Jairo Beras
P Down East Wood Ducks| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | G | GS | IP | ERA | FIP | K% | BB% | WAR | MLE rates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 22 | MIX2 levels | 14 | 0 | 14 | 5.02 | 4.84 | 21.2% | 13.6% | — | K 16.4% · BB 16.9% · FIP 6.07 | |
| 2018 | 23 | A+Down East Woo… | 38 | 0 | 54 | 4.33 | 2.73 | 32.6% | 11.3% | — | K 25.1% · BB 13.0% · FIP 3.48 | |
| 2019 | 24 | MIX2 levels | 36 | 0 | 42 | 7.65 | 5.13 | 19.0% | 18.0% | — | K 15.0% · BB 20.3% · FIP 5.47 | |
| 2020 | 25 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2021 | 26 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2022 | 27 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2023 | 28 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2024 | 29 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2025 | 30 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
| 2026 | 31 | No MLB games played | ||||||||||
Contract
Contract
No contract data on file. Pre-MLB players and minor-league free agents do not yet have salary projections — entries are added at first 40-man roster placement.
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how WAR & MLE are computed
Stats are park-neutral MLB equivalents. The "TEAM" column shows current org affiliation only — we do NOT project at that team's park.
Rates (K%, BB%, HR-BF) are park-stripped; MiLB stat lines are translated to their MLB-equivalent via per-level MLE factors.
WAR is computed from projected runs prevented vs a replacement pitcher (the marginal arm a team would call up if this pitcher were unavailable) — calibrated to the standard WAR scale.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | G | GS | IP | BF | K | BB | HR | GS% | IP/G | K% | BB% | K-BB% | HR% | ERA | FIP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per year (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||
| ▸ Career — adjusted (each season translated to a park/league-neutral MLB-equivalent line; levels combined per year) | |||||||||||||||||||
| 2017 | 22 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 14 | 0 | 14 | 66 | 14 | 9 | 2 | 0% | 1.0 | 16.4% | 16.9% | -0.4% | 4.1% | 5.02 | 6.07 | — |
| 2017 | 22 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 14 | 0 | 14 | 66 | 14 | 9 | 2 | 0% | 1.0 | 21.2% | 13.6% | 7.6% | 3.0% | 5.02 | 4.84 | — |
| 2018 | 23 | A+ MLE | Down East Wood Ducks | 38 | 0 | 54 | 230 | 75 | 26 | 4 | 0% | 1.4 | 25.1% | 13.0% | 12.1% | 1.6% | 4.33 | 3.48 | — |
| 2018 | 23 | A+ RAW | Down East Wood Ducks | 38 | 0 | 54 | 230 | 75 | 26 | 4 | 0% | 1.4 | 32.6% | 11.3% | 21.3% | 1.7% | 4.33 | 2.73 | — |
| 2019 | 24 | MIX MLE | 2 levels | 36 | 0 | 42 | 211 | 40 | 38 | 4 | 0% | 1.2 | 15.0% | 20.3% | -5.3% | 1.9% | 7.65 | 5.47 | — |
| 2019 | 24 | MIX RAW | 2 levels | 36 | 0 | 42 | 211 | 40 | 38 | 4 | 0% | 1.2 | 19.0% | 18.0% | 0.9% | 1.9% | 7.65 | 5.13 | — |
| ▸ Career totals — MLB only (actual + projected) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | 88 | 0 | 111 | 507 | 100 | 84 | 10 | 0% | 1.3 | 19.8% | 16.5% | 3.2% | 2.0% | 5.69 | 4.64 | — | |
| / 200 IP | — | MLE | 159 | 0 | 200 | 916 | 181 | 152 | 19 | 0% | 1.3 | 19.8% | 16.5% | 3.2% | 2.0% | 5.69 | 4.64 | -0.2 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2019 A+Down East Wood Ducks · 24 IPFIP 4.46 → 5.20 (+0.74)K% 17.9% → 13.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 17.86% | — | ×0.770 | 13.75% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 18.75% | — | ×1.150 | 21.56% |
| HR / BF /BF | 0.89% | ÷1.152 | ×1.250 | 0.97% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 130).
Result: FIP 4.46 → 5.20, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2019 AAFrisco RoughRiders · 18 IPFIP 5.23 → 5.76 (+0.53)K% 20.2% → 16.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 20.20% | — | ×0.810 | 16.36% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 17.17% | — | ×1.100 | 18.89% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.03% | ÷1.208 | ×1.200 | 3.01% |
Factors used: pitcher AA level factors — K ×0.81, BB ×1.10, HR ×1.20. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 142).
Result: FIP 5.23 → 5.76, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2018 A+Down East Wood Ducks · 54 IPFIP 2.73 → 3.48 (+0.75)K% 32.6% → 25.1%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 32.61% | — | ×0.770 | 25.11% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 11.30% | — | ×1.150 | 13.00% |
| HR / BF /BF | 1.74% | ÷1.393 | ×1.250 | 1.56% |
Factors used: pitcher A+ level factors — K ×0.77, BB ×1.15, HR ×1.25. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 179).
Result: FIP 2.73 → 3.48, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2017 AHickory Crawdads · 13 IPFIP 4.78 → 6.07 (+1.29)K% 22.2% → 16.4%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /BF | 22.22% | — | ×0.740 | 16.44% |
| BB% (unintentional) /BF | 14.29% | — | ×1.180 | 16.86% |
| HR / BF /BF | 3.17% | ÷1.019 | ×1.300 | 4.05% |
Factors used: pitcher A level factors — K ×0.74, BB ×1.18, HR ×1.30. Pitcher translation is level-wide (no per-league rows, no age adjustment); HR/BF is park-adjusted at half strength (park HR factor 104).
Result: FIP 4.78 → 6.07, computed from the rates in the table with the same formula before and after. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression is applied when seasons are blended into a projection (how).