Luis Reynoso
| Year | Age | Lvl / Team | PA | AVG/OBP/SLG | HR | SB | wRC+ | WAR | MLE AVG/OBP/SLG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | 19 | ROKGreeneville A… | 141 | .233/.298/.310 | 2 | 2 | 15 | — | .164/.206/.209 |
| 2015 | 20 | AKC | 182 | .226/.306/.258 | 1 | 1 | 30 | — | .205/.260/.236 |
| 2016 | 21 | A+Lancaster Jet… | 133 | .209/.295/.252 | 0 | 1 | 18 | — | .168/.233/.202 |
Career Stats + Projections
Methodology▸ how these numbers are built
All seasons translated to park-neutral MLB-equivalent (MLE) and combined per year. 2027 = full-season projection (no games played yet). 2028+ via Advanced Marcel + aging curve.
| Year | Age | Lvl | Team | MLB% | PA | AB | H | 2B | 3B | HR | BB | SO | HBP | SB | CS | AVG | OBP | SLG | OPS | ISO | BABIP | K% | BB% | wOBA | wRC+ | BAT | RUN | FLD | POS | REP | WAR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ▸ Career — actual stats, one row per stint (as recorded, no adjustments) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2012 | 17 | ROK | DSL Astros | — | 200 | 171 | 48 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 27 | 31 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 281 | 382 | 363 | 744 | 82 | 338 | 16 | 14 | 342 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 18 | ROK | Greeneville Astros | — | 175 | 150 | 35 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 18 | 36 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 233 | 327 | 313 | 641 | 80 | 293 | 21 | 10 | 291 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 19 | ROK | Greeneville Astros | — | 141 | 129 | 30 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 42 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 233 | 298 | 310 | 608 | 78 | 329 | 30 | 8 | 280 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 20 | A | Quad Cities River Bandits | — | 182 | 155 | 35 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 49 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 226 | 306 | 258 | 564 | 32 | 318 | 27 | 10 | 254 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 21 | A+ | Lancaster JetHawks | — | 133 | 115 | 24 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 43 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 209 | 295 | 252 | 547 | 43 | 329 | 32 | 9 | 252 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career — adjusted (every ACTUAL line translated to park/league-neutral MLB equivalents) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| 2012 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Astros | — | 200 | 180 | 33 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 38 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 183 | 261 | 222 | 484 | 39 | 236 | 19 | 9 | 233 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 18 | ROK MLE | Greeneville Astros | — | 175 | 156 | 29 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 51 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 186 | 257 | 244 | 501 | 58 | 249 | 29 | 7 | 222 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 19 | ROK MLE | Greeneville Astros | — | 141 | 134 | 22 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 60 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 164 | 206 | 209 | 415 | 45 | 280 | 43 | 4 | 190 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 20 | A MLE | Quad Cities River Bandits | — | 182 | 161 | 33 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 70 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 205 | 260 | 236 | 496 | 31 | 311 | 38 | 7 | 213 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 21 | A+ MLE | Lancaster JetHawks | — | 133 | 119 | 20 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 60 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 168 | 233 | 202 | 434 | 34 | 311 | 45 | 6 | 195 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Astros | — | 200 | 180 | 33 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 38 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 183 | 261 | 222 | 484 | 39 | 232 | 19 | 9 | 233 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 17 | ROK RAW | DSL Astros | — | 200 | 171 | 48 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 27 | 31 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 281 | 382 | 363 | 744 | 82 | 338 | 16 | 14 | 342 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 18 | ROK MLE | Greeneville Astros | — | 175 | 156 | 29 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 51 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 186 | 257 | 244 | 501 | 58 | 262 | 29 | 7 | 222 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 18 | ROK RAW | Greeneville Astros | — | 175 | 150 | 35 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 18 | 36 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 233 | 327 | 313 | 641 | 80 | 293 | 21 | 10 | 291 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 19 | ROK MLE | Greeneville Astros | — | 141 | 134 | 22 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 60 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 164 | 206 | 209 | 415 | 45 | 288 | 43 | 4 | 190 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 19 | ROK RAW | Greeneville Astros | — | 141 | 129 | 30 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 11 | 42 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 233 | 298 | 310 | 608 | 78 | 329 | 30 | 8 | 280 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 20 | A MLE | Quad Cities River Bandits | — | 182 | 161 | 33 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 70 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 205 | 260 | 236 | 496 | 31 | 348 | 38 | 7 | 213 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 20 | A RAW | Quad Cities River Bandits | — | 182 | 155 | 35 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 49 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 226 | 306 | 258 | 564 | 32 | 318 | 27 | 10 | 254 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 21 | A+ MLE | Lancaster JetHawks | — | 133 | 119 | 20 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 60 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 168 | 233 | 202 | 434 | 34 | 333 | 45 | 6 | 195 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 21 | A+ RAW | Lancaster JetHawks | — | 133 | 115 | 24 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 43 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 209 | 295 | 252 | 547 | 43 | 329 | 32 | 9 | 252 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 17 | ROK MLE | DSL Astros | — | 200 | 179 | 33 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 38 | 1 | 8 | 3 | 184 | 261 | 223 | 485 | 39 | 236 | 19 | 9 | 233 | 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 18 | ROK MLE | Greeneville Astros | — | 175 | 158 | 29 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 51 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 184 | 257 | 241 | 498 | 57 | 249 | 29 | 7 | 222 | 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 19 | ROK MLE | Greeneville Astros | — | 141 | 133 | 22 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 60 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 165 | 206 | 211 | 416 | 45 | 280 | 43 | 4 | 190 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 20 | A MLE | Quad Cities River Bandits | — | 182 | 168 | 33 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 70 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 196 | 260 | 226 | 486 | 30 | 311 | 38 | 7 | 213 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 21 | A+ MLE | Lancaster JetHawks | — | 133 | 122 | 20 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 60 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 164 | 233 | 197 | 429 | 33 | 311 | 45 | 6 | 195 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| ▸ Career Totals | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Career | — | MLE | — | 831 | 750 | 137 | 18 | 2 | 3 | 56 | 279 | 7 | 18 | 14 | 183 | 246 | 224 | 470 | 41 | 283 | 34 | 7 | 213 | 30 | -69 | -2 | +0 | +9 | +18 | -4.5 | |
| / 162G | — | MLE | — | 650 | 587 | 107 | 14 | 2 | 2 | 44 | 218 | 5 | 14 | 11 | 182 | 245 | 223 | 468 | 41 | 282 | 34 | 7 | 213 | 30 | -54 | -2 | +0 | +7 | +14 | -3.5 | |
How the minor-league lines were translated
One row per minor-league stint. Open a row to see each step: the raw rate, the park adjustment, the league/level factor, the age adjustment (hitters) and the resulting MLE rate. Factors are the same ones listed on the MLE Factors page.
2016 A+Lancaster JetHawks · 133 PAwOBA .247 → .195 (−52)K% 32.3% → 45.0%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 32.33% | ÷0.962 | ×1.340 | — | — | 45.02% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.02% | ÷1.046 | ×0.710 | — | ×1.012 | 6.20% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.50% | — | ×0.790 | — | ×1.012 | 1.20% |
| Singles /BIP | 26.39% | ÷0.982 | ×0.910 | ×1.050 | ×1.012 | 25.97% |
| Doubles /BIP | 6.94% | ÷1.070 | ×0.820 | ×1.050 | ×1.012 | 5.65% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.900 | ×0.760 | ×1.050 | ×1.012 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.252 | ×0.920 | — | ×1.012 | 0.00% |
