Tyler Palmer
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 22 | A/ROK2 orgs | 243 | .238/.312/.341 | 2 | 12 | 32 | — | .181/.236/.244 |
| 2015 | 23 | A+SEA | 250 | .274/.371/.367 | 2 | 11 | 60 | — | .214/.290/.290 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2014 | 22 | A | Burlington Bees | — | 106 | 94 | 15 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 24 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 160 | 233 | 202 | 435 | 43 | 208 | 23 | 7 | 202 | -1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 22 | ROK | Orem Owlz | — | 137 | 120 | 36 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 16 | 3 | 10 | 1 | 300 | 373 | 450 | 823 | 150 | 327 | 12 | 8 | 360 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 23 | A+ | Inland Empire 66ers | — | 250 | 215 | 59 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 31 | 50 | 2 | 11 | 2 | 274 | 371 | 367 | 738 | 93 | 350 | 20 | 12 | 336 | 60 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2014 | 22 | A MLE | Burlington Bees | — | 106 | 96 | 14 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 32 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 146 | 204 | 188 | 391 | 42 | 188 | 30 | 5 | 166 | -1 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 22 | ROK MLE | Orem Owlz | — | 137 | 125 | 26 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 23 | 3 | 10 | 1 | 208 | 261 | 288 | 549 | 80 | 239 | 17 | 4 | 253 | 57 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 23 | A+ MLE | Inland Empire 66ers | — | 250 | 224 | 48 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 22 | 69 | 2 | 11 | 2 | 214 | 290 | 290 | 581 | 76 | 296 | 28 | 9 | 257 | 60 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 22 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 243 | 221 | 39 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 55 | 5 | 12 | 3 | 176 | 232 | 240 | 472 | 63 | 225 | 23 | 5 | 215 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 22 | ROK RAW | 2 teams | — | 243 | 214 | 51 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 18 | 40 | 5 | 12 | 3 | 238 | 312 | 341 | 653 | 103 | 278 | 16 | 7 | 291 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 23 | A+ MLE | Inland Empire 66ers | — | 250 | 224 | 48 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 22 | 69 | 2 | 11 | 2 | 214 | 290 | 290 | 581 | 76 | 301 | 28 | 9 | 257 | 60 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 23 | A+ RAW | Inland Empire 66ers | — | 250 | 215 | 59 | 12 | 1 | 2 | 31 | 50 | 2 | 11 | 2 | 274 | 371 | 367 | 738 | 93 | 350 | 20 | 12 | 336 | 60 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 22 | ROK MLE | 2 teams | — | 243 | 225 | 39 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 55 | 5 | 12 | 3 | 173 | 232 | 236 | 468 | 62 | 217 | 23 | 5 | 215 | 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 23 | A+ MLE | Inland Empire 66ers | — | 250 | 224 | 48 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 22 | 69 | 2 | 11 | 2 | 214 | 290 | 290 | 581 | 76 | 296 | 28 | 9 | 257 | 60 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 493 | 445 | 87 | 16 | 3 | 3 | 33 | 124 | 7 | 23 | 5 | 196 | 262 | 265 | 527 | 70 | 261 | 25 | 7 | 236 | 46 | -32 | +3 | +0 | -5 | +11 | -2.4 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 587 | 115 | 21 | 4 | 4 | 44 | 163 | 9 | 30 | 7 | 196 | 263 | 266 | 528 | 70 | 261 | 25 | 7 | 236 | 46 | -42 | +3 | +0 | -7 | +14 | -3.2 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2015 A+Inland Empire 66ers · 250 PAwOBA .328 → .257 (−71)K% 20.0% → 27.6%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 20.00% | ÷0.972 | ×1.340 | — | — | 27.56% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 12.40% | ÷1.013 | ×0.710 | — | ×0.988 | 8.59% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.80% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×0.988 | 0.62% |
| Singles /BIP | 26.67% | ÷1.021 | ×0.910 | ×0.982 | ×0.988 | 23.08% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.27% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | ×0.982 | ×0.988 | 5.79% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.61% | ÷1.150 | ×0.760 | ×0.982 | ×0.988 | 0.39% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.21% | ÷0.896 | ×0.920 | — | ×0.988 | 1.23% |
Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 79, 1B 104, 2B 100, 3B 130, K 94, BB 103 — applied at half strength. Age: age 24 vs a level average of 22.8 → −1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.2 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.982.
Result: wOBA .328 → .257; ISO .093 → .075; BABIP .350 → .296. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2014 ROKOrem Owlz · 137 PAwOBA .355 → .253 (−103)K% 11.7% → 16.8%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 11.68% | ÷1.000 | ×1.440 | — | — | 16.82% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 8.03% | ÷1.000 | ×0.610 | — | ×0.965 | 4.73% |
| HBP% /PA | 2.19% | — | ×0.720 | — | ×0.965 | 1.52% |
| Singles /BIP | 23.08% | ÷1.000 | ×0.820 | ×0.962 | ×0.965 | 17.57% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.69% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×0.962 | ×0.965 | 5.14% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.92% | ÷1.000 | ×0.720 | ×0.962 | ×0.965 | 1.29% |
| Home runs /BIP | 1.92% | ÷1.000 | ×0.750 | — | ×0.965 | 1.39% |
Factors used: league row PIO. Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 19.5 → −3.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (3.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×0.962.
Result: wOBA .355 → .253; ISO .150 → .104; BABIP .327 → .239. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2014 ABurlington Bees · 106 PAwOBA .201 → .166 (−35)K% 22.6% → 29.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 22.64% | ÷1.030 | ×1.360 | — | — | 29.90% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 6.60% | ÷0.998 | ×0.690 | — | ×0.990 | 4.52% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.89% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×0.990 | 1.46% |
| Singles /BIP | 17.14% | ÷0.994 | ×0.920 | ×1.000 | ×0.990 | 15.70% |
| Doubles /BIP | 2.86% | ÷1.023 | ×0.830 | ×1.000 | ×0.990 | 2.29% |
| Triples /BIP | 1.43% | ÷0.923 | ×0.910 | ×1.000 | ×0.990 | 1.39% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.935 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.990 | 0.00% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 87, 1B 99, 2B 105, 3B 85, K 106, BB 100 — applied at half strength. Age: age 23 vs a level average of 22.0 → −1.0% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.000.
Result: wOBA .201 → .166; ISO .043 → .037; BABIP .208 → .188. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).