 83 | 296 | 33 | 9 | 260 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 20 | ROK | Elizabethton Twins | — | 192 | 167 | 37 | 8 | 0 | 10 | 24 | 62 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 222 | 319 | 449 | 768 | 228 | 281 | 32 | 12 | 339 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 21 | A | Cedar Rapids Kernels | — | 140 | 118 | 17 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 48 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 144 | 273 | 280 | 553 | 136 | 206 | 34 | 13 | 259 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2013 | 17 | ROK MLE | GCL Twins | — | 119 | 114 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 42 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 140 | 169 | 289 | 459 | 149 | 175 | 35 | 3 | 204 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 18 | ROK MLE | GCL Twins | — | 205 | 182 | 35 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 18 | 75 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 192 | 279 | 341 | 620 | 148 | 283 | 37 | 9 | 274 | 72 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 19 | ROK MLE | Elizabethton Twins | — | 207 | 188 | 25 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 96 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 133 | 197 | 181 | 378 | 48 | 236 | 46 | 5 | 174 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 20 | ROK MLE | Elizabethton Twins | — | 192 | 176 | 25 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 15 | 88 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 142 | 209 | 290 | 499 | 148 | 219 | 46 | 8 | 219 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 21 | A MLE | Cedar Rapids Kernels | — | 140 | 122 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 67 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 90 | 201 | 172 | 374 | 82 | 164 | 48 | 10 | 178 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 17 | ROK MLE | GCL Twins | — | 119 | 114 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 42 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 140 | 169 | 289 | 459 | 149 | 174 | 35 | 3 | 204 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 17 | ROK RAW | GCL Twins | — | 119 | 112 | 24 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 29 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 214 | 254 | 455 | 710 | 241 | 231 | 24 | 5 | 305 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 18 | ROK MLE | GCL Twins | — | 205 | 182 | 35 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 18 | 75 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 192 | 279 | 341 | 620 | 148 | 284 | 37 | 9 | 274 | 72 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 18 | ROK RAW | GCL Twins | — | 205 | 171 | 50 | 11 | 2 | 8 | 29 | 52 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 292 | 407 | 520 | 927 | 228 | 375 | 25 | 14 | 407 | 72 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 19 | ROK MLE | Elizabethton Twins | — | 207 | 188 | 25 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 96 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 133 | 197 | 181 | 378 | 48 | 253 | 46 | 5 | 174 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 19 | ROK RAW | Elizabethton Twins | — | 207 | 181 | 36 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 18 | 68 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 199 | 286 | 282 | 567 | 83 | 296 | 33 | 9 | 260 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 20 | ROK MLE | Elizabethton Twins | — | 192 | 176 | 25 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 15 | 88 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 142 | 209 | 290 | 499 | 148 | 220 | 46 | 8 | 219 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 20 | ROK RAW | Elizabethton Twins | — | 192 | 167 | 37 | 8 | 0 | 10 | 24 | 62 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 222 | 319 | 449 | 768 | 228 | 281 | 32 | 12 | 339 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 21 | A MLE | Cedar Rapids Kernels | — | 140 | 122 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 67 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 90 | 201 | 172 | 374 | 82 | 167 | 48 | 10 | 178 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 21 | A RAW | Cedar Rapids Kernels | — | 140 | 118 | 17 | 7 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 48 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 144 | 273 | 280 | 553 | 136 | 206 | 34 | 13 | 259 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 17 | ROK MLE | GCL Twins | — | 119 | 114 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 42 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 140 | 169 | 289 | 459 | 149 | 175 | 35 | 3 | 204 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 18 | ROK MLE | GCL Twins | — | 205 | 181 | 35 | 7 | 1 | 6 | 18 | 75 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 193 | 279 | 343 | 622 | 149 | 283 | 37 | 9 | 274 | 72 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 19 | ROK MLE | Elizabethton Twins | — | 207 | 190 | 25 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 96 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 132 | 197 | 179 | 376 | 47 | 236 | 46 | 5 | 174 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 20 | ROK MLE | Elizabethton Twins | — | 192 | 175 | 25 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 15 | 88 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 143 | 209 | 291 | 501 | 149 | 219 | 46 | 8 | 219 | 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 21 | A MLE | Cedar Rapids Kernels | — | 140 | 122 | 11 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 14 | 67 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 