Factors used: league row CAL. Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 150, 1B 96, 2B 114, 3B 80, K 92, BB 109 — applied at half strength. Age: age 22 vs a level average of 22.8 → +1.2% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.8 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .247 → .195; ISO .043 → .031; BABIP .329 → .311. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2015 AQuad Cities River Bandits · 182 PAwOBA .250 → .213 (−38)K% 26.9% → 38.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 26.92% | ÷0.960 | ×1.360 | — | — | 38.16% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 9.89% | ÷1.021 | ×0.690 | — | ×1.015 | 6.78% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.00% | — | ×0.780 | — | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
| Singles /BIP | 30.19% | ÷0.989 | ×0.920 | ×1.050 | ×1.015 | 29.94% |
| Doubles /BIP | 1.89% | ÷1.106 | ×0.830 | ×1.050 | ×1.015 | 1.51% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷0.900 | ×0.910 | ×1.050 | ×1.015 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.94% | ÷1.032 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.015 | 0.74% |
Factors used: level-wide A factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): HR 106, 1B 98, 2B 121, 3B 80, K 92, BB 104 — applied at half strength. Age: age 21 vs a level average of 22.0 → +1.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (1.0 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .250 → .213; ISO .032 → .024; BABIP .318 → .311. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2014 ROKGreeneville Astros · 141 PAwOBA .270 → .190 (−80)K% 29.8% → 42.3%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 29.79% | ÷1.000 | ×1.420 | — | — | 42.30% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 7.09% | ÷1.000 | ×0.640 | — | ×0.995 | 4.52% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.71% | — | ×0.740 | — | ×0.995 | 0.52% |
| Singles /BIP | 27.59% | ÷1.000 | ×0.840 | ×1.040 | ×0.995 | 23.99% |
| Doubles /BIP | 4.60% | ÷1.000 | ×0.740 | ×1.040 | ×0.995 | 3.52% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.740 | ×1.040 | ×0.995 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 2.30% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×0.995 | 1.83% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 20 vs a level average of 19.5 → −0.5% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr older than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.040.
Result: wOBA .270 → .190; ISO .078 → .052; BABIP .329 → .280. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2013 ROKGreeneville Astros · 175 PAwOBA .289 → .222 (−67)K% 20.6% → 29.2%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 20.57% | ÷1.000 | ×1.420 | — | — | 29.21% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 10.29% | ÷1.000 | ×0.640 | — | ×1.008 | 6.63% |
| HBP% /PA | 1.71% | — | ×0.740 | — | ×1.008 | 1.28% |
| Singles /BIP | 24.56% | ÷1.000 | ×0.840 | ×1.030 | ×1.008 | 21.41% |
| Doubles /BIP | 2.63% | ÷1.000 | ×0.740 | ×1.030 | ×1.008 | 2.02% |
| Triples /BIP | 2.63% | ÷1.000 | ×0.740 | ×1.030 | ×1.008 | 2.02% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.88% | ÷1.000 | ×0.800 | — | ×1.008 | 0.71% |
Factors used: level-wide ROK factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 19 vs a level average of 19.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.030.
Result: wOBA .289 → .222; ISO .080 → .060; BABIP .293 → .249. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).
2012 DSLDSL Astros · 200 PAwOBA .332 → .233 (−99)K% 15.5% → 18.9%
| Component | Raw | Park ÷ | Level factor × | GB/FB × | Age × | = MLE |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K% /PA | 15.50% | ÷1.000 | ×1.220 | — | — | 18.91% |
| BB% (unintentional) /PA | 13.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.700 | — | ×1.008 | 9.17% |
| HBP% /PA | 0.50% | — | ×0.700 | — | ×1.008 | 0.35% |
| Singles /BIP | 25.71% | ÷1.000 | ×0.680 | ×1.050 | ×1.008 | 18.50% |
| Doubles /BIP | 7.86% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×1.050 | ×1.008 | 4.99% |
| Triples /BIP | 0.00% | ÷1.000 | ×0.600 | ×1.050 | ×1.008 | 0.00% |
| Home runs /BIP | 0.71% | ÷1.000 | ×0.470 | — | ×1.008 | 0.34% |
Factors used: level-wide DSL factors (no league-specific row for this league/era). Park (home-season share, regressed): no park row on file (treated as neutral) — applied at half strength. Age: age 18 vs a level average of 18.5 → +0.8% on BB/HBP/hit rates (0.5 yr younger than average). Ground-ball/fly-ball mix moves 1B/2B/3B by ×1.050.
Result: wOBA .332 → .233; ISO .082 → .050; BABIP .338 → .236. Both wOBAs use the same linear weights, so the change is the translation alone. The MLE line is not regressed to the mean — regression happens later, when seasons are blended into a projection (how).