90 | 201 | 172 | 374 | 82 | 164 | 48 | 10 | 178 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 863 | 782 | 112 | 25 | 2 | 20 | 62 | 368 | 11 | 3 | 4 | 143 | 216 | 257 | 473 | 114 | 229 | 43 | 7 | 213 | 30 | -72 | -1 | +0 | -15 | +19 | -7.1 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 589 | 85 | 19 | 2 | 15 | 47 | 277 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 144 | 217 | 260 | 477 | 115 | 231 | 43 | 7 | 213 | 30 | -54 | -1 | +0 | -12 | +14 | -5.4 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2017 ACedar Rapids Kernels · 140 PAwOBA .255 → .178 (−77)K% 34.3% → 47.7%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 34.29% | ÷0.977 | ×1.360 | — | — | 47.74% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 12.86% | ÷0.925 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.015 | 9.74% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.14% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.015 | 1.70% |
| Singles /BIP | 10.00% | ÷1.016 | ×0.920 | ×0.950 | ×1.015 | 8.73% |
| Doubles /BIP | 10.00% | ÷1.086 | ×0.830 | ×0.950 | ×1.015 | 7.37% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.012 | ×0.910 | ×0.950 | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 4.29% | ÷0.984 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.015 | 3.54% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 97, 1B 103, 2B 117, 3B 102, K 95, BB 85 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .255 → .178; ISO .136 → .087; BABIP .206 → .164. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2016 ROKElizabethton Twins · 192 PAwOBA .331 → .219 (−113)K% 32.3% → 45.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 32.29% | ÷1.000 | ×1.420 | — | — | 45.85% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 12.50% | ÷1.000 | ×0.640 | — | ×0.995 | 7.96% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.740 | — | ×0.995 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 18.10% | ÷1.000 | ×0.840 | ×0.987 | ×0.995 | 14.93% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.62% | ÷1.000 | ×0.740 | ×0.987 | ×0.995 | 5.54% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.740 | ×0.987 | ×0.995 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 9.52% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.995 | 7.58% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 19.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.987.
Result: wOBA .331 → .219; ISO .228 → .150; BABIP .281 → .219. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 ROKElizabethton Twins · 207 PAwOBA .257 → .174 (−83)K% 32.9% → 46.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 32.85% | ÷1.000 | ×1.420 | — | — | 46.65% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.21% | ÷1.000 | ×0.640 | — | ×1.008 | 5.30% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.93% | — | ×0.740 | — | ×1.008 | 1.44% |
| Singles /BIP | 22.12% | ÷1.000 | ×0.840 | ×0.982 | ×1.008 | 18.39% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.96% | ÷1.000 | ×0.740 | ×0.982 | ×1.008 | 5.83% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.740 | ×0.982 | ×1.008 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.77% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.008 | 1.43% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 19.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.982.
Result: wOBA .257 → .174; ISO .083 → .054; BABIP .296 → .236. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2014 ROKGCL Twins · 205 PAwOBA .397 → .274 (−123)K% 25.4% → 36.5%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 25.37% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 36.53% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 13.66% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×1.022 | 8.66% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.95% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×1.022 | 1.44% |
| Singles /BIP | 24.37% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | ×0.950 | ×1.022 | 19.41% |
| Doubles /BIP | 9.24% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×0.950 | ×1.022 | 6.46% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.68% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×0.950 | ×1.022 | 1.18% |
| Home runs /BIP | 6.72% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.022 | 5.36% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 19.5 → +2.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.950.
Result: wOBA .397 → .274; ISO .228 → .159; BABIP .375 → .283. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2013 ROKGCL Twins · 119 PAwOBA .298 → .204 (−94)K% 24.4% → 35.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 24.37% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 35.09% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 5.04% | ÷1.000 | ×0.620 | — | ×1.038 | 3.24% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×1.038 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 13.25% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | ×0.954 | ×1.038 | 10.75% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.02% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×0.954 | ×1.038 | 4.29% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.41% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×0.954 | ×1.038 | 1.72% |
| Home runs /BIP | 7.23% | ÷1.000 | ×0.780 | — | ×1.038 | 5.85% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 17 vs a level average of 19.5 → +3.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (2.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.954.
Result: wOBA .298 → .204; ISO .241 → .166; BABIP .231 → .175. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).